how many Dark Worlds can exist before there’s an imbalance?
Cause halfway through ch. 4: there’s the shelter fountain, castletown, and the 2 dark fountains by the knight in the church.
So is the limit 5, when the knight makes the titan? Or was that because it was made in the DW
There are a lot of good valid uses for AI that also dont destroy the ecosystem, poison water supplys, destroy the economy, and feed us slop.
There is not a single effective use for generative AI that doesnt have substantial drawbacks and negative effects for society.
Since a lot of people dont understand the difference.
Not all AI is bad, because not all AI is generative AI.
A game (like alien isolation for example) having an AI based algorithm so a monster can track your movement isnt GENERATIVE AI
WE ONLY DISLIKE GENERATIVE AI.
@Melonman2223@MrMangolele@cognitiva6@MattWallaceTech I didn't think of it as a 'gamble' scenario at all, when I first saw a post arguing for red I thought they were being sarcastic. Blue is so obviously the correct choice to me. Funny how we're all locked in our own minds, just assuming others think the way we do.
@MrMangolele@cognitiva6@MattWallaceTech That’s a great question I ask every blue button presser. When you get gamble scenarios like these you always look for the less risky, and red holds no chance of death.
@normalmadeline I get what you mean but I don’t think we should be catering to disabled people just because there’s a chance we could end up the same way. We should be catering because y’all are people too and deserve accessibility.
i feel like some "woke progressive" people have a morality based around blind revenge to injustice, rather than a morality based around uplifting those affected by it and then deconstructing the system that allowed that injustice.
@iggie404 oh absolutely. everyone hates homophobes more than they love gay people, hates transphobes more than loves trans people, hates racists more than loves poc. very very blatant once you notice it. you always see attacks on hate rather than any support for the impacted.
@Melonman2223@cognitiva6@MattWallaceTech It’s not a “problem”, it’s how it always works with large numbers of people. 100% agreement is impossible with large enough numbers of people, ask any question to enough people and there will be disagreement. Can’t change that without turning us into robots
@cognitiva6@MattWallaceTech And that’s really sad. If people can look, see an instant win button and still pick the gamble button, it’s a serious problem.
@yummypopcornyum@Variamech@MattWallaceTech Blues were never in danger either until reds voted to protect themself against a risk only votes create. Save the toddlers, don’t play death games by refusing to for some weird reason, that’s the blue side
@Variamech@MattWallaceTech "You lost"
The reds were literally never in danger; the only people who were in danger of "losing" were the idiots that voluntarily picked the button that entered them into a giant death casino. You played against your own stupidity and won; that has nothing to do with reds.
@waitbutwhy Positive Outcome: Requires 100% of people to do something (which never happens)
VS
Positive Outcome: Requires only 50%
+ If red wins y'all live in a post-apocalypse where ~50% of humans died. A lot of those you call stupid and suicidal are making your food rn
Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?