Lin Tian

52 posts

Lin Tian

Lin Tian

@LinTianEcon

Assistant Professor of Economics at INSEAD

Katılım Aralık 2017
136 Takip Edilen220 Takipçiler
Lin Tian retweetledi
Jon Steinsson
Jon Steinsson@JonSteinsson·
Intermediate macro instructors: You probably need to talk about the impact of AI on the labor market. But to make contact with the notion that this can destroy jobs and potentially reduce wages you need to introduce the task-based model of production. Cobb-Douglas (or CES) just doesn't cut it for this issue. You might consider using my undergrad textbook chapter on production where I cover this topic in a way that (I hope) is accessible to undergrads (see section 7 of the chapter): jonsteinsson.com/teaching/produ… I also have a pretty detailed discussion of how technical change affects the labor share and the recent apparent fall in the labor share (section 6), which is obviously related to the AI issue.
English
16
88
529
85.8K
Lin Tian retweetledi
Alex Imas
Alex Imas@alexolegimas·
New post: What is the impact of AI on productivity? I review all of the studies and data that I can find and try to provide a synthesis. There’s a lot of disagreement on what we know about the productivity impact. Part of the reason for this is the disconnect between the micro and macro evidence. The micro studies overwhelmingly find positive productivity benefits (except for one notable exception), but these productivity benefits are yet to show up in the macro data. There is also a disconnect on who benefits most: micro (mostly) finds low-skill/less-experienced workers see higher returns, the (limited) macro evidence is more mixed but leans toward higher wage/higher ed people seeing more of the benefits. I discuss potential reasons for the micro-macro gap in the post and 🧵 below. Importantly, this is a living post. I will update it continuously as new data comes in. If you see something I'm missing, please let me know and I will add it. For regular updates, please consider subscribing to the substack. Here is the link: aleximas.substack.com/p/what-is-the-…
Alex Imas tweet media
English
35
141
541
195.9K
Lin Tian retweetledi
Luis Garicano 🇪🇺🇺🇦
My New Year post is a letter to a young person trying to find their direction in a world disrupted by AI. My advice, in four words: take the messy job. I hope you enjoy it and find it useful. Happy New Year!
Luis Garicano 🇪🇺🇺🇦 tweet media
English
7
70
347
137.2K
Lin Tian retweetledi
Oleg Itskhoki
Oleg Itskhoki@itskhoki·
*Trade war: my theory of the case* 1. What is the goal/ideal outcome/trump admin hopes: 10% tariff across the board with no retaliation + direct non-tariff favors from other countries to settle this at 10% + a possible full-scale bilateral trade war with China. (1/n)
English
12
97
400
81.6K
Lin Tian retweetledi
Lawrence H. Summers
Lawrence H. Summers@LHSummers·
Universities should make clear that their formidable financial endowments are not there to simply be envied or admired. Part of their function is to be drawn down in the face of emergencies, and covering federal funding lapses surely counts as one. My column today in @nytopinion. nytimes.com/2025/04/03/opi…
English
41
168
951
147.7K
Lin Tian retweetledi
Ivan Werning
Ivan Werning@IvanWerning·
Interesting to see some basic demand theory applied to tariff choices. So… What’s wrong with it? Used in isolation on a single small trading partner the formula makes some sense. But if applied widely to many non trivial ones it does not. 1/2
Ivan Werning tweet media
United States Trade Representative@USTradeRep

To learn about the methodology behind President Trump's reciprocal tariff calculations, visit USTR's website. ustr.gov/issue-areas/re…

English
24
164
759
250.8K
Lin Tian retweetledi
Gabriel Felbermayr
Gabriel Felbermayr@GFelbermayr·
88% of the variance in bilateral balances can be explained without making any reference to asymmetries in bilateral trade costs. See my EER-paper with @YotovG "A solution to the mystery of excess trade balances" cepr.org/voxeu/columns/… via @cepr_org @WIFOat
English
0
26
70
16.9K
Lin Tian retweetledi
Trade Diversion (Jonathan Dingel)
Trade Diversion (Jonathan Dingel)@TradeDiversion·
Trade flows are measured with error: theguardian.com/australia-news… The Guardian found the errant bills of lading that explain US import tariffs "imposed on tiny Australian territories that are either uninhabited or claim to have no trading relationship with the US".
Trade Diversion (Jonathan Dingel) tweet mediaTrade Diversion (Jonathan Dingel) tweet media
English
0
4
7
1.3K
Lin Tian retweetledi
Brent Neiman
Brent Neiman@BrentNeiman·
I do not think that the government's formula is an appropriate way to think about reciprocal tariffs. And it is unclear what the note references or doesn’t from my research with Cavallo et al. But I believe our work suggests the value for the “elasticity of import prices to tariffs” should be close to 1. If that value were used, rather than 0.25, I believe their calculation of reciprocal tariffs would be lower by a factor of four.
Trade Diversion (Jonathan Dingel)@TradeDiversion

USTR: "The elasticity of import prices with respect to tariffs, φ, is 0.25. The recent experience with U.S. tariffs on China has demonstrated that tariff passthrough to retail prices was low (Cavallo et al, 2021)." Cavallo et al: φ is 0.945. aeaweb.org/articles?id=10…

English
22
152
443
119.4K
Lin Tian retweetledi
Lin Tian retweetledi
Paul Novosad
Paul Novosad@paulnovosad·
A new India-China fact (to me): The Chinese state prioritized primary education over secondary/tertiary, while the Indian state did the opposite. Chinese primary enrollment rate passed India in 1950, secondary 1975, and tertiary only in 2000!
Paul Novosad tweet mediaPaul Novosad tweet media
English
71
888
4.6K
535.4K
Lin Tian
Lin Tian@LinTianEcon·
Wrapped up the third edition of INSEAD-SMU International Economics Workshop last week!🍾Huge thanks to our keynotes @pol_antras & @HansbergRossi, presenters, and participants for their valuable insights and contributions. Here’s to more collaboration and discovery! #inseadSMU2024
Lin Tian tweet media
English
0
5
55
5.9K
Lin Tian
Lin Tian@LinTianEcon·
Thanks for a ton of helpful feedback from many of you! And to funding from @PEDL_CEPR
English
0
0
0
107
Lin Tian
Lin Tian@LinTianEcon·
Overall the literature points towards sizeable, positive economic impacts in many—but not all—settings. Considerable uncertainty remains, and we know almost nothing about many important parts of internet-in-developing-countries. We highlight promising future research directions
English
1
0
1
112
Lin Tian
Lin Tian@LinTianEcon·
@HjortJ & I sent 1st draft of our invited overview piece to Annual Review of Econ., CEPR wp here. On economic impacts of internet connectivity in developing countries; 90/150 studies we cover provide direct empirical evidence on this (+60 w/rich country or other related findings)
CEPR@cepr_org

New CEPR Discussion Paper - DP19371 The Economic Impact of #Internet Connectivity in Developing Countries Jonas Hjort @HjortJ @ucl @UniOslo, Lin Tian @LinTianEcon @INSEAD ow.ly/hyxO50T1gWP #CEPR_DE #CEPR_ITRE #economics

English
2
3
12
1.8K