Freedom Daily

Taxation is fundamentally theft because it involves the forcible extraction of property from individuals without their genuine consent. In a free society, ownership implies the right to control one's earnings and assets, yet governments claim a portion of these through taxes, backed by the threat of penalties, imprisonment, or even violence if resisted. This mirrors the actions of a thief who takes what isn't theirs, except the state cloaks it in legality and necessity. Without the option to opt out or negotiate terms, citizens are compelled to surrender their wealth, making the process indistinguishable from robbery on a systemic scale. The illusion of consent in taxation crumbles under scrutiny, as it relies on coerced participation rather than voluntary agreement. Proponents argue that taxes fund public goods and services, implying a social contract, but this contract is never explicitly signed or agreed upon by each individual—it's imposed at birth or citizenship. Imagine a neighbor demanding a share of your paycheck for "community benefits" and enforcing it with force; that would be extortion. Taxation operates on the same principle, where refusal leads to escalating consequences, proving that true consent cannot exist under duress. This coercive nature strips away personal autonomy, reducing people to mere revenue sources for the state's ambitions. Ultimately, labeling taxation as anything but theft requires imaginative justifications that prioritize collective authority over individual rights. While governments may provide roads, schools, or defense in return, these are often inefficient and unwanted by some, yet funded involuntarily by all. The distinction between taxation and theft is a fabricated one, sustained by power imbalances and societal conditioning. Recognizing this empowers a reevaluation of governance, urging systems built on true voluntary cooperation rather than institutionalized plunder.

@DeepBlueCrypto Q: What's the difference between Mafia and Government? A: Both are corrupt and extort your money, but the Mafia doesn't have nukes.

@newstart_2024 Palliative care nurse Bronnie Ware listed 5 common regrets of the dying. I wish I’d: • lived a life true to myself, not the life others expected of me. • not worked so hard. • had the courage to express my feelings. • stayed in touch with my friends. • let myself be happier.

An ICU nurse with 4 years in critical care has seen a pattern that keeps her up at night: patients—sometimes with rock-solid vitals, no acute decompensation on the horizon—abruptly express a calm, unshakable certainty. They quietly say some version of: “Please tell my family I love them.” “I don’t feel good.” “I know I’m going to die.” She calls it a “spiritual shift”—an internal pivot that defies the monitors, labs, or treatments. In her repeated experience, once those words land, the trajectory rarely changes; they pass shortly after, almost as if the awareness itself signals readiness to let go. What hits hardest isn’t drama—it’s the clarity it brings. Amid endless pursuits of stuff, status, certainty… the end strips everything to essentials: unspoken love, quiet regrets, a sudden sense of connection to something beyond the room. She’s urging people not to wait for that final moment of lucidity to reassess what truly matters—relationships, meaning, the quiet pull toward depth we often ignore. This isn’t about proving or disproving anything spiritual; it’s one seasoned observer noting a human constant in the chaos of dying. Science explains much of the process, yet this recurring foreknowledge remains one of medicine’s quiet mysteries—part intuition, part biology, part… something else? Have you encountered (or heard from loved ones) that eerie sense of “knowing” at life’s edge? Or seen similar patterns in other high-stakes moments? Open to hearing real experiences—medical insight, personal close calls, whatever form it takes.

@JohnCleese Two-tier justice in action !!

Total insanity...

🚨🚨BREAKING: Another NetChoice Victory for Free Speech & Families: Court HALTS Virginia’s Unconstitutional Attempt to Ration Online Speech 🏛️ ALEXANDRIA, Va.—Today, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia granted NetChoice’s request for a preliminary injunction, halting the enforcement of SB 854. This ruling prevents the state of Virginia from imposing unconstitutional restrictions on how its citizens access lawful speech online while NetChoice v. Miyares moves through the legal system. “The First Amendment is alive and well in Virginia. This ruling reaffirms that the government cannot ration access to lawful speech—even if it has noble intentions. Fundamentally, parents must stay in the driver’s seat when it comes to decisions about their families,” said @Paul_Taske, Co-Director of the NetChoice Litigation Center. “Today’s decision underscores a core truth: unconstitutional laws do not help anyone. Moreover, laws requiring age-verification and other privacy-invasive measures actually make everyone less safe and more prone to data breaches. We are seeing this in real time as countries around the world have started mandating similar privacy-destroying age-verification regimes.”

Brazil Law: All OS's Have 13 Days to Add Age Verification A new law, in Brazil, requires age verification on all Operating Systems (including Linux & Windows) by March 17th. Plus a rundown on similar laws in California, Colorado, and New York.

UK. France. Australia. Now the U.S. Every government is running the same playbook, using kids as the excuse to force age‑verification laws that will kill anonymity. KOSA isn’t about kids, it’s about control. Once anonymity is gone, it never comes back.

Let’s get one thing straight before they gaslight you into swallowing this. This is NOT just about “age verification” so kids can’t scroll TikTok. The under-16s social media ban, and the under-18s VPN ban, is digital verification for everyone; because the only way to enforce it is to make every single person prove their age, prove their identity, and “check in” with the State before accessing the modern internet. And yes… you already know where it leads. OneLogin. A centralised identity system designed to collect your credentials and your biometrics (face, iris, fingerprint) and bind them to a single government account. This ban is not the end goal. It is one verification type. One tiny draconian token. One single piece of the Digital ID puzzle. And the equation remains the same: OneLogin + GOV Wallet = Digital ID. Age verification will become one token on that wallet, but first, before the wallet is fully normalised, before it’s “rolled out” to every citizen through exclusion and coercion, they’ll do what they always do: They’ll introduce the gate first. To access a VPN, a social media site, or even an AI tool, you will be forced to “prove” you are over 16 or 18 — and the proof won’t be a private check, or a local device setting, or a parental control. It will be a government check. A government login. A government permission slip. You will have to “check in” with GOV OneLogin to access the internet like a normal person — and soon enough a token for this will be issued into the GOV Wallet, just like the proposed BritCard token that has now allegedly been “scrapped.” This is the same system, the same architecture, the same rollout pattern... just with a different sticker slapped on the front. And once the token exists, it becomes the default. Once it becomes the default, it becomes the requirement. Once it becomes the requirement, it becomes the leash. Because what they’re building is not an age gate. It’s a permission gate. A surveillance gate. A system where your ability to access platforms, services, information, communication — your ability to exist online — becomes conditional on your compliance with a credential check that is logged, tracked, and centrally controlled. They will see what you do. When you do it. What you search. What you access. What you post. And people will still be saying, with a straight face: “Well, it’s a good thing under-16s are being banned from social media… they’ll be safer.” That’s the bait. Then you hear Starmer say: “How will parents police this alone?” And notice what he’s really saying. He is not empowering parents. He is positioning the government next to parents, granting the State the same “authority” to parent your child, to decide what is healthy, what is harmful, what is permitted, what is “wellbeing,” and what must be restricted. The same government that has lied to you for years about safety. The same government that signs away your rights in the name of protection. The same government that cannot define a woman, cannot secure a border, cannot arrest a p3dophile (rather employs and promotes them), cannot run a hospital — but somehow wants you to believe it can be trusted to police your child’s mind. And if you think this is going through “proper process,” think again. A month ago they announced a consultation on the under-16s ban. That consultation is a red herring. Because Starmer’s little phrase “Fast Track” is just PR language for something much uglier: Henry VIII powers. Powers that allow ministers to change legislation without parliamentary scrutiny, without debate, without any democratic friction. And that means the actual rules — the ones that govern your data, your access, your verification, your wallet, your permissions — will not be written on the floor of the House. They will be written by an unelected civil servant in a closed room, and rubber-stamped by a Secretary of State. The consultation is not democracy. It is the hologram of democracy. Designed to make you feel heard while the law is already coded, the architecture already built, and the enforcement mechanism already chosen. And it gets worse. Because this ban is being routed through the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill; a bill that will receive Royal Assent before the consultation even ends. So what exactly are you “consulting” on? A decision that’s already been made. A system that’s already being implemented. A lock that’s already being installed on your front door while they ask you what colour you’d like the handle to be. Then there’s the Unique Identifier for ALL children. They will sell it as “tracking attendance.” But it isn’t an attendance system. It is a digital tether. A permanent state identifier for your child, designed to follow them across systems, databases, services, education, healthcare, “wellbeing,” behavioural monitoring, and digital permissions. And once you combine a Unique Identifier with digital tokens, with “digital wellbeing” regulation, with AI-driven scoring, you have built something monstrous: A system where a child’s “Wellbeing Score” can drop — determined by government-approved metrics, possibly processed by government AI — and the State can remotely revoke their digital tokens. Effectively deleting their social existence until they comply. No access. No platform. No digital participation. No “privileges.” Just compliance. And here’s the part people are missing: They are granting themselves the power to amend the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill without proper parliamentary scrutiny and without waiting for the consultation to end. They are giving the Secretary of State delegated powers to regulate “digital wellbeing” which is a euphemism so broad you could drive an authoritarian regime through it. They can amend laws at any time. They can expand definitions at any time. They can widen the net at any time. Meaning the Prime Minister and Secretaries of State become the architects and the judges. The lawmakers and the enforcers. And Henry VIII powers are named after a tyrant for a reason. Because they were designed for a monarch who forced Parliament to pass laws and accept personal proclamations. That is the lineage of the power Starmer is dressing up as “Fast Tracking.” This isn’t safeguarding. It’s centralisation. And it doesn’t stop there. The other legislation being pulled into this system is the Crime and Policing Bill which is progressing as we speak and the Online Safety Act 2023 — both of which contain mechanisms to expand and amend enforcement without passing fresh primary legislation. Meaning they can tighten the screws without the public ever noticing. No new “big scary bill.” No headline. No national debate. Just silent regulatory expansion. A little more coercion. A little more surveillance. A little more permissioning. Until one day you wake up and the internet — the place you work, learn, communicate, bank, shop, organise, speak, and live — requires you to present a government token just to enter. And you’ll be told it’s normal. You’ll be told it’s safety. You’ll be told it’s “for the children.” This consultation is a farce. The law is being passed. Age verification for all will be forced upon us unless we act now, and unless people stop staring at the headline and start seeing the architecture. This is not even the start of mission creep. This is another step. Another spoke. Another token. Another gate. And yes, there are other ways to improve online safety. Every person over 16 is issued with a National Insurance number. There are privacy-preserving options. There are local-device checks. There are non-centralised approaches. But that is not the point. Because the point is not safety. The point is control. This is part of the digital gulag. The panopticon. A credentialed society where your ability to participate is conditional, permissioned, and revocable... and where the State holds the master key. Linked below is another important post about the Digital ID stack that everyone needs to understand...

@nmdacosta Once this is lost, it will never be regained. Those who come after will be secretly pleased that yet another cornerstone of our democracy has been swept away.

Looks like MPs will vote within the next fortnight on jury trials. They’ll then have to vote when the Bill returns IMMEDIATELY before the local elections to strip out the Lords amendments trying to protect the right to trial by jury. Probably two or three times at least in successive rounds of ping pong.

@GBNEWS Remember the old saying "possession is 9/10 of the law". I'm with Reform/Tories on this one.

Keir Starmer's Chagos deal is not about decolonisation. This is what's really going on - Nigel Nelson gbnews.com/opinion/chagos…

@Resist_CBDC China is their blueprint, and that didn't work out too well for citizens, who can be denied food and travel of their social credit score fails for any reason, including social media posts the government doesn't like. Refuse, resist. While you still can !!

Digital 🆔 + facial recognition cameras = the creation of an INTERNAL passport. This will allow a big tech enabled, globalist agenda compliant, central authority to track and control your every movement. Resist like your children's lives depend on it, because they do.

@NiohBerg Remember, preparations for the 2003 Iraq War took about 18 months, starting soon after the 9/11 attacks and culminating with the invasion on March 20, 2003. Specific contingency planning began earlier, but the formal push for military action intensified significantly in late 2002

The people inside Iran are looking up to the sky every day, waiting for the sound of American planes. This is no exaggeration. Everyone is holding their breath.

My Mum is 89. A few weeks before Christmas, her elderly dog died, and she was heartbroken. She’d decided not to get another dog because she didn’t think it would be fair to a dog, as she is disabled and doesn’t think she’ll live long enough to outlive it. However, a dog rescuer who had rehomed dogs with her in the past knew her old dog had died, and when a little 12-year-old dog came in whose elderly owner had died, she phoned Mum and asked if she’d be interested. By then, she was feeling very lonely without a constant companion, so she said she’d give it a go and see how it went. As you can see by the photo, they got on very well and are blissfully happy. Both of them have got a new lease of life and adore each other. Credit to the respective owner ✍️

Sadiq Khan claimed there were no rape gangs in London. Everyone knew that was nonsense. Here comes the evidence. bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…

Most people in Britain carry DNA that traces back over four thousand years.🇬🇧⌛️ Before the Romans. Before the Anglo-Saxons. Before the Vikings. Your ancestors were already here. And scientists just proved what they built. In 1999, two men pulled something from a German hilltop. The oldest map of the night sky ever found. Anywhere. The Nebra Sky Disc. 3,600 years old. Found in Germany. But scientists traced the gold. Atom by atom. It came from Cornwall. The tin? Also Cornwall. Your ancestors mined it from this ground. It travelled 4,000km. Across the sea, through Europe, to the Mediterranean. Without tin, you cannot make bronze. No tools. No weapons. No civilisation as we know it. Egypt. Greece. None of them could function without what came from these islands. Near Stonehenge, they found a chieftain with a gold lozenge on his chest and a dagger with 140,000 gold studs. Each thinner than a human hair. They tested the gold. Cornwall. Again. Stonehenge was 500 years old when the first pyramid was built. They taught you these islands were at the edge of the world. They were at the centre of it. The miners. The traders. The builders. They never left. Their DNA is still here. In you. Be proud of that. They taught you Rome brought civilisation to Britain. They didn't teach you Britain supplied the metal that built it. We will. Be part of us. 🫡 proudofus.co.uk/support Be Proud Of Us. 🇬🇧

A THIRTEEN-year-old girl was bought for FIVE POUNDS. The journalist who exposed it was the one they sent to prison. The men who sold her walked free. His name was W.T. Stead. Editor of the Pall Mall Gazette. In 1885, the age of consent in Britain was thirteen. A bill to raise it had failed in Parliament three times. Nobody cared enough to act. Stead decided to prove how easy it was to buy a child. He arranged the purchase of a thirteen-year-old girl called Eliza Armstrong. Price: five pounds. Then he published everything. Four days of front-page exposés. "The Maiden Tribute of Modern Babylon." The most shocking investigation Victorian journalism had ever seen. W.H. Smith refused to sell the paper. So people bought it on the streets. Copies changed hands for twenty times the cover price. The Salvation Army gathered 393,000 signatures. Ten thousand people besieged the office demanding more copies. On 14 August 1885, Parliament raised the age of consent to sixteen. Then they arrested Stead. Three months in prison. His crime: proving the system worked exactly as he said it did. He wore his prison uniform on the anniversary every year for the rest of his life. In 1912, he boarded a ship to New York. The Titanic. When it struck the iceberg, he gave away his lifejacket. His body was never recovered. His memorial in Central Park reads: "Numbered amongst those who, dying nobly, enabled others to live." This is what Britain is made of. And the world needs to know it. Help us tell these stories. proudofus.co.uk/support Be part of us. Be Proud Of Us. 🇬🇧

@murphyhugh04 @afneil The only people whose lives are improving are Starmer and his inner circle. But not for long. After Epstein and the gr00ming g@ngs, it's finally time for the farmer harmer to go.

@afneil AN, there is growth, not a lot, but ordinary people’s lives are improving whilst in the USA with a much higher published growth rate people are facing a very difficult cost of living. Why is that so !?

Labour was elected in July 2024 with an overriding promise to accelerate economic growth. We now now have its record for its first full calendar year, 2025: Q1: 0.7% Q2: 0.2% Q3: 0.1% Q4: 0.1% So, far from stimulating the economy, the dead hand of Starmer-Reeves has knocked the stuffing out of it. They took a good start to the year and squandered it with reckless tax, spend and borrow (none of which was in their manifesto). Our giant services sector — 2nd biggest in the world — is stagnating. Construction is in its worst state for over 4 years, with output down 2% in Q4 (which is why Labour’s promise of 1.5m new houses by 2029 is already broken). As for GDP per capita, which was very popular among X tweeters under the Tories but not so much now (I wonder why), it fell for the second quarter in a row — so we’re effectively in a GDP/capita recession.

@Andypublicuk Certainly not a plane ✈️ any time soon...

What are these going to catch? 🤔 UK police today 🇬🇧

@elonmuskTRENDS Elon invested $88 billion to create the last bastion of free speech on the planet !!!