JSONmaxxing

1.8K posts

JSONmaxxing

JSONmaxxing

@JSONmaxxing

anonymous academic.

U.S. Katılım Şubat 2026
198 Takip Edilen77 Takipçiler
JSONmaxxing
JSONmaxxing@JSONmaxxing·
@MarioNawfal one area where I support DEI is that the government should provide funding for Latinos, Arabs and Koreans to start small businesses. they're really good at dealing with niqqer criminals. saving millions of taxpayer money every time.
English
0
0
0
132
Mario Nawfal
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal·
Armed robbery is a hazardous profession… wrong store, wrong day.
English
338
803
9.9K
581K
JSONmaxxing
JSONmaxxing@JSONmaxxing·
@Tablesalt13 I thought Carney is a fairly high IQ guy but I genuinely don't understand some of what he does there's no worse time in history to align with Europe over the U.S.
JSONmaxxing tweet mediaJSONmaxxing tweet media
English
0
0
0
176
Tablesalt 🇨🇦🇺🇸
‼️ALERT: Armed with a stolen majority, Carney just revealed HIS FULL PLAN for Canada "the new international order will come out of Europe" Reveals his plan to shift Canada away from the USA in all IMPORTANT sectors: Banking, minerals, energy, space... and towards Europe!
English
603
827
1.9K
103.9K
JSONmaxxing
JSONmaxxing@JSONmaxxing·
@Byrnzie800 @mirann_darrow I'd unalive myself before citing pamphlets typed in poorly formatted word-to-pdf documents as my academic source
English
0
0
0
4
JSONmaxxing
JSONmaxxing@JSONmaxxing·
@mirann_darrow note that there were only two nations with widespread communes in the 1960s, Israel and Maoist China. Israel was more economically left-wing than the Soviet Union (during or after Stalin).
English
0
0
0
25
JSONmaxxing
JSONmaxxing@JSONmaxxing·
@JoosyJew clearest proof that this is a lie is that he'd have brought it up 200 times before today if it was actually real
English
0
0
6
1.1K
Joo
Joo@JoosyJew·
Why did Jews need sheltering in Kuwait?
Joo tweet media
English
29
57
2.8K
60.7K
Daniela Conte
Daniela Conte@danielaconte·
I would have expected a crab museum to be the one place I was safe from being lectured to about British colonialism.
Daniela Conte tweet media
English
400
361
4.3K
184.9K
JSONmaxxing
JSONmaxxing@JSONmaxxing·
@RichardHanania if it's so easy I genuinely don't understand why most Latin American or African autocrats don't do it there's a theory that UN/western NGOs have forced some countries to be more lenient on crime than they want to be, but I doubt the caudillos care much about what they think
English
1
0
1
201
Richard Hanania
Richard Hanania@RichardHanania·
No matter the poll, Bukele's approval rating is nearly always over 90%. In the last three polls, it's 93%, 93%, and 94%. I've never seen anything like this. We need to study this regime. The international community has massively underestimated the importance of public order.
Richard Hanania tweet media
English
111
148
1.6K
49.5K
JSONmaxxing
JSONmaxxing@JSONmaxxing·
@BusDownBonnor so they hired a female philosopher to do AI ethics and now it gets moody and stops talking to you ok
English
0
0
50
2K
Connor
Connor@BusDownBonnor·
Claude literally just ended the conversation on me???? This might be AGI
Connor tweet media
San Francisco, CA 🇺🇸 English
636
85
4.3K
1M
JSONmaxxing
JSONmaxxing@JSONmaxxing·
@david_stewart as a Chinese this would have been very easy. but I guess this is why Chinese game shows ask obscure questions about American football instead.
English
0
0
0
16.9K
JSONmaxxing
JSONmaxxing@JSONmaxxing·
@DastDn you're not even talking about the same dynasty. but good job remembering a few phrases from AP world history?
English
0
0
0
85
LoLNothingMatters
China scuttled its navy because they were afraid of outside ideas destabilizing their idea of a harmonious society. The isolationist policy that followed would lead China to cataclysmically fall behind the West and end up a helpless victim during the Century of Humiliation.
🤝@xPeaceLandBread

Whitepilling when you learn the Chinese built the biggest ships to ever exist then just scuttled them instead of trying to conquer the planet. Evil is not an inevitable byproduct of power.

English
16
40
374
14.4K
JSONmaxxing
JSONmaxxing@JSONmaxxing·
notice the models depicted the larger ship as being approx. 120-130 meters, echoing the 450 ft (44 zhang) figure from Chinese fiction, which is now commonly taught in Chinese textbooks. Inferring from an excavated Song-era Quanzhou trading junk which was measured at 113.5 ft and had a recorded capacity of 1000 liao (a unit of cargo volume): a ~450 ft ship with similar dimensions would imply a cargo capacity of ~60000 liao, approximately 12 times the recorded capacity of the largest baochuan (5000 liao). Noah might have phrased it badly but he is correct to call out these absurd models.
JSONmaxxing tweet mediaJSONmaxxing tweet media
English
0
0
0
19
JSONmaxxing
JSONmaxxing@JSONmaxxing·
@cwjones89 it can both be true that they're a fair bit larger than a carrack, and that the frequently-cited figure (450 ft), which is also what is depicted in the photo, is a fictional number invented in the 16th century, something that Sally Church has also written on
JSONmaxxing tweet media
English
1
0
0
40
JSONmaxxing
JSONmaxxing@JSONmaxxing·
sigh. if you had just paid a little attention you'd notice the model grossly over-estimates the size of both ships, which is actually what tends to happen outside of historical circles. eyeballing from two different angles, the models are approximately 30 meters (~100 ft) and 120 meters (~400 ft). which both imply a displacement that's about 8 times as large as their actual size. let me go back a little bit and review what happened here. we have Noah and a few other posters trying to correct a common Chinese historical myth, one which is receiving tens of thousands of likes at the moment and thus misleading potentially millions of people. you, random China-loving gwailo, barge in and say "no one's claiming that". when in fact it would have taken you 5 seconds to ascertain that the 400 ft estimate is exactly what the model is portraying, what its comment section is claiming, and also apparently what Kaiser Kuo believes. this is why it's particularly frustrating to deal with people like you. you have such a tribalistic instinct to defend China as some gwailo with a meagre dose of Chinese knowledge that you are willing to strawman every reasonable criticism of China while steelmanning even the dumbest myths from the "Chinese" side. you think this is somehow supposed to make you a friend of China. you don't really seem concerned that you are, in fact, reinforcing far-right mythologies about the Ming dynasty and that at this very moment, "Ming nationalists" on the Chinese internet are calling for massacres of Manchu and Hui people, and that is why some of us are really insistent on debunking pro-Ming mythologies. you don't really know half as much as you think you do. it might be better to listen to people who do.
JSONmaxxing tweet mediaJSONmaxxing tweet media
English
0
0
1
23
changethis
changethis@xcanceluser·
Except that Columbus did not use galleons, but instead the much smaller carrack and caravels in his fleet. The carrack/caravels measured 50-60 ft, whereas a Ming treasure ship measured 166 ft, so the model does look to be accurate. Columbus's ships would have looked puny next to a Spanish galleon or Venetian galleass.
English
2
0
0
109
JSONmaxxing
JSONmaxxing@JSONmaxxing·
okay I'm chinese so I don't really care about your korean-japanese squabbles but I'll say that, having examined a lot of the biographies of foreign students in the U.S. in this era, it was not uncommon to finish a PhD 3-4 years after a bachelor's degree. the standardization of PhDs to 6+ years happened after the mid-20th century.
English
1
0
0
61
茄子nasubi 🇯🇵
茄子nasubi 🇯🇵@nasubin99·
渡米後たった6年で博士号を取得。 しかも基礎学習から始めて修士課程すらまともに修了していない時点で、これは学問的成果ではなく政治的演出学位であることは明白です。 キリスト教会ネットワークとプリンストン大学が便宜的に与えた『なんちゃって学位』でしょう。 得た情報は丸ごと信奉するのではなく、少し頭を働かせて脳内精査した方が良いと思います。 まぁ、それを条件に米国の傀儡役を引き受けたのでしょうけど。 で、朝鮮戦争時の敵前逃亡と何か関係あるんですかね。 ほんとに彼は、韓国人らしいご立派な人ですね。
日本語
7
1
3
1.8K
ViiV
ViiV@ViiV_333·
일부 보수우파들과 참정당의 일본 넷우익에 따르면 아름답고 좋았던 일제시대 때 이승만은 왜 독립을 외쳤을까? 그 수많은 사람들이 할일이 없어서 해방 됐을 때 길거리로 뛰쳐나와 만세를 불렀나? 그들의 역사관대로라면 일제시대를 지금까지 유지하지 않은 이승만을 쓰레기 아닌가? 그런데 니들 보수 우파라며. 말이 되는 소리를 좀 하자. 과거 일본으로 현재의 일본인들을 질타하지 말자고 하는 것과, 반일을 정치적으로 그만 이용하자는 것이 보수의 입장이지, 행복했던 일제시대로 꼭 돌아가고 싶다고 하는게 보수의 입장임? 적당히들 하자 정말. '실제 육성 연설' #이승만 대통령 서거 60주년 youtube.com/shorts/ARxKjhQ… via @YouTube
YouTube video
YouTube
한국어
9
31
92
18.1K
JSONmaxxing
JSONmaxxing@JSONmaxxing·
@FeiyanXie the worst tetris-playing of all time and it's a chinese propaganda account. they're really not sending their best.
English
0
0
0
11
Feiyan Xie
Feiyan Xie@FeiyanXie·
遇事不要慌张,没困难也要制造困难😎
中文
2.1K
2.7K
39.3K
21.9M
JSONmaxxing
JSONmaxxing@JSONmaxxing·
@Noahpinion idk about you but i've blocked Kaiser Kuo long ago and I'm a fairly pro-China guy. the guy is one of the most pathetic shills I've ever known. absolutely shameless.
English
1
0
4
1.6K
JSONmaxxing
JSONmaxxing@JSONmaxxing·
@xcanceluser @Noahpinion the model portrayed in the photo that Noah was responding to is clearly meant to be ~450 ft (more than 4x as long as a galleon), which is also the figure that is still taught in every Chinese textbook, and which is a completely fictional number "no one" x.com/JSONmaxxing/st…
JSONmaxxing@JSONmaxxing

1. the original, authentic version of 瀛涯勝覽 does not mention the dimensions of the ship. The copy which added the "450 ft" (44 zhang) description was the 澹生堂刻本, which was produced in the 1580s-1620s. Whether it is earlier than the novel is debatable, but in either case, it is clear that the "450 ft" characterization is a late-16th century invention, created nearly 200 years after the original voyage. There is no intermediate work that supports this description. 2. The 5000 liao record is consistent with the Western 200 ft (61 m) estimate, not the 450 ft (137 m) claim which is the fantasy that is often taught in Chinese textbooks This is very simple math. "liao" is a unit of volume describing the cargo volume. The cargo volume is proportional to the displacement of the ship. Thus, just like the displacement, a ship's liao is proportional to the *cube* of the length of a ship Let x be the liao capacity of the ship Let y be the length in meters x = k(y^3) where k is a constant We know that a Song-era Quanzhou trading ship excavated was measured at 34.6 meters and recorded at 1000 liao Hence we can arrive at an estimate of k: 1000 = k(34.6^3) k ≈ 0.024 If a treasure ship is 450 ft (137 m), x ≈ 0.024(137^3) ≈ 61712 liao If a treasure ship is 200 ft (61 m) x ≈ 0.024(61^3) ≈ 5448 liao Hence, the "5000 liao" description actually implies a ship slightly smaller than the Western historical consensus, a "200 ft" ship. Meanwhile, the "450 ft" ship would imply a cargo volume that is more than 12 times larger than the recorded "5000 liao".

English
1
0
4
184
changethis
changethis@xcanceluser·
No one's making the claim they were unfathomably large though, you imagined that argument. You have to realize the ships Columbus used were rather small (largest being a carrack at ~58 ft) compared to a standard galleon. So a Ming treasure ship would have looked massive compared to that (~166 ft), but just somewhat large compared to a standard Spanish galleon (150 ft).
English
2
0
8
2K
JSONmaxxing
JSONmaxxing@JSONmaxxing·
@wil_da_beast630 @Keanubtc @elonmusk if you haven't yet, you should read Paul Johnson's Modern Times (1983) it contains scathing appraisals of the careers of FDR, JFK and the "Bandung generation" (Nehru/Sukarno/Nasser etc.) and then his volume on Intellectuals (1988)
English
0
0
0
33
JSONmaxxing
JSONmaxxing@JSONmaxxing·
@PAHoyeck for the Germans it's mostly due to the difficulties of translating German academic prose. Derrida and Lacan were genuinely terrible writers even in French though.
English
0
0
0
9
Phil Hoyeck
Phil Hoyeck@PAHoyeck·
Philosophers whose English writing skills are absolutely appalling: • Immanuel Kant • G.W.F Hegel • Martin Heidegger • Jacques Derrida • Jacques Lacan Am I missing any?
English
158
39
954
387.8K
JSONmaxxing
JSONmaxxing@JSONmaxxing·
@wil_da_beast630 @Keanubtc @elonmusk this actually seems like a good time to start the project, the MLK files will be released in early 2027 and you can be one of the first to publish a balanced assessment of his life
English
1
0
3
199
Wilfred Reilly
Wilfred Reilly@wil_da_beast630·
@Keanubtc @elonmusk I actually want to do a book about "modern saints," at some point. Were Mandela, JFK and MLK, Gandhi, Harvey Milk, Caesar Chavez, etc etc better men than the Founding Fathers we so often hear derided?
English
38
3
88
8.1K