Jan Woldstad

3.5K posts

Jan Woldstad banner
Jan Woldstad

Jan Woldstad

@JanWoldstad

A little bit of this and a little bit of that. System builders eat last, but they eat forever.

Katılım Ağustos 2013
697 Takip Edilen378 Takipçiler
Jan Woldstad
Jan Woldstad@JanWoldstad·
@VictoriaZeev @TAmTrib @elonmusk You do not decide the venue, the opponent does that. Thus you can be assured that the venue will become violence as that is the common identifier.
English
0
0
7
363
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
AI5 will punch far above its weight, because the entire Tesla AI software stack is designed to make maximally effective use of every circuit. We co-signed our AI software and hardware. Bear in mind that AI5, while it can be used for training in data centers, is primarily optimized for AI edge compute in Optimus and Robotaxi. There is still significant room for improvement. In the same half reticle and same process node, we think a single AI6 chip has the potential to match a dual SoC AI5.
English
276
569
6.2K
391.6K
phil beisel
phil beisel@pbeisel·
Tesla’s forthcoming AI5 uses a half-reticle design, which is crucial for yield. A reticle defines the imaging area of a lithography machine, fitting two chips per shot effectively doubles yield. This means the Tesla chip design team had to carefully manage die features, for instance dropping the older ISP (and classic GPU) to make room for more AI cores. By contrast, NVIDIA’s Blackwell fills nearly a full reticle, making it a single-reticle design. If Tesla hits its compute and efficiency targets with AI5 in this half-reticle format, it’s almost like cutting fab requirements in half. And this has a big impact on Terafab, especially if it carries forward for AI6, AI7, etc.
phil beisel tweet media
phil beisel@pbeisel

Terafab may be the most essential vertical integration Tesla has ever undertaken— and it is truly non-optional. It will take years to build and will test even Elon’s speedrunning abilities to the limit, but that won’t stop him from trying. The breakthrough likely lies in overhauling the overall facility’s cleanroom model. By moving wafers in sealed pods with localized micro-environments, the fab no longer needs a monolithic ultra-clean space. Elon’s line about “eating cheeseburgers and smoking cigars” on the fab floor isn’t silly, it’s the practical reality of a radically simpler, cheaper, faster approach that could finally change the economics of chipmaking. This is all forced by the brutal “pinch” in chip supply. Tesla must produce on the order of 100–200 billion AI chips per year just to saturate its roadmap. That volume powers: FSD cars & Robotaxis (tens of millions of vehicles needing AI5 inference for near-perfect autonomy), Physical Optimus (scaling from thousands today to millions per year, each requiring AI5/AI6-level compute), Digital Optimus (the new xAI-Tesla software agents for digital/office automation, running massive inference clusters), Space-based data centers (AI7/Dojo3 orbital compute for GW-scale training and inference beyond Earth limits). AI5 delivers the ~10× leap for vehicles and early robots; AI6 shifts focus to Optimus + terrestrial DCs; AI7 goes orbital. No external foundry (TSMC, Samsung, etc.) can deliver that scale or timeline— hence the Terafab launch. Without it, the entire robotics + autonomy future hits a brick wall. Terafab isn’t optional; it’s the only way forward.

English
63
196
2.2K
356.8K
Jan Woldstad
Jan Woldstad@JanWoldstad·
@FalkTG The US has been paid in full. This sort of argument discounts the immense wealth transfer that has taken place in the same period from Europe into the US. NATO was in essence Americas useful idiots.
English
0
0
0
13
FalkTG 10k 🦅🇪🇺🇩🇪🇺🇦
An honest question: We Europeans need NATO for our defense. The Americans do not. Why should the U.S. stay inside NATO besides power projection? We should stop expecting that the U.S. has to be an „useful idiot“. They are not - they are a very important ally and we Europeans should treat them as such. And that also means, that we have to accept, that the U.S. has slightly different interests than we do. They don’t need a shy NATO. They need an active one. 🇺🇸🇪🇺
English
511
127
1.7K
63.2K
Jan Woldstad
Jan Woldstad@JanWoldstad·
So, lets just recap this. First the US plays with fire in Ukraine, and starts a hot proxy war with Russia. Then the US elects Trump, Trump refuses to actually back their own side in this proxy war that they started, and basically dumps the entire thing on Europe. Then Trump demands Greenland as a territorial concession. Then the US and Israel start a war with a Iran; They don't even bother to inform Europe about it. Since the US is self sufficient with energy, US has no need for arab oil and gas, so the price spike hits Europe, China and the rest of the world. Iranians play the strait card as they have always said they would. US forces find themselves unable to guarantee that the strait is open and ask the same people they've bullied for several years now to chip in. Yeah, so Trump is just using it as an excuse to get out of NATO.
English
0
0
3
78
Shane Connor 🇺🇲
Shane Connor 🇺🇲@ShaneConnor·
@Tendar Quite a few minesweepers. What doesn't make sense is by not helping to keep the Strait safe and open, it hurts not only other countries but themselves as well
English
113
0
54
18.2K
(((Tendar)))
(((Tendar)))@Tendar·
Number of dedicated mine hunters / minesweepers in navies belonging to NATO: Europe: +150 vessels USA: 4-8 vessels Canada: 9-12 vessels
(((Tendar))) tweet media
English
180
548
4.8K
316.6K
Jan Woldstad
Jan Woldstad@JanWoldstad·
@amasad wow congrats! that wefunder community round gave me a ticket to the show! ;)
English
0
0
0
10
Amjad Masad
Amjad Masad@amasad·
We’ve raised $400M at a $9B valuation. Investors include Georgian, G Squared, Prysm, 1789, YC, Coatue, a16z, Craft, and QIA, with strategic investments from Accenture, Databricks, Okta, and Tether. We’re also lucky to have incredible individuals backing us, including Shaq and Jared Leto. This funding will help us scale our ambition and expand beyond coding into AI systems that center human creativity. Replit is now used at 85% of the Fortune 500. We have an opportunity to help shape the future of work. One where AI abstracts away the boring parts and humans shine as creative directors. We’re also investing more globally, particularly in Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. Innovation can come from anywhere in the world, and we want to help unlock it.
English
522
719
8.3K
2.4M
Jan Woldstad retweetledi
OpenAI
OpenAI@OpenAI·
GPT-5.4 Thinking and GPT-5.4 Pro are rolling out now in ChatGPT. GPT-5.4 is also now available in the API and Codex. GPT-5.4 brings our advances in reasoning, coding, and agentic workflows into one frontier model.
OpenAI tweet media
English
1.9K
3.4K
23.6K
6.8M
Jan Woldstad
Jan Woldstad@JanWoldstad·
OpenAI nerfed codex 5.3 so bad for Plus its unusable.
English
0
0
0
26
Branko
Branko@brankopetric00·
Your Docker image is 2.3GB. You're shipping an entire operating system to run a Python script that sends emails. This is not engineering. This is hoarding with extra steps.
English
71
149
2.8K
127.9K
Jan Woldstad retweetledi
MERICA MEMED
MERICA MEMED@Mericamemed·
starting to blur the line between entertainment and declaring war on the next suburb
English
339
3.3K
37.5K
1.8M
Jan Woldstad
Jan Woldstad@JanWoldstad·
@scaling01 LLMs are notorious for defaulting to very old models :=)
English
0
0
0
114
Lisan al Gaib
Lisan al Gaib@scaling01·
never seen GPT-5.3-Codex do something this stupid and stupid of me not to check it another $30 down the drain
Lisan al Gaib tweet media
Lisan al Gaib@scaling01

@GregKamradt forget everything I've said I used GPT-5.3 to vibe-code, it added the config for Gemini 3.1 Pro, but it was actually still calling Gemini 3.0 Pro rerunning it again with 3.1 now

English
21
2
244
43.9K
hinata
hinata@HinataMotivates·
Former Goldman Sachs executive: Knowledge is now worth zero with AI.
English
742
1K
5.8K
1.8M
Jan Woldstad
Jan Woldstad@JanWoldstad·
Tried to use Sonnet 4.6 it just went off doing its own thing datamining my entire repo for Anthropic. Back to Opus.
English
0
0
0
24
Jan Woldstad
Jan Woldstad@JanWoldstad·
@shiri_shh not really true though. X/twitter was already built, users already there when Elon bought it. Yeah I know rewrite etc, but it was already there.
English
0
0
0
102