Johan

"In the refusal to ascend beyond one's limitations lies the epitome of pitiful existence. Embrace the pursuit of excellence, for stagnation is the hallmark of mediocrity." - Dr Doom.

Ambient music recorded on cassette

WEBFACE_2000 First edition on ETH. Let’s try. Link below, as always

@AbudBakri @dirtenjoyor @biohacker Starches. Even when they're cooked, they're a bit serotonin inducing.

@dirtenjoyor @biohacker Based on?

The biggest energy shifter for me lately is the $9 thiamine bottle I bought on Amazon Not some fancy thiamine Just dirty cheap thiamine HCL At some hefty doses. 3-600+mg BID Honestly better than Mot-c, SS-31, NAD+ lol High carb + b1

@ibuybooks Ah yes, the Elder Archivarius is back to bestow upon us a timeless gift. PS: I'm still seething about the library of Alexandria though. WHERE THE FUCK WERE YOU NIGGA?

Introducing: The Athaeneum of Bioenergetics A full-text search engine for all Ray Peat podcast transcripts/articles/email exchanges. Alpha version out now at: bioenergetic.wiki

Skyrim is calling me

Just saw another Solomon Nelson takedown of Mike Israetel and his "evidence based" bullshit. I'm not even into lifting weights, but it's just fascinating how exercise "science" seems to be just as much made-up fake nonsense as nutrition "science." I almost feel bad for Israetel, he went through the steps to join the "evidence based" exercise "science" grift and now people are mad at him, when they should be mad at "science." What people are expecting of scientists is just dumb & unrealistic; most scientists are stupid and don't know anything, even in their own field. They're low level bureaucrats turning your tax money into mortgage payments & moderate levels of respect at dinner parties. I propose that nobody knows ANYTHING about muscle building. Those for whom it worked were just genetic hyperresponders, and the same methods won't work on low responders, cause nothing does. Heck, exercise "science" doesn't even agree on what causes muscle growth to begin with! youtube.com/watch?v=gc-7oS…

What is a woman? A woman is a destructive terroristic agent infiltrating your home, and that agent may or may not contain a baby of yours at any point in time. I'm realizing this as I enter a phase of my life where I have 6 children and I can afford saying "no." My conclusions are devastating for the woman genre: a woman is always *never* worth *anything* other than the integral probability over time that she may contain your baby at instant t. Worst, her mere presence, let alone her economical costs, is always an enormous burden and cost on the whole family. The state of women right now in our society is as follows: 1. They are dumb. Stupid as a brick yet necessitate just the right amount of intellectual engagement at their level of cognitive functioning so that they can feel they are not dumb. 2. They are addicted to street drugs. "That's for my pain and anxiety management," they'll say. They're just drug addicts with fully broken brains. 3. They are addicted to psychiatric medications. Any woman capable of displaying normal interactions in a social setting is simply doped on psychiatric tranquilizers to hide the pain of their meaningless existence. You won't notice it in a short interaction but you will when you get to know them. 4. They have behavioral dysfunctions that keep them from entertaining normal emotional relationships with the world around them. Entitlement, narcissism, arbitrary demands, control, capriciousness, self-esteem issues. Endemic. 5. They are intolerant of male cognition, male liberty, and want to acquire control. They will resort to calling the state if you do not comply in order to keep you from having a normal relationship with your children. When I look at all this, and I look at my undisturbed life as a happy father, where I would estimate my current happiness at 10/10, I'm like: how can we make this work? How can I justify bringing a woman rationally into my life? What is the value that a woman with the 5 features above (all women, literally), could bring to my life? The fact is that on a scale of happiness of 10, the current value of the average woman is about -9000. This is why the baby-containing artificial uterus is so attractive. It's not so much that the container itself is so interesting, it's just that it finds itself to be orders of magnitude less problematic than the alternative container, which comes with all of the above.

Here it is. All of @haidut's articles from 2013-2026. And most, if not all, his interview transcripts (133). Again, just upload these files into Notebook LM and you're good to go. Also uploaded the Ray Peat Resources again for the ones that missed it last time.

@Metabolicmonstr @jonmunier @HansThorLief Tremendous work! Sorry for the dumb question; How would I use these? Should I download the files or feed the link directly to an AI?

Big thanks to @jonmunier for helping with Claude and the transcripts. Also to @HansThorLief for his help.

game theory + marketing psychology + insane implementation speed + delusional optimism + specific knowledge = the highest form of leverage

"Women have no existence and no essence; they are not, they are nothing. Mankind occurs as male or female, as something or nothing. Woman has no share in ontological reality, no relation to the thing-in-itself ..." Otto Weininger, Sex and Character

I know people worth 7-8 figures that still pirate media / fraud free trials Lesson in that You gotta be a little Jewish to build and keep wealth

Ironically, women (particularly single childless women) welcome invasion because wanting a barbaric conqueror is coded into them Just look at what they read Behave brutally or get controlled by those who will

@VERYKOOLLUKEY @BerbarianWizard Peat didn't advocate for avoiding meats, he just advocated for balancing the amino acids profile in meats with organ meats, collagenous cuts and gelatin.

@BerbarianWizard Tbh if you wanna be an androgenic beast you need to eat more meat than peat recommends

Someone told me the Peat space focused too much on female physiology (progesterone, fertility, etc.) and not enough on androgens. He’ll be surprised how much the same principles apply to men.