Jon bon

10.5K posts

Jon bon

Jon bon

@InfernoTake

Katılım Temmuz 2022
565 Takip Edilen28 Takipçiler
Jon bon
Jon bon@InfernoTake·
@jaredpolis You're actually a minority rule party that seeks to overturn and evade every law you can,wishes to expand gov as much as possible & even use it against your political foes (illegally) and couldn't give two squirts of piss of the constitution except how much you can disfigure it.
English
0
0
0
2
Adam E. M.
Adam E. M.@AEM_1981·
@varadmehta Zero. The people who would be the problem were born during Trump’s first term..
English
2
0
0
139
Jon bon
Jon bon@InfernoTake·
@michaelmalice @DaruneAlbane the laws since bushes and clintons time have been so severely weakened by things like the florez agreement that turnarounds and deportations are a fraction of what happened back then. the entire legal infrastructure has been changed to make it way harder to deport.
English
0
0
0
38
Michael Malice
Michael Malice@michaelmalice·
@DaruneAlbane i wouldnt be surprised the rest is still bad on its face, not a strong defense
English
3
0
12
1.6K
Michael Malice
Michael Malice@michaelmalice·
I don't understand how conservatives can post this data (which I havent checked into) as some defense of Trump
Michael Malice tweet media
English
81
13
333
30.7K
Paolo Gerbaudo
Paolo Gerbaudo@paologerbaudo·
Mandelsongate has revealed just how deep is the moral abyss of the Labour Party, and more generally of Western social democracy. Impossible to understand the rise of right-wing populism, and why it appeals to workers, without taking this into account.
English
2
14
51
2.6K
The Political Bitcoiner
The Political Bitcoiner@PoliticalBTC·
@unusual_whales Going after China made sense. Going after Canada and all of the United States allies was a mess. Whoever’s policy it was to push all of their allies away should be fired and investigated.
English
13
0
9
1.7K
unusual_whales
unusual_whales@unusual_whales·
Question: If Canada came to the US and said, 'We're going to 0 tariffs on the US, all of them are off,' would you and the president go to 0 tariffs and let Canadian companies and American companies compete on a level playing field? Bessent: Absolutely not
English
188
149
2.2K
482.4K
Norbert J. Michel
Norbert J. Michel@norbertjmichel·
@stanveuger is right - shrinking a market by kicking people out/keeping people out is a recipe for making people poor. It's even true for America. "Not only have immigration restrictions reduced the number of workers employers can hire, it cuts into how many workers employers need to hire, according to Veuger. That is because immigrants aren’t just workers, they are consumers, too. “It’s both supply and demand,” he said." wsj.com/economy/jobs/t… via @WSJ
English
5
9
37
3.9K
Jon bon
Jon bon@InfernoTake·
@joewrote kamala was a drunk retard on camera, doesn't matter if she was centrist or leftist or whatever, candidate quality still matters
English
0
0
0
33
Joe Wrote
Joe Wrote@joewrote·
Chait is wrong. The centrism didn't work. Harris was climbing in favorability until the convention (which Yglesias "loved too much"), then her popularity fell. Chait wrote his "centrism works" article when she was -2 points. More centrist = less popular.
Joe Wrote tweet media
Jonathan Chait@jonathanchait

@joewrote @AJentleson No, I’m saying it did work, but she didn’t do enough to overcome the hole she was in.

English
40
169
1.3K
62.9K
Ann Coulter
Ann Coulter@AnnCoulter·
Smart man. WSJ: Ken Griffin "called out specific Trump policies and moves that he supported. That included the administration’s focus on securing the U.S. border with Mexico ..."
English
15
16
282
56.5K
Jon bon
Jon bon@InfernoTake·
@RobertLusetich @AnnCoulter it's an autoplay from reels on an election fraud video where it's generative ai redoing the lion king
English
0
0
0
9
Latinx Adjacent Doctor PhD
Latinx Adjacent Doctor PhD@TonerousHyus·
I’d like to point out Trump isn’t who you are running against. And RARELY do personal feelings bleed over to another person in politics. See Obama to Hillary or Biden to Harris
English
5
1
92
2.4K
Matt Stoller
Matt Stoller@matthewstoller·
@BaldingsWorld Amazing you imagine the only way to produce is to be a totalitarian. Shows what a fraud your framework really is.
English
9
2
43
2.1K
Jon bon
Jon bon@InfernoTake·
@ASzigetvari the fundamental stupidity of euro's was they actually thought they could have russian raw materials, chinese goods and american protection and it wouldn't cause massive problems.
English
0
0
0
16
Marco Foster
Marco Foster@MarcoFoster_·
Tim Dillon: “I don’t know what Trump’s a part of, but he’s probably fucked some underage people I would imagine. And God only knows what else. He’s been accused of horrible things in these files… He’s guilty. It’s guilt. This is guilt.”
English
558
1.2K
11.9K
1.5M
Alison Harrison
Alison Harrison@Falisonharrison·
@matthewstoller So blocking a black governor and a gay governor from the White House dinner is ok with you?
English
3
0
4
445
Jon bon
Jon bon@InfernoTake·
@barnes_law apparently there's no need to fundraise for elections
English
0
0
0
9
Robert Barnes
Robert Barnes@barnes_law·
Sadly symbolic of Trump's 2nd term: turning our 250th anniversary into a donor-driven event.
Kenneth P. Vogel@kenvogel

SCOOP: @Freedom250 — the group launched by Trump to oversee projects including the @UFC fight on the WH lawn & his arch overlooking DC — is offering access to him for donors who give $1M. For $2.5M, donors can speak at the national July 4 celebration. nytimes.com/2026/02/08/us/…

English
67
124
549
19.8K
Michael Tracey
Michael Tracey@mtracey·
You'd think everyone would be EXTREMELY RELIEVED that there's clearly not as much pedophilic sex criminality going on as they'd been mistakenly led to believe. But nope. Instead, it's been the complete opposite reaction. People are even more flamboyantly incensed than they were before. They can't, or won't, celebrate what should be seen as objectively good news: No credible evidence of mass child rape! Let us rejoice... right?!?! Wrong... Because as should be abundantly obvious by now to everyone using the internet, the presumed existence of industrial-scale "child sex-trafficking" is principally a function of (warped) ideology, not genuine concern for the welfare of children. And of course, it has nothing to do with the actual facts or evidence. Much like other sub-empirical dogmas, it's wholly non-falsifiable. It's a faith-based doctrine that people for some reason have come to derive profound meaning from -- personally, politically, commercially, and otherwise. This new dogmatic conviction is especially bizarre and perverse, but it's a dogma all the same.
English
230
82
961
70K