神の侍
88 posts

神の侍
@KamiNoSamurai
神の侍です✝️ 日本で少ないカトリック信者として、孤独を感じる兄弟姉妹と共に祈り、支え合い、聖なる道を歩む場所です。 あなたは一人ではありません。一緒に天国を目指しましょう。
Katılım Mayıs 2026
40 Takip Edilen34 Takipçiler

@atoreiyu200001 @PEAKS_RACING That is disgusting.
That behaviour in Britain, would be frowned upon, by British people.
English

I want to ask people around the world who are not Japanese.
At the restroom near Fushimi Inari Shrine last night — a sacred place —
someone left diapers covered in feces and piles of trash in the hand-washing area and just walked away.
Is this considered normal behavior where you come from?
To whoever did this — what the hell is wrong with you?
This isn’t just bad manners — it’s disgusting, disrespectful, and completely unacceptable.
This is a place of worship, not a garbage dump.
If anyone thinks this kind of behavior is okay, that’s the problem.
Clean up your own filth and learn some basic respect.
Don’t you all agree?

English

@TheGospelo0jsz 全身全霊でキリストを求めなさい。もし今暗闇の中にいるなら、「光を見せてください」と彼に祈りなさい(「自分は光など必要ない」と思うなら、特に注意してください。誰も光を必要としない人はいません)。
そうすれば、救いに一歩近づきます。
日本語

@himery_iddm ロザリオを首にかけるのは可能ですが、それが本来の使い方ではありません。
ファッションや見た目のために使うのはおすすめしません。
信心の目的(祈るため)であれば大丈夫です。
日本語

@tanpukunokami 日本を守るためにイスラム化を防ぐ道はただ一つ——キリストとその教会への回心です。
カトリック信仰は、日本の伝統・文化・習慣と完全に調和します。
日本語

La verdad que yo nunca sentí eso. Es una devoción con la que no conecto tanto. Con la Liturgia de las Horas sí, por ejemplo. Pero no me siento igual sobre el rosario como parece sentirse todo el mundo por aquí
Obdalis Damian✝️@obdDamian
Cuando comencé a rezar el Rosario a diario, recuerdo que las primeras cuentas se me hacían eternas. Poco a poco, siento que se pasa en un santiamén. Creo que en un tiempo más podría incluso rezarlo 2 veces al día. La experiencia es sobrenatural. Te eleva al cielo.
Español

Ya fuera de bromas, el fascismo está lejos de lo que quiero como católico. Critico a todo el espectro político porque todos se acogen a un marco incompatible con mi religión
MONSEÑOR PABLO EXCOMULGANDO A TOWA POR VIOLIN@JuanFon03729761
@YungJoseca no me quemes
Español

@tourouken555 ここいらの人間は警戒しなくちゃいけない人間とかはわかってない
昨日なんか普通に外人が乗ったボロい仮ナンバーの車がウロウロしてたけどそう言うのが警戒すべき所なんだけどね…
日本語

@tourouken555 @task_fortress ムハンマドとその宗派は、日本の価値観とは全く合いません。
彼らを日本に迎えるつもりはありません。
日本は女性を尊重し、愛する国です。
日本語

@KamiNoSamurai @XCkyro Appreciate the clarity and the good-faith dialogue. Forgive the ellipses, but I’d point to Ephesians 2:8–10: ‘By grace you have been saved through faith… not a result of works… for we are created in Christ Jesus for good works.’ We’d say faith saves and that produces works.
English

66 or 73 books? Let's talk about this...
If we are going to talk about the canon of Scripture, we start here: God is not confused about His own Word. The Lord who speaks clearly is fully able to preserve and identify His revelation. The issue is not whether there is a canon, but whether we will recognize the one God has established. When examined carefully, the 66 books stand on a consistent and coherent foundation.
First, the Old Testament canon was already recognized in the time of Jesus. The Jews, entrusted with the oracles of God, had a defined body of Scripture known as the Law, the Prophets, and the Writings. This matches the 39 books we have today. The apocrypha was never included or treated as Scripture by them.
Second, neither Jesus nor the apostles ever quoted the apocrypha as Scripture. They quoted the Old Testament hundreds of times with authority, using phrases like "it is written." Yet they never did this with the apocryphal books. That silence is significant.
Third, the apocrypha contains historical errors and theological contradictions. It promotes ideas that conflict with the clear teaching of salvation by grace through faith. God does not contradict Himself.
Fourth, the early church did not universally accept the apocrypha. Leaders like Jerome rejected it as Scripture, making a clear distinction between inspired books and useful writings.
Fifth, the New Testament books come from apostles or their close associates and were recognized early by the church as carrying Christ's authority. The church did not create the canon, it recognized it.
Finally, the apocrypha was officially added by the Roman Catholic Church at the Council of Trent in 1546, long after the canon was already established. That timing matters.
Taken together, the 66 books reflect a unified, preserved, and God-breathed revelation. They expose sin, reveal Christ, and call us to faithin Him.
That is why the canon stands firm at 66 books.
Josh Barzon@JoshuaBarzon
How many books are in the Bible?
English

I agree that true faith produces works. But it doesn’t do so automatically like a machine. God’s grace moves our will, but we must cooperate freely.
Abraham had tremendous faith, yet he still had to decide to obey and offer Isaac. He could have disobeyed. His faith was proven genuine precisely because he did his part and acted.
That’s why we believe works are necessary for salvation: not to earn the initial grace (that is a pure gift), but because a faith that does not produce works of love is not a saving faith.
English

@KamiNoSamurai @XCkyro Agreed! There’s no real contradiction between Paul and James. We’re just coming at it from different lenses. Both Protestant Christians and Catholic Christians affirm that true saving faith is never alone. It is living within us and produces good works.
English

The apparent contradiction disappears when we understand the Greek word “justified” (δικαιόω) has different senses:
Paul (Romans 4) speaks of initial justification — Abraham was justified by faith before any works.
James 2:21 speaks of demonstrative justification — Abraham’s faith was proven real when he offered Isaac.
“Faith without works is dead” (James 2:17). True saving faith works by love (Gal 5:6). Paul and James complement each other perfectly.
English

@XCkyro You’re not understanding the original Greek here. In James 2:21, “justified” (δικαιόω) can mean shown/proven to be righteous, not “made righteous” or “saved.”
And in context, James is talking about Abraham’s faith being proven by works, not how he was initially justified.
English

私たちが求めるエキュメニズムは、妥協や中途半端なものではありません。
キリスト教徒同士で「誰が正しいか」を争う必要はありません。大切なのは、互いに争わず、キリストに近づくことだと思います。
真実を真剣に求める人は、必ずキリストを通してその真理に導かれます。そしてその道は、必然的にカトリック教会へと通じています。
実際、プロテスタントからカトリックに回心した人は非常に多くいます。
だから私たちの役割は、争ったり非難したりすることではなく、祈ることです。
良心に従って神の愛を求めるプロテスタントの兄弟姉妹が、いつか必ず本当の教会を見つけるよう、一緒に祈りましょう。
争いではなく、祈りによって。
日本語

@Ojo_Ball @JuanFon03729761 フィロカリアには複数の作者がいますね。誰の言葉かを明確に伝えた方がいいかもしれません。
追伸:イエスの名の祈りについて読んでいる人に出会えて本当に嬉しいです。
日本語

@MartinP49146517 @JoshuaBarzon つまり、プロテスタントが聖書から「完全性」を削除したのは偶然ではない、ということです。7は完全性を表す数字ですから。
私はカトリック信者です。
日本語

@KamiNoSamurai @JoshuaBarzon Lightweight.
So according to your Mormon like worldview, the Holy Spirit got the New Testament right but was not powerful enough and got the Old Testament wrong until over 1,400 years later when a bunch of old Protestant men in London removed 7 books in 1826?
English

















