Johan Gamper

131 posts

Johan Gamper

Johan Gamper

@JohanGamper

Licensed psychologist. Independent ontologist.

Vendelsö, Sweden Katılım Temmuz 2018
46 Takip Edilen97 Takipçiler
Johan Gamper
Johan Gamper@JohanGamper·
Anna — a dialogue about the problematic relation between consciousness and self-consciousness - Article (Preprint v2) by Johan Gamper | Qeios qeios.com/read/613WBP.2
English
0
0
0
12
Johan Gamper
Johan Gamper@JohanGamper·
Mileva — a Dialogue About General Relativity as Regional - Article (Preprint v1) by Johan Gamper | Qeios qeios.com/read/6I9WNV
Română
0
0
0
8
Johan Gamper
Johan Gamper@JohanGamper·
On the Axiomatisation of the Natural Laws — A Compilation of Human Mistakes Intended to Be Understood Only By Robots - Article (Preprint v1) by Johan Gamper | Qeios qeios.com/read/KC9YAU
English
0
0
0
9
Johan Gamper
Johan Gamper@JohanGamper·
Causal Principles in Material Constitution: A Philosophical Inquiry into the Composition of Objects - Article (Preprint v2) by Johan Gamper | Qeios qeios.com/read/H2B7NA.2
English
0
0
0
4
Johan Gamper
Johan Gamper@JohanGamper·
@PhysInHistory Johan Gamper. (2023). Metaphysics uniting theology and science — back to the basics (as in back to the basic assumptions). Qeios. doi:10.32388/JS5Z04.2.
English
0
0
0
16
Johan Gamper
Johan Gamper@JohanGamper·
Nice picture! Please ask me what the paper is about and I will spell it out. Don’t know if it’s that hard, though.
English
0
0
0
47
Johan Gamper
Johan Gamper@JohanGamper·
“We define a set of things of one singular kind as the set of all things that can causally affect one another. To enable causal interaction between such sets, we define a thing that is of a non-singular kind as consisting of more than one singular kind.” qeios.com/read/NHBKBT
English
1
0
0
66
Physics In History
Physics In History@PhysInHistory·
Religion and science go together. As I've said before, science without religion is lame and religion without science is blind. They are interdependent and have a common goal—the search for truth. Hence it is absurd for religion to proscribe Galileo or Darwin or other scientists. And it is equally absurd when scientists say that there is no God. The real scientist has faith, which does not mean that he must subscribe to a creed. Without religion there is no charity. The soul given to each of us is moved by the same living spirit that moves the universe. -- A. Einstein, as mentioned in Einstein and the Poet (1983) recoreded (roughly) from a series of conversations William Hermanns had with Einstein.
Physics In History tweet media
English
175
744
3.2K
236K
Johan Gamper
Johan Gamper@JohanGamper·
You may be interested in this @qeios Article: "Mileva — a Dialogue About General Relativity as Regional" qeios.com/read/6I9WNV. Summary M&A talk about physics. They conclude that causal dependence between separate ontological domains may be permitted.
English
0
0
0
55
Johan Gamper
Johan Gamper@JohanGamper·
You may be interested in this @qeios Article: "Samuel — a dialogue about incompleteness" qeios.com/read/GJCSL5.2 Abstract Samuel seeks out Kurt at a pub and initiates a discussion. Soon Kurt becomes engaged. What is it that is incomplete?
English
0
0
0
49
Johan Gamper
Johan Gamper@JohanGamper·
@jordicat Good job! If you’re interested I’ve tried to find a foundation for the next step, to unite science and theology. The key I’m exploring is to expand the number of basic assumptions. (Gamper, 2023, qeios.com/read/JS5Z04.2.
English
0
0
0
52
Johan Gamper
Johan Gamper@JohanGamper·
@JoshuaLWatson Identity: (Gamper 2021). Biological Energy and the Experiencing Subject. Axiomathes 31, 497–506 (2021). doi.org/10.1007/s10516…, Theseus: Gamper (2023). Interstellar Variations 1: Plan B and Causal Objects. Qeios. doi:10.32388/XZ2MD6.2. Both need some more work to be honest.
English
0
0
0
26
Josh Watson
Josh Watson@JoshuaLWatson·
I know metaphysics is dead and all but I do still kind of feel puzzled by the Ship of Theseus stuff and personal identity stuff so would someone send me the memo about the answer, thanks
English
41
6
85
10.6K