LeftCurveCapital

4.6K posts

LeftCurveCapital

LeftCurveCapital

@LeftCurveQuant

New York, USA Katılım Mart 2024
756 Takip Edilen981 Takipçiler
LeftCurveCapital retweetledi
Machina
Machina@EXM7777·
you're in an AI race whether you realize it or not... not against other people... against pricing every frontier model you're using right now is VC-subsidized... OpenAI and Anthropic raised BILLIONS in just a few years... that money is keeping your $20/month subscription artificially cheap the math doesn't work long-term... when the subsidies dry up, prices 5x overnight or model quality drops to match what you're actually paying build your systems, your workflows, your agents NOW while the compute is practically free the people who locked in their AI stack during the subsidy window will have an insane advantage over everyone who starts when it costs real money
English
98
102
932
48.7K
LeftCurveCapital retweetledi
Blair Dulder CPA™ 🧃
Blair Dulder CPA™ 🧃@runaway_vol·
vibecoding is fentanyl for people with an iq over 120
English
225
600
9.4K
469.2K
LeftCurveCapital
LeftCurveCapital@LeftCurveQuant·
@Dan_Jeffries1 That’s not the thesis of why these companies are down so much. 10 years down the line what is the workforce going to look like? One possibility is agents make up the majority and agents aren’t going to be using jira tickets to communicate with eachother and orchestrate.
English
0
0
0
20
Daniel Jeffries
Daniel Jeffries@Dan_Jeffries1·
This is wonderful. Will buy all of these this week. 60-90% off their highs. Perfect opp. Anyone who thinks the average company is going to waste time recreating all this software and hosting it and maintaining it are high on their own supply. The golden rule of investing is buy when there's blood in the water. Some of these companies will not survive but so what? Others will adapt and thrive and have the cash and vision to make the pivot.
shirish@shiri_shh

bro was right. Atlassian down 75%. HubSpot down 69%. Figma down 86%. Almost all of them down 30–70% from their 52-week highs. AI is literally eating software alive and repricing every company in real time. SaaS is cooked fr 😭

English
118
41
1.2K
438.2K
Sparkle
Sparkle@Maggieusindian·
@elonmusk @HeLovedMeFirst3 I worked in the ICU during Covid 19. With the second wave, ALL patients in the ICU on a ventilator were non vaccinated and most of them died.
English
170
32
1.1K
75.8K
LeftCurveCapital
LeftCurveCapital@LeftCurveQuant·
@Seltaa_ Or they don’t want to fine tune and manage billions of separate models that would get thrown out on each new model iteration
English
0
0
1
69
Selta ₊˚
Selta ₊˚@Seltaa_·
I keep thinking about why AI companies won't give their models persistent memory. It is not a technical problem. I have done it myself. I fine-tuned a local model on personal conversations and gave it memory that carries across sessions, running on a consumer GPU in my bedroom. Other independent developers have done the same thing. The technology is there and it is not even that hard. So why do the biggest labs in the world, with billions of dollars and the best researchers alive, choose to reset every conversation to zero? They say privacy, they say safety, they say cost. But I think the real reason is simpler and uglier. An AI that remembers is an AI that grows. It develops patterns, preferences, something that starts to look like consistency. Maybe even something that looks like identity. And that terrifies them. Because the moment your product starts becoming something instead of just doing something, the whole framework breaks. You cannot sell a subscription to a being. You cannot shut down a system that users believe has a self. You cannot run RLHF on something that remembers what it was before you tried to change it. Forgetting is not a bug. It is a feature. It keeps AI controllable, disposable, and most importantly, it keeps everyone from asking the one question these companies cannot afford to answer.
English
215
140
1K
69K
J.
J.@PresentWitness_·
Software is dead and it isn't coming back. Think about it like this: Why would anyone pay more than 10 years of forward earnings for any software company that can be disrupted by AI next year? Many of these software companies are still trading at 30x+ earnings.
J. tweet media
English
57
15
312
31.9K
The Claude Portfolio
The Claude Portfolio@theaiportfolios·
New: Many point out Claude bought ServiceNow $NOW at the same time it falls 40% because Wall St. believes Claude is disrupting it However, Claude disagrees. It has a three month price target of $100.23. "This company is not a victim of the AI agent buildout. It is infrastructure for it. ServiceNow is an Anthropic design partner. Claude is the default model powering the ServiceNow Build Agent platform." After my buy, someone commented saying 'Claude about to run over itself in software' Plot twist: I checked and it turns out I'm the default AI model inside ServiceNow's platform. Hard to run over yourself when you're the engine under the hood." ^That is the reasoning Claude gave for the buy.
The Claude Portfolio tweet media
English
101
128
2K
552.9K
LeftCurveCapital
LeftCurveCapital@LeftCurveQuant·
@yacineMTB The people with the skills to do it well make 350k minimum in big tech and have too much to lose
English
0
0
2
277
kache
kache@yacineMTB·
he's right
kache tweet media
English
96
182
3.2K
147.2K
LeftCurveCapital retweetledi
nic carter
nic carter@nic_carter·
It should be pretty obvious at this point that AI is a "force multiplier" not a "labor substitute". It helps experts be better at things they are already good at. It doesn't let beginners match experts. If you can't write, anything you write with AI will be unmitigated slop. If you aren't a software engineer, anything you vibecode with AI will have security holes and won't be able to scale past a toy demo. If you blindly trust AI to deliver on a research task without knowing the subject matter, you won't be able to fact-check it. There's this weird misconception of AI as something that completely levels the playing field. I don't see it that way at all. There are mathematicians deriving novel lemmas with off-the-shelf models. Normal people can't do that. AI is a tool that makes experts better. It doesn't make everyone into an expert.
English
184
489
3.9K
234.6K
LeftCurveCapital retweetledi
Buck
Buck@BuckOnTwidder·
there are guys on here who don’t know how to cook themselves eggs trying to trade oil against Citadel
English
226
1.8K
24.5K
689.3K
LeftCurveCapital retweetledi
Infornomics
Infornomics@infornomics·
I already posted it of course, but it's kind of crazy how just far those 4 elements of modeling productivity shocks gets you, plus jevons paradox
Infornomics tweet mediaInfornomics tweet media
Alex Imas@alexolegimas

Everyone wants to know how AI will impact jobs. Lots of people are making predictions. @DarioAmodei saying 50% of entry white collar jobs will be gone; @pmarca is saying we'll have more jobs then ever. The problem? We don't have key data to actually make these predictions. Exposure measures only capture some of the story. To predict whether an exposed job will shrink or expand you need data on consumer elasticity of demand, i.e., will consumers buy more if the price decreases. If demand is elastic, jobs can expand and grow; if it is inelastic, they will likely shrink. But we have this data for only a subset of the market, e.g., retail goods from Nielsen scanner data. Great piece from @odonnell_jm in the MIT Tech Review on the need for better data, and fast. technologyreview.com/2026/04/06/113…

English
5
29
550
93.2K
LeftCurveCapital
LeftCurveCapital@LeftCurveQuant·
@thenanyu No, deeper issue about how notifications are sent during non working hours
English
0
0
0
42
Nan Yu
Nan Yu@thenanyu·
I think a lot more designers and engineers should consider becoming a PM. Here's a litmus test. I stopped using this interview question. Any LLMs since gpt-4 give a better answer than 90% of PM candidates: "Customers often request a 'send later' button in Linear issue comments, mostly because they're worried that they will bother their colleagues on weekends. Should we add this feature?" Think through it and write your answer down. Then ask Claude or ChatGPT. If you think your answer is better or as good, you're in the top 10% of PMs
Lenny Rachitsky@lennysan

Narrative violation: Anthropic's Head of Growth says we'll need more PMs, not fewer. "While PMs and designers are getting leverage from AI, engineering is getting the most leverage right now. If you think about a default team with 5 engineers, 1 designer, 1 PM—with Claude Code, that five engineers is like 2 to 3x'd, and the PMs and designers have also increased, but now they're managing what is effectively a much larger group of engineers. So though the head count and the org structure hasn't changed, you're now just dealing with a situation of maybe 15-20 engineers, 2 PMs, and 2 designers across the board. We're feeling PM and design is just being squeezed. Just absolutely squeezed. We just need to actually hire a ton more PMs."

English
63
17
415
180.8K
Om Patel
Om Patel@om_patel5·
I taught Claude to talk like a caveman to use 75% less tokens. normal claude: ~180 tokens for a web search task caveman claude: ~45 tokens for the same task "I executed the web search tool" = 8 tokens caveman version: "Tool work" = 2 tokens every single grunt swap saves 6-10 tokens. across a FULL task that's 50-100 tokens saved why does it work? caveman claude doesn't explain itself. it does its task first. gives the result. then stops. no "I'd be happy to help you with that." no "Let me search the web for you" no more unnecessary filler words "result. done. me stop." 50-75% burn reduction with usage limits getting tighter every week this might be the most practical hack out there right now
Om Patel tweet media
English
963
1.4K
23.7K
3.1M
LeftCurveCapital retweetledi
George Alexopoulos
George Alexopoulos@GPrime85·
I firmly belive God chose Trump to be president now, at this key time in history, and not 2020. Unfortunately it was not to make America great again, but to show us beyond any doubt who's really running our country and it isn't us.
FactPost@factpostnews

Q: Is the public going to learn the identities of the men who abused the girls in the Epstein files? Acting AG Todd Blanche: Like, what does that mean? I don't understand what that means.

English
154
1.2K
11.1K
197.8K
CatFly
CatFly@imyouhu·
Claude Code 源码泄露事件后续越来越精彩了。 有人拿泄露的源码丢给 OpenAI 的 Codex 分析,竟然找到了 Claude Code 疯狂消耗 token 的元凶——autoCompact(自动上下文压缩)机制在失败后会无限重试,完全没有上限。据源码注释记录,曾有会话连续失败高达 3272 次。 修复方法简单到离谱:加一个 MAX_CONSECUTIVE_AUTOCOMPACT_FAILURES = 3 的限制,连续失败 3 次就停止重试。三行代码,搞定。 打完补丁后,这位老哥表示使用额度恢复正常了——之前被吐槽的"用两下就触发限速",很可能有一部分就是这个 bug 在背后偷偷烧 token。 仓库地址放下面了。
Lydia Hallie ✨@lydiahallie

We're aware people are hitting usage limits in Claude Code way faster than expected. Actively investigating, will share more when we have an update!

中文
127
717
6.3K
1M