Infinite Trading Protocol

1.6K posts

Infinite Trading Protocol banner
Infinite Trading Protocol

Infinite Trading Protocol

@InfiniteTradePr

The protocol for tokenized automated trading funds. Funds are available in Optimism, Polygon, Arbitrum and Base. Owners of @cbEGGS_Finance. $ITP $cbEGGS

Optimism & Base Katılım Haziran 2023
2K Takip Edilen669 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Infinite Trading Protocol
Infinite Trading Protocol@InfiniteTradePr·
🔥 Infinite Trading Perpetuals DEX is live! 🔥 perps.infinitetrading.io Trade perpetuals for $ETH, $BTC, $SOL, and $XPL with up to 100x leverage. - Low fees - Fast execution - Multichain - Smart accounts - Beautiful UI - Gasless trading - High leverage - @solana integration Trade on our DEX to climb leaderboard ranks. Airdrop program for top traders coming soon. Secured by @Ethereum
Infinite Trading Protocol tweet media
English
3
7
13
597
Infinite Trading Protocol
Infinite Trading Protocol@InfiniteTradePr·
We just shipped three major upgrades to our trading API Smart RPC routing: When one provider goes down, we instantly switch to backups. No more failed transactions because Alchemy is having a bad day. Intelligent approvals: The system checks token allowances before every trade. If you're already approved, we skip it and save gas. If not, we auto-approve and retry. Zero manual intervention needed. Multi-DEX fallback: If ODOS hits rate limits, we automatically try 1inch. If that fails, KyberSwap. Then Uniswap V3. Your trade executes no matter what. The goal is simple: eliminate every single point of failure. No reliance on one RPC provider, one DEX, or one approval flow. The system just works, no matter what breaks upstream. We've been testing this in production. When ODOS and 1inch both exhausted their quotas yesterday, trades kept executing through KyberSwap without missing a beat. We are building a resilient infrastructure for quant traders.
English
2
2
5
123
Roy
Roy@SSJCurrency·
I have spent the last 3 weeks working on a complicated tool/software for $AERO LPers to track their profits and losses across various liquidity pools on Aerodrome I have made immense progress so far but there is much more to accomplish before going public Not sugar coating it but there isn't a similar tool out there that is able to give accurate metrics and proper accounting Here's what it does right now > Compiles all your LP mints and withdrawal events > Computes the difference in USD value between entering an LP position and exiting it > This feeds to your impermanent loss or gain depending on the price movement of the underlying assets > Compiles all AERO rewards > Compiles all Fees earned (Since Aerodrome merges fees + LP position amounts when you withdraw, the tool had to separate principal from yield) > Compiles all gas fees paid > Gives you a USD denominated PnL > Gives you a net APR and a net return based on the period Here's what it doesn't do right now but will be added later > All AERO rewards have the USD value equivalent based on the price they were claimed at - future implementation would give them proper USD value based on your actions (selling vs holding) > No holding IL included (that's IL that is computed based on the difference between the moment an asset enters your wallet, either via purchase, transfer or LP event, and the moment it exists, either via a sell event, LP event or transfer. If it entered your wallet and you're still holding it then it gives your PnL between purchase timestamp and current price) > veAERO yield in case you've locked those claims and started voting with them > Live AERO rewards that are accruing in an active CL position > Full accounting for all Liquidity pools at once as it currently operates based on one LP / Gauge Once everything is tested and these additional things added then it will go public Prompting this terminal is going to be fully AERO aligned, meaning priced in AERO Would appreciate feedback
English
25
15
146
14K
Infinite Trading Protocol
Infinite Trading Protocol@InfiniteTradePr·
API Pricing Update - Simplified USD-Based Fees We're excited to announce a major update to our API pricing structure! We've moved from gas-multiple based fees to simple, transparent USD-based pricing. New Fixed Pricing: Trading Operations (trade/swap): $0.10 per transaction Token Approvals: $0.02 per approval Lending Operations (lend/borrow/repay): $0.05 per operation Free Operations: Deposits, withdrawals, pool composition queries, claim rewards, and estimates are now FREE How It Works: Fees are automatically converted to the native token of your network (ETH or MATIC) using real-time market prices from Coinbase. This means you pay the same dollar amount regardless of which network you use. Supported Networks: Ethereum Optimism Arbitrum Base Polygon
English
0
2
4
57
Infinite Trading Protocol
Infinite Trading Protocol@InfiniteTradePr·
We’ve upgraded from the @odosprotocol V2 API to the Odos V3 API and integrated the latest @dHedgeOrg v2 SDK. We also migrated our Express API to PM2, updated all dependencies to their latest versions, and are actively expanding the API with additional endpoints and functionality.
English
0
1
3
67
illya gerasymchuk 📈
illya gerasymchuk 📈@illyaGera·
Your track record is not verified. An image with a graph does not constitute proof. I can fabricate an image with any numbers you want (see attached example from my own fund, which is totally real because you can see it in the image 😄) Once again, you can easily prove the validity of your models/positions by sharing public calls or revealing your models/strategies. You seem to be doing everything but that - text, images, etc 😄 If your track record is really so good, it's also not clear why you are selling $80 signal group memberships on discord. This is in no way the norm in the industry and it doesn't make sense in terms of alpha retention.
illya gerasymchuk 📈 tweet media
English
12
2
52
1.8K
ZenomTrader
ZenomTrader@ZenomTrader·
Crazy what AI agents can do right now. I asked Claude Code to autonomously code me a Gold strategy from scratch inside NinjaTrader 8. It compiled it, debugged it on its own, ran the backtest, and came back with a profitable system. Probably only 0.1% of the industry is doing this.
English
125
85
1.1K
142.4K
Infinite Trading Protocol
Infinite Trading Protocol@InfiniteTradePr·
@illyaGera @ZenomTrader You can eliminate overfitting by using dropouts in ML strategies you can also use neighborhoods of the MLE’s and assign intervals in a bayesian way to reduce it too
English
0
0
0
51
illya gerasymchuk 📈
illya gerasymchuk 📈@illyaGera·
Yeah - all academia people that write papers are trading billionaires, right? 😉 Your statement regarding overfitting is just wrong. Overfitting is one of the biggest problems in finance strategies, and the people who write your favorite academic papers agree. I can also make an ML model that has 100% trading success on backtesting, but fails on new data. You also say that overfitting is invented by academia and then say that your strategies are based on academic papers? 😄 You can easily prove that your automated strategy is profitable by either publishing the strategy or making predictive calls here on X. This would be faster than answering me, but if your strategy doesn't perform better than chance on real data, I understand why you haven't done so yet
English
2
0
34
3.2K
Matt Giannino
Matt Giannino@MarketMovesMatt·
After 10 years testing every indicator on the internet, I only use TWO: 1. EMA Clouds (trend validation) 2. RSI (risk assessment) Here's how they work together: Step 1: Check EMA Clouds • 2 stacked green = bull trend (trade) • 2 stacked red = bear trend (cash) Step 2: Check RSI (only if clouds are green) • RSI 70+ = too hot, wait • RSI 50-60 = small position • RSI 40-50 = normal position • RSI under 30 = aggressive position No bull trend? No trade. Bull trend + low RSI? Hammer it. Two indicators. Full system. Trend + Risk = Everything you need.
English
20
66
455
38.1K
Anton Cheng
Anton Cheng@antonttc·
Morpho's shutting down its public Discord. Didn't see that coming. This could be a trend for other protocols too—scams, bot scraping, or just too much noise might be at play. But maybe its also signals that big DeFi teams are focusing more on institutions and less on "communities". Kinda bittersweet to see DeFi going mainstream.
Anton Cheng tweet media
English
116
21
650
298.1K
Infinite Trading Protocol retweetledi
Kira Sama
Kira Sama@Kira_sama·
CT is all noise. BREAKING : Solana is losing stablecoins at a massive accelerated pace. Lost almost 10% of its stablecoin supply in just a week. Binance Smart Chain has taken a billion dollar plus lead against solana. Not long before hyperliquid also overtakes solana. Being a casino chain is no moat. There is only one #1 undisputed king. Ethereum. Ethereum is #1 in liquidity and that is why, launching an L2 is always better than launching an alt-L1. ( Robinhood spokesperson confirmed this ). That is why I believe that eventually all institutions will launch L2s and make alt-L1s obsolete. Imagine apple eth L2, amazon eth L2, X eth L2 etc. The ticker is ETH.
Kira Sama tweet media
English
37
30
336
23.6K
Alex Finn
Alex Finn@AlexFinn·
Every app I vibe code has the tech stack below Easy for beginners and free to start If you've never built an app before, just paste this list into Claude Code and you'll be good to go: Web framework: NextJS Hosting: Vercel Database: Supabase Auth: Clerk Payments: Stripe Styling: Tailwind AI: logic- OpenAI, creativity- Claude, cheap tasks- Gemini Flash 3 Emails: Resend AI I use to build it all: Claude Code Any questions let me know!
English
200
139
1.9K
122.4K
rabib
rabib@rabizzzy·
@toghrulmaharram > With Alpenglow, the protocol will incentivize co-location, so the validator count will coincide with potentially increased geographic centralization. if true, it stands to worsen an already-bad stake weight geographic centralization problem
English
1
0
3
241
Infinite Trading Protocol retweetledi
Toghrul Maharramov 🇺🇦
Toghrul Maharramov 🇺🇦@toghrulmaharram·
When I was asked my opinion about the "latency" discussions by someone yesterday, this was my answer. I'll add Max into the "chatting shite" category. Messages traveling between NYC and Tokyo are not really relevant to Ethereum, since Ethereum gossips the messages instead of broadcasting them to everyone (technically, in Alpenglow, the shreds are first propagated to 64 relays, before being broadcast to the rest of validator set, but the general point still stands). While that introduces a trade-off - Ethereum trades-off latency for stronger DDoS resistance. While it is true that Solana proved that you be can fast and cheap, it's a worrying trend that Solana validator set is continuously dropping (and I am not buying the "it's just Sybils" argument). With Alpenglow, the protocol will incentivize co-location, so the validator count will coincide with potentially increased geographic centralization. The facts are not, in fact, so obvious. One of the main revenue generators for Solana was the memecoin mania in the past year and a half. The latest iteration naturally fit Solana better because of Solana's fast block times (for some memecoin traders, average hold time is below Ethereum's block time, so Pumpdotfun on Ethereum just wouldn't work). Additionally, in Q4 2025, according to Blockworks, Solana's REV was 40% lower than Ethereum's REV and that includes vote fees that contributed to almost 16% (!!!) of Solana's REV. Notice how the REV conversations died down lately? The reason is outlined above.
Toghrul Maharramov 🇺🇦 tweet media
Max Resnick@MaxResnick

Messages can travel round trip from NYC to tokyo 60 times in the span of a 12 second Ethereum slot. Saying that latency is fundamentally limited by the speed of light in the context of an ethereum block is like a runner saying he cant run any faster because the speed of light exists. Solana has demonstrated that blockchains can be fast cheap, and reliable over the last 2 years with bandwidth and latency Eclipsing all other blockchains. Activity has correspondingly fled to Solana. Ethereum refuses to compete on Latency because Vitalik is afraid. Afraid that the decade old LMD-Ghost consensus engine won't be able to handle it if they step on the gas, afraid of admitting that they he was wrong on the L2 roadmap, and, most importantly, afraid that if Ethereum competes head on with Solana, they will ultimately lose. Whether he admits it or not. The facts are obvious to everyone. The L2 roadmap has been a catastrophic failure. While Ethereum core developers were busy wandering for 40 years giving away all their revenue to corporate L2s, other L1s were shipping performant code increasing bandwidth and reducing latency and eating into their monopoly market share. I sincerely hope that the Ethereum core community gets its act together and ships 6 second slots in the next hard fork. While I think if Ethereum tries to compete head on with Solana on latency they will likely lose. If they don't compete, they will certainly lose.

English
22
6
117
15.5K
Etheraider
Etheraider@etheraider·
$SOL chain is between a rock and a hard place. It’s not decentralized enough to compete with @ethereum. It’s not secure or resilient enough to attract meaningful DeFi or stables. And it’s too slow to compete with other performant chains. It’s become a vanilla L1 not the best at anything.
Max Resnick@MaxResnick

Messages can travel round trip from NYC to tokyo 60 times in the span of a 12 second Ethereum slot. Saying that latency is fundamentally limited by the speed of light in the context of an ethereum block is like a runner saying he cant run any faster because the speed of light exists. Solana has demonstrated that blockchains can be fast cheap, and reliable over the last 2 years with bandwidth and latency Eclipsing all other blockchains. Activity has correspondingly fled to Solana. Ethereum refuses to compete on Latency because Vitalik is afraid. Afraid that the decade old LMD-Ghost consensus engine won't be able to handle it if they step on the gas, afraid of admitting that they he was wrong on the L2 roadmap, and, most importantly, afraid that if Ethereum competes head on with Solana, they will ultimately lose. Whether he admits it or not. The facts are obvious to everyone. The L2 roadmap has been a catastrophic failure. While Ethereum core developers were busy wandering for 40 years giving away all their revenue to corporate L2s, other L1s were shipping performant code increasing bandwidth and reducing latency and eating into their monopoly market share. I sincerely hope that the Ethereum core community gets its act together and ships 6 second slots in the next hard fork. While I think if Ethereum tries to compete head on with Solana on latency they will likely lose. If they don't compete, they will certainly lose.

English
8
3
87
6K

Keşfet

@SSJCurrency @VelodromeFi @odosprotocol @dHedgeOrg @illyaGera @ZenomTrader @MarketMovesMatt @quantian1