Laura

Thank Heaven for the First Amendment in America!

I, too, am a rape survivor. When I was 17, my then-boyfriend cooperated with one of his friends to drug me so that the friend could rape me. That was 25 years ago. Today I’m a grown woman, and I work a job that entitles me to carry a gun wherever I go. I’m also 6’0 and 160 lbs, and I know how to handle myself in a fight. I still don’t want to share a bathroom with men. When you’re using a public restroom, you’re trapped in a flimsy cubicle with one exit and your pants down. That is NOT a position I want to be in when a strange man is around, and especially not when that man is a transvestite, as transvestites are even more prone to committing sex crimes than normal men. Women’s spaces exist to be man-free, so that female humans can use the bathroom or change clothes in privacy and in safety, thus enabling us to participate fully in public life. The moment a man enters one of those spaces, its utility is destroyed. It is no longer private, and is no longer safe. Women and girls have no way of knowing whether or not the transvestite at the sinks plans to restrict his fetishistic activities to invading the restroom, or if he is predatory as well as perverted. As with any other man, it is simply impossible to tell whether or not he is a danger until it’s too late — which is why women’s spaces exist in the first place. The destruction of women’s single sex spaces is an act of open cruelty, in which entitled sexual deviants have been allowed to put themselves and their twisted desires above the rights and safety of half the human race. These men have convinced themselves that their fetishistic impulses make them vulnerable, and therefore special, and that they are thus entitled to pursue these desires without any care for the women and girls who are being hurt in the process.

REMINDER: When communists say “re-imagine”, they mean “destroy.” Destroying things doesn’t sell well so they came up with “re-imagine.”

The safe space for women debate is very simple: if you object to women having safe spaces, you're a danger. If women saying no to men and asserting boundaries makes you angry, you're a danger. If you want to belittle or attack women for saying no, you're a danger. End of story.

Funny, isn’t it, how women who’ve been raped or beaten are accused of ‘weaponising’ their trauma when they ask for male-free spaces, but trans-identified men who claim using the Gents has a higher mortality rate than armed combat are met with credulity and simpering concern.

What do Harvard, Oxford, Stanford, Univ of Edinburgh, Mayo Clinic, Ohio State, James Cook, UCSF, and UCSD share in common? They are all conducting trials of ketogenic diets for mental illness. The results could change the field of psychiatry.

@BumLumpy @Heavenly_Race_ Correct. One of the brilliant people I mentioned was my Dad and it was interesting to see him in social situations with people roughly his IQ and their conversations and the next day he's talking with a neighbor about bagging a whitetail and he was happy in both conversations

@Lrazzo1 @Heavenly_Race_ If I’m understanding you it sounds like their “topic IQ” were on similar levels. If they’re discussing the best way to bag a big whitetail everything goes well but if they’re discussing the future collapse of Social Security things might not go as well.

Once you hit about a 20-point IQ gap, communication starts to completely break down. It's not that the lower IQ person is "stupid" (although that can often be the case) or the higher one is arrogant, it's that you're literally operating on different systems. A 20 point difference (roughly 1.3 standard deviations) means: Vocabulary and abstraction levels diverge sharply. What feels like crystal clear logic to one side sounds like vague, pretentious word salad to the other. Jokes land flat. Metaphors get taken literally. Complex cause and effect chains get simplified into "this good, that bad." Different time horizons and pattern recognition. One person thinks in months or years and sees systems, the other is locked into days or immediate rewards. Trying to explain second order effects feels like speaking another language. Also, processing speed and working memory gaps. The higher IQ person is already three steps ahead, getting impatient. The lower IQ person feels talked down to or overwhelmed. Both walk away frustrated. Both have wasted each others time.

In case you’re wondering about the current state of House Democrats: they just voted against establishing a Smithsonian American Women’s History Museum. Their objection? It didn’t include a dedicated wing for trans history. You almost have to admire the consistency. They managed to turn a women’s museum into an argument about men.

CBS News said there was no evidence of fraud. The NYT said the Somali community was being targeted CNN said there was "little evidence." Tim Walz said it was “white supremacy” to expose fraud Today: $90M busted and 15 charged. IT WAS ALL FRAUD AND THEY KNEW.

Brandolini’s Law: It takes an order of magnitude more effort to refute misinformation than it does to produce it. Take one of trans activism’s favourite catchphrases: “Gender affirming care is evidence-based.” Sounds plausible. Doctors wouldn’t perform drastic life-altering interventions on healthy kids in the total absence of credible evidence. Right? Wrong. The two linchpin Dutch studies upon which the entire experiment is based were so methodologically flawed that the results should have been completely invalidated. But instead, the medical world mistook the experiment as proven medical practice and adopted the treatment globally and without restraint. In a terrible twist of fate, this occurred in 2014, right at the very moment the messaging of trans activism triggered the social contagion of kids identifying as transgender. In this part of my @May_Day_Canada talk I explain why it is simply impossible to call “gender affirming care” evidence based.

@Lancastria31693 @ramonagusta @dave43law They did but they charged some children as prostitutes to cover up the fact that they had been groomed and gang raped.

@ramonagusta @dave43law Why didn't they just go to the police

A message that part of the UK needs to learn

This poor boy was running away from someone who stabbed him & stole his phone, but the police in the UK attacked him instead of his murderer!

Court footage reportedly captured Henry Nowak’s final moments after he was stabbed. Lying on the pavement struggling for breath, Mr Nowak could be heard saying: “I can’t breathe.” He repeatedly told police he had been stabbed and was desperately trying to explain that something was seriously wrong. But instead of immediately treating him as a victim in critical condition, an officer told him he was under arrest on suspicion of assault. “I’ve been stabbed,” he said again. A male voice then allegedly replied: “I don’t think you have, mate.” Henry Nowak later died after his lungs filled with blood and he effectively drowned in his own blood while handcuffed on the ground. The footage is genuinely disturbing. Yet our Government and Keir Starmer refuse to even recognise this awful murder or mention Henry Nowak’s name. SHAMEFUL!

🚨 WTF?! DHS Sec. Markwayne Mullin confirms 50% PERCENT of *ALL* murders in deep-blue Fairfax County, Virginia were committed by illegal aliens Gov. Abigail Spanberger and Democrat officials are RUINING their own state! "Roughly 50% of the murders in Fairfax, Virginia, the perps are illegal, shouldn't even be in the country. You know, that's just in Fairfax!" "You make Virginia a sanctuary, you encourage more illegal activities." "This individual right here that we just arrested. This is his third time to be deported. He's self-deported once. He was deported again. He's snuck back across."

No screaming. No fires. No broken glass. No threats, or machetes, or chants of “Allahu Akbar.” Just well-mannered, civilized Brits working to save their country from barbarism.

I can't help thinking that if the British Government brought the energy it has to prevent the "far right" from entering the country to preventing illegal immigrants from entering the country there might not be a "far right" in the first place.

🧵THE UNIPARTY UNMASKED – They Believe They Are “Democracy” The seven NGOs in the chart below, in my view, represent the Uniparty. Each of these organizations receives substantial financial support from USAID or the Department of State. Around 2019, the phrase “democracy in danger” began to dominate public discourse, amplified by the media. This was odd—after all, the U.S. is a democracy (or more precisely, a constitutional republic). But as I traced the influence of these NGOs, a pattern emerged: they are controlled by establishment politicians, they play a major role in shaping political narratives worldwide, and their core mission is always framed as “protecting democracy.” Originally, these NGOs were created to support U.S. democratic efforts abroad—many of them emerging during the Cold War to combat the spread of communism. But with the fall of the Soviet Union, their original purpose faded. Instead of dissolving, they redefined their mission. Now, they have positioned themselves as the guardians of democracy itself. This shift explains why Trump’s re-election was framed as a "threat to democracy." To these NGOs, “democracy” means themselves. Their survival depends on maintaining that role, and any challenge to their authority is perceived as a direct attack on democracy itself.

Western society is currently divided between people who know this is a man and are prepared to say so and those who know this is a man but lie out of obedience to an ideology. There is no third option. Literally nobody on earth thinks "Roxanne Tickle" is actually a woman.

Top row: Winsome Earle-Sears, Tamika Hamilton, Charlotte Bergmann. All (black) Republican women. Bottom row: Abigail Spanberger, Ami Bera, Steve Cohen. All Democrats. (2 white as rice, and 2 men.) The top 3 lost elections to the bottom 3. They want you to believe this is all about race and black representation, it’s not.