JY

93 posts

JY banner
JY

JY

@JYonchain

Developer worked on blockchain before | Database optimizer engineer

대한민국 서울 Katılım Temmuz 2021
220 Takip Edilen38 Takipçiler
JY
JY@JYonchain·
@sandeepnailwal @levie Why do you keep shitting about ai? Nobody trusts you on that and everybody knows you are incompetent loser now. Do your job. First you need to know what your job is. Watch $POL. Pathetic indians...
English
0
0
2
16
Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※)
*AI is not going to take away jobs* Great insights by @levie! Specially the one below. Been saying this based on my experience too. * Most companies are *not* talking about replacing jobs due to agents. The major use-cases for agents are things that the company wasn’t able to do before or couldn’t prioritize. Software upgrades, automating back office processes that were constraining other workflows, processing large amounts of documents to get new business or client insights, and so on. More emphasis on ways to make money vs. cut costs.
Aaron Levie@levie

Another week on the road meeting with a couple dozen IT and AI leaders from large enterprises across banking, media, retail, healthcare, consulting, tech, and sports, to discuss agents in the enterprise. Some quick takeaways: * Clear that we’re moving from chat era of AI to agents that use tools, process data, and start to execute real work in the enterprise. Complementing this, enterprises are often evolving from “let a thousand flowers bloom” approach to adoption to targeted automation efforts applied to specific areas of work and workflow. * Change management still will remain one of the biggest topics for enterprises. Most workflows aren’t setup to just drop agents directly in, and enterprises will need a ton of help to drive these efforts (both internally and from partners). One company has a head of AI in every business unit that roles up to a central team, just to keep all the functions coordinated. * Tokenmaxxing! Most companies operate with very strict OpEx budgets get locked in for the year ahead, so they’re going through very real trade-off discussions right now on how to budget for tokens. One company recently had an idea for a “shark tank” style way of pitching for compute budget. Others are trying to figure out how to ration compute to the best use-cases internally through some hierarchy of needs (my words not theirs). * Fixing fragmented and legacy systems remain a huge priority right now. Most enterprises are dealing with decades of either on-prem systems or systems they moved to the cloud but that still haven’t been modernized in any meaningful way. This means agents can’t easily tap into these data sources in a unified way yet, so companies are focused on how they modernize these. * Most companies are *not* talking about replacing jobs due to agents. The major use-cases for agents are things that the company wasn’t able to do before or couldn’t prioritize. Software upgrades, automating back office processes that were constraining other workflows, processing large amounts of documents to get new business or client insights, and so on. More emphasis on ways to make money vs. cut costs. * Headless software dominated my conversations. Enterprises need to be able to ensure all of their software works across any set of agents they choose. They will kick out vendors that don’t make this technically or economically easy. * Clear sense that it can be hard to standardize on anything right now given how fast things are moving. Blessing and a curse of the innovation curve right now - no one wants to get stuck in a paradigm that locks them into the wrong architecture. One other result of this is that companies realize they’re in a multi-agent world, which means that interoperability becomes paramount across systems. * Unanimous sense that everyone is working more than ever before. AI is not causing anyone to do less work right now, and similar to Silicon Valley people feel their teams are the busiest they’ve ever been. One final meta observation not called out explicitly. It seems that despite Silicon Valley’s sense that AI has made hard things easy, the most powerful ways to use agents is more “technical” than prior eras of software. Skills, MCP, CLIs, etc. may be simple concepts for tech, but in the real world these are all esoteric concepts that will require technical people to help bring to life in the enterprise. This both means diffusion will take real work and time, but also everyone’s estimation of engineering jobs is totally off. Engineers may not be “writing” software, but they will certainly be the ones to setup and operate the systems that actually automate most work in the enterprise.

English
19
4
70
6.3K
Polygon | POL
Polygon | POL@0xPolygon·
A quick list of what you missed on Polygon last week: ■ @fraxfinance launches onchain FX markets on Polygon with @CurveFinance + @DFB_DeFi@TokenPocket_TP extends zero-gas transfers to USDT + DAI on Polygon ■ @orbitals_gg lanches international stablecoin dex pools ■ @Hadronfc and @Ignyte_AE kick off $100k for builders ■ @bpconsortium publishes a draft definition for onchain payments ■ @Polymarket announces pUSD on Polygon ■ Giugliano Upgrade goes live on mainnet bringing faster finality and higher P2P throughput under load ■ P2P stablecoin volume hits $7.52B in March
Polygon | POL tweet media
English
26
30
229
12.4K
JY
JY@JYonchain·
@0xPolygon Another dumping soon. Never ever believe them and never buy $POL.
English
0
0
1
104
Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※)
Out of like 300 working days in a year as an entrepreneur you get maybe 30 good ones and 5-6 really good ones. The ratio doesnt change as you grow, the goals just scale. But man those 5-6 days where it all lines up and the thing you've been grinding on actually works, thats enough to carry the other 300+ and thats the whole game really.
English
55
20
233
10.8K
JY
JY@JYonchain·
@sandeepnailwal @vadim_web3 @0xPolygon Crypto is not that dead. See bitcoin and ethereum. Polygon is absolutely dead compared to them. You know why? You ignored the market continuously and you are again doing it. Still not changed. Crypto will survive but not polygon. Not in this way. Snap out of it, please.
English
0
0
7
203
Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※)
Every cycle i hear "crypto is dead" and every cycle the teams that ignored the noise and kept building ended up spawning the best products. We're building the future of onchain payments at @0xPolygon right now and barely anyone is talking about it because sentiment is so low. We've been here before.
English
60
27
340
13.5K
Alex
Alex@obchakevich_·
63% of all x402 Facilitators activity occurs on @0xPolygon Polygon has been the undisputed leader since early March 2025. data: @hashed_official
Alex tweet media
English
10
4
62
4.9K
JY
JY@JYonchain·
@sandeepnailwal @0xPolygon You have the wrong priority and still not realizing it for years. He has zero talent for running a company. Please step down. $POL shows you lost every trust from all.
English
0
0
5
198
JY
JY@JYonchain·
@sandeepnailwal @ilblackdragon Why $POL is going down while all others are going up about 3~5%? Your team is dumping it again at this time?
English
3
0
3
194
JY
JY@JYonchain·
@sandeepnailwal I truly wonder why Polygon has no ETF at all? Is the team actually doing something for getting listed? Am I the only one who's curious?
English
0
0
1
78
JY
JY@JYonchain·
@0xPolygon No chain can do this. $2.8 to $0.1
English
0
0
1
34
Polygon | POL
Polygon | POL@0xPolygon·
can YOUR sidechain do this?
Dune | We Are Hiring!@Dune

1/ @0xPolygon is the #1 L2 for stablecoin unique holders, and has been all year. 17.4M holders as of Feb 2026, up 64% from 10.6M a year ago. As L2 adoption accelerates across the board, Polygon continues to lead on user reach.

English
26
17
136
9.5K
Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※)
You need to understand something. AI agents are going to need real financial rails, i.e. real wallets, real identity, real payments. The team just shipped exactly that. One CLI, everything an agent needs to go onchain on Polygon. We literally just gave agents their own Open Money Stack 🤣
Polygon | POL@0xPolygon

Everything an agent needs to transact onchain, in one toolkit. Wallets, payments, swaps, bridging, onchain identity, and x402. Just install + ship.

English
102
58
411
25.2K
JY
JY@JYonchain·
@sandeepnailwal What a pity.. It seems nobody cares anymore
English
0
0
2
43
JY
JY@JYonchain·
@sandeepnailwal $POL is dumped again alone while other coin are going up a lot.
English
1
0
8
473
JY
JY@JYonchain·
@sandeepnailwal The most impcompetent, self-righteous scammer of a founder I’ve ever met. That' you. Agree?
English
1
0
3
129
JY
JY@JYonchain·
@sandeepnailwal I just hope you have the decency to feel ashamed.
English
0
0
0
24
JY
JY@JYonchain·
@GregIsRekt 1. I wonder if they have some plans to gather liquidity such as ETF and DFA. Polygon seems to be quite behind compared to other tokens. 2. Any plan to touch US market? Polygon seems to be ignored and not spot lighted in US market.
English
0
0
0
47
JY
JY@JYonchain·
@hanni_abu Polygon didn't say about why Polygon is not L2. They said why Polygon is not considered as Eth ecosystem while the Polymarket is always considered as one of them. You know Polymarket run on Polygon PoS, not on Ethereum. You got totally wrong. This was the point. L2? No.. too slow
English
0
0
4
356
hanniabu.eth (Ξ, α)
hanniabu.eth (Ξ, α)@hanni_abu·
Vitalik: Here's the benefits of being an L2 Polygon: So you know how in 2021/2022 we said Polygon PoS would be converted to an L2? Yeah....we never did that and refuse to Also Polygon: I don't get it, why doesn't anybody call Polygon PoS an L2? Please Mr. Vitalik give us praise!
vitalik.eth@VitalikButerin

Base is doing things the right way: an L2 on top of Ethereum, that uses its centralized features to provide stronger UX features, while still being tied into Ethereum's decentralized base layer for security. Base does not have custody over your funds, they cannot steal funds or stop you from withdrawing funds (this is part of the L2beat stage 1 definition). You can see Base's status as an L2 on l2beat: l2beat.com/scaling/projec… I feel like many people have been confused by recent cynicism and think that things like L2beat are a weird sort of nerd-sharia compliance authority. This is NOT what is going on. The security that L2s provide, that L2beat measures, reflects concrete properties that protect you as a user from being rugged. Here is an explanation of how, if an L2 shuts down, users are automatically able to withdraw funds even without that L2's involvement: x.com/l2beat/status/… Here is an example of how L2s prevent the operator from censoring transactions, that happened on Soneium earlier this year: x.com/gauthamzzz/sta… This is what we mean when we say that L2s are non-custodial, they are extensions of ethereum, not glorified servers that happen to submit hashes. There are concrete pathways implemented in smart contract logic on Ethereum L1, that have been successfully used in the wild, that ensure that the L2 users' funds are ultimately controlled by L1, they cannot be stolen or blocked by the L2 operator.

English
19
16
285
50.1K
JY
JY@JYonchain·
@venturefounder @sandeepnailwal It's sad to say that the leader doesn't seem to put $POL holder's profit at his top priority. There seems to be a lot before that. And the market might be feeling the same thing.
English
1
0
9
439
venturefounder
venturefounder@venturefounder·
Sandeep is a great leader and I very much still believe in him. But one can still have blind spots when he’s stuck inside the fortress. That’s why I’m providing a clear outsider stakeholder perspective on polygon strategies and initiatives. @sandeepnailwal I’m willing to work on your strategy team for free. If you let me I can help you execute these strategies.
venturefounder@venturefounder

@JamesHamps36963 @sandeepnailwal Market is rational here. That’s my whole point. Market is valuing $POL very fairly. That’s why I’m urging @sandeepnailwal for changes. Tokenomics, partnership, doubling down on prediction market and stay close with Polymarket, align marketing efforts to where it matters.

English
5
3
44
7.3K