
Judas Ischariotts
965 posts

Judas Ischariotts
@JudasIsch
White Ppl Are Retarded


SAM ALTMAN: “WE SEE A FUTURE WHERE INTELLIGENCE IS A UTILITY, LIKE ELECTRICITY OR WATER, AND PEOPLE BUY IT FROM US ON A METER.”


Imagine if the #1 women’s tennis player, Aryna Sabalenka, held a segregated dinner party for only white players with John McEnroe in attendance. She would be forced to apologize, Tennis Channel & ESPN would make statements/condemn it, & McEnroe would be suspended or fired. So why is a segregated blacks-only dinner party hosted by Naomi Osaka, with Chris Eubanks in attendance ok? You can’t have it both ways... PS: There has never been a whites-only party hosted by a white player in professional tennis as Osaka claims. She’ll never be able to provide proof.














CAUGHT ON CAMERA: Video captures moment bystanders took down suspect in deadly Smith's shooting. MORE: bit.ly/4dgUNyn








found my mom’s grocery receipt from 2006, and I just fell to my knees omg…🧎🏾♀️






How Chud WINS on Self-Defense In Nashville Shooting! LIVE at 11 AM ET! youtube.com/live/kYlV406-H… Dalton Eatherly, known online as "Chud the Builder," recently shot a man named Joshua Fox in Tennessee. Chud has built a reputation for deliberately provoking confrontations in public spaces—calling Black individuals racial slurs, making inflammatory remarks designed to agitate, and seemingly looking for conflict, all for the purpose of creating social media content. That pattern makes context critical as we analyze the shooting confrontation with Joshua Fox. This is a case where legal analysis requires walking a difficult line. Whatever one thinks of Chud’s antics, he has all the same rights of self-defense against unlawful attack as the rest of us—no more, and no less. The outcome in this shooting depends entirely on facts: Did Chud reasonably believe he faced imminent threat of death or serious bodily harm? Did he provoke the confrontation and acquire a legal duty to retreat in what is normally a stand-your-ground state? Provocation complicates a self-defense claim but doesn't automatically eliminate it. We'll break down the known and speculative facts, the applicable law, and explore the various legal outcomes. The purpose of all this? So you have a better understanding of the legal boundaries for the lawful use of force. Join me LIVE at 11 AM ET as I break it all down! Episode #1323. youtube.com/live/kYlV406-H…










