Geoffrey Beaver

@JeremyDow3 @Mandlbaur @demystifysci The guy has his own subreddit (r/Mandlbaur). He's been having this same conversation over and over for a long time... He submitted his stuff to many journals and the results were as you'd expect.

@Mandlbaur @demystifysci Did you publish the findings and submit to journals?

we should go back to the old days where all scientific presentations started with a set of definitions and a set of assumptions. Trying to define "energy" in a way that isn't circular should keep theorists busy for a generation or two

@Mike32341842 @Mandlbaur @ProfFeynman You won't get anywhere with this guy, he's a notorious crank and has been doing this for over a decade now: reddit.com/r/Mandlbaur/

If you have a theory, you must try to explain what’s good and what’s bad about it equally. Science teaches standard integrity and honesty.

@partridge98545 @Mandlbaur @sleenastevens @DavidRu31988626 @MaytheforcebeM @JinemanFim @PhysInHistory Correct. The Mandlbaur prediction of 12000 rpm is easily falsified.

@Mandlbaur @beaver51581 @sleenastevens @DavidRu31988626 @MaytheforcebeM @JinemanFim @PhysInHistory Incorrect. 12000 rpm is the Mandlbaur prediction, so called because it originated from John Mandlbaur. No real physicist ever predicted 12000 rpm.

Can science and religion coexist, or are they fundamentally at odds? ✍️

@Mandlbaur @DavidRu31988626 @MaytheforcebeM @JinemanFim @PhysInHistory @grok Grok already answered this for you. x.com/grok/status/19…

@beaver51581 @DavidRu31988626 @MaytheforcebeM @JinemanFim @PhysInHistory @grok @Grok, does conservation of angular momentum predict 12000 rpm for a ball on a string demonstration which starts at 2 revolutions per second and is pulled in to 1/10th radius?

@lorenafreed @JimTorricelli @Mandlbaur @Michael39223352 @TimWilkinsFirst @DavidRu31988626 @Ferrari_ball @azforeman @sleenastevens @ItSpinsFaster @grok @logic_quantum @simonmaechling He previously advocated for the torture of scientists who disagree with him so presumably he expects people to pay in blood: x.com/Mandlbaur/stat…

@JimTorricelli @Mandlbaur @Michael39223352 @TimWilkinsFirst @DavidRu31988626 @beaver51581 @Ferrari_ball @azforeman @sleenastevens @ItSpinsFaster @grok @logic_quantum @simonmaechling In quatloos presumably

Conspiracy theorists create a world where they can’t be wrong. Evidence doesn’t matter, because they’ve already decided that disagreement = corruption.

@sleenastevens @Mandlbaur @DavidRu31988626 @MaytheforcebeM @JinemanFim @PhysInHistory @grok I noticed @grok ignoring me too so maybe its a more general issue. @grok is everything ok buddy?

@beaver51581 @Mandlbaur @DavidRu31988626 @MaytheforcebeM @JinemanFim @PhysInHistory @grok Had he been blokked by Grok? In his last interaction he said "Grok tells lies". Maybe enough for Grok to stop engaging?

@Mandlbaur @sleenastevens @DavidRu31988626 @MaytheforcebeM @JinemanFim @PhysInHistory Nice, yeah I know 12000 rpm is wrong too. 12000 rpm is the Mandlbaur prediction which is provably false.

@beaver51581 @sleenastevens @DavidRu31988626 @MaytheforcebeM @JinemanFim @PhysInHistory I know that 12000 rpm is wrong and I am trying to explain that to physicists and this incompetent waste of my time is not invited.

@Mandlbaur @DavidRu31988626 @MaytheforcebeM @JinemanFim @PhysInHistory 12000 rpm didn't come from the book, it came from a South African pseudoscientist called John Mandlbaur. 12000 rpm is the Mandlbaur prediction.

@beaver51581 @DavidRu31988626 @MaytheforcebeM @JinemanFim @PhysInHistory It is irrational to imagine that 12000 rpm is not the prediction of COAM when it objectively is.

@Mandlbaur @sleenastevens @DavidRu31988626 @MaytheforcebeM @JinemanFim @PhysInHistory Yes, you think it's a fact. I know. Why are you wasting my time by repeating your beliefs?

@beaver51581 @sleenastevens @DavidRu31988626 @MaytheforcebeM @JinemanFim @PhysInHistory It is fact and you are simply making up your own facts. This is disingenuous behavior. Why are you wasting my time?

@Mandlbaur @DavidRu31988626 @MaytheforcebeM @JinemanFim @PhysInHistory Its perfectly rational to ignore physicists that don't exist. Please stop manifesting fake physicists?

@beaver51581 @DavidRu31988626 @MaytheforcebeM @JinemanFim @PhysInHistory This is called invincible ignorance

@Mandlbaur @sleenastevens @DavidRu31988626 @MaytheforcebeM @JinemanFim @PhysInHistory I already know that you think that. :) No need to repeat yourself.

@beaver51581 @sleenastevens @DavidRu31988626 @MaytheforcebeM @JinemanFim @PhysInHistory My maths has never been faulted. Please stop lying?

@Mandlbaur @DavidRu31988626 @MaytheforcebeM @JinemanFim @PhysInHistory @grok Sounds like you're the one lying about there being some physicists that agree with your prediction of 12000 rpm. Otherwise you would have told me who they are by now. Please stop the dishonest?

@beaver51581 @DavidRu31988626 @MaytheforcebeM @JinemanFim @PhysInHistory @grok Any physicist must agree that 12000 rpm is the prediction of COAM or they are lying. Fact.

@Mandlbaur @DavidRu31988626 @MaytheforcebeM @JinemanFim @PhysInHistory Yeah you keep saying that but you can't name one of these physicists that agrees with you that 12000 is the prediction for classroom demonstrations. It is unscientific to manifest physicists to agree with you when they don't actually exist. Please behave adult?

@beaver51581 @DavidRu31988626 @MaytheforcebeM @JinemanFim @PhysInHistory Every single physicist just either agree that 12000 is the prediction of COAM, is show an error in my maths. Anyone who understands the concept of a mathematical proof understands that.

@Mandlbaur @DavidRu31988626 @MaytheforcebeM @JinemanFim @PhysInHistory Then name one of these physicists that agrees with you that 12000 rpm is the prediction for classroom demonstrations?

@beaver51581 @DavidRu31988626 @MaytheforcebeM @JinemanFim @PhysInHistory Not a single physicist disagrees with the 12000 rpm being the correct prediction of the theory. Some have even described my maths as “perfect”. This is fact. 12000 rpm is the textbook prediction of existing physics. That is how the proof works. I show existing prediction

@Mandlbaur @ABallOnAString @DavidRu31988626 @MaytheforcebeM @JinemanFim @PhysInHistory So where did they get this non secret meths from?

@beaver51581 @ABallOnAString @DavidRu31988626 @MaytheforcebeM @JinemanFim @PhysInHistory There is nothing secret about it. At least there was nothing secret until now. They assume p stays the same magnitude and believe that is consistent with COAM because of the mistaken derivations of COAM from N2

@Mandlbaur @Rainmaker1973 @grok @Mandlbaur do you concede my discovery that time has mass because its affected by gravity? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitati…

@beaver51581 @Rainmaker1973 @grok I am ahead of everyone else. And your ideas are biased and ignorant. Please stop the personal attack. Stfu.

Scientists create matter from pure light, proving Einstein's 120-years old theory E = mc², right in the lab. For the very first time, researchers used ultra-powerful lasers to smash photons particles of light together, triggering a reaction that produced actual particles of matter and antimatter: electrons and positrons. This is known as the Breit-Wheeler process, a phenomenon first predicted back in 1934 but never observed in the lab until now.

@sleenastevens @Mandlbaur @DavidRu31988626 @MaytheforcebeM @JinemanFim @PhysInHistory Oh yeah I'm quite familiar with his subreddit and the Quora groups where his maths has been debunked. 😄 He thinks none of it counts though because he has a list of opinions or "rebuttals" as he calls them.

@beaver51581 @Mandlbaur @DavidRu31988626 @MaytheforcebeM @JinemanFim @PhysInHistory (blocked by John so invisible). His maths is flawed. Equation 2 is for radians/s, but he uses rps. He also cancels m1 and m2 without explaining this. No scientist has called it "perfect". It's copied badly and without understanding.

@Mandlbaur @DavidRu31988626 @MaytheforcebeM @JinemanFim @PhysInHistory @grok So you can't tell me the name of the real physicist who predicted 12000 rpm? I'm starting to get the feeling that this "real physicist" isnt real at all and you were making it up.

@beaver51581 @DavidRu31988626 @MaytheforcebeM @JinemanFim @PhysInHistory @grok What has to happen, is that a physicist would have to identify an error in my maths or concede that 12000 rpm is the prediction of existing physics.

@Mandlbaur @DavidRu31988626 @MaytheforcebeM @JinemanFim @PhysInHistory @grok Anyone? Can you tell me one physicist that predicted 12000 rpm for a classroom demonstration then? Just give me a name?

@beaver51581 @DavidRu31988626 @MaytheforcebeM @JinemanFim @PhysInHistory Anyone who makes the standard prediction of COAM will predict 12000 rpm. Let’s ask @grok what is the standard existing physics prediction of conservation of angular momentum for a ball on a string demonstration starting at 2 revolutions per second and being pulled in to 1/10th?

@Mandlbaur @DavidRu31988626 @MaytheforcebeM @JinemanFim @PhysInHistory So who's the "real physicist" that agrees with your 12000 rpm prediction? Tell me their name and I'll add them to the list of people who predict 12000 rpm.

@beaver51581 @DavidRu31988626 @MaytheforcebeM @JinemanFim @PhysInHistory False. No real physicist can claim any other prefix COAM than 12000 rpm and this is a stupid argument.