JohnTrash

LOL, like clockwork 😜

Oil top confirmed 🫡

@shahh @BTCVIX 10 months is actually a generous distribution timeframe in crypto 💁

Absolutely insane how the entire ’24–’25 Solana rally got fully retraced in less than 10 months.

Al Gore is a fraud. There is no evidence whatsoever to suggest that trace carbon dioxide (CO₂) is in any way a danger to public health. The Obama administration's EPA Endangerment Finding was a politically motivated response to Massachusetts v. EPA (2007). The Clean Air Act, as written, does not classify CO₂ and other “greenhouse gases” (GHGs) as “air pollutants.” Congress would have to amend the Clean Air Act to do it, but Obama decided to lean on the Chevron Deference (which no longer stands) to force the EPA to “find” evidence that GHGs are a danger to public health. Contrary to what you have been told by charlatans like Al Gore, scientists cannot say for certain whether most, or even all, of the warming observed over the last century and a half has been human-caused or not. This is for two reasons: 1⃣ The measurement of the natural radiation fluxes in and out of Earth's climate system have a larger margin of error than the global energy imbalance imposed by mankind's CO₂ emissions. 🔗nature.com/articles/ngeo1… 2⃣ Computer models used to ascribe warming to our emissions are artificially tuned such that CO₂ is the proximate cause. That is, when building their models, climate “scientists” assume Earth's climate system was in a natural state of energy balance before the Industrial Revolution. They set everything to zero and assume nothing else has changed the planet's mean surface temperature since 1850, then jack up the CO₂ until the modeled temperature curve matches the observations, then they say, “See?! CO₂ is the cause of the warming.” But this is circular reasoning because they are trying to prove what they assumed from the outset. There was a good article published in Science about this almost 10 years ago. 🔗science.org/doi/10.1126/sc… Even less compelling, scientists cannot claim with any high level of confidence that global warming—and by extension, CO₂ emissions—are in any meaningful way endangering public health and life on Earth. First, the human condition has never been better than it is today: • Average life expectancy has more than doubled on every continent since the 19th century. 🔗ourworldindata.org/life-expectancy • The total number of deaths resulting from weather-related disasters have decreased by >96% since the 1920s; that is despite a six billion-person increase in global population over that time. 🔗ourworldindata.org/natural-disast… • Global crop yields have been at all-time record highs in recent years. 🔗ourworldindata.org/crop-yields Anyone who claims that we are facing an “existential crisis” because the planet is a little warmer than it was a century ago is either uninformed OR is lying. No hard data supports that claim. Secondly, there is no scientific justification to relegate CO₂ to a “pollutant.” Recall that the EPA has, up until now, classified CO₂ as pollution because it “contributes to GHG pollution that threatens public health and welfare.” Well, by that standard, then water vapor (H₂O) should also be classified as a pollutant and regulated because, like CO₂, it is a GHG and is also a byproduct of combustion. In fact, vapor is the most abundant and potent GHG since it (a) comprises 1-4% of atmospheric volume (CO₂ is only 0.04%) and (b) it absorbs a wider spectrum of infrared wavelengths than do CO₂ molecules. However, we do not regulate water vapor because water is an essential compound for life on Earth. But, so is CO₂; it is required for photosynthesis, which forms the basis for the food chain on land and in the oceans. At the end of the last glacial maximum 20,000 years ago, atmospheric CO₂ levels were on the order of 180 parts per million (ppm). There is plenty of peer-reviewed evidence suggesting that plants were in fact carbon-starved during this period. 🔗link.springer.com/article/10.100… 🔗cell.com/trends/plant-s… 🔗pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pn… As of January, the atmospheric CO₂ concentration is nearing 429 ppm. That is about half the level needed for optimum plant growth and only about a third of the concentration in the room you are probably reading this post in. 🔗gov.mb.ca/agriculture/cr… The OSHA Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) is 5,000 ppm for an 8-hour period. 🔗fsis.usda.gov/sites/default/… Submariners in the Navy are exposed to levels that often exceed 10,000 ppm, and it has little to no impact on their mental faculties or ability to complete their assigned tasks. Some people may experience drowsiness at 10,000 ppm, but not most. Almost everyone will feel drowsy at levels exceeding 30,000 ppm, but only at levels at or above 40,000 ppm is CO₂ “immediately dangerous to life or health.” At concentrations encountered in Earth’s atmosphere (which have been as high as 7,000 ppm in the last 600 million years), there is no compelling evidence that justifies labeling CO₂ as “pollution.” And, in fact, we do not have enough fossil fuel reserves left to tap into, extract resources from, refine into petroleum products, and burn to get the atmospheric CO₂ level anywhere remotely close to 5,000 ppm. U.S. CO₂ emissions have been falling for 30 years. They will continue to fall (largely due to the phaseout of coal and adoption of natural gas, but the increase in solar and wind capacity do play a major roll) despite the rescinding of the Endangerment Finding. As it turns out, the free market has done more to reduce our emissions than government actions. Regardless, until China and India curb their emissions whatever the U.S. does will make little difference. This is nothing but rehearsed performative outrage.

@realpeteyb123 @stoolpresidente Petey gonna break the algorithm once again 😂

This is peak male form. You may not like it, but this is what peak male performance looks like. Hey @stoolpresidente share your habits so the world can embrace them.

I'm sweating on this $NVDA short. It was premature and risky, since the 200 day MA provided solid support (I was speculating on a similar breakdown like Amazon did). But bulls need yet to slice through the 195 resistance convincingly with volume, given all the positive news

@LimitlessXBT This hits hard 🥲

Gonna take a stab at this $NVDA short The AI hype is showing cracks already

@tradermatt And just imagine how many of us, that didn't manage to sell near the crypto, feel now 😬 You got out in time, huge respect 🫡

mentally, i'm still here

$SNDK - what a beautiful blow-off top. RAM about to get a lot cheaper again 😊

$LTC on life support at this (imaginary) trendline😬

@PJaccetturo Holy crap, this is so good! I'm currently reading book five of the Stormlight Archive and this is a storming great adaptation! 🤩

RIP Hollywood. AI is now 100% photorealistic with the launch of Kling 3.0 In just two days, I created the opening sequence from The Way of Kings by Brandon Sanderson You have to try this new Multi-Shot technique that makes making films much faster and cheaper 🧵👇

Every cycle feels different, but it never is. You make real money on paper and think it’s permanent. Then you round-trip it and swear you’re done forever. You then miss the early part of the next cycle because of PTSD. You buy back some only after it doubles “just to be safe.” You get fully loaded by the mid-cycle, the tingly feeling is back. You promise yourself this time you’ve learned a thing or two and will be smart and reasonable this time. Then the gains start and you take the bait, you get emotional, fall in love, and go searching for narratives to latch too. The hucksters are back too in full force selling you a dream, you ignore their last cycle grift, and fall for their new shiny paper. A faster path to your dream. You start regurgitating all their talking points, welcome to the club. You start adding leverage, this is easy, you’re going to be super-yacht rich. You buy garbage tokens and projects, telling yourself they figured out some money glitch. It’s a whole new paradigm. You start to project where you’re going to be just one year out at this rate and say that’s too long, let’s go harder. And then the rugs begin to get pulled. You’re quickly down 50% on a leveraged/speculative pile of poop, that you fear selling at such a “discount”. What about the dream. Paralysis becomes so great you can’t even action an exit over your better thoughts. And not before long, you’re back to the beginning. ----------------------------- I know this is only a subset of people entirely, more so in crypto, but I think we all to some level or extent, fall for the above. I do too! So not intended to throw shade on people (except the hucksters), but a reminder that a balance between risk and preservation is paramount, but more importantly when to be balanced between the two at various stages of the cycle. Knowing where we are in the cycle requires being as unemotional and agnostic to your positions as possible. Once money becomes so personal, rational judgement is lost. As for where we are now. Stocks haven’t broken down broadly, although the cracks are forming. We’re in a bull trend still, but also in that “be mindful” stage, and dips are probably not opportunities anymore. For crypto, the carnage is huge, but can get so much worse. We’re way past the get out stage, but that doesn’t mean you can’t get out to live another day. If you’re sitting on stuff with paralysis, free yourself of this burden and dump it. A worthless token isn’t cheap because it's down 60%. This does not apply to spot bitcoin, you’re not selling that 44% off highs, even expecting much deeper levels to come in 2026.

@CredibleCrypto I enjoy your content but never understood why you keep shilling $CRV so hard? It has performed terribly over the years. It feels like a huge missed opportunity not to focus elsewhere 🤔

A small sample of what will be included in Part 2 (altcoins) of the vids I am working on right now. The people that are saying $CRV is dead today are the same ones who would have said Silver was "dead" at $4.89 and XRP was "dead" at 50 cents. They would have faded both at high timeframe, macro bottoms, before some of the most aggressive expansion phases we have seen in years on both respective assets. After forming an accumulation base over 4 years in it's own HTF range, $XRP ran 6x to range highs in under a month. $CRV now looks to be wrapping up the final phase of it's own 5.5 year long accumulation base. How long do you think it will take to hit it's own range highs?

@__Con_ I got rekt on $GLXY -30% in a few days from my entry ~$30 🫤

@__Con_ That NYSE open on Monday is going to be carnage, damn 🫣

$GLXY: I have started to dca in here as I think we got potential to go much higher. My thesis is we've bottomed on wave 2 here before a wild wave 3 higher. Here is the fundamental thesis: Strategic Infrastructure Pivot: Helios data center campus in Texas positions Galaxy as a major player in AI and crypto compute, moving beyond volatile trading revenue into stable, long-term infrastructure. Massive Scale: 1.6 GW approved capacity after receiving an additional 830 MW approval in January 2026 Mint Ventures, with potential for 3.5 GW total capacity Mint Ventures on the expanded campus. This sets up massive, high-margin revenue streams. Partnership with CoreWeave: CoreWeave committed to 100% of currently approved grid capacity through multiple phases Mint Ventures, guaranteeing tenancy and giving exposure to the booming AI infrastructure market. Billion-Dollar Revenue Potential: Over $1 billion in annual revenue expected on average over the next 15 years from Helios at full utilization Mint Ventures - this is transformational for the company. Institutional Appeal: Transitioning from pure crypto speculation to stable, predictable infrastructure income, attractive to equity investors. $1.4 billion project financing facility closed in August 2025 PR Newswire, $460 million equity investment from a major institutional investor in October 2025 Data Center Dynamics. Diversified Revenue Streams: Combines crypto trading, asset management, and infrastructure hosting for lower correlation to Bitcoin volatility. CEO Vision: Mike Novogratz (@novogratz) is aiming for Helios to be a "top five data center in the world", signaling ambitious, long-term growth plans. CEO Track Record: Novogratz's strong connections and track record will continue to help the company execute on its vision. Massive Expansion Potential: Over 1,500 acres total campus size after additional land acquisition in 2025 Mint Ventures, with interconnection capacity supporting up to 3.5 GW. This is room for years of growth. Construction Milestones: First data hall powered on in December 2025, with first power delivery expected in early 2026 CoinDesk - the project is real and happening now. New Administration: The crypto-friendly Trump administration provides a supportive regulatory backdrop for $GLXY's digital asset business. Don't forget, bitcoin is going to bottom soon (imo). We basically have an AI + Crypto play in the bear market. I'm very bullish. What are your thoughts on $GLXY?

@tradermatt Just watched the recording, great stuff! Many thanks for putting out such high quality content 🙌

🔴livestreaming now on the agenda: - what the bottom of the market could look like - how to position yourself for the bottom - creating a lifestyle around trading

One thing my mentor taught me a long time ago: You chase trades because you doubt your ability to find another good one. You feel bad about missing pumps because you're unsure about your ability to find another opportunity.

@CryptoSays Just got my copy 🫡

When the world feels uncertain, clarity becomes an act of love. Our report for February is not about predicting everything, it’s about knowing where you stand. Built on stoic principles, honest timing, and respect for the human journey. A calm roadmap through the noise. 👺 iqs.selly.store/product/c10c6d…

@TheFlowHorse Savage 😆

Peter Attia supposedly is the best longevity doctor yet his patient Jeffrey Epstein died before 70.