lucidityRx

@TrashPandaTv @FoxNews @DestinyDani3094 I could probably be convinced some of the scientists who went missing were recruited by foreign nations.

@FoxNews @DestinyDani3094 Russia or China kidnapping them to torture them for information on alien technology in our possession .

PETER DOOCY: “There are now 10 American scientists who have either gone missing or died since mid 2024. They all reportedly had access to classified nuclear or aerospace material. Is anybody investigating this to see if these things are connected?” KAROLINE LEAVITT: “I’ve seen the report, Peter. I haven't spoken to our relevant agencies about it. I will certainly do that, and we'll get you an answer. If true, of course, that's definitely something I think this government administration would deem work worth looking into. So let me do that for you.” @pdoocy

@LadyGriz She leads with verifiable facts—like Corby Hall creating FoldAR or Victor Marx negotiating with Haitian gang leaders—so you’ll trust the completely unhinged leap that comes next.

@LucidityRx What verifiable facts? She told you a fantastical story. Just like she always does.

So Candace made a big claim about a folding gun and said she'd seen the evidence, and everyone believes her with zero proof? Again?

@RealCandaceO I think that when you spend 4 days a week telling the world a woman is evil, some nutjobs are going to take it upon themselves to threaten her. Your lack of accountability is nauseating.

Erika Kirk pulled out of her event last minute with Vice President Vance, citing “threats”. This is PR horseshit, obviously. He is now doing the event alone at the University of Georgia. What do we think is the real reason she pulled out?

@Mouseygirl100 @ConservativeG99 Not to be confused with the other anonymous donor who said it did happen but Candace conveniently forgot about.

@ConservativeG99 Ahh yes the anonymous donors.

Thank You, to the Aspen donors who came forward and exposed TPUSA for lying YET AGAIN! ❤️👇

@Jordan_S90 I like how she called Trump a narcissist for thinking the Pope was elected to keep him in check, but she doesn't see that same narcissism in thinking it's reasonable to assume Charlie was killed to distract from her Macron legal battle.

So Candace Owens is a bald-faced liar. I know you already knew that, but it’s important to point it out for her cultists. They always ask, “What did she lie about?” Now you’ll be able to show them these clips and prove she’s contradicting herself. Candace Owens loves using weasel words and slippery language. She does this to hedge her bets against lawsuits and to give herself plausible deniability when the fables she weaves inevitably contradict themselves. Here she is claiming she never said that the donors in Aspen heard Charlie Kirk say he wanted Erika Kirk to take over if anything happened to him. There’s only one problem with your statement, Candace: You said exactly that several months ago, and you yourself conceded that you believed the donor who heard Charlie Kirk say he wanted Erika to take over if anything happened to him. Oh sure, your cultists will act like that’s not exactly what you said in this second clip I’m providing, but it’s painfully obvious that’s precisely what you meant. You are a fraud, and as your lies continue to catch up to you, we will keep exposing them. Read ’em and weep.

He claimed Dutch East India Company as a client. They dissolved in 1799. Later changed his bio to say he just managed their archives. Stormy Daniels affair claims - Avenatti, who he claimed to speak to, said his story was "completely fabricated, untrue and bogus, and is nothing more than a ridiculous attempt by this idiot to try and escape being a nobody." OAN forced to formally retract the story. October 2023 claimed- with "as close as 100% confidence as possible" that there will be multiple terrorist attacks in the US... for the next 14 months. This did not happen. Incredible claims with zero evidence, such as this zipline tweet- x.com/TonySeruga/sta… Trump assassination attempt suspect Ryan Routh visited Fort Bragg 147 times - fact checked by Newsweek, no evidence whatsoever this is true. Times of San Diego, Newsweek, Lead Stories, Politifact have all looked at specific claims and found nothing behind them. OAN ran his material uncritically and was forced to retract it. Even if you want to explain all of these things away - (which, fine, I wouldn't criticize you for doing at all; you could say the East India claim a misunderstanding, Avenatti is a disgraced loser, close to 100% does not equal 100%, Fed coverup in Butler, Newsweek can't technically fact check evidence Seruga refuses to provide, only fact check evidence available to journalists... I still have to ask, what HAS he proven? This is what I don't understand - he has a very large and diverse following. This lends itself to the idea that there is something legitimate about this guy. But what is it about him that distinguishes him from one of the thousands of cranks on the internet making grandiose claims (e.g. "owning every mobile device ID in America") without third party confirmation? I'm trying to figure out if I'm late to the party and missed some crucial reveal that was corroborated by other people, or if maybe he is simply just a crank. Am I missing something huge he's revealed that substantiates the claims he makes? I'm asking this question in good faith because I feel like must be. I know this was a huge wall of text, sorry for that, but this guy fascinates me so forgive me for going down the rabbit hole a little bit.

@gubbe_jord @LucidityRx @ProjectConstitu Why don't you show me when he was wrong about what with evidence?

Tony Seruga is saying that the NSA has a giant secret data center in Utah nicknamed Bumblehive. This place sucks up enormous amounts of phone data from everywhere. Because of something he calls “cross-pollination” (basically, all the little bits of data from your calls, texts, locations, apps, Wi-Fi connections, and even your old phones mixing together like pollen in a beehive), their super-advanced secret computer programs can do something scary: Even if you buy a cheap “burner” phone (one of those disposable phones people get to try to stay anonymous), after you use it normally for about 30–60 days, the NSA’s system can figure out — with almost 100% certainty — exactly who you are and link it to every phone you’ve ever owned before. In other words: Burner phones don’t actually protect your identity for very long anymore. The NSA can eventually connect the dots and know it’s really you using it. Why is he saying this now? He posted this as a follow-up to his earlier claim that raw GPS data showed 44 foreign phones (Israeli, Chinese, Russian, Iranian) were right near Charlie Kirk when he was assassinated in Utah last September. Now he’s pointing out that even those foreign-registered phones can be traced back to their real owners using this Bumblehive tech — and that 4 of the 16 Israeli registered phones present at UVU the day Charlie Kirk was assassinated—just showed up in Pakistan the same fancy hotel as high level peace talks we're taking place with the US, Israel and Iran. He’s basically warning: “Don’t think these phones stayed anonymous — the NSA already knows who was carrying them.” It’s all about how modern surveillance makes true anonymity almost impossible once you use a phone for a month or two.

@midnightcivics @beyond_sus @itsdeaann My mistake for engaging, I didn't realize you were a troll.

@LucidityRx @beyond_sus @itsdeaann Dude you’re obsessed. Just take the L

Calling it now, Trump is going to delete the photo depicting him as Jesus, then he’s going to claim it was posted by a staffer (but he won’t name or fire the staffer) & 99% of the MAGA influencers criticizing him right now will simply act like it never happened.

@midnightcivics @beyond_sus @itsdeaann Yes, the "misinformation." 🙄 x.com/i/status/20437…

@LucidityRx @beyond_sus @itsdeaann There they go, with misinformation

@midnightcivics @beyond_sus @itsdeaann Dean posted this at 8:42 MST. It was already reported as deleted as early as 8:27 MST. Hope that helps.

@beyond_sus @LucidityRx @itsdeaann Wrong again. Bro what is it with you guys and wrong info

@midnightcivics @itsdeaann He called it after it was already deleted 😂

@itsdeaann Called it

@RobertNitsch6 @Antunes1 Why do you think this is legitimate information?

Elon Musk just reposted this. Who are the “Bolsheviks”?

@Picasso_1963 @ProjectConstitu I see his bio and his claims, but not evidence that any of his claims are true, and a few where he has been proven wrong. I'm assuming he's leaked info that has been confirmed as accurate by anyone other than himself? I can't find anything anywhere saying this guy is legit.

@LucidityRx @ProjectConstitu Look at his bio and pinned tweet. He owns all the isp addresses. He is how many people are exposed these days. Totally credible.

Can I unbuckle yet?

Comparative bullet lead analysis was abandoned as unscientific, but do you understand why? If so, you should have even graver concerns about the toolmark analysis that's now the default method for connecting a suspect's gun to a bullet. I compare these methods in my latest piece: andreaburkhart.substack.com/p/comparative-…

@_wej01 ! We're just like bananas :(

Being a woman is like: Don’t get pregnant Don’t get pregnant Don’t get pregnant Don’t get pregnant Don’t get pregnant Aren’t you too young? Get an abortion Don’t get pregnant Don’t get pregnant QUICK GET PREGNANT! GET PREGNANT, FOR THE LOVE OF GOD BEFORE ITS TOO LATE! Aren’t you too old to be pregnant???

@RavenGrace0613 I'm not a Swift fan but I interpreted this as shaking her head like "nope, absolutely none of this would be possible without God." Like she went from happy and agreeable to deadly serious and deeply sincere. Just my unsolicited opinion!

I’ve seen this clip 100 times and I just don’t get why she’d get upset at thanking God? She says she’s a Christian. Weird.

@RealAlexJones Now might be a good time.

Now that Trump has proven that I have a low IQ should I retire?

@TheophorusJB @JayVTheGreat She literally lied about the case last night. Dishonest grifter.

Why won’t Erika or anyone else sue her? Because they fear what will come out in discovery. Candace is presenting the truth and nobody wants to challenge her on the facts so they attack her personally. They will call her demonic, but strangely nobody can provide counter-evidence that she’s wrong.

How much money has Candace Owens milked off the death of Charlie Kirk and the targeting of his company and his wife?