LifeTilts

Don't be left holding the bag this cycle. #Bitcoin 🟢🟢🔴🔴

@comic @petrakov47 Sandisk investors got zero Bitcoin yield, what a bunch of losers...

@petrakov47 $10,000 but you have more bitcoin per share

$25,000 invested into Sandisk 1 year ago would be worth $1,000,000 today.

@WhiteHouse If you have all the cards and you’re playing Uno, you’re losing you fucking moron.

@bitcoinkeskus Lisää "luottokortteja" vaan niin aiemmat velat hoituu... x.com/i/status/14696…

Tuota Yhdysvaltain valtionvelkaa ei tulla koskaan maksamaan takaisin, ja sen määrä jatkaa kasvamistaan joka vuosi (sama juttu muillakin valtioilla). Markkinoiden näkökulmasta on merkitystä sillä, onko velan kasvu suhteessa talouden kasvuun hallinnassa eli velan määrä vs. BKT.

@Pledditor Rug Pal tried to get funding to shill Polkadot a couple years back. polkadot.polkassembly.io/referenda/295

Whatever bag Raoul is long at the moment, that is the #2 SoV coin that competes with bitcoin. It used to be ETH, then it was SOL, then it was SUI, now it's ZEC, and he will claim it's something else 12 months from now after he dumps on you guys and enters a new swing trade.

@AdamBLiv Look at this 👆 shitcoiner making fun of other shitcoiners while he's down over 50% on $MSTR

Imagine being so stupid that you sold waiting for $35k while Saylor came out with STRC to Trojan horse the $300 trillion bond market but you didn’t know that because you’re obsessed with charts like some shitcoin trading moron 🤣🤣🤣

@BTCtreasuries Where does the yield for $STRC come from?

JUST IN: $XXI CEO Jack Mallers just said Saylor "ran out of people willing to give him money at 0% and now has to pay 12%." 🤯 What Mallers missed: $STRC is perpetual. The principal never gets paid back. Saylor is porting fixed income capital into Bitcoin forever. 🔶

@diglloyd @AdamBLiv He's on the spectrum

@AdamBLiv how the heck did you generate all that

A NORMAL PERSON TRIES TO UNDERSTAND ANTI-SAYLOR BITCOINERS: “Let me get this straight.” “Okay.” “You believe people should buy Bitcoin?” “Yes.” “As much as they can?” “Yes.” “And hold it for the long term?” “Correct.” “Because fiat money is broken?” “Exactly.” “And Bitcoin is scarce?” “Yes.” “And the best way to protect yourself from debasement is to own the scarce asset?” “Now you’re getting it.” “Great. So Michael Saylor did that.” “No, that’s bad.” “Why?” “Because he did it with a company.” “A company owned by shareholders?” “Yes.” “Who voluntarily bought the stock?” “Yes.” “And the company voluntarily bought Bitcoin from sellers?” “Yes.” “At market prices?” “Yes.” “Using legal capital markets?” “Yes.” “And this changed Bitcoin’s fixed supply?” “No.” “Changed the code?” “No.” “Changed your node?” “No.” “Gave Saylor the ability to print more Bitcoin?” “No.” “Gave him the ability to reverse transactions?” “No.” “Gave him the ability to censor the network?” “No.” “So what exactly happened?” “He bought a lot.” “That’s the whole crime?” “It centralizes Bitcoin.” “No, it concentrates ownership. Those are different things.” “They’re the same.” “They are absolutely not the same.” “Explain.” “If one man owns a lot of gold, he does not control chemistry. If one company owns a lot of land, it does not control gravity. If Strategy owns a lot of Bitcoin, it does not control the protocol.” “But it’s dangerous.” “To whom?” “To decentralization.” “Again, no. Bitcoin decentralization is enforced by nodes, miners, consensus rules, and the inability of anyone to change the monetary policy. Ownership is a market outcome. Protocol control is a technical reality. You’re confusing the cap table with the constitution.” “That sounds too clean.” “It is clean. That’s why your argument needs fog machines.” “Saylor works for the financial-industrial complex.” “He works for shareholders.” “He’s helping Wall Street.” “He’s using Wall Street to buy Bitcoin.” “That’s the problem.” “No, that’s the part you’re mad about.” “But Bitcoin was supposed to be for the people.” “It still is. Nobody stopped the people from buying it.” “But now institutions are buying it too.” “Yes. That is what winning looks like.” “I don’t like the way it’s winning.” “There it is.” “What?” “The honest sentence.” “I’m serious.” “So am I. You spent fifteen years telling everyone Bitcoin was inevitable. Then a public company believed you at scale, and now you’re acting like the fire department is suspicious because they brought too much water.” “He has too much Bitcoin.” “Then buy more.” “That’s not fair.” “That’s the market.” “He got there first.” “That’s also the market.” “It feels wrong.” “It feels wrong because he understood the game before the people who claimed to be its priests.” “Bitcoin should be decentralized.” “It is.” “But ownership is uneven.” “So is intelligence. So is conviction. So is risk tolerance. So is patience.” “You’re being harsh.” “No, I’m being precise.” “Saylor could become too powerful.” “He can become rich. He can become influential. He still cannot change 21 million.” “But people will follow him.” “People follow anyone with conviction and results. That is called leadership. It is not a consensus attack.” “So you’re fine with corporations buying Bitcoin?” “I’m fine with anyone buying Bitcoin.” “Anyone?” “Yes. Individuals, companies, pensions, insurers, sovereign wealth funds, family offices, weird guys in cargo shorts, and bald men in orange ties with capital markets bazookas.” “That sounds chaotic.” “That sounds neutral.” “Bitcoin doesn’t care who buys it.” “Exactly.” “So the anti-Saylor argument is…” “People should buy Bitcoin, unless they buy too much. Institutions should adopt Bitcoin, unless they adopt it aggressively. Bitcoin should win, as long as it wins politely, slowly, and in a way that flatters the early podcast class.” “That’s brutal.” “That’s accurate.” “So what’s really going on?” “Simple. Saylor embarrassed the small imagination of his critics.” “How?” “They thought Bitcoin adoption meant vibes, conferences, and personal sovereignty lectures. He saw a global capital structure starving for collateral and built a machine to convert fiat demand into Bitcoin accumulation.” “And the critics?” “They’re standing outside the machine yelling that the machine is too effective.” “So the problem isn’t that Saylor betrayed Bitcoin.” “No.” “The problem is that he believed in it harder than they did.” “Now you’re getting it.”

@AdamBLiv TL;DR Adam is full of 💩

🔥STRATEGY WILL BE THE WORLD'S MOST VALUABLE COMPANY🔥 Strategy bought OVER 56,000 Bitcoin in April. That number is so absurd people are psychologically incapable of processing it. Post-halving miners produce roughly 13,500 BTC per month. Strategy just bought about 4.1x an entire month of new miner supply in one month. Now run the simple monster math: Today: Strategy BTC stack: 818,334 BTC Bitcoin price: $76,196 Bitcoin NAV: $62.35B Assume Strategy keeps buying 56,000 BTC per month for 5 years. That is: ASSUMING STRC GROWTH TOTALLY STOPS (LOL) ~672,000 BTC per year ~3,360,000 BTC over 5 years Their stack goes from: 818,334 BTC to 4,178,334 BTC Now assume Bitcoin compounds at 25% CAGR. Bitcoin goes from: $76,196 to roughly: $232,532 So the Bitcoin NAV becomes: 4,178,334 BTC × $232,532 = roughly $971.5 BILLION Almost $1 TRILLION in Bitcoin NAV. And the funniest part? This model assumes no mNAV expansion. No premium insanity. No additional acceleration. No credit flywheel getting stronger. No market panic as everyone realizes Strategy is vacuuming Bitcoin off the planet like a publicly traded monetary black hole. Just: 56,000 BTC per month. 25% Bitcoin CAGR. 5 years. That’s it. Don't think they can accumulate that much Bitcoin at that low of a CAGR? Think the Bitcoin CAGR has to go higher? Cool. That only helps Strategy buy more Bitcoin. The bear case is basically: “Sure, they are absorbing multiples of new supply, building the largest corporate Bitcoin balance sheet in history, converting fiat capital markets into Bitcoin ownership, and compounding NAV at escape velocity, but have you considered that I am emotionally upset?” MSTR is becoming the most aggressive Bitcoin accumulation machine ever built. The fiat world is still modeling it like a tech stock with a weird treasury policy. GOOD LUCK.

@ChrisMMillas The average $MSTR bull spent less than 1 minute...

The average $MSTR bear has likely spent less than 10 minutes studying the company. And that 10 minutes was likely scrolling on X to see what other $MSTR bears were saying. NGMI.

@gladstein @tipofico How do you know? The Bitcoin ledger doesn't record the electricity input. You're making assumptions that clearly aren't economically viable given the price trend of Bitcoin. Don't reflect your lack of knowledge on me.

@LifeTilts @tipofico In order to mine Bitcoin you need to use electricity. Currently we are near all time highs of electricity spend. This is part of the security arrangement. Not sure why this is complicated for you to understand.

Another guy who thinks Bitcoin stores energy...

@You_Suck_at_btc You're describing every Bitcoin Maximalist right now. Also I'm not misreading anything, Alex just couldn't articulate his point properly because he is uneducated.

@LifeTilts I'm a huge fan of purposely misreading things for an easy dunk. Then when called out I just double down. Can't lost if you're too stupid to know you're wrong. 10/10 strats.

@tipofico @gladstein He talks about sending electricity to the Bitcoin network. Not my fault he doesn't understand how electricity works, which is quite common among Bitcoin Maxis, which is evident whenever you listen to any PoW vs PoS discussion.

@gladstein @LifeTilts There’s nothing in what you wrote above that says “Bitcoin stores energy.” and Alex didn’t write that either. Don’t be disingenuous.

@MaestroBSV @CoinMarketCap Noone is as retarded as people who put their life savings into BSV

@CoinMarketCap HOW MANY TIMES ARE YOU CLOWNS GOING TO RECYCLE THE SAME DESPERATE COPES?? CRAIG WRIGHT IS SATOSHI. THE PROOF IS RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOUR EYES CARVED IN STONE INSIDE THE PROTOCOL AND THE CODE ITSELF. HOW FUCKING RETARDED CAN YOU PEOPLE BE!?

LATEST: 🎥 A new documentary argues Satoshi Nakamoto was a shared pseudonym between Hal Finney and Len Sassaman, with Finney's widow conceding he likely played a role in Bitcoin's creation.

@gladstein No, that's exactly what you said. Not only that, you're also wrong about an increasing hashrate equating to increasing electric consumption, when that's driven by improvements in hardware, which results in fewer machines and less security.

@LifeTilts I didn’t say that

@soonfully "Nobody is talking!?!" 🤣

@LifeTilts 🤣🤣🤣

LMAO 😂

That's news to me, I'm pretty sure zero Bitcoin has been sold to pay $STRC dividends. $MSTR shareholders have been paying for everything and that's why the stock is down a lot over the past year.

@AdamBLiv Dude, you were left holding my bags, still down over 50%...

It's almost like we understand we want amplified Bitcoin... $MSTR

@Paladin620 Long before you and Saylor discovered Bitcoin. It's full of nonsense to be honest. I did load my bags because I figured many would buy into the ideas hook line and sinker.

@LifeTilts Oh. I see. I believe you haven't read The Bitcoin Standard by Sammous Safedean, am I right?

The key word here is IF. If Strategy stops buying Bitcoin, the price collapses. Resulting in a negative CAGR for a few years. The whole scheme falls apart. Moonboys like Adam here who discovered Bitcoin like last week don't understand the math problem at hand.