JS
196 posts








🚨 Manono Lithium Valuation dispute KoBold-AVZ acquisition still on hold over a major valuation dispute: AVZ calls the offers “far less than reasonable” and well below fair value for its stake in the world’s largest hard-rock lithium deposit. No exclusivity — they’re running a competitive process. Geopolitics angle: Trump admin/White House has directly urged AVZ to sell to U.S.-backed KoBold (Bezos/Gates-linked) to secure Western supply chains — while China’s Zijin races ahead toward first production in June 2026. Critical minerals chess match in DRC. Who wins? 🔋🇨🇩🇺🇸🇨🇳 #Manono #Lithium #USChina #DRCMining #CriticalMinerals @AvzMinerals @KoBold_Metals @MinMinesRDC

ICSID tribunal reconstituted in AVZ Manono case — bullish signal for AVZ & KoBold! Active proceedings = stronger push toward fair settlement. KoBold’s framework for the southern lithium section is ready to deploy $1B+ AI-powered development for Western supply chains. US-backed winner in the critical minerals race. #KoBoldMetals #Manono #AVZ @KoBold_Metals @AvzMinerals







NASA chief responds to Trump’s UFO files directive, says there’s no classified info of aliens on Earth “Do I believe that intelligent life has visited Earth? I have not seen any evidence of that whatsoever. Nothing in any classified files or historic documentation would ever support that.”




"Public demand is gonna get us the truth." UFO investigator Jeremy Corbell tells Piers Morgan there's White House and Pentagon talks currently underway on what information should be released on aliens. Watch more👇 📺 youtu.be/k1aUBkSesmY @piersmorgan | @JeremyCorbell






Dear Mr. Ndayizeye, As stated in the @ICC_arbitration and @icsid $AVZ filings in 2025, the total compensatory damages is around USD $10+ billion. The pecuniary fines (exemplary - emotional distress, reputational damage, opportunity cost, etc) are additional. 👇




The problem isn't that scientists (or anyone) are skeptical that NHI is engaging our Earth. That's reasonable based on the evidence we do have. The problem is when they have near certainty. That's not intelligent skepticism. It's ideology. By “near certainty,” I mean treating the odds that NHI is engaging Earth as below 1%. Anyone who ridicules the UFO enigma is implicitly treating it that way. The combination of credible witnesses over decades, corroborated sightings, whistleblowers, and consistent emergent patterns makes near certainty inappropriate. I think history will validate this position. I've never been against skepticism. I've been against overconfident skepticism. Good luck on your bet with Avi Loeb.





