MJ33Wx

6K posts

MJ33Wx banner
MJ33Wx

MJ33Wx

@MJ33Wx

Professional Meteorologist at WFO LMK.

Ohio Valley Katılım Ocak 2013
634 Takip Edilen1.4K Takipçiler
Marc Weinberg
Marc Weinberg@MarcWeinbergWX·
There appears to be a light smoke plume showing up on radar near West Point / Fort Knox. Anyone will eyes on this area?
GIF
English
6
6
38
18.1K
MJ33Wx
MJ33Wx@MJ33Wx·
I'm not attempting to play down the threat by any means. However, I've been through plenty of these setups over the last 30 years to see failure models that occur often. Given the setup, threat is there for high winds, but the threat does dampen with eastern extent. #kywx
English
0
1
11
1.2K
MJ33Wx
MJ33Wx@MJ33Wx·
SPC always accounts for spillover in the category areas. If the line becomes elevated, I think we would more likely see widespread 50-55 mph winds with a few 60-70+ reports in there. However, the highest risk of 65-70+ mph winds will likely remain west of I-65. #kywx
English
1
1
5
1K
MJ33Wx
MJ33Wx@MJ33Wx·
With regards to the Sunday night severe, I think the risk levels are appropriately placed. However, things do get a bit murky in the I-65 corridor and points east. #kywx
English
1
3
28
7.3K
MJ33Wx
MJ33Wx@MJ33Wx·
@wxstorm18 @cpinney998 @MarcWeinbergWX Because day 1 and day 2 outlooks go back to the 50/60s, they existed before the internet. They are still intended for internal NWS guidance and forecast coordination. Same for AFD's from local offices. In the 90s, everything just got ported to the internet.
English
0
0
0
23
Marc Weinberg
Marc Weinberg@MarcWeinbergWX·
The season is still young and we are getting a lot of people complaining about the new SPC "CIG" system. The hatched really used to have meaning and raise awareness. Now, we are hearing that it is causes a huge amount of confusion and is being "spammed" everywhere. Why change something that was working well? What a mess.
English
18
1
57
8.1K
MJ33Wx
MJ33Wx@MJ33Wx·
@WX_Marker RRFS exists with a FV3 core, but yes, it is going to MPAS core. Most NCEP models will be moving to MPAS cores for a unified model system. NAM will eventually get retired, but not sure on date.
English
1
0
1
68
Jon Marker
Jon Marker@WX_Marker·
@MJ33Wx I thought RRFS was based off MPAS? Is the NAM still expected to be discontinued soon?
English
1
0
0
44
MJ33Wx
MJ33Wx@MJ33Wx·
In reference to the day 3 outlook for 3/11/2026. I have seen an uptick in social media posts utilizing the RRFS for convective forecasting. It's not a model that I would use (1/2) #kywx
MJ33Wx tweet media
English
1
1
25
3.6K
MJ33Wx
MJ33Wx@MJ33Wx·
I have been involved in evaluating these models in the hazardous weather testbed where we compared them to the MPAS cores. Again, MPAS was way better, but the RRFS initialization is pretty good. Just tends to go off the rails later in the run.
English
1
0
3
481
MJ33Wx
MJ33Wx@MJ33Wx·
First off, you should never use forecast composite reflectivity for convective forecasting. Second, most people do not realize that the FV3 core overdevelops convection badly. MPAS cores are WAY better. (2/2) #kywx
English
2
0
4
787
MJ33Wx
MJ33Wx@MJ33Wx·
@2024yesyes Composite reflectivity can be a good indicator of storm mode. However using to to diagnose where convection will fire or its eventual evolution is not recommended.
English
1
0
1
202
werwerwrewerwrw
werwerwrewerwrw@2024yesyes·
@MJ33Wx Is there a problem with using composite reflectivity just to get a general idea on where storms could develop and what the storm mode could be, but not using it as what will happen?
English
2
0
0
52
MJ33Wx
MJ33Wx@MJ33Wx·
@garrityv_t Yeah, when the PV gets stretched out like a football in an east/west direction, cold isn't coming back for a while.
English
0
0
0
20
MJ33Wx
MJ33Wx@MJ33Wx·
Looking at the latest MJO forecasts, the orbit from phase 4/5 to phase 6/7 would result in a warm/wet pattern for the Ohio Valley. Dynamical models are on this already. Local river flooding will become a problem. Probably will see some severe wx threats as well. #kywx
MJ33Wx tweet mediaMJ33Wx tweet mediaMJ33Wx tweet mediaMJ33Wx tweet media
English
1
1
13
1.4K
MJ33Wx
MJ33Wx@MJ33Wx·
@Vinceuk01 We can some nice weather his weekend!
English
0
0
1
31
MJ33Wx
MJ33Wx@MJ33Wx·
@garrityv_t There is speculation that we may have another strat warm event. This could displace or poke the PV. If comes back over to the western hemisphere, that would be helpful.
English
0
0
0
36
MJ33Wx
MJ33Wx@MJ33Wx·
Now, despite the MJO going into phase 6/7 in March, while the overall average of temps/precip should be above normal, I still think we'll see a strong flux in temps before and after fronts coming through. Some wintry wx is possible, but time is fading. #kywx
English
2
0
2
244
MJ33Wx
MJ33Wx@MJ33Wx·
For a colder pattern, you need to be in phase 2/3. If the pulse were to continue through phase 7/8 in late March, and get into phase 1/2/3 in April, that would result in a colder pattern going into April. #kywx
MJ33Wx tweet media
English
1
0
1
342