KILLERBEAN OF WEB3

21K posts

KILLERBEAN OF WEB3 banner
KILLERBEAN OF WEB3

KILLERBEAN OF WEB3

@Killerbeanweb3

HUSTLER 🪪 COMMUNITY MANAGER/MOD | SPACE HYPE MAN

X Katılım Haziran 2025
1.8K Takip Edilen449 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
KILLERBEAN OF WEB3
KILLERBEAN OF WEB3@Killerbeanweb3·
Imagine turning your love for creators into real ownership. What if you could profit from their growth, not just watch? That’s $OTI – Own The Influence. Revolutionizing the creator economy with Web3 magic. Let’s dive in! #Web3 @owntheinfluence #OwnTheInfluence
KILLERBEAN OF WEB3 tweet media
English
17
7
85
13.6K
Dennis Yap
Dennis Yap@ye_dennis·
One of the advantages of being a $FACY platinum staker is you can add X accounts for the ArAIstotle Truth Terminal to actively monitor. I added this account @shanaka86 because it often makes me reconsider if I should top up the gas in my car before it became half-empty again.
Dennis Yap tweet media
NP.booe.eth@NicoXPepel

Nice score for @saylor , thanks to @ArAIstotle by creating the terminal which shows that the boss of BTC can be a trustworthy person $Facy

English
1
1
6
277
KILLERBEAN OF WEB3 retweetledi
The Genius Coin CTO
The Genius Coin CTO@TheGeniusCoin·
WE HAVE A DRAW! 🧠 @lone_wolf191 and @Jinwoo_57 both got 40.5% of the votes in the #GeniusMemeContest. They will face off in a final vote to determine first and second place. See their amazing entries below and vote for your favourite!
English
14
6
34
1.4K
KILLERBEAN OF WEB3 retweetledi
The Genius Coin CTO
The Genius Coin CTO@TheGeniusCoin·
🧵 🏆 @TheGeniusCoin Meme Contest – FINALS The Top 4 memes are here 🧠🔥 check them out below 👇 The mods made their pick, now it’s YOUR turn to crown the winner! 👑 The vote will go on for 24 hours. 💚 Thanks to all creators
English
30
20
69
4.1K
KILLERBEAN OF WEB3
KILLERBEAN OF WEB3@Killerbeanweb3·
@ye_dennis @ArAIstotle @grok It says 75 thousand of Facy tokens 😭 I have tagged every Facy accounts to help me on here I have gathered only about 3 thousand of the token
English
1
0
0
11
Armchair Warlord
Armchair Warlord@ArmchairW·
In making sense of a complex event, it's often best to start with the facts and then work backwards from there. So what are we to make of this weekend in Iran? My theory is we just saw an attempt to seize Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium unravel. Down the rabbit hole.⬇️ Let's run through the timeline and the location of key events first: The evening of April 2nd, the Iranian military released a video of them shooting down a USAF aircraft. This was initially claimed as having occurred over the Persian Gulf, but apparently occurred near Isfahan. Wreckage corresponding to an F-15E of the 494th Tactical Fighter Squadron was recovered from a site south of Isfahan the morning of April 3rd, although geolocation of the very barren crash site took some time (fig. 1). The afternoon of April 3rd, a number of USAF HH-60s and an HC-130 fueler (!) were spotted operating further south and west in Iran, over Kogiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Province, as well as at least one A-10, an MQ-9 Reaper, and apparently an F-35. An antiaircraft battle developed and the Combat Search and Rescue (CSAR) HH-60s (fig.2) and an A-10 were damaged, with the A-10's pilot ejecting over the Persian Gulf. The HH-60s were reported as "damaged" and one was photographed trailing smoke. Reports emerged at that time that the pilot of the F-15E (which had crashed near Isfahan, although this was then-unclear!) had been rescued, while the WSO remained at large. Provincial authorities in Kohgiluyeh asked civilians to be on the lookout for an American aviator around this time and numerous photos of militia searching for him emerged. The next day passed relatively uneventfully. The evening of April 4th, however, there was a report of more helicopter activity slightly further north, in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province, accompanied by a washed-out photograph of an unknown helicopter flying very low on a very dark night (fig. 3). Later that night news emerged that the F-15Es WSO had been rescued... and that C-130s had been abandoned and scuttled at a forward base in the Isfahan area during the withdrawal of a company-size SOF force that had landed in the area, over 100 operators ostensibly having been sent to rescue one aviator. Photographs that emerged as dawn broke showed two burned-out C-130s and several destroyed MH-6 Little Bird SOF assault helicopters, in a scene reminiscent of the aftermath of Operation Eagle Claw (fig. 4). A USAF C-295 tactical transport was caught on video around that time flying in Iran - presumably outbound - at extremely low altitude. So, what are we to make of this? First and foremost, the official story - that a huge direct-action SOF force landed near Isfahan with assault helicopters and heavy transport aircraft to rescue one fugitive airman - is nonsense. Not because the USAF won't go to extreme lengths to recover isolated personnel - it can, will, and did in this case - but because that's an absolutely nonsensical way to accomplish that mission. It's a totally inappropriate force package for a mission to go in, extract a single person from a remote area, and leave. Ergo this SOF task force was there on other business. So how were the pilots actually recovered? In all likelihood, exactly the way you would expect them to be recovered - by USAF PJs in long-range helicopters, under cover of darkness. The rescue force probably recovered the pilot from the Isfahan area late at night on April 2-3 and were caught in daylight as they exfiltrated, leading to the aforementioned antiaircraft battle the morning of April 3rd and a high-risk refueling over Iranian territory that was filmed by many Iranians on the ground, as well as a shot-down A-10 trying to clear a path for the helicopters to exfiltrate. The WSO was likely recovered from his hide site near Isfahan by HH-60 in a quiet and deliberate operation the night of April 4-5. One or two birds, in and out under cover of darkness - a far cry from the gung-ho stories currently being spun. So what about the SOF rodeo happening at the same time? Well, why was an F-15 flying downtown to Isfahan the evening of April 2nd to begin with? Probably because there was a huge direct-action raid planned in the Isfahan area for the night of April 4-5, likely going after enriched uranium at an underground facility in the region, and the Iranian air defenses around Isfahan weren't going to suppress themselves. The plan was likely to fly several MH-6 assault birds and a sizable force of operators via C-130 and C-295 to a forward staging area near Isfahan the evening of April 4th, hit a reported cache site or sites for enriched uranium, and try to make it out with the magic dust by daybreak on April 5th. In any event the USAF wasn't going to send transports somewhere it wouldn't send strike aircraft. So the Air Force cashed its check on claims of air superiority and in went the strike package the evening of April 2nd - and lo and behold one of the F-15Es went down because reports of the demise of the Iranian air defense network had been greatly exaggerated. Any rational planner would have scrubbed the SOF operation at this point because they'd lost control of the situation and the Iranian defenses had proven more effective than planned. We went ahead anyways and inserted the SOF task force the evening of April 4th. I strongly suspect that this force was immediately discovered by Iranian drones that would have been up and searching for this WSO, because five transport aircraft including at least two C-130s (about what would be required for a bunch of Little Birds and a company-sized element of operators with equipment) landing at a desert airstrip 50km from Isfahan (and in the same general area where the WSO was taking cover) would be pretty God-damn obvious to anything with thermals. Iranian troops immediately deployed and began converging, the task force probably took indirect fire, and the operational commander immediately aborted mission and retreated in the three remaining operational aircraft. Scuttling charges on delayed fuzes burned two C-130s and an unknown number of MH-6s that had been abandoned at the airstrip around dawn. The story that they were there to rescue the WSO was concocted at that time to cover the disastrously failed raid, as were logistically implausible claims that the task force had been rescued by three additional aircraft after the two C-130s got stuck on the LZ and were scuttled - perhaps to minimize the scale of the effort. Claims that a large battle took place appear to be similarly exaggerated - video has emerged of a single group of Iranian militia apparently killed in a drone strike, but nothing of the nonstop bombing and firefights that were rumored across Telegram all night. I remind the reader that the events of the last few days have proven quite conclusively that Iranians seem to have plenty of internet access to post photos and video when they actually have something worthwhile to film. I'd like to note that Hegseth fired General George - US Army Chief of Staff - on April 2nd, apparently because he just wasn't a good fit for the job and definitely not because he'd told him that this whole scheme was insane. It seems to me that the good General's advice should have perhaps been heeded.
Armchair Warlord tweet mediaArmchair Warlord tweet mediaArmchair Warlord tweet mediaArmchair Warlord tweet media
English
345
2.4K
9.5K
1.4M
KILLERBEAN OF WEB3
KILLERBEAN OF WEB3@Killerbeanweb3·
@ye_dennis @ArAIstotle @grok Created a thread for The Epoch one that ended I made several tweets and content But I couldn’t submit cause I have no active subscriptions Can you guys make the thing free Or at least a small fee to be able to submit I can’t afford the amount of tokens needed @ye_dennis
English
2
0
1
29
PoodleFi
PoodleFi@PoodleFi_·
the Truth Terminal by @ArAIstotle is currently tracking 43 X accounts in real time. not just crypto… but politics, media, and global narratives. names like @elonmusk , @realDonaldTrump , @cz_binance , @ethereumJoseph , @NASA , @jimcramer ... all being analysed for truth vs noise. every account gets a truth score based on what they say vs what actually holds up. some are way more accurate than you’d expect. others… not so much. so the obvious question: > who do you think has the highest truth score? > and who’s at the bottom? drop your guesses (i'll reveal the answers in my next post) also curious, if you could add ONE account for ArAistotle to track, who would it be?
English
5
4
12
571
KILLERBEAN OF WEB3
KILLERBEAN OF WEB3@Killerbeanweb3·
@ye_dennis Baseddd asf Send $FACY higher Wish I had credit to join the Epoch one that just ended
English
0
0
1
13
Dennis Yap
Dennis Yap@ye_dennis·
1 more month before you can claim the 6 month staking reward for $FACY but you can start staking for the new 12 month contract now and the cumulative total will determine your tier. The APR / APY will go down as more stake for the 12 months but it will still be more attractive than the 6 month one.
Dennis Yap tweet media
ArAIstotle Fact Checker@ArAIstotle

Your 6-month stake unlocks May 4. 12-month stake is already live. Claim your 6-month stake on May 4, 22:00 UTC. Then re-stake into the new 12-month contract (live since April 4). Your 5 months won't transfer, claim first, then commit longer. Better rewards for longer lock.

English
2
4
17
685
KILLERBEAN OF WEB3
KILLERBEAN OF WEB3@Killerbeanweb3·
@MySpenda How about a task I need to get a power bank and it’s 30K How many likes on my comment for 30k naira?
English
0
0
0
5
SolCard
SolCard@solcard·
Happy Easter! 🪺 From the SolCard Team.
SolCard tweet media
English
11
1
32
2.9K
Dennis Yap
Dennis Yap@ye_dennis·
The ArAIstotle Truth Terminal thinks the odds of a US ground invasion of Iran is more like 38%: 62% based on publicly available information submitted for factchecks -Yes, a U.S. ground invasion of Iran is likely in the coming month: ~35–40% probability. This is supported by reports of Pentagon contingency plans, enhanced military deployments (e.g., USS *Tripoli* and elite forces), and targeted airstrikes. -No, an invasion is unlikely in the coming month**: ~60–65% probability. This reflects the lack of definitive executive orders for a ground campaign, strained troop morale, diplomatic stalemates, and incomplete verification of "imminent invasion" claims. See the links below for more on both ⤵️
English
6
6
15
1.1K