Joseph Myer

@SageAmenti @covie_93 It would serve you well to look into the history of the Democrat party - slavery, KKK, segregation, Jim Crowe… all enacted and fought for by democrats.

@covie_93 The Supreme Court also ruled that they are racist. This isn't all that surprising since the Court is majority conservative and racism has long been a mainstay of white conservatives. For a Black man to be part of this is particularly hurtful.

The US Supreme Court ruled today that Black votes are worth less than others.

@covie_93 If school districts were created by race, Democrats would be howling about the injustice. When it comes to creating voting districts by race, well that’s just the way Democrats have always fought for things to be - segregated.

@RBReich If school districts were created by race, Democrats would be howling about the injustice. When it comes to creating voting districts by race, well that’s just the way Democrats have always fought for things to be - segregated.

Reminder that any political party trying to make it harder to vote is sending a clear message: they can't win on their ideas alone.

@BarackObama Let’s play a game: replace the word “voting” with “school” and draw district maps based on race. Do you think that might be racist?

Today’s Supreme Court decision effectively guts a key pillar of the Voting Rights Act, freeing state legislatures to gerrymander legislative districts to systematically dilute and weaken the voting power of racial minorities - so long as they do it under the guise of “partisanship” rather than explicit “racial bias.” And it serves as just one more example of how a majority of the current Court seems intent on abandoning its vital role in ensuring equal participation in our democracy and protecting the rights of minority groups against majority overreach. The good news is that such setbacks can be overcome. But that will only happen if citizens across the country who cherish our democratic ideals continue to mobilize and vote in record numbers - not just in the upcoming midterms or in high profile races, but in every election and every level.

@GuntherEagleman @ReverendWarnock Let’s play a game: replace the word “voting” with “school” and draw district maps based on race. Do you think that might be racist?

Trump’s Supreme Court just ruled against RACIAL GERRYMANDERING, stopping Democrats from carving up districts based purely on SKIN COLOR, and this race-baiting grifter screams “Jim Crow”?! Bro, your own Democrat Party invented Jim Crow and segregation. Now you’re mad because you can’t keep Black voters locked in your racial plantation districts anymore. The Supreme Court didn’t bring back Jim Crow, they just ended YOUR modern version of it. Cope and seethe

Trump's Supreme Court is dragging us back to the dark and ugly days of Jim Crow. x.com/abc/status/204…

@ReverendWarnock Let’s play a game: replace the word “voting” with “school” and draw district maps based on race. Do you think that might be racist?

@stacycay Let’s play a game: replace the word “voting” with “school” and draw district maps based on race. Do you think that might be racist?

I’m starting to think that maybe the Supreme Court is racist

By “protecting kids” you mean mutilating their genitalia or doing permanent damage to them with hormone “therapy” right? If the President was a pedophile, the Obama, Biden, Clinton crime syndicate would have plastered it on every billboard in America before the law-fare ensued. Get a clue.

@SusieWiles47 Hi Susie, protecting PEDOPHILES to keep her job since January 21, 2025🙄🤡#SusieWiles #Trump

I’m joining X to share occasional updates about the work we do at the White House. We are relentlessly focusing on advancing President Trump’s agenda and delivering on promises to the American people. I welcome different viewpoints. Follow along for insights and information.

Andrea Yates, who drowned her five children in her bathtub, is a mother too. Does that make her exempt from consequences for her own decisions. BTW, this is not a comment suggesting Good or Alex deserved what happened to them, but they made choices to engage with law enforcement aggressively, and those are situations that can go horribly awry. Stop presenting brainwashed people as martyrs.

Your agents shot a mother in the face, then called her a "fuckin' bitch."

@epaleezeldin @RepJoshHarder @SecKennedy If only the American public wasn’t constantly bombarded with cockamamie “facts” from Democrats that they never hear getting dismantled.

California’s 9th Congressional District apparently isn’t sending their brightest to Congress. Last week, @RepJoshHarder tried scoring cheap political points attacking our great HHS @SecKennedy, asking RFK Jr. to defend against Harder’s bogus claim that EPA was doubling the amount of mercury pollution (100% untrue!). He even called Secretary Kennedy a coward for not recognizing and being able to explain the fictitious numbers Harder was so confidently peddling. The problem, of course, was that Harder’s numbers were make-believe fairy dust.   This afternoon, Harder tried pulling that same garbage on me and walked into a buzz saw. First off, he had no clue the Biden rule he was defending hadn’t even taken effect yet, and when I pressed him using the official numbers developed through the rulemaking process, and asked him where his make-believe numbers were coming from, all he could muster was that they come from some mysterious source somewhere in the community.

@ElaineLuria Virginians live in Virginia. Not Texas or Florida. Virginia.

Haven’t seen any outrage from Virginia Republicans over this. 👀👀

@arnimalatesta @brivael Beware of letting political dogma taint the interpretation of objective facts. The Marx experiment led to the deaths of ~100 million people. That is a human tragedy brought about by horrendously flawed economic theory and the misguided politics that used it as their cornerstone.

@brivael Ton argumentation est belle... mais elle est bien idéologique... ça sent le droitardé...

Hello Julia, sans aucune ironie, c'est top que tu prennes le temps de te renseigner. Mais le problème quand on lit Marx aujourd'hui, c'est qu'on prend pour acquis sa prémisse de départ, alors qu'elle a été démontée scientifiquement il y a plus de 150 ans. Toute la pensée de Marx repose sur la théorie de la valeur-travail. L'idée que la valeur d'un bien vient de la quantité de travail nécessaire pour le produire. Si tu acceptes cette prémisse, alors oui, tout son raisonnement tient. Le capitaliste "vole" la plus-value du travailleur, l'exploitation est mathématique, la révolution est inévitable. Sauf qu'en 1871, trois économistes (Menger en Autriche, Jevons en Angleterre, Walras en Suisse) découvrent indépendamment la même chose : la valeur n'est pas objective, elle est subjective et marginale. Un verre d'eau dans le désert vaut une fortune. Le même verre à côté d'une rivière ne vaut rien. Le travail incorporé est identique. Donc le travail ne détermine pas la valeur. C'est le consommateur qui valorise un bien selon son utilité marginale dans un contexte donné. Exemple concret : tu peux passer 1000 heures à tricoter un pull moche que personne ne veut. Selon Marx, ce pull a énormément de valeur (beaucoup de travail incorporé). Selon la réalité, il ne vaut rien. Parce que personne n'en veut. À l'inverse, Bernard Arnault crée des milliards de valeur non pas parce qu'il "exploite" mais parce qu'il a su anticiper et organiser des désirs humains à grande échelle. La valeur est créée par la coordination, pas extraite par le vol. Cette découverte (la révolution marginaliste) a invalidé tout l'édifice marxiste. Pas pour des raisons idéologiques, pour des raisons scientifiques. C'est pour ça que plus aucun département d'économie sérieux au monde n'enseigne Marx comme un cadre d'analyse valide. On l'enseigne en histoire de la pensée. Maintenant, le truc important. Si ton intention en lisant Marx c'est d'aider les pauvres (c'est une intention noble), alors tu vas être surprise par ce qui suit. Regarde les chiffres de la Banque mondiale. En 1820, 90% de l'humanité vivait dans l'extrême pauvreté. Aujourd'hui, moins de 9%. Cette chute historique ne s'est PAS produite dans les pays qui ont appliqué Marx. Elle s'est produite dans les pays qui ont libéralisé leur économie. Chine post-1978, Vietnam post-1986, Inde post-1991, Pologne post-1989. À chaque fois qu'un pays libéralise, des centaines de millions de gens sortent de la pauvreté en une génération. À chaque fois qu'un pays applique Marx (URSS, Cambodge, Corée du Nord, Venezuela), c'est la famine et les goulags. Ce n'est pas une opinion, c'est l'expérience la plus massive jamais menée en sciences sociales. Plusieurs milliards de cobayes humains, sur un siècle. Donc paradoxalement, si tu aimes vraiment les pauvres, la position la plus cohérente n'est pas d'être marxiste. C'est d'être pour la liberté économique. Parce que c'est empiriquement la seule chose qui a jamais sorti massivement les gens de la misère. Pour creuser, je te recommande trois lectures qui vont changer ta vision : "La Loi" de Frédéric Bastiat (court, lumineux, gratuit en ligne) "La Route de la Servitude" de Hayek "Économie en une leçon" de Henry Hazlitt Bonne lecture, et vraiment chapeau de chercher à comprendre plutôt que de rester dans tes certitudes. C'est rare.

@brivael Well done, sir! Thank you on behalf of humanity!

@CvilleBubble We've seen very clearly that AG Jones cares very little about what the law directs, and only about Democrat power. Murder? Means to an end. Reckless driving? That's for the little people. Community service hours? Beneath him.

🗳️VA Supreme Court hears gerrymander case today Here AG Jay Jones frames the issues as the "will of the people" and "to protect the right to vote" -- despite the referendum violating the VA Constitution "Republicans are using any opportunity to undermine the will of the people" "That's why we've taken this to court, to make sure the will of the people will stand and go forward" Perhaps SCOVA will agree with Jones -- and the numerous lawyers hired to help him But they shouldn't: the "will of the people" isn't an argument to invalidate the Constitution

@Hoodie_Reid19xx How many assassination attempts on Obama, Biden, Clinton? Oh, that's right, ZERO! The coordinated, shrill sound of liberals losing their minds about DJT has gotten old. No gymnastics needed to identify and compare a hangnail to liberlism's plague; only rationality.

Oh so now they’re one offs after you’ve been disproven? Insane mental gymnastics.

@StatisticUrban Literally no one is making the claims you just threw out. @Geiger_Capital is countering the left's mantras verbatim. It should be easy for a "data scientist" to see the variance.

AOC is not Stalin. Immigration is not genocide. Enough with the fucking rhetoric.

@Tangul_Bei @RonFilipkowski Such a skillful argument, douchebag.

@JosephMyer13 @RonFilipkowski Fuck off you dumbfuck magatard. Christ you people are fucking stupid

Anyone suggesting we should stop accurately pointing out factual ways that the president is wrecking this country on a daily basis, or expressing an opinion about that, because of something a random nut does is espousing a profoundly un-American concept that I completely reject.

You passed the douchebag test with flying colors! If the President says something offensive, it does not negate the need or effectiveness of his policies. The meme you reference is highly offensive to me. My being offended doesn't override the best interests of the nation. Leftists don't believe that. Feelings are the lib's litmus test for all their actions.

@JosephMyer13 @RonFilipkowski Here's a magatard test for you

@JamesTate121 Someone being offended does not justify violence.

The people who posted racist memes of the Obamas as apes are asking to tone down the rhetoric. 🙄