@Hatim
227 posts







99.8% of bun’s pre-existing test suite passes on Linux x64 glibc in the rust rewrite










very unfortunately my business, post-bridge.com has been down all day since 11AM EDT i apologize greatly to all my customers for this trouble. sucks a lot, i know many people are frustrated not being able to schedule their posts out tonight.





Okay I'll try to vibe code an automatic Stripe dispute responder that: 1) receives disputes via webhook 2) collects evidence of user sign up and activity 3) puts it in a beautiful PDF 4) submits it back to Stripe for the banks to review Once it works I'll ask it to summarize it and share the prompt/skill here Codebase is too unique per project so prompt/skill makes more sense!




Can I get some questions answered by someone at Anthropic? 1. Can you use an OAuth token generated from a subscription to power the Claude Agent SDK strictly for using Claude Code in a local dev loop? All I want is a more reliable API for parallelizing multiple Claude Code's. 2. If I build an open source tool that relies on this pattern - i.e. for making parallelization easier - can I distribute it so that other people can use it? The reason I'm asking is that the legal compliance docs and @trq212's public statements (below) appear to contradict. x.com/trq212/status/…

Ahhhh, Codex 5.3 (xhigh) with a vague prompt just solved a bug that I and others have been struggling to fix for over 6 months. Other reasoning levels with Codex failed, Opus 4.6 failed. Cost $4.14 and 45 minutes. Full trace plus includes original issue: ampcode.com/threads/T-019c… I know this prompt is relatively bad. Honestly, our stable release is in a week, and I was throwing some Hail Marys at the frontier models to see if I could get a clean, understandable fix for some of these bugs. By using `gh`, it grabs much better context from the issue, so its not terrible. The best thing that Codex did was eventually start reading GTK4 source code. That's where I ended up (see my GH issue), and I knew the answer was somewhere in there, but I didn't have the time or motivation to do it myself. The other models never went there, and lower reasoning efforts with 5.3 didn't go there either. Only xhigh went there. I think that was a critical difference. The final fix was decent. It was small, all in a single file, and very understandable. It had one bug I identified (you can see in the trace), and then I manually cleaned up some style. But, it did a great job. Definitely an "it's so over" moment. But at the same time, it feels amazing because now our next stable release will have this fix and I was able to spend the time working on other fixes as it went.


apparently I'm the only one not living in /fast mode permanently lol tried it last night, couldn't tell the difference. realized my workflow makes speed irrelevant: • small tasks: zoe throws them to background agents. don't care when they finish • big tasks: I write a 1k+ line spec .md first and let codex xhigh one-shot it. takes an hour anyway - shaving 20 min doesn't change my life so far running it with 2x the cost seems like poor ROI, am I coping? x.com/elvissun/statu…







