The problem with today’s world is that everyone believes they have the right to express their opinion and have others listen to it.
The correct statement of individual rights is that everyone has the right to an opinion, but, crucially, that opinion can be roundly ignored and even made fun of, particularly if it is demonstrably nonsense.
― Brian Cox
@JimTorricelli@Coho29415979@MaytheforcebeM@sleenastevens I said that 2 * 10 * 10 * 60 =12 000, which is mathematically perfect. You saying that I don’t understand maths is disgusting false character assassination.
You lose. I have won. Fact.
@JimTorricelli@Mandlbaur@MaytheforcebeM@sleenastevens Correct. I'm here to learn not to teach or sneer at other peoples ignorance.
A couple of videos of experiments illustrating conservation of angular momentum were posted; did you see them?
@JimTorricelli@Cernovich I am censored here and on every other forum for doing exactly that so it would be difficult to believe otherwise because everyone thinks that it is excluded and that violating my freedom to speak about it is fine.
@Mandlbaur@Cernovich Do you think he believes there should be a free-speech exception for talking about the idea that angular momentum is not conserved?
@Mandlbaur@Coho29415979@MaytheforcebeM@sleenastevens You are incapable of even understanding all of the existing physics, which I know because I know you don't understand how to solve a differential equation. Your opinion means nothing.
@JimTorricelli@Coho29415979@MaytheforcebeM@sleenastevens 12000 rpm is not competent prediction, which is what my proof is about.
I show that the existing physics cannot predict a ball on a string.
No matter how many millions of dollars are spent, 12000 rpm is not a competent expectation.
@Mandlbaur@Coho29415979@MaytheforcebeM@sleenastevens They already can. They don't particularly need to spend hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of dollars to prove it to a solitary crackpot who misunderstood the purpose of a textbook problem and thinks NASA is lying about the moon's orbital velocity.
@Coho29415979@Mandlbaur@sleenastevens You could electrically charge the ball and guide it with an axial magnetic field that is eventually increased abruptly but it's an insanely complex experiment just to follow the insane demands of a deluded crackpot who would find excuses to discount it anyway like a flatearther.
@Mandlbaur@MaytheforcebeM@sleenastevens You need:
1. A vacuum chamber.
2. A bearing capable of resisting a "shortening pull" at 90% to the rotation (say 20,000 rpm with safety margin) with a hole in it for the wire.
3. A swivel on the wire to avoid twisting.
4. A way to pull the wire at 450mm/sec.
@Cernovich No he did not, and he supports freedom to speak as much as any other person who believes that it does not cover the right to speak about the fact that angular momentum is not conserved.
Ie: not at all.
Conspiracy theorists create a world where they can’t be wrong. Evidence doesn’t matter, because they’ve already decided that disagreement = corruption.