Olivia Laing

108.2K posts

Olivia Laing banner
Olivia Laing

Olivia Laing

@LongPeace69

Logo and mycophile, among other things.

Portland, OR Katılım Ağustos 2021
1.1K Takip Edilen814 Takipçiler
Olivia Laing retweetledi
Lydia Rodarte Quayle
Lydia Rodarte Quayle@TheSpiciestLRQ·
Imagine a bunch of adults deciding it's fine to ruin a child's life this way. And some - Carol Kelly, Mike Chute and "Fucking" Jon Comeau are doubling down to this day, when any normal person with a brain and a heart would be mortified to have been in the thrall of this evil.
English
3
1
19
442
Olivia Laing retweetledi
The Comm Center
The Comm Center@commcenterpod·
If Karen Read was standing over an incapacitated man with a gunshot wound, would you find it suspicious if she was questioning herself about whether she shot him or not? “I never said I shot him… I said DID I SHOOT HIM!?” How do they not see something that obvious? Why would you even think you hit him?
English
42
13
115
4.5K
Olivia Laing retweetledi
girlwithaneagleeye
girlwithaneagleeye@AnEagleEyedGirl·
The 1st piece of taillight was found at 5:45PM...not 5:50PM as stated by Karen Read jury foreman, Charlie DeLoach. (Charlie also stated that Karen's car arrived in the Canton SallyPort at 5:39PM with a 3-minute drive to 34 Fairview. Both figures are inaccurate. However, by his calculation if they 2nd two were true (and now knowing that the 1st piece was found at 5:45PM), it would have left under 3 minutes for police to plant taillight in the aftermath of a blizzard). Math matters....
English
0
2
15
300
Olivia Laing retweetledi
girlwithaneagleeye
girlwithaneagleeye@AnEagleEyedGirl·
CHARLIE DELOACH, KAREN READ JURY FOREMAN "GOT THE MATH WRONG" SURROUNDING THE TAILLIGHT EVIDENCE: At a November 2025 Fisher College @FisherCollege speaking engagement, Charlie DeLoach, Karen Read jury foreman from the second trial revealed there were jurors who "wanted to dive more deeply into the evidence" - more specifically the taillight evidence. One juror had concerns around the taillight pieces embedded in John's clothing. Mr. DeLoach relayed that the juror ultimately relinquished to arguments that they could have been "sprinkled on" given the clothes were not immediately processed. Another juror wanted to look closely at the time the 1st piece of taillight was found (likely to determine whether the police had the ability to plant taillight pieces on scene at 34 Fairview Road). Mr. DeLoach asserted that the 1st piece of taillight was found at 5:50PM. He stated Karen's car was in the SallyPort at 5:39PM, and it only took 3 minutes to get from the police station to Fairview Rd - leaving "more than enough time to plant a piece." The problem with Mr. DeLoach's assessment...to start, his timelines were inaccurate and did not match witness testimony, evidence documentation, video evidence and Karen Read's car data. The grid search (shoveling) for taillight officially began at 5:24PM at 34 Fairview Rd by Lt. O'Hara / the SERT Team while Karen Read's car was currently en route to the Canton PD from Dighton. The grid search initially zoned in on the street's curb area where Karen's vehicle was spotted parked outside earlier. Lt. O'Hara testified that no one other than the SERT Team entered the grid area where the search was being conducted. They did not want the scene to be disrupted so that the team could search the snow in unison. The 1st piece of taillight was discovered/documented at 5:45PM. Notably, that 5:45PM figure was not disputed by Karen Read's defense team. John's sneaker was found directly up against the curb covered in snow. Six to seven other pieces of taillight were found that evening at ground level touching asphalt (photographed / documented). Karen Read's Power On/Off vehicle data detailed that her car was removed from the tow truck at the Canton PD at 5:34PM and relocated into the SallyPort garage around 5:36PM (matching Canton PD surveillance video timestamps). On that same video surveillance footage, no one is seen behind the car for a few minutes (and no video evidence ever displayed anyone breaking taillight). The window of time to plant taillight was under 8 minutes. That window becomes smaller when evaluating the travel time between the Canton PD and 34 Fairview Rd - a nearly mile and a half distance. Alan Jackson himself relayed in questioning that it is a 3 to 4 minute drive (depending on route taken). However, that time reflects normal weather conditions - and doesn't factor in those after the record snowfall which delayed road travel that day. Even without the road conditions, it would leave under 4 minutes to plant taillight (under 20+ inches of snow). It simply was not possible for anyone at the Canton PD to break Karen Read's taillight, drive to 34 Fairview Road and plant. Time did not allow for it. As for those tiny, smaller than rice size fragments of taillight viewed under a microscope that were embedded in John's clothing that concerned another juror, they likewise were not planted by police.
English
20
8
46
1.9K
Olivia Laing retweetledi
Olivia Laing retweetledi
Non-Expert Witness
Non-Expert Witness@bishalot·
You absolutely deleted a Bible verse that you were using to hide behind your condemnation, calling it righteous and just in God’s eyes. And implying that because GOD can condemn people for their wicked deeds, that you can/should as well. I guess you recognized how ridiculous this was when I called you out on it, which is why you never responded and instead deleted the comments. And yet, through this weird denial game you play constantly, you call ME a gaslighter? 😂 You are the classic hypocritical lying “Christian” type… The exact type of person that drove me away from the church as a whole. It’s just sickening to witness.
English
0
1
2
75
Olivia Laing retweetledi
Olivia Laing retweetledi
Tuesday Gazette
Tuesday Gazette@TuesdayGazette·
I wrote this back in 2024, and it still holds true. Some people left the cult since then, and they received the wrath of that decision. Some people attempted to leave… And then returned after the wrath flooded them. I’ve come to acknowledge that some of those people enjoy living the lifestyle of hate. open.substack.com/pub/tuesdaygaz…
English
9
13
68
1.5K
Olivia Laing retweetledi
Rose
Rose@riversedgg·
Witness Intimidation.
English
0
2
8
127
Olivia Laing retweetledi
CWvKR 22117
CWvKR 22117@CWvKR_22117·
Aidan outwardly and finally admits he illegally recorded Karen. “In the privacy of his own home.” Not in some other state like he was initially lying about
English
24
12
99
4.2K
Olivia Laing retweetledi
Missy Lerch
Missy Lerch@TheMissyLerch·
Let’s make this simple so you can understand, David. You are currently a non-party in the witnesses defamation suit against your BFF Aidan and Karen. As you may know, a non-party can become a party at any time. See, Chris Mattei is smart, very smart. Your name is riddled throughout that lawsuit already. I mean, A LOT🤣 AJ is listed as well, but interestingly enough, not as much as you. Maybe because you were the one that had by far, the most communication with the blogger. And, it is your liscence that is at stake. YOU are responsible for what the defense attorneys say. My favorite thing about the lawsuit besides the defamation claims are the aiding and abetting and conspiracy claims. Yeah, the fit what YOU did to a tee. Buckle up buttercup, I think it’s going to be a bumpy ride.
English
8
16
89
2K
Olivia Laing retweetledi
TruthOverBS
TruthOverBS@TeamFUKR·
"I can't even argue in court. If you were to sue me, I would no longer be able to argue this is opinion... what I just said is open-and-shut slander, open-and-shut defamation."
English
2
7
32
987