jadklein

@seanmdav @bowtiedreact He is right, and if you don't believe him go back and listen to the most politicized argument in the history of the court NFIB v. OSHA from just 4 short years ago apps.oyez.org/player/#/rober…

As many are beginning to understand after listening to oral arguments today, the Supreme Court does not exclusively weigh the law, the facts, the text, and the history to come to its conclusions. Sometimes it does that. But in the most political and contentious cases, that is most definitely not what happens. We do not actually have a supreme court, we have a lifelong legislature of lawyers who prefer the robe to the campaign trial. One-third of the court makes decisions based entirely on what is best for the Democrat party and never wavers from that mission. Only two of the nine justices seem to have any consistent interest in determining a given law’s text and original meaning. Of the remaining four, the chief justice thinks he’s a thermometer whose job is take to the temperature of the country and then make decisions based on whether they’ll make people like him. The former professor seems to think she’s still writing academic papers. The former Western judge is occasionally reliable when he’s not claiming boys can become girls or fan-girling over Indian treaties. The final justice seems to be saddled with the horrifying task of corralling the two rudderless and emotional basket cases into something resembling coherence. And if that weren’t horrifying enough, let me comfort you with the observation that this collection of Democrat party operatives, weepy thermometers, wannabe legislators, and only sometimes actual lawyers is actually the least dysfunctional of the three federal branches of government. Happy Wednesday!

@the78070 @Bitcoin_Teddy

@Bitcoin_Teddy I know it’s not your point. Which was a good one The pyramids are much older than the established narrative suggests

If you made $500,000 per day, every single day since the Great Pyramids were built, you would have less than half of what the US govt has borrowed since June.

@BumpstockBarbie @BillboardChris Humans have 2 legs. Butterflies have 0 legs. I once knew a baby that was born with 1 leg. Ipso facto this baby was half human half butterfly

XO = Turner Syndrome = female XXX = Trisomy X = female XXY = Klinefelter Syndrome = male XYY = Jacobs Syndrome = male DSDs are not a third sex, and they’re not some weird “in between.” True hermaphroditism doesn’t exist in human beings. No one is truly both, because no one can produce both large and small gametes. DSD/intersex conditions are *male or female specific disorders.* These are a bunch of congenital conditions that affect the reproductive system. These conditions, again, are male and female specific.

@Hoosier1Pitt @MTillbilly The coach on here I am most surprised to see is Bielema, not because 53 is a lot to lose by, but only bc Bret is just such a godawful coach I figured he would have laid a bigger egg before that

In two years at Indiana under Curt Cignetti, the Hoosiers have faced 23 different coaches. 12 of those coaches received their largest loss in their entire tenure with the school at the hands of Cignetti. That’s more than half! Amazing. #Iufb

You missed the point. For many people the failures in the covid response is an indictment on big government in general, not just public health institutions. Many people realized for the first time in their lives that the federal or state government does not have your best interests in mind, and they are unable to help you even if they did.

A question for everyone: survey data suggests that by the end of the Covid-19 emergency trust in public health institutions had decreased significantly. If you are among the people who reacted that way, why specifically? I'm hoping for long, diverse, individualized answers.

@alexelliottgolf No but it does qualify as a hole over one

This has to count surely?🤯

@B1Gfootball @IndianaFootball We don't retire numbers but let's simply commit to always have a #15 at QB. No pressure Tyler.

First look at QB Josh Hoover in a @IndianaFootball jersey 👀

@B1Gfootball @IndianaFootball Tyler Morris looks BIG!

@CFBGuy999 @B1Gfootball @IndianaFootball Notre Dame's worst nightmare

@B1Gfootball @IndianaFootball Josh Hoover’s worst nightmare ⬇️

@KGSGolf Apparently I have been practicing wrong for 40 years.

Now well into his autumn years Phil has retained the beautiful tempo that he’s enjoyed all his golfing life. A fabulous example that can be copied by anyone regardless of age or ability..

@Tarquin_TMP @xxChessMaster Whites best move is lateral King

@xxChessMaster white loses at least 2 knights on the first 2 moves.

Who wins this game? White or Black? 🤔

@voltronsworld @xxChessMaster Only if you can't move the king on first move

@xxChessMaster White goes down piece on move 1. Then its just trade down, potentially to a 2 bishops vs 1 knight. As long you can maintain opposite colored bishops black should win, whites only hope is 50 move draw if white does not play perfect.

I could write an equally impressive things that he does "right" in this swing, at least according to modern instruction. Look at that head position and stability, his inside tight Hoganesque trail elbow, and watch how this back knee rotates all the way over to his left foot at impact.

What’s happened over time is this: modern instruction has become very position-based, while the greats—like Jack Nicklaus—were built on motion, sequence, and intent. So when teachers look at Nicklaus today, they often see: •Inside takeaway → “too far inside” •Across the line → “out of position” •Over-the-top move → “wrong path” •Early extension → “loss of posture” But that’s judging a living motion by frozen positions. The fundamentals that power his swing are no longer understood. Nicklaus wasn’t built on perfect positions—he was built on sequence, timing, and motion. A powerful shift before the top. A natural re-route of the club as he turned the corner. A vertical release that kept the face stable under pressure. It wasn’t textbook. It was effective. The great players didn’t all look the same—but they were built on the same timeless principles. Those principles haven’t changed… they’ve just been forgotten. I’ll be breaking this down step by step in my free webinar on the Classic Golf Swing, March 30th at 8pm and March 31st at 6pm. There’s a link to register in the first comment!

@golfnokiwami Cocking it at set up, then unlocking near the top and recocking and letting it fly at the end

グリップ軌道 Pay attention to grip trajectory

@elijah_sarratt @TheIndianaBison From an unknown to a NFL superstar. Keep working like you have and the league is all yours

🙏🏽

@TPCarney Green wins hockey. Western Blue wins everything else

This is the U.S. divided into 8 slices of equal population. Field an all-star team of residents (not counting college or professional athletes) from each of these regions. This would mostly be premier HS athletes. Then put them in a bracket. Who would win 1) Baseball 2) Basketball 3) Football 4) Hockey

@hgtq4qyrkv @VinnysCorner1 Holy crap they had cameras back then?

@VinnysCorner1 Juan Marichal

Age yourself by naming a MLB pitcher you grew up watching. I’ll start: Roger Clemens

@VinnysCorner1 Mike Henneman

@BaseballCentraI I was in the 8th row behind home plate when he hit this. The most magnificent swing I've ever seen in person.

Never Forget when Ken Griffey Jr. turned on a 104 MILE PER HOUR fastball for a grand slam 😳

@HoosierHoss12 @Hoosier_Huddle

@Hoosier_Huddle Lee BeeBe Jr. dude is a dawg

Can’t say Charlie Becker. Which RETURNING offensive player are you most exciting to watch this year?