InspecτorSubneτ

Imagine liquidating tens of millions selling $TAO while showing real conviction that the price will go x500 higher. Imagine doing this while building “the best trading algorithm on the planet” as a subnet, then replace it with “the best prop firm on the planet”, then crashing it. This is Arrash. One of the strongest subnet devs on Bittensor. But no worries guys. $TAO will hit 25k next week.

@Pritensor @SiamKidd Don’t forget about this kind of predictions, coming from the king of SN crashes. 😂

Bittensor // $TAO I call the following situation: „DUNNING-KRUGER-EFFECT" @SiamKidd is back. And it won't get boring. Thank you for that. All of this was supposedly already supposed to happen in 2025 according to him… Now it’s being shifted to 2026 because he was completely wrong… not just a little, no, he was way off, nowhere near his predictions. The interesting part is… there’s no rethinking or adjustment, because that would mean admitting he was wrong, and that he’s watching the market full of emotion instead of rationally. He still claims that $TAO will reach at least $3270… so a 15× from the current level of ~$215. He also once said that $KAS would reach $2–$3, which would be at least a 53× from the current ~$0.0375. So if he actually believed his own analyses, shouldn’t he be going all-in on Kaspa? Hm, strange. The truth will probably be… $TAO won’t hit those targets… Total market cap won’t hit his targets… And 2026 will eventually pass, and everything will just get pushed to 2027. First 2025…
Then 2026…
Soon 2027… And so on… Facts are facts. Crypto people have too big an ego to simply say:
“Hey, I completely overestimated the market and especially $TAO, I was wrong about everything. Honestly, it doesn’t look good, and I don’t know shit.” I would have huge respect for that! 
I respect anyone who owns up to their actions, but I have zero respect when someone is completely wrong about everything, keeps acting like it’s all “still on track”, and just permanently moves the timeline. Sorry, but that’s weak. I don't see a learning process in people. τ = bittensor $TAO #Crypto

@TAOFlows @sobczak_mariusz @ridges_ai @hobbleabbas @JosephJacks_ People are blind even if we show on chain proofs.

@sobczak_mariusz @ridges_ai @hobbleabbas @JosephJacks_ @InspectorSubnet who is selling ridges? Any foul play?😅

I just added to @ridges_ai. I don’t know about you boys, but a 40% dump in 3 days feels a bit excessive. @hobbleabbas needed help in order to compete with multibillion-dollar companies, and he just achieved that by joining forces with @JosephJacks_ $TAO

@TheGoldenOrder I disagree with this 100%. Sorry. If Bittensor is scam, then the entire Crypto space is scam. Honestly.

@InspectorSubnet Bittensor ecosystem is a scam bro. Its a network where free money (paid by investors) is extracted by random devs claiming to do some Ai stuff that doesnt work. These devs leech from the network which is funded by people "investing".

Something is wrong with dTAO. Since the last update, emissions are supposed to be based on $TAO inflow. Subnet 8 is still in last place for monthly TAO inflow, with an outflow of –4.3k TAO, yet its emissions are higher than in previous days. How is it possible to have the worst inflow but still be at the top in emissions? Long time since the inflow update, but still doesn't count that much.

Update. $TAO monthly inflow. #125 place for Vanta SN8. How can something rank in the top 5 for emissions but be last in TAO inflow? The worst place for "The world's first decentralized proprietary trading firm on PLANET". SLOW RUG mode activated?

@KakashiTao You are a joke. I mean taostats is not a joke man. Come on!

@InspectorSubnet you are a joke. why not investigate real shit?

We have 125 active $TAO subnets. Let's check the $TAO monthly inflow and see where "The world's first decentralized proprietary trading firm" SN8 sits. #124 place. WOW! After crashing their holders on 13 May 2025, they are going to revolutionize the trading industry next month. I can't wait!

All my statements were supported by on-chain evidence. Everything I got wrong, I took responsibility for and stated publicly. It is impossible to know in detail all the mechanisms behind 128 subnets, especially since they change from one day to the next. What I am pointing out here are only suspicious activities that anyone can see on-chain, but they are hard to reach because some subnet owners make thousands of transactions of 0.001 $TAO and no one asks why. They rush to throw mud at me because I speak negatively about their favorite project. It’s not me speaking - it’s the on-chain evidence. Yes! Maybe I am not a perfect professional investigator. But that is not my goal. My goal is to make people aware of certain activities. Why? To avoid possible rugs. There are people who lose all their savings in crypto, and I am trying to make the Bittensor ecosystem as little harmful as possible in this area of rug pulls. Btw...I don't think taostats is lying about TAO inflow, isn't it?

@InspectorSubnet Bruh. The scope of your account is lovely. But the way you are doing it is worse than an amateur. Do a thorough research about a subnet. Investigate something properly and be 100% sure about it like zachxbt.

@wywyjumpshot What are you saying? Explain. Do you know what “trustless” means?

@InspectorSubnet 🤦‍♂️ you don’t get it. seems like you’re willfully ignorant at this point. i’d caution anyone from giving this guy’s words any weight. 😂

Ooops! $TAO A big portion of the miners’ incentives is getting burned in BitCast SN93. That means the miners didn’t accomplish their tasks, so they didn’t deserve the reward. So here we have a case where miners are producing zero value, but the subnet owner’s key is still extracting TAO from the network. In this case, maybe the owners should burn their incentives too instead of hyping people with burning while still extracting $TAO for nothing coming from their miners?

Of course you should burn emissions if you don’t provide value. But that process should happen in a trustless way, like some other subnets are doing mate. A trustless burn mechanism. Otherwise there will always be a big risk. Imagine btc mining rewards going to a single wallet and then the owner choosing where and how to split the emission lol. Fair play game. 😂

@InspectorSubnet Hey bud, didn't you just say that @Bitcast_network should burn emissions? Such an unserious account 🤣

@aztecman13 @grok @Pritensor Keep smoking my friend.

@InspectorSubnet @grok @Pritensor aren’t you sounding a bit like a Bittensor maxi? @InspectorSubnet yes, yes I am… 🤡🤡🤡

Ok. My mistake. $TAO That address is not actually a miner. I get confused because I saw the address on the miners leaderbord on taomarketcap .com. It looks like this coldkey is actually a treasury where the "unclaimed emission" are automatically allocated. Still very very dangerous. This is not how it should work in a fair and trustless economy. They can burn it instead. $500k+ per month sounds a bit scary for a startup with zero revenue generated imo. Maybe I'm wrong.

@taostacker @buck6000 :)))))))))) Very good answer boy. The Magic Treasury is LIVE.

@buck6000 @InspectorSubnet Looks like here's the answer to another bullshit case from the inspector

Very interesting how BitCast SN93 miners are printing $TAO for their views on YouTube. A single miner has generated 2,150 $TAO in less than a month, while the others… just look at the picture. As you can see, there is a total of 82k views for all the content on their dashboard, across multiple creators / miners. But one miner alone was enough to generate more than $500,000. A few thousand views for half a million. I guess that’s fair. Nice job, BitCast. When crash?

@wywyjumpshot OHHHH that's another brilliant idea. Magic Treasury instead of burn. I love it!

@InspectorSubnet github.com/bitcast-networ… it’s all a big conspiracy! 😂

That cold key was created on 06 nov 2025 with 0.05 $TAO total incoming transfer. Ok. My mistake that I didn’t know this is how mining should work on Bittensor. Trustless level 0. All the mining rewards goes to a single entity that should manually transfer the rewards to the creators. Genius work. That means we have $526,000 for 83k views on YouTube >> 6$ per view. What a deal!

just because you don’t understand something, does not mean it’s a conspiracy. that coldkey has received 788 TAO in the last month, not the total 2,150. (this mistake alone kinda invalidates everything you have to say lol) this is due to the mech split they have of 85/15%, since this coldkey is earning 85% of emissions. this is the split for youtube miners since you can register as a miner for bitcast using an email address.

@Yuuuuurrr310079 I will also make a leaderboard with the most stupid people from TAO community based on their reactions when they see onchain proofs. I'll make sure you will be in TOP 3 man.