
Planetraveller
467 posts






I see a lot of talk about EMIB-T hehe but I don't see this being published, which I've seen in some documents placed around 2030. So you have something new to discuss hehe 200+ EMIBS/241x240=🤯🤯🤯🤯 576cm2? DIN A4 sheet= 630 cm2 right?🤯


BESSENT: TRUMP SHOULD GET CREDIT FOR MAKING MONEY ON INTEL INVESTMENT




BESSENT: TRUMP SHOULD GET CREDIT FOR MAKING MONEY ON INTEL INVESTMENT



"Microelectronic Assemblies including Stacked Dies Coupled by A Through Dielectric Via", Stephen Morein (CTO, SAIMEMORY, Aug 2025 --), ..., Prashant Majhi, Intel (Jun 2022) patents.google.com/patent/US12525… <= VLSI 2026 x.com/ogawa_tter/sta… ZAM、4月22日 x.com/ogawa_tter/sta… 38億円🤔




Here are $INTC’s valuation metrics compared to other semiconductor peers. When you look at Intel through this lens, it becomes clear that the stock is still undervalued across nearly every major metric relative to the industry. This isn’t just a book-value story (though Intel is significantly undervalued on assets alone). The discount shows up in real operating metrics as well, EV/EBITDA and operating cash flow... P/E is obviously distorted due to massive capital expenditures tied to long-term growth. If you believe in Intel’s story, don’t let naysayers or clueless analysts tell you otherwise. + Remember this is the current valuation before any real IFS income. Intel (and LBT) may still have a long road ahead to fix the balance sheet and fire up IFS, and that’s exactly where the $1T upside comes from. But even ignoring all that, today’s valuation data says $INTC is a great deal. Table ranked from best to worst by EV/EBITDA.







If you aren’t buying the dip here, I genuinely don’t understand what you’re doing. $INTC





$INTC isn't done yet Traders are aggressively buying 130-140 OTM call strikes (30%+ MORE upside) Why? @forefrontalpha/note/c-251674771?r=3wzwn0&utm_source=notes-share-action&utm_medium=web" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">substack.com/@forefrontalph…


