Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Jasper Wiese
4.3K posts


@henkkakoskinen @sierras_account Sweden let the Nazis run train on them. Literally.
English

@sierras_account Sweden didn't either. It was a massive advantage compared to the neighbouring countries that their infrastructure was intact during and after the war. A lot of history spared too.
English

@lastchalice @SynthPotato QoL feature. Let people read at their own pace.
English

@SynthPotato I think this is good to bring up.
Though I think many were just exercising their frustration at the fact this post makes it seem like an awesome feature, when what you’re skipping is exactly what so many of us are playing for.
English

Everyone angry at this but Cyberpunk 2077 lets you do this exact thing
Quite literally an identical feature, even has an option for a continuous fast forward in the settings
This literally does not matter.
Jake Lucky@JakeSucky
One of the features I really liked in Crimson Desert is you can fast forward through dialogue while still being able to understand the context, it's not a jump skip, but a time save
English
Jasper Wiese retweetledi

@baundiesel They were a Rockstar dev, they are unemployed now.
English

I don't think gamers really understand how bad of a state the video game industry is in right now.
The Rockstar developer I am interviewing next week has been unemployed for a year, he can't find work and this is someone who worked on L.A. Noire, RDR1, GTA V and RDR2!!
Even with an impressive resume he can't even get interviews, I wasn't exaggerating when I said we are in the midst of an extinction level event of talent in the game industry.

English

@Bri_squared623 Thanks XD It’s a dirty job, but someone’s gotta do it
I’m not a fan of FF16 either - but at least it didn’t ruin FF7
That alone makes it 10x better to me 💀
English

Lmao I LOVE FF7 Rebirth (with its flaws) but watching @Sebbywebz shit on it every chance he gets is HILARIOUS. He hates that game just as much as I hate FF16 and I HAVE to respect it… 🫡
English

@PeterP_1985 @nib95_ Ranges from very good looking to downright bad. Incredible inconsistency
English

I have quite a lot of thoughts on this game, that I'll go into more extensively when I have finished it. I did post this recently (the og is one of my fave games of all time).
From a technical pov, I actually find it to quite inconsistent. Some aspects, particularly cutscenes, are fantastic. But then, I'll often see really poor character models, or extremely low res textures, right next to decent ones, and it can be kind of jarring imo.
The lighting outside of cutscenes is also questionable.
Overall, its definitely a good looking game, i just wish it had a more consistent visual finish to it.
I would post some shots but I'm not at home right now and apparently the ps app only goes back 14 days for capture!
x.com/i/status/20061…
English

Square Enix cooked with the Final Fantasy VII remakes, even if they are more like reimaginings.
Here's the original vs Rebirth. 27 years between them! #FinalFantasy #FinalFantasyVII #FF7 #PS5
English

Please don’t take this as confirmed team news
We’re just sharing info from sources at the same hotel as @LFC
Florian Wirtz, Alexander Isak, and Hugo Ekitike all sitting together at the breakfast table with Arne Slot
Just the four of them.
English

@ArtGridGoal @ianyoungkop Talking like Gakpo isn’t being shat on and viewed like trash by 100% of the same blue check twitterati.
English

You don't have to agree with Jamie Carragher's opinions but as someone who grew up with him, the constant revisionism around his playing career infuriates me. Only one man has played more games for the club and he won nine major honours. Rightly considered a club legend.
yoan@_yxan14
Let’s be real here if Steven Gerrard hadn’t done a madness in Istanbul Jamie Carragher wouldn’t even be a Liverpool legend
English

@ExVGSvea Jeg dras mot Zlatan. Ja, det var en vennskapskamp mot England. Men det var åpningen av Friends Arena. Krone en syk kamp med en absurd brasse-aktig goal. Komme på noe sånt. Ha kraften og akrobatikken til å gjennomføre det. 4 scoringer. Av de beste landskampene noen har spilt vettu
Norsk


@KRLunde Det kommer han til å gjøre. I mine øyne er han Nordens beste fotballspiller gjennom tidene. Zlatan har selvsagt en bedre karriere, men Haaland er en bedre spiller enn Zlatan noen gang var.
Norsk

Square Enix announces more layoffs as part of US and Europe restructuring - “Nearly all areas” of Square Enix’s Western business affected by latest cuts, it tells staff
videogameschronicle.com/news/square-en…

English

I would like to clarify a few things.
First, the obvious one: we do not have or want government guarantees for OpenAI datacenters. We believe that governments should not pick winners or losers, and that taxpayers should not bail out companies that make bad business decisions or otherwise lose in the market. If one company fails, other companies will do good work.
What we do think might make sense is governments building (and owning) their own AI infrastructure, but then the upside of that should flow to the government as well. We can imagine a world where governments decide to offtake a lot of computing power and get to decide how to use it, and it may make sense to provide lower cost of capital to do so. Building a strategic national reserve of computing power makes a lot of sense. But this should be for the government’s benefit, not the benefit of private companies.
The one area where we have discussed loan guarantees is as part of supporting the buildout of semiconductor fabs in the US, where we and other companies have responded to the government’s call and where we would be happy to help (though we did not formally apply). The basic idea there has been ensuring that the sourcing of the chip supply chain is as American as possible in order to bring jobs and industrialization back to the US, and to enhance the strategic position of the US with an independent supply chain, for the benefit of all American companies. This is of course different from governments guaranteeing private-benefit datacenter buildouts.
There are at least 3 “questions behind the question” here that are understandably causing concern.
First, “How is OpenAI going to pay for all this infrastructure it is signing up for?” We expect to end this year above $20 billion in annualized revenue run rate and grow to hundreds of billion by 2030. We are looking at commitments of about $1.4 trillion over the next 8 years. Obviously this requires continued revenue growth, and each doubling is a lot of work! But we are feeling good about our prospects there; we are quite excited about our upcoming enterprise offering for example, and there are categories like new consumer devices and robotics that we also expect to be very significant. But there are also new categories we have a hard time putting specifics on like AI that can do scientific discovery, which we will touch on later.
We are also looking at ways to more directly sell compute capacity to other companies (and people); we are pretty sure the world is going to need a lot of “AI cloud”, and we are excited to offer this. We may also raise more equity or debt capital in the future.
But everything we currently see suggests that the world is going to need a great deal more computing power than what we are already planning for.
Second, “Is OpenAI trying to become too big to fail, and should the government pick winners and losers?” Our answer on this is an unequivocal no. If we screw up and can’t fix it, we should fail, and other companies will continue on doing good work and servicing customers. That’s how capitalism works and the ecosystem and economy would be fine. We plan to be a wildly successful company, but if we get it wrong, that’s on us.
Our CFO talked about government financing yesterday, and then later clarified her point underscoring that she could have phrased things more clearly. As mentioned above, we think that the US government should have a national strategy for its own AI infrastructure.
Tyler Cowen asked me a few weeks ago about the federal government becoming the insurer of last resort for AI, in the sense of risks (like nuclear power) not about overbuild. I said “I do think the government ends up as the insurer of last resort, but I think I mean that in a different way than you mean that, and I don’t expect them to actually be writing the policies in the way that maybe they do for nuclear”. Again, this was in a totally different context than datacenter buildout, and not about bailing out a company. What we were talking about is something going catastrophically wrong—say, a rogue actor using an AI to coordinate a large-scale cyberattack that disrupts critical infrastructure—and how intentional misuse of AI could cause harm at a scale that only the government could deal with. I do not think the government should be writing insurance policies for AI companies.
Third, “Why do you need to spend so much now, instead of growing more slowly?”. We are trying to build the infrastructure for a future economy powered by AI, and given everything we see on the horizon in our research program, this is the time to invest to be really scaling up our technology. Massive infrastructure projects take quite awhile to build, so we have to start now.
Based on the trends we are seeing of how people are using AI and how much of it they would like to use, we believe the risk to OpenAI of not having enough computing power is more significant and more likely than the risk of having too much. Even today, we and others have to rate limit our products and not offer new features and models because we face such a severe compute constraint.
In a world where AI can make important scientific breakthroughs but at the cost of tremendous amounts of computing power, we want to be ready to meet that moment. And we no longer think it’s in the distant future. Our mission requires us to do what we can to not wait many more years to apply AI to hard problems, like contributing to curing deadly diseases, and to bring the benefits of AGI to people as soon as possible.
Also, we want a world of abundant and cheap AI. We expect massive demand for this technology, and for it to improve people’s lives in many ways.
It is a great privilege to get to be in the arena, and to have the conviction to take a run at building infrastructure at such scale for something so important. This is the bet we are making, and given our vantage point, we feel good about it. But we of course could be wrong, and the market—not the government—will deal with it if we are.
English

@secret__level The fact that it took a lot of effort makes it worse lol.
English

@Sulebakken Eg er glad for at du prioriterer rett, slik at du kan forsvare meg og fedrelandet når det blir krig!
Norsk















