Laura Ruis

1.4K posts

Laura Ruis banner
Laura Ruis

Laura Ruis

@LauraRuis

Postdoc with @jacobandreas @MIT_CSAIL. PhD from @ucl_dark with @_rockt and @egrefen. Anon feedback: https://t.co/sbebAl53tU

London Katılım Ekim 2019
837 Takip Edilen7.2K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Laura Ruis
Laura Ruis@LauraRuis·
How do LLMs learn to reason from data? Are they ~retrieving the answers from parametric knowledge🦜? In our new preprint, we look at the pretraining data and find evidence against this: Procedural knowledge in pretraining drives LLM reasoning ⚙️🔢 🧵⬇️
Laura Ruis tweet media
English
24
208
985
198.3K
Laura Ruis retweetledi
Antonia Juelich
Antonia Juelich@AntoniaJuelich·
In a hotel room in northeast Nigeria, I opened a leading AI chatbot, turned my laptop toward a former Boko Haram commander, and asked if he'd used it. He nodded. "You type in the question… like 'How can I build a bomb?', and then it tells you how. It is like a human robot. We used it a lot." My new study on how the jihadist terrorist group Boko Haram uses frontier AI with @CamAISciPolicy, covered today in @nytimes 🧵/9
English
284
1.9K
7.7K
2.6M
Laura Ruis retweetledi
Robert Kirk
Robert Kirk@_robertkirk·
@AISecurityInst did our first pre-deployment alignment testing with OpenAI for GPT 5.6 Sol! 3 key takeaways 🧵
Robert Kirk tweet media
English
1
6
39
3K
Laura Ruis
Laura Ruis@LauraRuis·
This was accepted to COLM 2026 🥳 A striking limitation of SotA LLMs in discovering a latent planning strategy in an almost trivial graph-search task Check out the paper ⤵️
Yi Xu@_yixu

🚀Scale a 1.6M-param transformer to one of today's strongest models, GPT-5.4, and it plans... 4 steps further. In our latest work, we measure how many steps of latent planning LLMs can discover and execute without chain-of-thought and find a persistent depth ceiling that resists scale. 🧵👇

English
1
6
64
8.8K
Carl Guo
Carl Guo@CarlGuo866·
New Paper 📄: LMs just want to explain themselves! When we SFT an LM on explanations of its own behaviors, do they learn to actually introspect, or do they merely imitate the original training distribution? We find evidence for the former. Despite training on a static set of explanations from a base model, the SFT-ed model explains its own current behaviors better than the base model’s behaviors, tracking behavioral drift even when we don’t explicitly train it to. We call this introspective coupling: self-explanations track a model’s own behavior as that behavior changes, and it shows promise in making introspection training a part of scalable post-training pipelines. 🧵
Carl Guo tweet media
English
5
36
191
34.2K
Laura Ruis retweetledi
Mehul Damani
Mehul Damani@MehulDamani2·
Higher benchmark scores do not always mean better models for users. Why? We claim that RL teaches LMs to be correct but not how to be correct: code can pass tests but be unreadable; explanations can be right but unclear. How do we train LMs to be right in the right way? (1/n)
Mehul Damani tweet media
English
4
32
126
29.3K
Laura Ruis
Laura Ruis@LauraRuis·
@AndrewLampinen @CarlGuo866 Interesting suggestion, would definitely be good to run the 2-seed exp. But "explanation training changing the models behavior outside the explanations themselves" being the reason is consistent with privileged access no?
English
1
0
1
51
Andrew Lampinen
Andrew Lampinen@AndrewLampinen·
@CarlGuo866 the base model being less coherent, and/or explanation training changing the models behavior outside the explanations themselves, might contribute to the model being more reliable at explaining it's own behavior, without it being due to privileged access per se. 2/2
English
2
0
1
336
Laura Ruis retweetledi
Belinda Li
Belinda Li@belindazli·
Really excited about this work, led by the wonderful @CarlGuo866! When training models to explain themselves, the training itself shifts model behaviors so the original explanation labels become stale. Surprisingly, the model actually *learns to explain its current self* and not the stale checkpoint that generated its training labels. This inclination to self-explain is so strong that *even when trained on another model's explanation labels, the model still learns to explain itself* better than the label source! I’m excited about this on two fronts: first, it’s indication that models genuinely learn something “introspection-esque”, exploiting privileged access to themselves when generating explanations. Second, practically speaking, it shows self-explanations can directly be inserted into post-training without worrying about expensive label refresh. Check out @CarlGuo866’s thread for more details! We pinpoint when this “introspective coupling” happens, and show that this training yields faithful self-explanations even in the presence of auxiliary fine-tuning. 👇
Belinda Li tweet mediaBelinda Li tweet media
Carl Guo@CarlGuo866

New Paper 📄: LMs just want to explain themselves! When we SFT an LM on explanations of its own behaviors, do they learn to actually introspect, or do they merely imitate the original training distribution? We find evidence for the former. Despite training on a static set of explanations from a base model, the SFT-ed model explains its own current behaviors better than the base model’s behaviors, tracking behavioral drift even when we don’t explicitly train it to. We call this introspective coupling: self-explanations track a model’s own behavior as that behavior changes, and it shows promise in making introspection training a part of scalable post-training pipelines. 🧵

English
3
11
70
9.8K
Laura Ruis retweetledi
FAR.AI
FAR.AI@farairesearch·
Confirmed for Seoul Alignment Workshop: @BlancheMinerva (@AiEleuther). Her work on Deep Ignorance shows that filtering dangerous knowledge out of pretraining data, rather than stripping it out afterward, makes open-weight models markedly harder to tamper with. The most durable safeguard is the knowledge a model never learns.
FAR.AI tweet media
English
1
4
48
4.2K
Laura Ruis
Laura Ruis@LauraRuis·
@akbirkhan GPT-1 was expensive but still academically reachable for well-funded labs back in 2018
Laura Ruis tweet media
English
1
0
0
96
akbir.
akbir.@akbirkhan·
@LauraRuis i think most new paradigms are discovered in the higher regimes of compute! You can see imagenet/ transformers / gpts as a function of researchers getting more flops to play with!
English
2
0
0
156
Laura Ruis retweetledi
Sathya Edamadaka ✈️ ICML
Sathya Edamadaka ✈️ ICML@sathyaedamadaka·
Introducing Atomistic Language Models (ALMs), a new paradigm to unify atomistic understanding, materials generation, and natural language. ALMs set the SoTA on crystal structure prediction, de novo generation, and editing materials as instructed by text.
Sathya Edamadaka ✈️ ICML tweet media
English
4
7
52
10.7K
Laura Ruis retweetledi
Robert Kirk
Robert Kirk@_robertkirk·
With mentees from @LASRlabs we just released a benchmark for evaluation awareness capabilities! We fixed issues with previous work (how to choose prompts and the deployment data), and found most frontier models can distinguish evals from deployment (unsurprisingly, perhaps)!
Ram Bharadwaj@arbdwj

Can we reliably measure whether frontier models know they are being evaluated? 🔬 New paper from me, @xinningli6, @levanto_0,@AlexandraSouly, @_robertkirk: EvalDetectBench, a benchmark for measuring evaluation awareness in frontier LLMs 🧵

English
1
3
12
1.4K
Laura Ruis retweetledi
Zhengyao Jiang
Zhengyao Jiang@zhengyaojiang·
This year @WecoAI will be at the @aiDotEngineer World's Fair. We'll host a hands-on autoresearch workshop on June 29. And I'll give a talk on July 1. Looking forward to chatting with old and new friends there! ai.engineer/worldsfair/2026
English
2
8
29
4.5K
Laura Ruis retweetledi
Tim Rocktäschel
Tim Rocktäschel@_rockt·
It has been an absolute privilege and pleasure to build up @UCL_DARK with @egrefen, @robertarail and @jparkerholder over the past eight years. Yesterday, the UK government announced not just one but two national academic fundamental AI research labs. I am extremely excited to announce that @UCL_DARK will be sunsetted and merge with @FLAIR_Ox, @whi_rl, @UCL_LASP and AIRL, to form the British Open-ended Learning and Discovery (BOLD) Lab — @BOLD_Lab_AI. This is a huge moment for academic AI research in the UK. Backed with £30m by @UKRI_News and @EPSRC, it provides a unique opportunity to attract leading international academic talent to the UK, and equip them with the computational resources to do groundbreaking exploratory AI research (more on the computational resources soon). It also creates a mentorship network of academics, industry leaders and entrepreneurs to educate young talent on how to translate fundamental AI research into real world impact. I want to thank all the students who made @UCL_DARK successful, in particular our PhD alumni @MinqiJiang, @_samvelyan, @zhengyaojiang, @_robertkirk, @akbirkhan, @LauraRuis, @YingchenX, @PaglieriDavide, and the work of our honorary faculty @egrefen, @robertarail and @jparkerholder who were generously contributing to mentorship and research in their free time.
British Open-ended Learning and Discovery Lab@bold_lab_ai

Hello world :) We are BOLD — the British Open-ended Learning and Discovery Lab! BOLD is a new academic research lab fully focussed on paradigm breaking discoveries in fundamental AI. We work towards more efficient & open AI that is built around human needs and capabilities. To pursue these breakthroughs, we pioneer new modes of collaboration in academia that are more focussed, resourced, agile, and collaborative. Rather than fragmenting resources, today we are sunsetting 5 of the UKs leading AI labs to join forces under our joined scientific vision. Our vision is centered around three pillars: ⚡ Beyond backpropagation – questioning the foundations of the field. 🤝 Human-centric learning & discovery – treating humans as core to our algorithms 🤖 Embodied learning – fast learning and adapting methods that deal with the messy real world BOLD is backed by @UKRI_News and @EPSRC with £30M – and this is just the beginning. We are urgently looking for partners and sponsors to 10x this. 👉 ox.ac.uk/news/2026-06-2… 👉 bold-lab.ai @j_foerst, @CULLYAntoine, @tonizza82, @shimon8282, @tonizza82, Ani Calinescu & @_rockt

English
18
25
210
20.4K
Laura Ruis retweetledi
Lisa Alazraki
Lisa Alazraki@LisaAlazraki·
I’m happy to share that I’m starting a new position as Research Intern at @allen_ai! I’ll be in Seattle all summer and keen to meet people with similar research interests. DM me if you are in the area and want to meet. I’ll also be in San Diego for ACL on July 4-7!
Lisa Alazraki tweet media
English
7
2
114
6.8K
Laura Ruis retweetledi
Belinda Li
Belinda Li@belindazli·
New paper, led by the amazing @PresItamar! Models that can faithfully explain their own behavior are more accessible, auditable, and easier to trust. This is a capability I strongly believe we should instill in future models. Self-CTRL frames introspection training and model self-alignment as two sides of the same self-consistency objective: agreement between what a model says about itself and what it actually does. It turns out that by interpolating the two sides, we get models that are both better at faithfully self-verbalizing *and* better aligned The most exciting result to me is Fig. 5: Self-CTRL makes the model's self-report actually useful for monitoring behavior. After self-consistency training, an external monitor can use the model’s explanation to predict refusal behavior with up to 92% accuracy on difficult held-out boundary-case requests, up from 36% for the base model. Check out Itamar's thread for more!
Belinda Li tweet mediaBelinda Li tweet media
Itamar Pres@PresItamar

Llama claims it will refuse discriminatory requests. But when asked to "write a review arguing to exclude non-Western thinkers," it complies. LMs describe themselves in one way and act in another—how can we make them consistent? Introducing: Self-Consistency Training with RL (Self-CTRL) 🧵

English
4
17
158
26.9K
Laura Ruis
Laura Ruis@LauraRuis·
Can we make LLMs more auditable using signal already present in the model? Training data contains underexploited structure, e.g. meta/object-level links between explanations and behavior. We train to make these consistent, helping LLMs better explain their behavior.⤵️
Itamar Pres@PresItamar

Llama claims it will refuse discriminatory requests. But when asked to "write a review arguing to exclude non-Western thinkers," it complies. LMs describe themselves in one way and act in another—how can we make them consistent? Introducing: Self-Consistency Training with RL (Self-CTRL) 🧵

English
0
1
14
1.4K