JD Rockwell, Jr.

@InsiderWire @HarmlessYardDog "Let me pull my gun while surrounded by 6 BORTAC boys who cannot communicate with one another because my retarded communist friends are blowing their rape whistles and honking their Honda Fits constantly. What could go wrong?"

The nearest equivalent would be if a bunch of Alabaman and Texan billionaires funded a second 9/11, it fails, and then nothing is done to them. Then the Texabama Party wins the Presidency. Would anyone blame NYers for wanting out?

Disease of the Public Mind covers this well. There was already a growing fear of San Domingue (now Haiti) 2.0. Then one day, you have "fellow countrymen" who fund an attempt to San Domingue 2.0 you, your wife, and your kids. And then, their party wins the presidency.

And while it's easy to blame the algo alone, as I said, it's the audience's fault. The algo is agnostic. All it cares about is engagement. People engage with slop and kneejerk takes with "BREAKING" headers. They don't read a 3-5 post thread, and so the algo doesn't push it.

Blame the audience. People crave the slop. Sincere posts get terrible engagement. I quit paying for premium because it just wasn't worth it. Felt like yelling into pillow. The whole point is to talk with people and discuss ideas, but the algo doesn't allow it. The GC is better.

Both the Hart-Celler Act of 1965 and the additions to it in the early 90s need to be repealed. So many examples of putting American citizens last in those pieces of legislation.

Right out of college a nice progressive Jewish guy I knew got a job doing statistical analysis He was hired by a firm evaluating the mall in Tampa near USF where we graduated They wanted to understand why the mall was failing The analysts, in a moment of real moral crisis, told me “ I don’t know how to tell them the mall is attracting too many black people who are destroying it”

They literally cannot even model pro-life conservatives as people who genuinely think of abortion as murder. Like, as soon as they try to imagine being a person who genuinely thinks it’s murder, so that they can follow from that position to the obvious policy consequences, their brain like glitches out and they go immediately back to being confused. This is the simplest, most obvious, most straightforward case we’re just simply modeling the other person‘s mind leads immediately to their full suite of policy preferences. And they literally can’t even do it in this case. I’ve watched them glitch out on it like a hundred times during in-person debates. You can almost see on their face how difficult it is for them.

Why is it “ethnic cleansing” to send Third World migrants back to their home countries, but it’s not ethnic cleansing to turn the native inhabitants of Western nations into a minority in their own countries? If millions of British settlers moved into India and Africa and occupied the land, set up legal and political systems to entrench themselves in power, and then ruled these places with the intention of permanently changing the demographics of these regions in their favor, Leftists would absolutely call it ethnic cleansing. How do we know? Because they did it once before with decolonization and Rhodesia.

Everyone getting mad at me for not leaping to Chud the Builder's defense is a moron who doesn't understand the is-ought distinction. Let me walk you through this using baby language. Chud will be charged with attempted voluntary manslaughter under Tennessee § 39-13-211. This is a class C felony punishable with 3-15 years in prison and a $10,000 fine. He WILL be charged. No DA wants to establish the precedent that IRL streamers can cause public disturbances, shoot people, and walk. Even if the DA is sympathetic to Chud, he will be under immense public pressure to charge him. There is a very good chance the case never goes to trial. The vast majority of criminal cases end in plea deals, not jury trials. If there is even a whiff of a chance Chud could be acquitted by a jury, the DA will amp up the pressure to make him accept a plea deal. DAs love plea deals because they allow them to goose conviction rates and because jury trials are expensive and time-consuming. There are any number of means by which the DA can twist Chud's arm into accepting a shitty plea deal. The most obvious one is throwing him in county lockup and waiting out the clock until the day before the right to a speedy trial expires. DAs do this FREQUENTLY; a friend of mine who shot a black guy in self-defense was held in jail for YEARS because he refused to plea out and insisted on going to trial. Does Chud have the wherewithal to stick it out in jail for that long? He will either be sharing a cell block with black criminals who will be beating the shit out of "the n-word cracka" every day or he will be put in solitary for his own safety. Solitary confinement is so damaging to inmates that it shows up on brain scans. Chud is very unlikely to get bail because based on his antics as a streamer, the nature of his offense, public pressure, and his prior arrest history, the judge will deem him a flight risk and a threat to public order. If he does get bail, it will be insanely high (bail for class C felonies can be set as high as $250,000) and he will be barred from leaving the state. If he goes back to streaming like he normally does, it will almost certainly end in another incident that sends him right back to jail. Let's assume Chud goes to trial. The pressure to convict will be high. I can foresee the prosecutor arguing that Chud shouting the n-word at black people constitutes "fighting words" (a doctrine in both Tennessee and federal law, see Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire) and thus the black guy who attacked him should be let off. His history as an IRL streamer who intentionally creates public scenes will be used by the prosecution. His defense team will surely argue self-defense, which they should, but can that overcome the public pressure to convict a racist anti-Semitic groyper who makes videos harassing black people? He's in a terrible situation. And for anyone comparing Chud to Kyle Rittenhouse, you're wrong for these reasons: 1) Rittenhouse was not seeking conflict. Chud's entire career is about starting shit. 2) Rittenhouse was inherently sympathetic as a clean-cut white kid. Chud is a racist anti-Semitic groyper with a chomostache. 3) Rittenhouse's "victims" were white. Chud shot a black guy. Should Chud be found guilty at trial, his past history of arrests and disruptive behavior will likely result in the judge giving him a harsh sentence. There will also be, again, immense public pressure to throw the book at him. If you come at me with something like "oh you think it's OKAY for black people to assault white people", you missed the point entirely and are too retarded for this discussion. Chud might be justified in defending himself. He might not deserve to go to prison. But as Clint Eastwood said, deserve's got nothing to do with it. The justice system has every incentive to bring the hammer down on him, which is why he's a retard for putting himself in this situation.

This is what immigration does. It allows every company to act like they are a hot girl on Tinder.

Americans be like “I can’t even get some chopped foid from a dating app to go on a $250 date with me” while Japan bros are like “damn the handjob parlor and the milf joint are both on sale tonight idk which one to pick”

boomers sending DMs to AI-generated women on instagram

@TheDMVLive Clarence Thomas's successor has been found

DC Assistant Police Chief Andre Wright allegedly texted his wife from his work phone: “This Big Tittie bitch can’t read” during a meeting and later “I’m going out of town with a fat ugly bitch, will be back tomorrow… I’m taking two midgets with me.” dc.citycast.fm/news/andre-wri…

Alright look no one wants to think their coworkers are talking about them this way, but it’s his wife, if you can’t vent to your own wife about your illiterate big tittie coworkers what is marriage even for

"sir, do you think this blockade will collapse Iran?" "Iran?"

The Anglo-Saxons have been in Britain for about twice as long as the Maori have been in New Zealand. It makes you wonder why the Maori are called "indigenous" to New Zealand while Britain is called a "nation of immigrants".

"So called less authoritarian country" The UK detained me under the terrorism act with no right to a lawyer and no right to remain silent, bec I went to Goodsprings in the USA.

I stop using porn when in a relationship, just like I expect my girl to stop using her Code Red Pussy Triple Demolisher 3.0 while reading about goblins raping princesses

@Romy_Holland I did this all the time when we had kids that age.

parents: imagine you’re good friends with the neighbors 2 doors down. would you put your baby down for the night and go neighbor’s house for a drink if you brought the baby monitor?