Katherine Valentine

479 posts

Katherine Valentine

Katherine Valentine

@Karatesoup3

Katılım Mayıs 2026
48 Takip Edilen7 Takipçiler
Katherine Valentine retweetledi
Roger Stone
Roger Stone@RogerJStoneJr·
Senator LINDSEY GRAHAM, who said that January 6 protesters should be shot in the head and who told the White House counsel that President Trump should be removed under the 25th amendment after January 6 has died at age 71
English
983
1.9K
9.3K
566.9K
🎯Truth Seeker🎯
🎯Truth Seeker🎯@Nickisbackbaby·
I know Christians are supposed to keep their mouths shut and just love people but..... I honestly struggle to find anything positive about Islam!
English
145
15
289
4K
Katherine Valentine
Katherine Valentine@Karatesoup3·
@lsferguson When he locked the world down for Covid and initiated the greatest transfer of wealth (to the top not the bottom) what more did u ppl need to see?
English
0
0
0
2
Katherine Valentine retweetledi
Jeff Putnam |✍
Jeff Putnam |✍@TheJeffPutnam·
Since Flock loves to track our locations, it only seems fair that we know theirs. Flock Safety's new GA plant is located at 1885 Mitchell Rd, Smyrna, GA 30082 Flock went to great lengths to keep that address hidden. That probably means it should be public info.
English
412
15.5K
56.8K
638.1K
Katherine Valentine retweetledi
The Citadel Baseball
The Citadel Baseball@CitadelBaseball·
Pittsburgh just got a Bulldog! ⚾️🐶 Congratulations to Michael Gibson on being selected by the @Pirates with the 288th pick in the 10th round of the 2026 MLB Draft! #jOURney
The Citadel Baseball tweet media
English
2
31
71
4.5K
Katherine Valentine retweetledi
Ann Coulter
Ann Coulter@AnnCoulter·
Trump swore he "would not sign" the housing bill. He let it pass anyway. Inside it: a Section 8 expansion — better zip codes for the next Michael Brown. Yours, for instance. Guess who's made millions off Section 8 housing? Jared Kushner.
English
218
1K
3.5K
115.3K
Katherine Valentine retweetledi
The Biblical Man
The Biblical Man@Biblicalman·
A John MacArthur clip is going around right now where he says nothing political or social "has anything to do with the advancement of the kingdom of God." Thousands of Christians are bookmarking it. Reposting it. Treating it like settled doctrine because a famous man said it in a confident voice at a Q&A. Let me show you what your Bible actually says. Joseph of Arimathea used his political standing to retrieve the body of Christ. Without his seat on the Sanhedrin, that body stays on the cross and the burial never happens. That was political standing used for the kingdom. Daniel served in the government of Babylon. He governed as a believer inside a pagan empire, and God used that position to preserve an entire people. Esther used her political position in a foreign court to stop a genocide. She walked into the throne room and risked her life because the kingdom of God was operating through that system. Nehemiah had a political office under a pagan king. He used that office to rebuild the walls of Jerusalem. Actual stone and mortar. A political act that directly advanced the purposes of God. Moses walked straight into Pharaoh's court. Ten plagues targeted the political and religious systems of Egypt simultaneously. Jesus Himself was executed by a political system. The crucifixion was a Roman political act. And the resurrection was God's answer to it. The idea that the kingdom of God operates in some separate lane from politics and culture is not in your Bible. The entire Old Testament is the story of God working through nations, governments, judges, and kings. And the theology is only half of why that clip matters. The other half is how fast Christians adopted it as their own position without ever opening the text to check. A famous man says something with authority and a clip goes viral. Thousands of believers treat it as settled. I used to stitch my faith together from pieces of other men. A little of this pastor, a little of that podcast, whatever sounded smart that week. Then my kid asked me a question about the Bible and I realized I was quoting everyone except the Book. That's the disease. We have been trained to follow personalities instead of Scripture. Trained to let a man's reputation do the work our own study was supposed to do. You can respect a man and still hold his words up against the text. You should. That's what the Bereans did in Acts 17:11. They heard Paul preach and then searched the scriptures daily to see whether those things were so. The apostle Paul himself, and they still checked him. If the Bereans checked Paul, you can check anyone. Read your Bible.
English
145
439
1.5K
40.6K
Katherine Valentine
Katherine Valentine@Karatesoup3·
@skumWgmi Your neighbors property taxes would be the same. Homes values get reassessed and taxes go up depending on value not the price u paid. These r usually seniors who r on a fixed income and the property taxes are more than their initial mortgage so they can't stay in their home
English
1
0
0
1.4K
skumm🧊
skumm🧊@skumWgmi·
My neighbor bought his house in 1987 for $74,000. He never refinanced it. He paid it off. His property taxes are $1,800/year because of how long he's owned it. The exact same house next door just sold for $830,000. The 29-year-old who bought it pays $9,300/year in taxes and $4,100/month on the mortgage. Same street. Same house. Completely different life. We didn't just price people out of homes. We priced them out of future.
English
340
709
7.1K
246K
Katherine Valentine
Katherine Valentine@Karatesoup3·
@liderfiscal A young girl in Michigan was just taken in her backyard by an illegal. Her brother heard her screaming and hit the attacker with a rock and a marble in his slingshot and she was able to get away. Thankfully he has been apprehended. Your outrage is misdirected.
English
0
0
0
2
Valy 🎩🎭
Valy 🎩🎭@liderfiscal·
#URGENTE Las imágenes que nos llegan de todas las detenciones y redadas de #ICE son de verdad criminarles. ¿Cómo puede justificar el gobierno de Donald Trump este actuar de su Gestapo? ¿Acaso esto no debería de ser motivo de fuertes críticas y exhortos de organismos internacionales para que Trump respete los Derechos Humanos? @hrw @UNHumanRights @Claudiashein #UrgenteCOMPARTAN #RTMasivo
Español
2.8K
16.1K
21.3K
426.3K
Katherine Valentine retweetledi
George Barclay
George Barclay@gbarks_24·
None of the items listed fall within the American Bar Association’s Rule 2.11 regarding judicial disqualification (which are adopted by all 50 states in some form or fashion). The schools aren’t parties to this lawsuit, the players are. Sour grapes by the NCAA.
Ross Dellenger@RossDellenger

The Ohio judge who granted 15 athletes additional eligibility did not disclose his school “ties,” NCAA says in a statement to Yahoo. Chris Wagner is a graduate of Xavier & Cincinnati Law. His wife is a dean at UC Law. Five of the athletes are affiliated with Cincinnati/Xavier.

English
1
2
9
2K
Katherine Valentine
Katherine Valentine@Karatesoup3·
@RossDellenger The phrase "aggressively fight" reminds me of when Demi Moore character in A Gew Good Men says, I strenuously object and her co counsel ridiculed her. Motions for Reconsideration are rarely granted and winning on Appeal is even less likely.
English
0
0
0
111
Ross Dellenger
Ross Dellenger@RossDellenger·
The NCAA plans to aggressively fight the injunction from Wagner and is gearing up to submit an appeal and/or stay of the ruling or even a reconsideration. “The court disregarded over a century of precedent and substituted its own judgment,” the NCAA said in a statement Thursday.
English
3
3
33
25.2K
Ross Dellenger
Ross Dellenger@RossDellenger·
The Ohio judge who granted 15 athletes additional eligibility did not disclose his school “ties,” NCAA says in a statement to Yahoo. Chris Wagner is a graduate of Xavier & Cincinnati Law. His wife is a dean at UC Law. Five of the athletes are affiliated with Cincinnati/Xavier.
Ross Dellenger tweet media
Ross Dellenger@RossDellenger

A judge has granted these 15 athletes in Ohio their injunction, permitting them an additional year of eligibility. The case was filed in the wake of the new age-based, 5-year policy. The injunction also grants the players an ability to transfer now outside of the portal window.

English
42
52
284
503.2K
Katherine Valentine retweetledi
Noah Bieniek (Bee-Nick)
The NCAA disregarded over a century of precedent when they created the “Five to play Five” rule. They substituted their own judgement when they left out the 2022 class (that also didn’t get a COVID year) and thought they wouldn’t be taken to court for it
Ross Dellenger@RossDellenger

The NCAA plans to aggressively fight the injunction from Wagner and is gearing up to submit an appeal and/or stay of the ruling or even a reconsideration. “The court disregarded over a century of precedent and substituted its own judgment,” the NCAA said in a statement Thursday.

English
1
1
12
5.5K
Katherine Valentine
Katherine Valentine@Karatesoup3·
@M_Gerber17 It's B. I get developing in college but it comes with risk. If u get injured you get cut. A player can sign an MLB contract that agrees to pay for their college degree. If I was a player talented enough to be drafted at all I think I would go and chase a pro career.
English
0
0
0
153
Matt Gerber
Matt Gerber@M_Gerber17·
Asking for a friend…when a player “Removes himself from the Draft” does that mean: A - I want to go to school so badly that I am not signing no matter what B - I was told I was a 1st round pick by everyone around me, but I’m more like a eighth round pick C - Something else altogether
English
17
2
30
37K
Katherine Valentine retweetledi
First and 16 - A Big 12 Podcast
Since everyone wants to jump on ESPN FPI rankings, let’s check out how well ESPN’s FPI did last year! No 1 Texas missed the Playoffs No. 5 Penn State went 7-6 No. 11 Clemson finished unranked No. 12 LSU finished 7-6 No. 14 Auburn missed a bowl game No. 15 South Carolina finished 4-8 No. 18 Florida finished 4-8 No. 21 KSU missed bowl No. 22 Arkansas went 2-10 No. 25 Nebraska went 7-6 No Texas Tech, BYU, Utah, Houston, or TCU who all finished ranked. No Indiana who beat everyone and won the Natty No G6 teams (4 finished ranked) They had 13 SEC schools ranked, and somehow missed Vanderbilt I don’t think you could create a worse poll if you tried.
First and 16 - A Big 12 Podcast tweet media
English
107
221
1.3K
130.3K
Katherine Valentine
Katherine Valentine@Karatesoup3·
@robbhurstCPA Automatic transmission and windows. AC in the car. It was always fun pulling up to the toll booth hoping u had the correct change and hand rolling down your windows while you manually shifted your car
English
0
0
1
12
Robb Hurst, CPA 🇺🇸
Robb Hurst, CPA 🇺🇸@robbhurstCPA·
What was a luxury growing up that is taken for granted now? For me it was drinking orange juice.
English
126
1
60
11.6K
Katherine Valentine
Katherine Valentine@Karatesoup3·
@kacdnp91 Wow. I know a family whose child was diagnosed with a rare deadly cancer. They went to a naturopath and that child is now a young adult.
English
0
0
1
43
Kelly DNP Functional/Integrative Medicine
Three U.S. states ban the practice of naturopathy; Florida, South Carolina, and Tennessee. In these states, practicing naturopathic medicine is illegal. In fact, Florida maintains a strict ban on the practice, where it is classified as a felony. Why? Bc it is one of the greatest threats to big pharma @GovRonDeSantis
English
178
820
2.4K
76.2K
Drey
Drey@thedreydossier·
Trump Accounts are no longer going to be optional- so if you ever plan on having a child in the USA, you should read what I found: According to the @SocialSecurity Administration's announcement last week, they are modifying the hospital birth registration form so that a Trump Account is AUTOMATICALLY created for your child through that same process. It will be bundled into the Enumeration at Birth program (EAB), which is the already automated gov pipeline that gives your newborn a Social Security number. It’s one box that you check, you don’t have the option of unbundling it. So if you want your kid to have a Social Security number, they have to have a Trump account. Which is strange, because according to the IRS and @USTreasury’s public announcements, these accounts only open when a parent actively elects to open one. So which is it? Why is nobody in the government interested in explaining this flagrant contradiction? Who is going to answer the basic question of what a parent does if they don’t want a government-linked investment account (one that collects biometric data, by the way) created for their child at the exact moment their child’s Social Security number issued? They can call it a savings account all they want, but a $1,000 deposit is a hell of a cheap price for building a lifelong financial file on every American child before they can consent to anything. And once the government normalizes linking a person’s identity, financial activity, and predictive systems from birth, who gets to decide what that data will be used to predict later? We deserve answers immediately. @ndstudio @WhiteHouse
Drey tweet mediaDrey tweet media
English
564
6.3K
15.2K
1.6M