Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Want to know what's in all of Trump's trade deals? We combed through all of them, so you don't have to. Our tracker will be updated as more texts are released.
Check it out here on @CFR_org :
cfr.org/articles/track…
English
Inu Manak
10.8K posts
Inu Manak
@inumanak
Senior Fellow for International Trade, @CFR_org; PhD @GUGovt. Books editor @trade_review. TBT = technical barriers to trade. RT ≠ endorsements. Views my own.
Washington, D.C. Katılım Mayıs 2009
2.4K Takip Edilen6.3K Takipçiler
Inu Manak retweetledi
The US has today notified to the WTO its decision to introduce (Section 122) import restrictions taken for balance-of-payment (BoP) purposes. Other WTO Members may request a review of this notification under the 1994 Understanding on GATT BOP provisions.
docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/S…
English
Inu Manak retweetledi
Don't understand why another supply shock should affect the path of rates. Excessive focus on supply shocks as an explanation for pandemic inflation is a problem. Its causing excess fear from poliymakers today.
English
Inu Manak retweetledi
*TRUMP WAIVES JONES ACT IN BID TO CURB HIGH FUEL PRICES
English
Inu Manak retweetledi
.@stuartareid knew early on he was interested in journalism and international affairs. After college, he wound up at the intersection of both, working as an assistant editor at Foreign Affairs magazine. He worked his way up to executive editor over the years as he edited—or as he called it, “translated”—countless articles, turning complex topics into compelling prose and digestible insights.
Reid sat down with CFR to discuss the importance of good writing to convey global issues, and how he started writing his own stories. cfr.org/articles/how-i…
English
Consumers "really the last of our concerns" seems like a great thing to say when Americans are most worried about affordability.
Aaron Rupar@atrupar
Hassett: "If the war were to be extended, it wouldn't really disrupt the US economy very much at all. It would hurt consumers, and we'd have to think about what we'd have to do about that, but that's really the last of our concerns right now."
English
Inu Manak retweetledi
Thoughtful piece by a veteran Canadian official.
“Rules were not a constraint on power; they were how power became credible.”
Why American Primacy Is Ending — and What Comes Next cigionline.org/articles/why-a…
English
Inu Manak retweetledi
“If you look at the bilateral agreements that have been reached so far, they tend to be extremely one sided,” argues Marc Levinson, an independent historian and economist. “These agreements may not be very stable because it will occur to people in these other countries that these agreements are, in ways, quite disadvantageous to them.”
🔗 Watch the full conversation: on.cfr.org/4bORxuA
English
Inu Manak retweetledi
> be Donald Trump
> win a cost-of-living election
> immediately announce the largest tariff program in the last 100 years
> spend the next year carving out those tariffs
> “well at least the price of oil is falling”
> launch war that instantly raises the price of oil
Amy Siskind 🏳️🌈@Amy_Siskind
Delta CEO: fuel prices have doubled for airlines since the start of the war, and we are passing them on to consumers as higher ticket prices.
English
Inu Manak retweetledi
#USA calls on allies to open the #strait, #Carney shaking hands in #Nordic countries, and the auto plan by #Poilievre on todays @ArleneBynonShow
@AGMacDougall
@RobertFife
@bborzyko
@inumanak
@DavidColetto
for #PoliticalPunch we have @CamHolmstrom & @Will_W_Stewart
English
Inu Manak retweetledi
India will hold off on signing a trade deal with the United States for several months, four Indian sources said, as fresh investigations by the Trump administration into what it calls excess industrial capacity among trade partners add new friction [..] reuters.com/world/india/in…
English
Inu Manak retweetledi
The two new Section 301 investigations are very broad:
-Excess Capacity 301: 16 partners, 70.2% of imports
-Forced Labor 301: 60 partners, 99.3% of imports
That breadth suggests the goal isn't to address the issues at hand, but instead to recreate a sweeping tariff tool.
English
Refunds are not "windfall"-- they will return money that was illegally taken from U.S. businesses, and every business that paid tariffs is entitled to them. The government should not be telling businesses what to do with cash they stole from them.
Aaron Rupar@atrupar
SORKIN: Would you and the administration encourage companies that had higher costs because of tariffs to seek a refund? I ask because I've talked to CEOs who are worried about retribution GREER: If I were these companies and somehow they get this windfall, they should give it as bonuses to their workers
English
Inu Manak retweetledi
🚨 TRUMP ADMINISTRATION SET TO SUSPEND JONES ACT TO TAME OIL PRICE
English
Inu Manak retweetledi
"Investigations" with foregone conclusions that tariffs will somehow correct these problems. Looking forward to reading the justifications for maintaining higher costs on American companies and consumers.
Ana Swanson@AnaSwanson
Scoop: USTR is set to announce new 301 investigations today into excess industrial capacity, forced labor, digital service taxes and other issues, as the administration works to replace tariffs struck down by the Supreme Court. With @tylerpager nytimes.com/2026/03/11/bus…
English
Inu Manak retweetledi
Toldja: "Globalization is proving resilient" bloomberg.com/news/newslette…
The data's "a counter-narrative to politicians and analysts arguing that economic disengagement and the formation of new, distinct geopolitical blocs are happening in any seismic way"
Twas always a silly idea.
English
Inu Manak retweetledi
Here's a fun fact: The United States now has fewer manufacturing jobs today (12.573M) than it did in March 2018 (12.576M) when Trump first started his tariff wars:
BLS data: bls.gov/charts/employm…
English
Inu Manak retweetledi
🚨🚨🚨 "Other options include...lifting requirements under a U.S. law called the Jones Act that domestic fuel move only on U.S.-flagged ships, among others, the sources said, speaking on condition of anonymity."
zerohedge@zerohedge
*TRUMP TO REVIEW OPTIONS TO CURB OIL PRICES AS SOON AS MON: RTRS *TRUMP MULLS EXPORT CURBS, TAX WAIVERS TO CURB OIL PRICES: RTRS
English
Inu Manak retweetledi
Several have pointed this one out, but it's another clear indicator that Section 122 tariffs do NOT encompass a common trade deficit.
The Senate Finance committee report notes that it intentionally used the term *payments* to differentiate the section from *trade* deficits.
English