Omar

A woman’s voice is not ‘Awrah per the Hanbali school. Ibn al-Najjar al-Futuhī (d. 972 AH) in his Muntaha says: “The voice of the non-related/non-mahram woman [ajnabiyyah] is not ‘awrah” Ibn Qā’id in his commentary of al-Muntaha says: “…[Its not ‘Awrah] contrary to her hair” Al-Mardawī (d. 895 AH) says: “The voice of the non-related/non-mahram woman [ajnabiyyah] is not ‘awrah according to the correct view of the [Hanbali] madhab. [Ibn Muflih] has stated in al-Furu’ [her voice] is not ‘Awrah according to the most correct view”

@adam17129 @abdul_now @ProFrogICB @InspiringPhilos True. I see myself as both Arab and North African. The best way to put I guess is by heritage we are North African, but by identity we are Arab because of the language, religion, and culture.

@abdul_now @ProFrogICB @InspiringPhilos Usually as Egyptians we’d just align ourselves to whoever’s speaking with us. An Arab would say we are either Arab or not, and likewise an African would say we are African or not.

Huge red flag 🚩🚩🚩 The young man identified himself as a Coptic Christian and an Arab. Coptic Christians do not identify as Arab. In fact, they despise the label. They are native Egyptians. Did they think we would not catch this nonsense?

@Zaid_U9 مناخدش عقيدة السلف من الطوفي بس ناخدها من Zaid_U9 يا سلام

@M1srii لا يؤخذ منه عقيدة السلف

Najm al-Dīn al-Tūfī al-Hanbalī (d. 716 AH) on the statement of Allah ﷻ: ❝It is He Who is ˹the only˺ God in the heavens and ˹the only˺ God on the earth. For He is the All-Wise, All-Knowing❞. He [al-Tūfī] says: ❝He is above the heavens [Fī al-Samā’], above the throne with his essence and on earth with his knowledge and authority, just as it is said: "So and so is a ruler in Egypt, and in al-Shām he is a ruler", in one of them [present] by himself, and in the other [not present] by his authority". This is the view of Ahl al-Hadīth from the Hanābilah and others❞. #ClassicalPureHanabilah

@davids_s_ Wa feek

@M1srii Subhan Allah. Barak Allahu Feek

@ibnrajab01 Wa feek habibi

@M1srii barakallah feekm habibi.

It’s so fitting that you will one day be summoned alongside Ibn Taymiyyah in front of Allah ﷻ and he wraps you around his little finger like the kalb that you are. Including others but not limited to scholars like Ibn Jarir al-Tabari who validated the view. Ibn Taymiyyah whose contributions are many attested by all and one fought for the sake of Allah ﷻ. Simsim, the wannabe logician whose only contribution in life is spouting diarrhoea with his greasy fat fingers on Twitter, Telegram and Discord. I personally wish to be a witness against you too. عليك من الله ما تستحق يا واطي يا خبيث

It’s so fitting that those who say Hell isn’t eternal will find out that it is eternal, in the worst way possible.

@wannabemuhadith I hate this cover. They removed "Ibn Taymiyyah" deliberately.

okay malikis I'm sorry here is a cool text defending aml ahl madinah #Ifolded

@kutub_io That’s good to hear, I haven’t used your website yet, but is the Arabic also included with the translation for ease of mind or is it just the English present?

You can find minor errors but usually less than what a human translator can make. The raw output is generally very good, then a publishing house can make it better. Thousand of pages have been reviewed across multiple books by tulab, translators and organisations, and we got good feedback on the quality.

Al-Jawab al-Sahih has now been fully translated into English al-hamdulillah! Following a generous donation from a brother, may Allah reward him abundantly, we have completed the full English translation of Al-Jawab al-Sahih by Ibn Taimiya. It is now freely accessible on Kutub.io, with download support in: PDF, DOCX, EPUB If any publishing house is interested in a printed publication, feel free to contact us.

@Izolaka1 @LordDiososceles @Farid_0v @JamesKowalski88 There are Christian demonations pre-Islām that denied Jesus dying on the cross.

@M1srii @LordDiososceles @Farid_0v @JamesKowalski88 If you have no pre-Islamic record to support that version or the "true gospel," then everything is based on the revelation of a single man... then Joseph Smith's Jesus who came to America has the same historical reliability as Muhammad's Jesus, i mean...

This is the ultimate glass-house argument. They are demanding a standard of historical evidence for 1st-century Christianity that would completely vaporize their own religion if applied to 7th-century Islam.

@thirtyfivemmf2 بياخذ وقته 😅

شرح الشيخ السويلم على الدليل مغفول عنه.

Ibn al-Qayyim brings what Ibn Hazm said on the matter, in his Kitab al-Salah, and I’m pretty sure he or Ibn Taymiyyah mentioned that there was a basis for not making up missed prayers this from the Salaf. Dare I say Ibn Hazms’ arguments for not making up missed prayers is strong. Ibn Hazm is not a lunatic. He’s a scholar with Shadh opinions. Ibn Taymiyyah wouldn’t waste his time memorising al-Muhalla if the author was a lunatic. Also, I think Ibn Taymiyyahs opinion is different on this issue. I believe he thinks the one who missed his prayers should make them up because they’re a right for Allah, however they won’t be accepted. I may be wrong though.

@muhammad_karam0 @AhlulAthaarr @akh_tasawwuf He followed him in that error

Enter al-ʿAllāmah Ibn Ḥazm. May Allah ﷻ have mercy on him.

@LordDiososceles @Farid_0v @JamesKowalski88 John, how do you verify supernatural claims in the absence of eyewitness evidence?

@M1srii @Farid_0v @JamesKowalski88 My question was how you verify claims in the absence of eyewitness evidence. Your answer was basically “through revelation.” That means you’ve now left eyewitness verification entirely and moved to asserting revelation as self-authenticating. That’s circular.

Eyewitness testimony is the standard of things that happen in reality, things that we can see in real time, not events that are in the unseen which only God can reveal to whomever he wishes. That’s what Farid was initially pointing out. Both the Qur’an and Bible don’t claim eyewitness to the unseen, only revelation, (except in the case of Prophets whom we believe in, who were able to get a glimpse of the unseen). This is epistemological framework being employed here, the very same framework work you believe is credible when it comes to the Bible. I can simply ask you for the same thing concerning the resurrection of Jesus, or any other story from the bible where I demand eyewitness testimony, for example the story of Adam and Eve. There’s none.

@M1srii @Farid_0v @JamesKowalski88 If eyewitnesses testimony is the standard then how do you verify that in the absence of eyewitness evidence?

@LordDiososceles @Farid_0v @JamesKowalski88 You want an eyewitness claiming "Yeah I was given vision of the unseen and saw Jesus being saved by God in the background?" What you’re asking is ludicrous.

@M1srii @Farid_0v @JamesKowalski88 Is there eyewitness evidence to attest to the Quran’s claims?

@LordDiososceles @Farid_0v @JamesKowalski88 Why not? The Qur’ān does not deny a crucifixion took place nor does it deny that people did not see Jesus, we just simply believe something supernatural was happening the background, which was God saving Jesus from the punishment of the crucifixion.

@Farid_0v @JamesKowalski88 By the standards of Islamic tradition we can’t take the Quran’s claims about the crucifixion seriously then. See how that works?

@hadspekingur Farid and Adnan did good by responding to non-Muslim attacks from the likes David wood, Christian Prince etc… that’s a notable contribution to those who were affected and when there wasn’t enough info on the English side.

political compass of my fyp

Najm b. Fudayl (d. ? AH) said: "I saw the Prophet ﷺ in a dream leaving a village, and behind him was al-Bukhārī. Whenever the Prophet ﷺ took a step, Muhammad [al-Bukhārī] would step and place his foot exactly where the Prophet ﷺ had stepped".

@darthweit2 Asked

@M1srii Ibn Balbān

The Hanbalī scholar Badr al-Dīn Ibn Balbān (d. 1083 AH) responded to a total of six questions from a Zaydī that was sent to Damascus. Out of the six questions, three was about the naming of "Ahl al-Sunnah wal-Jama'ah". One of those questions was about what is meant by الجماعة. Ibn Balbān gave a response I have never seen before or heard from any scholar. He said: "It is because they have unanimously agreed upon the establishment of the Jum'ah prayer in all times and places provided the conditions are fulfilled, and not in those conditions does the infallibility of the imām exist as is said by the majority of the innovators, so they abandon it [the prayer] but [praying in] congregation is obligatory [for Salat al-Jum’ah]. So it must be prayed behind every [leading] imām whether he be righteous or sinful, and they [Ahl al-Sunnah] do not permit leaving it except for an excuse that is mentioned in the books of Fiqh, and the lack of an infallible imām is not from amongst the excuses as claimed by the innovators" In the second paragraph he was speaking about the same thing, but concerning the five daily prayers. What’s odd in this response is that he said اكثر أهل البدع, the majority of innovators claim infallibility is a condition for one to lead the prayer? Which innovators ever said this? In the third page he says واعلم ان الجماعة مأخوذة من الاجتماع للجمعة ولفعل الجماعة في الصلوات الخمس والعيد والكسوف والاستسقاء والتراويح "Know that Jama'ah is taken from al-ijtimā’ [the gathering] for Jum'ah, and congregational practice in the five [daily] prayers, ‘Eid, al-Kusūf, al-istisqā’ and Tarāwīh" He then touched upon ‘ismah [infallibility], initially claiming that it’s only for the Prophets عليهم السلام, and how الخيرية [goodness] is scarce after the first three generations let alone infallibility. However, he then says: "Yet we do not deny it [infallibility] for other than the Prophets, rather we say it’s possible, except that we see its occurrence to be rare". Infallibility for non-Prophets exist according to Ibn Balbān? 🤔 The book is an educational read, a response from two Muftīs from the Hanābilah to a Zaydī, however this particular response to this question from Ibn Balbān puzzled me.