@drsanjoykumar Notice he stops short of saying there is possibly an elephant in the room.
Genetics
English
MurderMeOnMonday
5.6K posts
MurderMeOnMonday
@MMonMonday
Now only available on Patreon.
South East, England Katılım Şubat 2021
312 Takip Edilen700 Takipçiler
Shared with you by a Times subscriber.
Enjoy this article for free.
Is psychiatry’s focus on race stats linked to Nottingham attacks?
thetimes.com/article/a54fdd…
English
@TrishHodkinson Let him stand there jabbering away to an empty set of opposition benches knowing full well how the whole country holds in in contempt
English
I think all opposition parties should not attend the next PMQs, what’s the point? He never answers questions. Make a stand and boycott the next one. Let him talk to himself!
Hopeless, useless PM!
Trish@TrishHodkinson
I actually despise this man who never answers a question at PMQs
English
@SomeCallMeLaz @GirlScout27 @latsot All the so called “rights” we have amount to nothing once someone in that position has made a decision.
English
@MMonMonday @GirlScout27 @latsot The power that doctors wield is incredible and quite disturbing once you realise how it can be and is misused, with virtually no way for victims of the abuse to correct the record or get a genuinely independent second opinion.
English
We've seen lots of these cases. Doctors convicted of abusing children who then go to a tribunal which decides whether they should be allowed to practice medicine again.
WHY would a medical tribunal be required for a doctor convicted of child abuse?
WHY would there be any possibility of his ever being employed ever again?
At this stage it's becoming clear that he'd be more likely to be struck off if he'd fiddled the books than because he fiddled with children.
thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/25950016.…
English
@SomeCallMeLaz @GirlScout27 @latsot Once you have a “label” it’s impossible to remove.
You have to approach every interaction with the medical profession, heck any public sector, like a defendant who knows they are innocent yet knows the system has marked you as “guilty”
English
@GirlScout27 @latsot The number of mentally ill women reporting getting BPD diagnosis when they complain they're not getting proper treatment for their actual illness is horrifying. As soon as that appears on their records they are immediately and forever disbelieved by the entire medical profession.
English
@ascentialbeing @Sorelle_Arduino @maliamum @UKLabour @StephenMorganMP David Fuller
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…
English
@Sorelle_Arduino @maliamum @UKLabour @StephenMorganMP There is a reason morgues don’t hire men, and instead choose to hire women.
We must have a zero policy, to include men, and men who identify as women.
We have them an inch, and our children are suffering because they take a mile 🤷🏼♀️😩
English
4 male nursery workers jailed for child sex offences in 4 months, men only account for 2% of nursery staff
Yet @UKLabour MP @StephenMorganMP has announced funding to increase male nursery staff
Morgan claims 9 out 10 parents support it, I can’t find the data
Can anyone help?
Emily Wilding Davison🏴@Wommando
⚠️This is the fourth male nursery worker to be jailed for child sex offences in the last four months The day before Parry's sentence, nursery worker Nathan Bennett was jailed for 24 years for 21 child sex offences against 5 toddlers in his care. x.com/i/status/20208…
English
@furbabygirl Schools are not closing!!!
It is propaganda designed to make it happen
And it’s working
Now the Iranian powers will keep repeating it until it happens
It’s called
Repeat a lie until it becomes truth
The video was AI
English
What’s Eid Mubarak got to do with the traditions and culture of Britain and why are our schools closing for a fringe religion?
I’m genuinely mystified why the left want to make a big deal out of every religion they can think of while dismissing Christianity as inconsequential 🤷♀️
English
@ginger010167 @PatrickChristys I was always told it signified who had been on the Hajj but apparently not
English
@PatrickChristys What is their obsession with Red and Ginger beard dyes?????? I am perplexed
English
What’s really important now is that we let loads more people like this into Britain
Afghanistan Defense@AFGDefense
🚨 BIG The Grand Mufti of the Supreme Court of Afghanistan, Sheikh Mawlawi Abdul Rauf, has issued a fatwa of jihad against the Pakistani military regime. He stated that it is obligatory upon all Muslims to go to or join the battlefield against the Pakistani military regime.
English
@LadyMercia49517 @TDieppe You moron. And you've got the absolute gall to use that name but have no idea of it's and my rich history. It's time you lot kept your stupid mouths shut.
"In common with his predecessors for almost 500 years, The King is known as Defender of the Faith"
English
The people are longing for the King to honour his solemn vow to defend the Christian faith in the public square.
Bishop Ceirion H. Dewar FSHC@BishopDewar
As a Bishop, I cannot stay silent. I have today drafted and sent an open letter to His Majesty King Charles III, the text of which reads as follows: To: His Majesty, Charles III, King of the United Kingdom and the Realms, Supreme Governor of the Church of England, Bearer of the ancient title Defender of the Faith. Your Majesty, I write to you neither as a politician nor as a commentator, but as one of your loyal subjects who, as a bishop of Christ’s Church, cannot remain silent while the Christian foundations of this kingdom are steadily dismantled. Sir, there are moments in the life of a nation when silence becomes a form of betrayal. If I refused to speak to Your Majesty now, this would be such a moment. For more than a thousand years the Crown of this realm has stood in solemn covenant with the Christian faith. The laws of this land were shaped by it. The liberties of our people were nurtured by it. The conscience of our civilisation was formed by it. From the abbeys of medieval England to the parish churches of our villages, from the preaching of the Reformers to the missionary zeal that carried the Gospel to the ends of the earth, the Christian faith has not merely influenced Britain — it has defined her. Yet today that inheritance is being quietly but deliberately eroded. Across the institutions of this nation there is a growing hostility toward the faith that built them. Christian belief is mocked in the public square. Christian morality is dismissed as intolerance. Christian institutions are pressured to surrender doctrine in order to conform to the ideology of the age. Within the very Church that bears the name of England, voices have arisen that appear more eager to mirror the spirit of the age than to proclaim the eternal truth of the Gospel. Meanwhile, beyond the walls of our churches, powerful political movements openly speak of removing Christianity from its historic place within the life of this nation. What would once have been whispered is now proclaimed openly: that Britain must become a post-Christian state. It is in this context that I write to you, Your Majesty. For the British Crown does not stand apart from this crisis. The Sovereign of this realm bears a title that is not merely historic but sacred in its origin and meaning: Defender of the Faith. Those words are not decorative. They are a charge. They speak of a monarch whose duty is not merely to preside over the ceremonies of the Church, but to stand as a guardian of the Christian inheritance of the nation. Yet many among your subjects now ask, with increasing anxiety: “Who will defend that inheritance today?” They see a nation drifting from its foundations. And they ask whether the Crown will remain silent while that inheritance is dismantled. Your Majesty, may I be so bold as to observe that your coronation oath was not a poetic formality. It was a solemn vow made before Almighty God to maintain and preserve the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law. Those words bind the conscience of the sovereign. They remind the Crown that its authority is not merely constitutional but moral. The monarch is not merely a symbol of national continuity, but a custodian of the spiritual inheritance that shaped this realm. History records moments when kings and emperors were confronted by the Church and reminded that their authority was accountable before God. In the fourth century Ambrose of Milan stood before the Emperor Theodosius I and reminded him that even the ruler of an empire must bow before the moral law of Christ. That tradition of prophetic witness has never disappeared. Nor should it. For when rulers forget the foundations upon which their authority rests, the Church must speak — not with hostility, but with holy clarity. And so, I write to say this, Your Majesty: The Christian character of this nation is under profound and accelerating assault. If the Crown does not stand visibly and courageously in defence of that inheritance, history will record that the guardians of Britain’s institutions watched in silence as the foundations were removed. The issue before us is not nostalgia. It is civilisation. Remove Christianity from the story of Britain and you do not create a neutral society — you create a moral vacuum. And history teaches us that moral vacuums are never left empty for long. Your Majesty now stands at a crossroads that few monarchs in modern history have faced. For the erosion of Britain’s Christian inheritance will not ultimately be judged by speeches made in Parliament or debates in the press. It will be judged by whether those entrusted with the guardianship of our ancient institutions chose to defend them — or merely preside over their quiet surrender. You may preside over the quiet dissolution of Britain’s Christian identity. Or you may rise to the ancient responsibility entrusted to the Crown and speak with clarity about the faith that built this kingdom. The first path requires little courage. The second will require a great deal. But it is the path that history honours. Your Majesty’s subjects are not asking for religious coercion. They are asking for leadership. They are asking that the sovereign who bears the title Defender of the Faith remember what that title means. They are asking that the Crown hear the growing cry of anguish from Christians across this land who feel that the spiritual inheritance of their nation is being surrendered without resistance. And they are asking whether the Crown will stand with them. For the faith that shaped Britain is not merely a cultural ornament. It is the wellspring from which our laws, our liberties, and our moral imagination have flowed. If it is cast aside, the nation will discover — too late — that it has severed itself from the very roots that sustained it. Your Majesty, to many the Crown is a symbol of authority. But before God it is also a symbol of stewardship. And stewardship carries with it the duty to defend what has been entrusted. May Almighty God grant Your Majesty the wisdom to discern this hour, and the courage to fulfil the sacred duty entrusted to the Crown. Yours faithfully, Bishop Ceirion H. Dewar FSHC Missionary Bishop Diocese of Providence Confessing Anglican Church @PhilHs10 @RevBrettMurphy @revwickland @BishopRobert1 @GBNews @TalkTV @danwootton @Jacob_Rees_Mogg @LozzaFox @BackBrexitBen @RupertLowe10 @KemiBadenoch @JohnCleese
English
@readwithai @OfcomCommentary And that’s exactly what I did.
No mandate and people don’t want this.
Government couldn’t organise the proverbial so data isn’t safe.
Didn’t hold back 🤭
English
Everyone with a functioning brain already knows the truth:
Government "consultations" are pure window dressing — a cynical charade to pretend they care what you think.
The real shock?
So many smart people, respected organisations, and even activists still play along, dutifully submitting responses like it might actually change anything.
Spoiler: It won't.
The decision was made before the page loaded.
Stop lending legitimacy to the farce.
Call it what it is: controlled theatre.
#AbolishOFCOM
#RottenParliament
Big Brother Watch@BigBrotherWatch
🆔Government to public: Do you want digital ID checks to be used to enforce a social media ban for under-16s ☐ Yes ☐ Definitely yes ☐ Strongly yes ☐ Yes 100% The “consultation” doesn’t appear to have a box for disagreeing.
English
@timorgxyz @DearRebelAda 2018???
So digging stuff up from 8 years ago or this is a new offence?
English
@dreamweaverguru @KevinMarsh45675 @BGatesIsaPyscho I read yesterday it’s now 5!! 5 I knew but the 5th was new.
English
Old clip of Keir Starmer shows he’s always wanted to abolish the justice system
Why?
Because without Juries they can prosecute, punish and release anyone they choose with great efficiency.
This of course means minorities go free, whilst in indigenous English people get jailed quickly.
English
English
@CharlesBanks99 @BGatesIsaPyscho Really??? Had no idea. Sounds very authoritarian in a dictatorship way?
English
@BGatesIsaPyscho Making justice a government office? We have that in Sweden where only the state is allowed to prosecute the state and you have no right to representation, the state handlers decide everything for you.
English
@SuperShane8008s @rebecca_ryder21 @onebern Of course not, but it’s not impossible to create a system that could determine viability of an aide rather than immediately disposing
English
@MMonMonday @rebecca_ryder21 @onebern So you think somebody can check for microfractures in the metal by simply looking at it? I guess aircraft are given the ok after a tyre kick! 🤣
English
NHS hospital: I noticed the clock on the wall showed the wrong time.
A nurse told me they knew, but they wouldn’t report it because replacing the battery through the NHS would cost £70.
A £2 battery... £70. How? Why?
That's when I began to dig further.
🧵
English
@SuperShane8008s @rebecca_ryder21 @onebern So have someone check the equipment and certify it safe. It’s got to be cheaper than buying new?
And how do they square all that waste with their Net Zero stuff????
English
@rebecca_ryder21 @onebern They can't reuse medical aids because they would have to be checked over after every use to check for any damage or risk of failure. Can you imagine what would happen if someone was injured using medical equipment that seemed OK, but had a major fault?
English
@paulabearthe2nd No, he won’t resign (masters won’t let him) and they won’t oust him until after the council elections as he will be the sacrifice they think they need
English
MurderMeOnMonday retweetledi
I see some weird things but this takes the biscuit. A vulnerability in the Companies House website, that let anyone view the private dashboard of any one of the five million registered companies, see directors' personal details.
And modify them.
English
MurderMeOnMonday retweetledi
BREAKING: The Word “Glitch” Is Doing the Heaviest Lifting in British Banking Today
This morning, customers of Lloyds, Halifax, and Bank of Scotland opened their banking apps and found themselves staring at the complete financial lives of total strangers. Transaction histories. Account numbers. Sort codes. National Insurance numbers. DWP benefit payments. English wages appearing in Scottish accounts. Pub tabs in Newcastle showing up in Wales. One Bank of Scotland customer cycled through six different people’s full account details in twenty minutes, each refresh serving a new stranger’s financial identity like a slot machine of personal data.
The banks called it a “technical glitch” and told customers not to worry. Halifax’s official response on X was to suggest logging out and back in. Lloyds asked users to “bear with them.” Bank of Scotland said they were “investigating.”
Let me translate this from institutional euphemism into plain language. A banking group serving over 26 million customers had a backend failure that served authenticated financial data, including government-issued identity numbers, to random sessions. In any jurisdiction with functioning data protection enforcement, this is not a glitch. This is a reportable data exposure event under UK GDPR. The Information Commissioner’s Office requires notification within 72 hours of any breach involving personal data that poses a risk to individuals’ rights. National Insurance numbers are the skeleton key to identity fraud in Britain. They unlock tax records, benefit claims, credit applications, and pension access. Every single NI number that appeared on a stranger’s screen this morning is now a compromised credential, regardless of whether the display bug has been “quickly resolved.”
The precedent is instructive. In April 2018, TSB suffered a similar failure during an IT migration from the same parent infrastructure. Lloyds Banking Group’s systems. Customers could see other people’s accounts, access funds that were not theirs, and were locked out for months. The FCA and PRA fined TSB £48.65 million. Over 225,000 complaints were filed. £32.7 million in redress was paid. The CEO was forced out. And that failure originated in a planned migration with known risk parameters.
This morning’s incident at Lloyds Banking Group was not a planned migration. It was a spontaneous failure in production systems that randomly distributed live financial identities to authenticated but unrelated sessions. The fact that it was brief does not reduce the severity. It increases it. A planned migration that goes wrong reveals poor execution. A production system that spontaneously begins serving random customer data to random sessions reveals something about the underlying architecture that no amount of “quickly resolved” can address.
Every customer who saw a stranger’s NI number this morning received proof that the verification promise underpinning digital banking, the promise that authentication equals isolation, failed silently and completely. The banks say your account is safe. What they mean is the display error has been corrected. These are not the same statement. The question is not whether it was fixed. The question is whether anyone took screenshots during those twenty minutes. And whether the ICO and FCA will treat this as what it is.
English
@PhilHannon @Keir_Starmer They get the engagement questions beforehand, so yes, it’s a prepared response.
Totally stupid as it just means he waffles around the supplementary clarification
English
I think it's pretty obvious now that @Keir_Starmer enters PMQS with a set of answers already prepared, so no matter what the question is, you're getting some form of answer. It's basically the PM having his say.
English