Chris Jeffreys

@KnownHeretic Dear WOMEN, If you have a problem with women-on-women gender-intersectional political action, please address your concerns to WOMEN. Men are not responsible in any way for women's trans advocacy. Do feminism. Raise women's consciousnesses. It's not men's job. Sincerely, Men

@chanwalrus @sappholives83 How many of your male friends embrace the trans movement?

@sappholives83 I have many female friends and only one of them is supportive of it because she is a transitioner herself. It’s a crazy world and the media is causing massive damage with this utter rot.

The lie that women are especially supportive of gender ideology has done more than anything to undermine our resistance to this nonsense. It is patently obvious that the media has actively worked to present a false narrative in which women are blithely supportive of the men and boys invading our spaces. The truth is far more complicated. The media has worked very hard to make it seem as if women support this stuff, because female support is, in and of itself, seen an argument for allowing these men to violate our spaces and claim to be women. The MMS has actively worked to silence any opposing voices, while at the same time giving endless amounts of airtime to any whack job leftist woman willing to get on camera and say that TWAW. I have spoken to hundreds of women in real life about this issue, and maybe three of them have been supportive of it. I don’t deny that in blue states there is significant support for gender ideology; however, the media has worked hard to make it seem as if that support is coming almost entirely from women, when this simply isn’t the case. The vast majority of the TRAs I encounter arguing this crap online are men, and other women have told me they have the same experiences.

@RoisinMichaux But this one kind of passes.

Amnesty staff spotted on their way to their inboxes

@sappholives83 @KDansky Also, the incomparable Helen Joyce @HJoyceGender assures you it's not male TRAs kidnapping young women into the trans cult.

@sappholives83 Also, your radfem sister-in-arms Kara Dansky @kdansky would like to whisper something to you.

@MrMcDillard @Myancatt @2uHipHop @bourne_beth2345 @AAGDhillon @YoloCoACE In the meantime, Mr. Dillard, some more homework. x.com/i/status/20771…

@MrMcDillard @Myancatt @2uHipHop @bourne_beth2345 @AAGDhillon @YoloCoACE Chris, sorry to bother you. I realize we have vastly different political alignments. But would you be willing to explain how wrong Mr. McDillard is? x.com/i/status/20769…

Yesterday at the Yolo County Elections Office the manager tells me it’s okay for her employees to wear attire with the progress pride flag (which symbolizes child m*tilation and the Democratic Party) while working at the front desk. I was there to file my paperwork to run for Davis Unified school board.

@BecomingCritter It got confused with Escher.

it's not that accurate but it did nail the waterwheel

“try to create an absurd image with a figure and a landscape in the style of the original dall-e where it looked slightly unreal”

@murder_turd @bourne_beth2345 @AAGDhillon @YoloCoACE Queer social transformation isn't being gay.

@JeffreysChChCh @bourne_beth2345 @AAGDhillon @YoloCoACE Gay people exist. It’s not political.

@sappholives83 There's certainly good women doing good work on this front. Sadly, for some, the only thing they hate more than trans madness is holding other women accountable for championing trans madness.

@JeffreysChChCh They’re their own greatest champions.

Imagine a group of white people saying that they know what it’s like to “feel black,” and that because of this feeling, and their enjoyment of stereotypically “black behavior,” they are now not just black themselves, but the most marginalized and vulnerable type of black person. Imagine them insisting that they should be the main focus of all activism meant to help black people. Imagine them having taxpayer-funded operations to darken their skin and mimic stereotypically black features. Imagine them walking around in blackface, and saying it’s better than being born black. Imagine them being referred to as black in the press and supported by celebrities, with laws passed to make white people who identify as black a protected class. Imagine these people demanding membership in black organizations, and demanding they be given awards created specifically to honor black achievement. Then imagine them getting their way. Now imagine mobs of them showing up to black events that don’t include them to drown out any speakers with noise, and coming up with slurs for any black person who doesn’t accept that white people are black if they say they are. Imagine them calling for the rape, torture, and mass murder of any black person who disagrees with them. Imagine them getting black people doxxed, harassed, assaulted, fired from their jobs, and investigated by the police for saying that you have to be born black to be black. Now imagine the government supporting their demands. That’s exactly the position that women are in right now, with a few extras, like being locked in cells with dangerous men, the sexual predation of lesbians via coercion, and the increased risk of sexual assault in formerly female-only spaces. Our greatest oppressors are now claiming not only the right to oppress us in whole new ways, but the right to erase our identities as women and rewrite the meaning of womanhood in ways that not just include, but prioritize them. If you wouldn’t support this kind of behavior towards black people, you have no business supporting this kind of behavior towards women.

@BecomingCritter Unimpressive

@fishpawz @RoisinMichaux lol... x.com/i/status/19885…

@fishpawz @RoisinMichaux The trenchant passive tense: "Was misappropriated". By whom? Kim herself? Name names. x.com/i/status/20765…

The poorer you are the more sex matters

@TheAkoFiles Similarly... x.com/i/status/20691…

Why is a problem caused by violent men expected to be solved by women? If men are attacking other men, deal with the men attacking other men. Why is the answer that women must surrender their own spaces instead of men tackling male violence?

@MaineGirlDads Real men aren't afraid to mansplain. x.com/i/status/20761…

Our example as fathers shape our children & shape their world. Today’s world calls for stronger fathers. Men of integrity. Men who seek & speak truth, especially when it’s hard. Men of courage. Courage takes no skill, it’s simply a choice. Just not the easy one. Not this one.

@bjportraits Those two aren't women. They're men.

This is your brain on the cult doctrine of gender ideology. “Gender” is obscurantism. The state is harvesting reproductive sex, but you can’t see the techno castration cult through the human rights lights flashing rainbows in your eyes.

@NoSecretLessons Oh, this despite one of those GC feminists in her inner circle, Kara Dansky @kdansky, saying the quiet part out loud when she thinks only the sisters are listening.

@NoSecretLessons Must remember: The GC feminists in JK's inner circle all characterize trans as "a men's rights movement". Meaning, "a patriarchy movement". While JK herself is hardly as hardcore as some of them, she does remain sympathetic to this trope. Hence, women & gay men are deserving.

This is a fascinating exposure of the poverty of the hidden political landscape beneath team GC… JKR will fund ‘women’s organisations’ and even extends her funding to ‘gay men’s organisations’ too, despite her fund being expressly set up for women. However, she has not extended her offer of support to the safeguarding orgs, the family charities, the Christian orgs and (most certainly not) those orgs which are pro life or perceive marriage as between men and women - despite the fact that, of course, they all mean to support women too, in their own ways, whether or not one agrees with their approach. So it seems now we know who this feudal lady will save from the gulag list; those she agrees with politically. This personal partiality is why, thrilling as it seems to have a powerful champion for ‘women’s (and, as it happens, gay men’s) rights’, politics by billionaire’s whim is not as good as principled self governance and the rule of law, before which we are all equal. JKR is of course entitled to fund whoever she wishes to take private legal action, but do you see the political divide and the structural problem of seeking justice not by proper democratic process but by lawfare? Do you see the lack of principle to stand up for a true freedom of conscience for everyone, when they are ear marked for cancellation from civil society - even if you deeply disagree with them? Think about it… if she would not fund SPUC then I presume she would also not have funded Ann Widdicombe, had she been defamed and libelled on the Amnesty blacklist. Beneath all the GC feminist posturing for ‘women’, the GCs really only care about ‘socially liberal women’ amongst whom they include the gay and transvestite men who are their friends. As I said before, this is dinner party philosophy, not true moral or even classically liberal principle. If one was blessed with the great wealth JKR has been, and found one’s organisation listed in this nasty way, one should stand up for everyone who has been libelled or none, imho. Justice is not only for head girls and the rich. But the best course of action here is not to play Olympian goddess, sprinkling money magic where one likes for litigious outcomes, it would be to call for a charity law overhaul to cut out this nasty kind of politicised activism by Amnesty altogether, for the proscription of the illiberal far left and to repeal the gender laws and international rights governance through which Amnesty was trying to assert its nasty blacklist. We have to choose principle over power, and universalism over sectarianism. This is not the time to assert abortion politics, it’s the time to defend anyone and everyone from growing totalitarianism. I stand with every org on that list, regardless of their wider position, specifically against the nasty action Amnesty took towards them.

@MrMcDillard @bourne_beth2345 @AAGDhillon @YoloCoACE It's not a community. It's a contrived political coalition and voting caucus. Don't be naive.

@JeffreysChChCh @bourne_beth2345 @AAGDhillon @YoloCoACE Well let’s see, he is a gay, conservative. Does that make him, literal embodiment of how sexuality is apolitical. You can wave a flag in support of the community without ascribing to any particular set of policy or political beliefs. Because the flag is not a political platform!

@Myancatt @2uHipHop @MrMcDillard @bourne_beth2345 @AAGDhillon @YoloCoACE Remember, kids: You can be Republican and homosexual. But you can never be Republican and queer. Because queer embraces a cluster of political commitments incompatible with conservatism. And incompatible liberalism, in the classic liberalism sense.

@2uHipHop @MrMcDillard @JeffreysChChCh @bourne_beth2345 @AAGDhillon @YoloCoACE The fact that you're attempting to insult someone's intelligence while conflating personal identity with political ideology is insane. The rainbow symbolizes people celebrating their humanity, not a political platform. Not to mention that Republicans can also be homosexuals.