JimBeam Is My Friend

@BillAckman @X Fight it all the way

I am reaching out to the @X community for advice with the likely risk of sharing TMI. I have been sufficiently upset about the whole matter that I have lost sleep thinking about it and I am hoping that this post will enable me to get this matter off my chest. By way of background, I started a family office called TABLE about 15 years ago and hired a friend who had previously managed a family office, and years earlier, had been my personal accountant. She is someone that I trusted implicitly and consider to be a good person. The office started small, but over the last decade, the number of personnel and the cost of the office grew massively. The growth was entirely on the operational side as the investment team has remained tiny. While my investment portfolio grew substantially, the investments I had made were almost entirely passive and TABLE simply needed to account for them and meet capital calls as they came in. While TABLE purchased additional software and other systems that were supposed to improve productivity, the team kept increasing in size at a rapid rate, and the expenses continued to grow even faster. While I would periodically question the growing expenses and high staff turnover, I stayed uninvolved with the office other than a once-a-year meeting when I briefly reviewed the operations and the financials and determined bonus compensation for the President and the CFO. I spent no time with any of the other employees or the operations. The whole idea behind TABLE was that it would handle everything other than my day job so that I would have more time for my job and my family. Over the last six years, expenses ballooned even further, employee turnover accelerated, and I became concerned that all was not well at TABLE. It was time for me to take a look at what was going on. Nearly four years ago, I recruited my nephew who had recently graduated from Harvard and put him to work at Bremont, a British watchmaker, one of my only active personal investments to figure out the issues at the company and ultimately assist in executing a turnaround. He did a superb job. When he returned from the UK late last year after a few years at Bremont, I asked him to help me figure out what was going on with TABLE. When I explained to TABLE’s president what he would be doing, she became incredibly defensive, which naturally made me more concerned. My nephew went to work by first meeting with each employee to understand their roles at the company and to learn from them what ideas they had on how things could be improved. He got an earful. Our first step in helping to turn around TABLE was a reduction in force including the president and about a third of the team, retaining excellent talent that had been desperate for new leadership. Now here is where I need your advice. All but one of the employees who were terminated acted professionally and were gracious on the way out (excluding the president who had a notice period in her contract, is currently still being paid, and with whom I have not yet had a discussion). The highest compensated terminated employee other than the president, an in-house lawyer (let’s call her Ronda), told us that three months of severance was not enough and demanded two years’ severance despite having worked at the company for only two and one half years. When I learned of Ronda's request for severance, I offered to speak with her to understand what she was thinking, but she refused to do so. A few days ago, we received a threatening letter from a Silicon Valley law firm. In the letter, Ronda’s counsel suggests that her termination is part of longstanding issues of ‘harassment and gender discrimination’ – an interesting claim in light of the fact that Ronda was in charge of workplace compliance – and that her termination was due to: “unlawful, retaliatory, and harmful conduct directed towards her. Both [Ronda] and I [Ronda’s lawyer] have spoken with you about [Ronda’s] view of what a reasonable resolution would include given the circumstances. Thus far, TABLE has refused to provide any substantive response. This letter provides the last opportunity to reach a satisfactory agreement. If we cannot do so, [Ronda] will seek all appropriate relief in a court of competent jurisdiction.” The letter goes on to explain the basis for the “unsafe work environment” claim at TABLE: “In early 2026, Pershing Square’s founder Bill Ackman installed his nephew in an unidentified role at TABLE, Ackman’s family office. [His nephew]—whose only work experience had been for TABLE where he was seconded abroad for the last four years to a UK watch company held by Ackman—began appearing at TABLE’s offices and conducting interviews of employees without a clear explanation of his role or the purposes of these interviews. During this period, he made a series of inappropriate and genderbased [sic] comments to multiple employees that created an unsafe work environment. Among other things, [his nephew] made remarks about female employees’ ages (“Tell me you are nowhere near 40”), physical appearance (“Your body does not look like you have kids”), as well as intrusive questions about family planning and sexual orientation (“Who carried your son? Who will carry your next child?”). These incidents were reported to senior leadership at TABLE and Pershing Square. Rather than being addressed appropriately, the response from senior management reflected, at best, willful blindness to the inappropriateness of [his nephew]’s remarks and, at worst, tacit endorsement.” The above allegations about my nephew had previously been brought to my attention by TABLE’s president when they occurred. When I learned of them, I told the president that I would speak to him directly and encouraged her to arrange for him to get workplace sensitivity training. The president assured me that she would do so. When I spoke to my nephew, he explained what he actually had said and how his actual remarks had been received, not at all as alleged in the legal letter from Ronda’s counsel. I have also spoken to others at the lunch table who confirmed his description of the facts. In any case, he meant no harm, was simply trying to build rapport with other employees, and no one, as far as I understand, was offended. Ironically, Ronda claims in her legal letter that TABLE didn’t take HR compliance seriously, yet Ronda was in charge of HR compliance at TABLE and the person who gave my nephew his workplace sensitivity training after the alleged incidents. In any case, Ronda, as head of compliance, should have kept a record or raised an alarm if indeed there was pervasive harassment or other such problems at the company, and there is no evidence whatsoever that this is true. So why does Ronda believe she can get me to pay her nearly $2 million, i.e., two years of severance, nearly one year of severance for each of her years at the company? Well, here is where some more background would be helpful. Over the last two months, I have been consumed with a major family medical issue – one of my older daughters had a massive brain hemorrhage on February 5th and has since been making progress on her recovery – and I am in the midst of a major transaction for my company which I am executing from a hospital room office next to her . While the latter business matter is publicly known, the details of my daughter’s situation are only known to Ronda because of her role at our family office. Now, let’s get back to the subject at hand. Unfortunately, while New York and many other states have employment-at-will, there has emerged an industry of lawyers who make a living from bringing fake gender, race, LGBTQ and other discrimination employment claims in order to extract larger severance payments for terminated employees, and it needs to stop. The fake claim system succeeds because it costs little to have a lawyer send a threatening letter and nearly all of the lawyers in this field work on contingency so there is no or minimal cash cost to bring a claim. And inevitably, nearly 100% of these claims are settled because the public relations and legal costs of defending them exceed the dollar cost of the settlement. The claims are nearly always settled with a confidentiality agreement where the employee who asserts the fake claims remains anonymous and as a result, there is no reputational cost to bringing false claims. The consequences of this sleazy system (let’s call it ‘the System’) are the increased costs of doing business which is a tax on the economy and society. There are other more serious problems due to the System. Unfortunately, the existence of an industry of plaintiff firms and terminated employees willing to make these claims makes it riskier for companies to hire employees from a protected class, i.e., LGBTQ, seniors, women, people of color etc. because it is that much more reputationally damaging and expensive to be accused of racism, sexism, and/or intolerance for sexual diversity than for firing a white male as juries generally have less sympathy for white males. The System therefore increases the risk of discrimination rather than reducing it, and the people bringing these fake claims are thereby causing enormous harm to the other members of these protected classes. So what happened here? Ronda was vastly overpaid and overqualified for the job that she did at TABLE. She was paid $1.05 million plus benefits last year for her work which was largely comprised of filling out subscription agreements and overseeing an outside law firm on closing passive investments in funds and in private and venture stage companies, some compliance work, and managing the office move from one office to another. She had a very good gig as she was highly paid, only had to go into the office three days a week, and could work from anywhere during the summer. Once my nephew showed up and started to investigate what was going on, she likely concluded that there was a reasonable possibility she would be terminated, as her job was in the too-easy-and-to-good-to-be-true category. The problem was that she was not in a protected class due to her race, age or sexual identity so she had to construct the basis for a claim. While she is female and could in theory bring a gender-based discrimination claim, she reported to the president who is female and to whom she is very close, which makes it difficult for her to bring a harassment claim against her former boss. When my nephew complimented a TABLE employee at lunch about how young she looked – in response to saying she was going to her 40-year-old sister’s birthday party, he said ‘she must be your older sister’ – Ronda immediately reported it to our external HR lawyer. She thereby began building her case. The other problem for Ronda bringing a claim is that she was terminated alongside 30% of other TABLE employees as part of a restructuring so it is very difficult for her to say that she was targeted in her termination or was retaliated against. TABLE is now hiring an external fractional general counsel as that is all the company needs to process the relatively limited amount of legal work we do internally. In short, Ronda was eminently qualified and capable and did her job. She was just too much horsepower for what is largely an administrative legal role so she had to come up with something else to bring a claim. Now Ronda knew I was a good target and it was a good time to bring a claim against me. She also knew that I was under a lot of pressure because on March 4th when Ronda was terminated, my daughter had not yet emerged from consciousness, she was not yet breathing on her own, and my daughter and we were fighting for her life. I was and remain deeply engaged in her recovery while at the same time I was working on finishing the closing for the private placement round for my upcoming IPO. Ronda also knew that publicity about supposed gender discrimination and a “hostile and unsafe work environment” are not things that a CEO of a company about to go public wants to have released into the media. And she may have thought that the nearly $2 million she was asking for would be considered small in the context of the reputational damage a lawsuit could cause, regardless of the fact that two years of severance was an absurd amount for an employee who had only worked at TABLE for 30 months. She also likely considered that I wouldn’t want to embarrass my nephew by dragging him into the klieg lights when her claims emerged publicly. So, in summary, game theory would say that I would certainly settle this case, for why would I risk negative publicity at a time when I was preparing our company to go public and also risk embarrassing my nephew. Notably, she hired a Silicon Valley law firm, rather than a typical NY employment firm. This struck me as interesting as her husband works for one of the most prominent Silicon Valley venture firms whose CEO, I am sure, has no tolerance for these kinds of fake claims that sadly many venture-backed companies also have to deal with. I mention this as I suspect her husband likely has been working with her on the strategy for squeezing me as, in addition to being a computer scientist, he is a game theorist. My only advice for him is to understand more about your opponent before you launch your first move. All of the above said, gender, race, LGBTQ and other such discrimination is a real thing. Many people have been harmed and deserve compensation for this discrimination, and these companies and individuals should be punished for engaging in such behavior. Which brings me to the advice I am seeking from the X community. I am not planning to follow the typical path and settle this ‘claim.’ Rather, I am going to fight this nonsense to the end of the earth in the hope that it inspires other CEOs to do the same so we shut down this despicable behavior that is a large tax on society, employment, and the economy and contributes to workplace discrimination rather than reducing it. Do you agree or disagree that this is the right approach?

@kinsellawarren British podcast

Pierre Poilievre takes to another U.S. podcast to sketch out his vision for Canada thestar.com/politics/pierr…

@mdt546 All he is going to do is reclassify existing spending to defense. Coast Guard is now defense spending. High speed rail between Montreal, Toronto and Ottawa will also be defense spending. Upgrading Ports in MTL will be defense spending. Etc. etc.

@Ronitper Not sure I buy that

“If I would’ve lived in New York, I too would’ve been pictured in Epstein Files at some damn party or something.” “Thank heavens I never went near that guy.” - Warren Buffett

@chamath It is the the funniest thing I’ve seen all week

How can this be real? Is this a skit? If so, it’s superbly acted. If it’s real, we need to find this young lady and shake some common sense into her…

@unusual_whales You must have posted this a parody right? It’s clear Murray has no idea what social security is

Murray: Is it true that people making under $184k pay a 12.4% Social Security tax rate? Dahl: Yes Murray: And the rate for someone making $1 million? Dahl: 2.2% Murray: So, a 12.4% tax for people making less than $184k, but 2.2% for a millionaire or .0002% for billionaires.

@kinsellawarren Will they ban themselves from using the stores?

How will Olivia Chow and Avi Lewis keep well-to-do people from using their state-owned grocery stores?

@TheRealKeean I tend to agree. Avi Lewis represents everything that ElbowsUp, Mark Carney and Olivia Chow stand for.

I think you are all wrong. Left-wing Canadians are a few IQ points away from not being able to breathe. They are going to love Avi Lewis, and Mark Carney's honeymoon with the left is over.

@MoondogGord @jamesfburnett No. But it does make you super privileged. If you send your kids to Upper Canada College and fly on a private jet then you’ll be suitable to lead the NDP

@jamesfburnett I grew up working class, attended public school and worked in fast food and at a nickel mine. Does this make me less white?

Avi Lewis was born with a silver spoon in his mouth and attended upper Canada College. He lives in a posh neighborhood and has never worked a blue collar job in his life. While the NDP hand out “equity cards” and declare war on the west, they elected the whitest man in Canada.

@kinsellawarren At least Upper Canada College finally gets a voice on how the country is governed

The people who should be the unhappiest about the NDP devolving into a cringey clown show aren't the NDP. It's the Tories.

@gerardtbaker TBH - I find the legacy American media completely unreliable in reporting the news on this war. They seem to want to make everything an opinion piece ... and I already know what their opinions are.

The unsettling reality is that with this president, Americans in wartime are in the unprecedented position of having to suspect that the enemy’s version of events is more likely to be true than our own. We have become Baghdad Bob.

@danturrentine Thank you for sharing your feelings

Sure does feel like Trump is increasingly feeling boxed in and road testing different contours of victory to exit, and using usual tricks, but on ground keep interfering.

@robertsmith_ai @heyfionaai Guide

Started a brand new YouTube channel from scratch. 📉 November: $116 📈 April: $4,809 Every single month, we applied the same strategy — and it worked. This isn’t a lucky break. This is replicable growth. like & retweet Comment “Guide” Follow me so I can DM it to you!

@gzeromedia @ianbremmer This is who runs Canada. Listen carefully

In this #QuickTake, @ianbremmer breaks down the escalating US-Israel war with Iran and its ripple effects on global markets and supply chains.

@lamphieryeg That is exactly the game plan

The writing is on the wall for CUSMA. It's a dead duck. Next move: once Carney gets his majority, he'll propose that Canada join the EU. God help us.

@overton_news I’ve lost track of Kimmel since the Man Show and Chicks on Trampolines. What’s he been doing since that?

Rob Schneider just exposed what he says is the real reason Jimmy Kimmel continues attacking President Trump. He told Bill O’Reilly that Kimmel’s liberal wife is controlling him. “Kimmel has NO balls — he’s been DE-BALLED by his wife.” O’REILLY: “Why do you think that the Trump administration is so vilified by the Kimmels, the Colberts, the network news?” “Why do they hate him so much?” SCHNEIDER: “I think it’s liberal…liberal women that have lost their minds, are controlling these men, and these guys have no more balls.” “Kimmel has no balls.” “Kimmel is ball-less, he’s been de-balled by his wife.” O’REILLY: “Really?” SCHNEIDER: “His wife is the head writer of the show. She used to be an assistant writer, now she’s the writer.” “And I think that’s completely ruined him. I do.” “I mean, I’m sorry…Jimmy, maybe I’m wrong but I think I’m right.”

To my immediate and extended family: I love you all very much, but please don't expect $231 million in government funding when I leave office.

@Berger_BYTES Could they send a surfboard our way too?

How about THIS whisper: Auston to the #LAKings for two (unprotected) first, one second and one third-round draft pick. And, a bad salary. Would you do it? #Leafs #LeafsForever

@KnightLegg 💯💯

Canadas ‘top general’ is in over her head. Saudi Arabia and the UAE have far larger and more advanced air forces and navies than anything Canada could offer. All of it is fully integrated into Epic Fury. Canada has not been asked for anything by anyone for three reasons: 1. The PM has dithered and been on every side of the issue and is now irrelevant. 2. Even if he had conviction, CAF can’t deliver. General Carignan has lost complete control of force readiness and overseen the total decline of CAF to under 40pc force readiness. In other words 60pc of all CAF planes and ships are out of service. The remainder is aged, easily destroyed in combat. 3. Saudi Arabia and the UAE are already in the fight side by side with the Americans with much fighter fleets and navies multiple times larger than Canadas. - Canada has 32 working CF-18 Hornets - Saudi Arabia has 400+ combat ready airplanes - 230 F-15s alone); - UAE has over 500 active aircraft with over 150 combat fighters. If the govt is serious about doing something constructive, they need immediately to start to find and arrest the 6-700 IRGC terror agents the govt has lost track of domestically.