Cashmere

@jai_deshpande @RHouseResearch Go back to college bub, why would a VC care about attention dumbass ?

@RHouseResearch But you’re talking about him. The fact that he’s getting your attention means he’s doing something right.

Genuinely the most unlikable prick in all of venture capital, which is saying a lot

@mean_field_zane Increasingly feels like a waste of my money — all of them, Claude and Gemini as well. They’ve only been useful for nuance-free tasks that I’m too lazy to do myself, or for work I don’t have the time to do manually.

Extended Pro Thinking has gotten really retarded lately.

@tylermacro10 Real

Just hike rates to 6% and see how confident all these AI guys are in their permanent underclass shilling & no I don’t think your neo-cloud is a transformational company

@DeepDishEnjoyer Mf going on some Vyvanse after that, she’ll straighten up.

what the reddit is this

@fejau_inc No no no it’s 5d chess 😹

Guys I don’t think they’re playing 4d chess at this point

@k3ithmccullough @Fullcarry @iBladesi What happens when I start playing 9D chess?

@Fullcarry @iBladesi Just as Bessent planned, you idiots are still only playing 8d chess

Nasty UST Whoop-Ass

@RKelanic Scaffolding is drone defense ? 🤣🤣

This is just the beginning. Over time, we’ll see more adaptation to drone warfare both in the Persian Gulf and in the shipping industry, such as cages or other structures around bridges. It’s too bad the lessons of drone warfare weren’t preventively applied before the Iran War. Of course, the Iran War never should have happened in the first place. But now that the proliferation of precision capabilities have been demonstrated by Iran in this war, countries everywhere — including in the Gulf, including the U.S. — will need to adapt. Something like an update of what this paper by Gholz, @BH_Friedman and Gjoza recommended — except perhaps “Defensive Defense: Drone Edition” tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…

@sama You still raped your sister.

we still get looksmaxxed on frontend a little but we IQmog hard now

@tutperson12 @mean_field_zane Can you stfu

@mean_field_zane He was still giving paid speeches (and potentially coming across as compromised by corporate interests as Fed board member) in Bumfuck, Kansas while being worth that much. He's willing to take the risk to his reputation for some money. It takes that kind of mentality. Most can't

How do I pull this off as an economist?

@DeepDishEnjoyer Bro bro, don't worry, we will just low-key it

@christankerfund Fake.

….. … …..

@DeepDishEnjoyer Bro bro just low-key it we don’t have anything to worry about

😎

@1PeterCarpenter @DeepDishEnjoyer Holy fuck you are dumb

@DeepDishEnjoyer Why would a ceasefire be a TACO? You’re implying he shouldn’t back off of negotiations make significant progress ahead of his deadline. Stupid post

>8% of Saudi oil output on fire "what if trump tacos and there's a ceasefire"

@RaisingTheBAR47 😹😹 “ Pod Guy”

That’s him officer. Thats the pod guy trading the second derivative rate of change on objectively terrifying data

@TankerTrackers Why tf would it be the later, mfs will make up fairy tale scenarios

No details as to whether that means Iraqi tankers or Iraqi oil. If it is the latter, then that is very good news.

@INArteCarloDoss Don’t win too fast ehh 🤣🤩

wow… easy…

@Avg__Enjoyer @DeepDishEnjoyer A retarded way to say a realpolitik with no strategic thought process

@DeepDishEnjoyer What the fuck does economic blitzkrieg even mean

checks out

@DeepDishEnjoyer Now put an S54 in it 😁

in honor of gasoline prices about to roof let's look at cars today

@UnintendedCons5 @darioperkins @citrinowicz 😉👍

@darioperkins You geopolitics guy hasn't said why Iran would do this. He/she should read for the real options: @citrinowicz

The way out of this mess, according to our geopolitics guy: The TACO was trailed by yesterday's talk about leaving others to free up the strait. Trump's latest burp today hardens this somewhat when, in answer to his own claim that Iran had requested a ceasefire, he said that he would agree if Iran unblocked the strait. But here, in fact, we have the "solution": Iran's president said that Iran would agree to stop the war in exchange for guarantees of no further attacks. US reples, "first you free the strait" (NB the item in Trump's talking points this afternoon about possibly resuming strikes on remaining targets down the road.). The way through the middle here seems pretty clear: (I) fighting stops, or at least winds down; (II) Iran bargains with various global counterparties over terms for safe passage through the strait under the threat of renewed US/Israel strikes at any time - a threat which is supposed to incentivize Iran to strike deals. A delicate dance that could drag on amid not only persistently high prices for all those things that come out of the Gulf, but also even shortages. But certainly far better for the economy and markets than if Trump had gone for one or other of the military options.

@UnintendedCons5 Only dullards

I wonder if anyone really believes this