Johann S.

115 posts

Johann S.

Johann S.

@M_November

Katılım Aralık 2011
78 Takip Edilen19 Takipçiler
Aegon
Aegon@diapsalmata_0x·
@mmmatt it blows my mind how good these ai models are at coding. you just need to know what you wanna build.
English
2
0
1
66
Hotronix
Hotronix@hotronixs·
@TraderMercury What happened? Can you explain a bit where it went wrong?
English
3
0
0
389
Mercury
Mercury@TraderMercury·
6 years ago today I liquidated the portfolio I spent 2 years building up ~12hrs a day trading all gone to waste because of one decision, ego, and skill issue that was the best thing that’s ever happened to me.
Mercury tweet media
English
33
11
471
14.9K
Johann S.
Johann S.@M_November·
@sussoutthetiger @astronomer_zero Let's say you long something at 100, stop loss 90. It goes to 108 and you move SL to 100. Then if it does 108>97 >125 your SL hits and you miss a win even though you had the right idea.
English
1
0
0
9
K
K@sussoutthetiger·
@M_November @astronomer_zero Thanks mate! Appreciate this, however, don't quite follow wdym by 'If you have good intuition but SL2BE prevent wins and you don't trade often, it's bad.' - why would it prevent win if the trade is running in the anticipated direction?
English
2
0
0
23
Astronomer
Astronomer@astronomer_zero·
$BTC longs Trade now up 1.7R , take some profits and set it risk free. (+ small rant) If you took the trade along, congrats. We are getting close to first TP (67.2k plus or minus time dependent dynamics). If you haven't already, I would set the trade risk free the way I usually do (not moving SL to BE, just TP'ing some to cancel out losses if it runs to the SL). Next, is the aim for 67.2k. That's the point this trade turns into an official win and we lock in our fifth win in a row. All done in live time by the way. Enjoy. And stop reading here... Rant underneath. (Do not read if you don't like rants). But yes, all done live because I have nothing to hide. As, during my early years in the trading industry, I know how frustrating it is when a smurk genius doesn't show what his/her trading life is actually like and if they actually make money. We all know that accurate calls and clear (emphasis on) entries and exits are a lot different. 0 educational value when not shared, just covering him or herself to keep his or her career, a broad feature of hedgefund floors, and interestingly also on X, because most are non profitable, some are profitable, and only very few elites are broadly profitable. Why so few? Exactly for those reasons I just mentioned: terrible mentorship, keeping people on the leash for a while with bad backend trading and thus bad fundamentals. Because I learnt that in all my years, when someone isn't clearly stating their entries and exits, they are probably not confident in their trading, hiding it to play it safe. Excuse my rant, but that's just the reality. Remember my existence as the one who tries to bring light to reality. Whilst at the same time demonstrating that profitable trading is possible and relatively stress free if done right. Enjoy the true journey. And I wish you a good night, as always. Take care.
Astronomer tweet media
Astronomer@astronomer_zero

$BTC longs 66k reached, trade now risk free. Alrightnice push off entry almost immediately after taking the trade. Trade up already 1100 points. We hit 66k, which is the start of the risk free zone (the zone where I intended to make the trade risk free). So without any excuses, trade is risk free (you already know the math). If 63.1-64.2k still comes, that's a free relong. Alternatively, if you prefer to let it run for longer and are less risk-averse, letting it run to 67k fully makes sense, potentially going through a drawdown first, and if 63.1 - 64.2 still comes, add to the position. Not something I recommend psychologically (trading is 50% psychology), but if you're experienced, this is option two. For now, good entry, good start of the trade. We eliminated the potential of a loss. I'll hope to see you higher to lock in the win next.

English
30
22
288
64.2K
Johann S.
Johann S.@M_November·
@sussoutthetiger @astronomer_zero astro rec : SL stays because i'm confident in my trade idea and invalidation level, gains will be lower, worst case it's not a loss The best option depends on your strengths. If you have good intuition but SL2BE prevent wins and you don't trade often, it's bad.
English
2
0
1
26
K
K@sussoutthetiger·
@astronomer_zero ik you've said SL2BE is an amateurish move & should instead trim. But I struggle to understand the logic, Astro If you trim and it runs back to SL, you lost most of what you've trim'd.
English
10
0
1
192
Johann S.
Johann S.@M_November·
@sussoutthetiger @astronomer_zero The three options have different reasonings : classic SL2BE : aiming for planned gains, worst case no (or negligible) loss your idea : gains will be lower, but it will be a positive PnL whatever happens
English
1
0
1
14
K
K@sussoutthetiger·
@astronomer_zero Why not instead put SL2BE once your trade has moved in the direction you anticipated and have trimmed, so that when you trim, you at least pocket some profit? Why allow it to go away by allowing the SL (below your entry) to hit? @astronomer_zero
English
1
0
1
27
Johann S.
Johann S.@M_November·
@str0nzetto @Ancient8Wisdom @astronomer_zero He didn't say that, you added the "straight to" part. It's a bit unclear because there could be an implicit "else" between the two sentences, but the comment in parens leaves no doubt anyways i guess.
English
0
0
1
16
Fabio
Fabio@str0nzetto·
@Ancient8Wisdom @astronomer_zero Did you read the post? He said that if we go straight to 73k, we won't break through. My question was whether we would break through if we saw 65.2k first.
English
2
0
0
41
Astronomer
Astronomer@astronomer_zero·
$BTC longs 68k reached, a small TP here (reasons below) Alright, longs continuing to feel comfy, now pushed to 68k. That's not random, it's because we likely hit the intraweek bias correctly again, trading the hourly upwards as it should be traded. I have faith in continuation up. But admittedle, I do have some light concerns for the long however, so going to address them first (with my $BTC expectations), and then finish with the most important part: my action. Expectations on $BTC This section is locally speaking, detailing out the range (to trade it). You already know my general expectations which is a bottom we called when $BTC hot 63k for the first time, and a range subsequently. Do you see by the way how it's forming slowly but surely by now? No where heard before but here, that the market was going to range. We only heard bottom and top calls or higher or lower. Markets have a third "bias" which is a range. No one knows about it so it seems. So, indeed, a range. And within it, we used 65.7k as a long level because at the time, it was perfect liquidity. Limits set there, and were called out in live time/before it happened, and the very next session, they were hit to the tick. Reaction went well, and now the trade is risk free without any drawdown prior, wonderful. Unfortunately, liquidity is also building at 65.2k and below. Could be multiple reasons, I do have a technical intraweek level there, could also be our call catching inner circles and being pushed around late degens longing. Or just me being wrong on going to 73k next and we see 65.2k first. My SL accounted for it, so does my POI. But of course, I don't want to see it because it potentially wastes a risk free trade if it goes any deeper which is equally possible. That's the only issue I have aside from Friday coming in, which also has an intraweek trend reversal tendency. Action (what am I going to do about it) So those concerns are light, I still mainly expect 73k. But they exist, so naturally, with light concerns, I'm going to TP a small amount further on the longs here at 68k, of only 15%. So I'm out 55%, the rest is for above 70k. If we go straight to 65.2k from here, I believe that's a better chance for higher (73k). If we go to 73k, it won't be to break out IMO (even in general the range isn't ready yet), so that will be for another short back down to 65.2k if indeed left behind. That's my plan, logical, straightforward and action oriented. No vagueness, vagueness leads to nothing, leads to inaction, leads to confusion. That's for engagement farmers. I am a trader. Enjoy trading along.
Astronomer tweet media
Astronomer@astronomer_zero

$BTC longs To the tick ✅, shorts fully closed and longs already up 2000 points Alright! A few posts ago, called to fully close shorts at 65.7k and last post, to set limits at the same level and open longs. Level ended up hitting to the tick before reversing. Trade now up 2000 points. Adjusted my SL to 64.5 and price is now at 67.7k. Puts the trade at a running 1.6 RR, so I trimmed 38% to make it risk free. Entire plan called out in live time/in advance step by step by step. Enjoy, fourth win in a row making.

English
56
39
371
65.6K
Killa
Killa@KillaXBT·
$BTC We swept the lows and printed a three drive pattern. Ideally, bulls want to see a daily close above 75K with acceptance above the prior wick low. If acceptance holds, looking for scalp longs makes sense, with stops at the PWL & targets at 79K.
Killa tweet media
English
26
44
644
118.6K
Possiblen't
Possiblen't@Possiblent·
@M_November @Crypto_Chase @IncomeSharks Selective logging of trades and forgetting/replacing losers with new ones is not logging, it's curating your TL to fool others into thinking you can trade better than a monkey pressing 2 buttons randomly
English
1
0
0
40
Chase
Chase@Crypto_Chase·
Imagine if a big CT personally (100K+ followers) came out and said they've been in crypto for 5 years and haven't made any money..
English
50
6
314
42.5K
Johann S.
Johann S.@M_November·
@Possiblent @Crypto_Chase @IncomeSharks I'm only reacting to "they don't have any proof of anything whatsoever". I have not paid his group but he's one of the very few to log explicit trades and exits. I bet you can't even give me 5 people you follow who do that
English
1
0
0
37
Possiblen't
Possiblen't@Possiblent·
@Crypto_Chase @IncomeSharks I know. Saylor is dumb but his portfolio is visible at least. And retards will defend him longer than they can stay solvent. Then you have 99% of KoLs who have no skin in the game because they don't have to provide any proof of anything whatsoever, and can just larp for free
English
1
0
0
413
Johann S.
Johann S.@M_November·
@JRedpill2 @anatolium Non je voulais dire si tu cherches précisément ces termes tu vas trouver des sources et des interviews d'un colonnel de la région toulousaine. (C'est une tentative de meurtre j'ai juste abrégé)
Français
0
0
0
20
Jimmy Redpill
Jimmy Redpill@JRedpill2·
@M_November @anatolium Le phénomène existe. Mais chaque affaire doit être vérifiée individuellement. Je n’ai pas trouvé de source claire confirmant précisément ce cas. Reconnaître une tendance ne valide pas un récit précis sans preuve. 😏
Français
1
0
0
69
Juan Branco ✊
Juan Branco ✊@anatolium·
Une femme toulousaine a payé 40.000 euros trois sicarios afin de tuer son mari qu'elle disait violent. Elle les a recrutés sur Snapchat. Ce pays est en train de s'effondrer.
Français
75
536
3.7K
269.9K
Jimmy Redpill
Jimmy Redpill@JRedpill2·
@anatolium Si c’est avéré, c’est majeur. Tu peux partager la source qui confirme l’information ?
Français
2
0
0
11.5K
Johann S.
Johann S.@M_November·
@CannaPhant @astronomer_zero This guys get big views tbh it's strange. His average for market updates is probably bigger than some 200-300k accounts I follow
English
0
0
0
13
Astronomer
Astronomer@astronomer_zero·
$BTC 83.4k, and triangle sweep in action ✅. I just entered long again. Alright, I said I would wait for confirmation below 83.7k before attempting another long based on our bullish bias. Also wanted to see a move below the triangle to sweep it (not hold it) and see some liquidations. I know it has been exhausting by now, but I just reminded you why this is a bottoming range, and why I will be looking to long here. We are right below 83.7k, so here is the long. This is most likely the final long I take to try and hit 112k. And it is the first of two potential entries, each half size, per usual. Likely a long I won't be taking profits upon as aggressively. Instead I'll be quite patient. The last long I have set risk free quite soon for reasons given and because an SL was quite possible. But with this long, I intend to aim for a larger move because we are at higher swing points of interest. So just a heads up to be prepared for that. Likely still going to do a risk free trim. But for now, it's all about taking full advantage of these prices without having an SL that is too sensitive. So that is a 4.1 RR trade up to 112k, more than enough, and giving some room to let local confirmation develop, and also giving some room to get out early on lower risk. No, I am not giving exact SL away (don't take the SL on the screen all too literal), but those who can calculate what 4.1 RR is at 112k, can deduct about where I put my SL. So going a bit experimental here, trying to tell you my SL without telling you the exact level to avoid MM's trying to get our liquidity. Besides, I don't need you to give the exact SL. I have already given you enough info, which is exactly where I went long, right here, right now. I also comment quickly, that these are indeed good prices. The sweep of 81k does not need to happen IMO hence why I said to get exposure again just under 83.7k, exactly what I am doing. Plan ➡️ Execution
Astronomer tweet media
Astronomer@astronomer_zero

$BTC I'm still bullish. But now, it's just about waiting for just under 83.7k. So, just to clarify, even if we bounce now, or move anywhere between 90.8k and 83.7k, that's of no action for me personally. Now that our key level of 90.8k rejected again, I am going to be patient and wait for sub 83k to enter long. So key is to be bullish but patient as mentioned a few posts ago. Because we did not close a weekly below 81k, nothing of the bullish bias is invalidated, especially when we move down on news such as us government shutdown. That's more support that indeed we are setting a low and not breaking down, but likely below 83.7k, not above. Not much lower that. We are already seeing so much "celebration" on the bear market continuing, "I told you so", while we still haven't even made any new lows and are only 1000 points down or so from our last long entry. So sentiment also supports the fact we likely hold. Drop is not ideal indeed and I'm not going to act as if I shorted or predicted it all, you know I'm transparent and obviously we were long expecting higher. But we made the long risk free and you have been reminded multiple times to do so. So I'm quite glad to just get another opportunity below 83.7k to get long from a low level for free (como implications). We'll see if I am right on that, that's the bigger question. But that will only be told in the future. I'll see you by then, but I'll be the last to change plans when there is no need to and based on the chart and our high timeframe analysis, there is no need to. So conviction in bullish bias remains just equally as much as it has been 11 weeks ago, and is more important now than ever. And the plan remains to long below 83.7k as will be called out live when I get in, and get out of it. Getting close to 90.8k before taking out 83.7k for me, could mean a local short as well, but I'll talk about that only if needed. Main trade is a long below 83.7k. So I'll see you there.

English
60
31
367
99.3K
Astronomer
Astronomer@astronomer_zero·
$BTC 85.8k reached. TP'd the top✅But now, I'm long again. Can we get six wins in a row? Attempt 2 Alright, big drop right after our point of resistance and liquidity area has been hit. Our TP'ing of the previous long into it aged pretty well as our 89.6k region ended up being the local top in decent alignment with the move up to 89.6k being all we would get in the next 12 hours pointed out at the time. Talked about a drop, and, although I didn't expect a new low (in all transparency), certainly won't complain as our analysis allowed to make our trade risk free, also reduce the SL, not lose any money and even make a tiny profit. And at the same time, we get a chance at a much better entry price so market essentially gifting us with a power play. As mentioned, going deeper than the minimum level of 87.7k we called back at 94k, is no big deal. And although 87.7k itself can be used once for a good long, the level's usage remains single-usage and any re-attempt should be done lower. Hence this setup, hence why I tightened my SL on the last one, and hence why 85.1k, exactly at the 0.25, is a valid level for a second attempt for the sixth win in a row. So here we are, lower. Sometimes it ends up this way, and although I would have loved a move to 94k immediately, I am here to show you the reality of trading with full transparency and exactly how to remain consistent, both from the analysis and execution point of view. Longing here isn't easy, but it is the direction towards money IMO, and I will be gladly trying to show it. Execution is never shared on this platform. And if I didn't share it here personally, my call for the 89.6k rejection where we called a local top would have looked completely genius. Yet it just ended up a break even / tiny win stop out, which is the reality. That shows, getting actual trading wins is harder than making proper calls. But if the calls are very accurate and offer high conviction, then it does allow to turn it into wins consistently. So on that note, still calling the streak alive, a tiny win doesn't break the streak of course. But not counting the recent trade as a win either to keep it completely fair. Now with weekly open above, CME close (still untapped) quite far away, and the same exact type of resistance where we TP'd pretty hard right before the drop, now forming similar type of support. Also having our trademarked version of the Monday range shape up again here (the do not wait for Monday close version). So the re-entry here makes a lot of sense. Ah yes and also tapping our beloved 0.25 level again. That is indeed significant. We do not have a reaction yet though, and this is in essence a blond long so far, so going in half size. But given time of day and significant support of our 0.25, I do expect a reaction. Overall I am rather confident this entry will end up a very good entry by the end of the week. The week is still very young and with our bias, which remains bullish and our there of weekly upside off the 81k low/no weekly closes below, drastically adds to the chance of upside later in the week. Sentiment also cracking again locally, so, a beautiful chance for a second chance. Can we get the win?
Astronomer tweet media
Astronomer@astronomer_zero

$BTC longs (VI) Nice and quick move off the weekly open. Taking some profits✅ Alright, 87.7k giving an absolutely excellent reaction sending us straight into the gap at 89.6k, close to target 1 already. Trade up pretty nicely, and probably the bulk of the move we get the first 12 hours into weekly open. Some ranging can be expected next and weekly open is below so good to already turn this first long, into a nice and risk free ride when price swings around a bit. So you know the drill, good enough for a first trim. 30% shaved off, booking a modest chunk, at 1.35 RR, indeed, turning it risk free. Looking forward to 90.2k as our first target of this first move, that's main liquidity and CME gap. This is where I look to close another 30%. The other 40% that would remain after that, is for a bigger move up, of which the targets I will point out as they come and as liquidity builds. For now, what matters the most is that major liquidity lies here starting from 89.6 up to 90.3, so that is where we start to exploit our first TP's. Good start for us, for the opening of this week.

English
51
20
384
86.8K
Astronomer
Astronomer@astronomer_zero·
$BTC shorts Weekly open hit. Main TP in. Win official ✅ Back to back W's both with near zero drawdown. Alright, shorts we took Yesterday now up 2.5 R. No if or but about it. We longed the low with high conviction, in conjunction with our 0.25 level hold plan and on top of our overarching high timeframe bias, with post after post explaining why our bias is up until at least 0.75. Ran the long all the way up to our beloved 0.75, then called for a rejection at that exact level. The call for "rejection" was not just words, words were backed by action, with a nice short we took off the 0.75. Everything was called in live time, and now we get our first main TP at weekly open area. Taking 30% off here. That makes this second win official. I am looking forward to the next TP, I would still like to see it, and soon I am getting excited to long again too. But for now, shaving this one off, and enjoying the gains. Pretty happy with how little drawdown the recent two trades have been, as well as how we captured pretty much every single H6 candle of this week, going both long and short back to back. Doesn't happen all too often. We thank the structure of this week, we thank the 0-0.25-0.5-0.75-1.0 range construct, we thank the clean order flow, and we thank the mmd with $ETH to call this local top. Ah and of course, the sentiment, consistently lagging with price. All plans are made reality, and converted into cash. Enjoy the money if you are trading along.
Astronomer tweet media
Astronomer@astronomer_zero

$BTC shorts 0.75 rejected ✅and TP 1 is hit Alright, nice move so far. Not the most impulsive NY we have ever seen. But finally reached first target deep into it. First target being the liquidity at the wick which is set just before the high is made. Taking 30% off here at 1.2 RR at 91.8k Indeed, TP'ing this short slightly more aggressively compared to the last trade (the long), per plan laid out. Hoping for second and third target next, of weekly open and the 0.5 (the main target). We'll see when. Logging off for today, hope the latter of NY or speeds up a bit and else, Tomorrow. And yes, addressing the question: I still have 5% of the last long open too.

English
43
36
327
74.9K
JimmyJammy
JimmyJammy@jimmy168371076·
@M_November @astronomer_zero being bearish at 38k in 2022 is like being bearish at 65k if that comes. ofc at that point all bullish supports are broken down and its clear, but being bearish at 50k+ was much harder which is where we are at relatively right now at 88k
English
1
0
0
35
Astronomer
Astronomer@astronomer_zero·
$BTC Nice move up so far, the slow reversal continuing, and the double-range setup in play. A few reminders. Quick update on $BTC. Because I see what you’re saying. “This looks like a bearish retest.” “A bear flag.” “A corrective move up.” Certainly on the local view. So I’m simply going to expand on the slow-reversal idea we’ve been sticking with. This will be a summary of the key elements I mentioned over the last few days, both in setting that important low and in the recent trade we’re in, along with some clarification to help you through this stage of the move. I also had some questions about the “slow reversal,” why it’s taking so long, and how to actually play it. And some questions about how I derive my zones. I’ll address all of that with a short, clearer version here. Large POI – Slow reversals – Double ranges When price hits a large POI, it takes time to react. It has to, simply because larger players need time to accumulate while simultaneously keeping everyone hesitant. These are naturally slow reversals, and with them comes the use of the double-range setup. I don’t often share this openly, but long-term followers know what a double range is. The construct is always tied to slow reversals. We also used it on the higher timeframe to call the intermediate Solana top in March 2024, as well as the breakout out of it. That too was a slow process, re-accumulation rather than accumulation. On that note, special thanks to TradingView for finally implementing the 0.25 and 0.75 on their parallel-channel tool within my most beloved concept, ranges. You know how much I value ranges, both as a tool and as a point of reference for breakouts. Only real ranges give real breakouts. The 0.25 and 0.75 are important because that’s precisely what the double-range construct is. It’s nothing more than a range above another range, right next to each other. Or, viewed differently, a larger range with more granularity. So not just a range low (0%), a range high (100%), and a mid (50%), but also the 0.25 and 0.75. They are Gann levels fused with my range theorem, and I simply consider them a double range because it blends perfectly with modern price concepts like deviations (a deviation from the lower range is an entry into the upper one) along with other benefits I’ll expand on later. This explains why I placed our grey box where it is, at the 0.5. I hoped that level would form a significant bottom to at least range-high 97k (the 0), but price tapped the 0.75 (93k) first before going deeper. Knowing exactly how price moves within a slow reversal using this range is difficult and requires close monitoring of the intraday structure and sessions. Always use confluence. Using this range to determine what comes next is the key to the entire outlook. A breakdown is bad; a break to the upside is good, especially if we get a pre-breakout consolidation at midrange. I still think we break to the upside, regardless of the last trade’s result, but of course I’ll humbly accept a break to the downside. My money remains on a break up, and this range will help us decide early which way it goes. But again, I think it’s up. Never let past trades affect future analysis. Use analysis to project future positioning. Losing a trade doesn’t mean flipping a bias, that’s letting ego get involved. Best to continue observing what the chart tells you, then conclude and execute accordingly. That’s exactly why I took a new trade at the 0.25 a few posts ago. The answer still leads higher, working through this range first. Eyes also on the FOMC date coming up, as you know, by the time FOMC comes, the low is already in. And still keeping in mind the 91% chance of no new weekly closes below the low. To recap; TLDR Further clarification of this purple POI through the double-range construct, why it’s tied to slow reversals, and how to play it. It also frames why I remain bullish, why this purple POI likely holds, and how I see the slow reversal continuing. Slow, but still a reversal. Both upper targets of 112k and ATH remain in play, and $BTC bears and flip-floppers will keep calling for 70k or lower at the worst possible time. (Same with alt bears on BTC.D calling for a cyclical high.) I’ve seen none of that yet, and I’m not seeing signs of it now, at least not for the next high-timeframe move. Regardless, there’s no point in calling for a bearish retest right here anyways. You have to ask: is shorting smart even if you expect a retest? Or am I simply playing into sentiment? Shouldn’t I be long or bullish here instead? That “retest” may lead straight into a new ATH. Because time and price now are right to buy. And money is only made by predicting the next move. Waiting for a retest doesn’t make money. And that is exactly why this projected “retest” happens in the first place (though I don’t think we get it). I could always be wrong, and I’ll adjust if needed. All of this is NFA. But for now, the slow-reversal idea has been the idea for a while, and I expect it to remain the idea for a while. Has some flaws executing on this idea recently in getting into this trade, but the analysis remains intact. And we will bring it home in the name of my core analysis components.
Astronomer tweet media
Astronomer@astronomer_zero

$BTC Trade frame and idea going forward: the bull market is not over So, after the large down move and for a big part, being part of that, setting us back the streak gains we made in the last 4 trades before that, I made clear Yesterday that I am still bullish, still expect 112k and still believe the bull market isn't over. Reasons The reasons are that 112k is still a wide and open untouched magnet, we are in a higher low area, the top is not in according to any of my core system signals, so neither does this final drop start the bear market unlike what we are hearing everywhere now. Finally and as mentioned last post, I repeat that the time and price pattern structure of this weekly candle strongly tells us that this is the last weekly downside candle, after which we range and go up again IMO. Sweeps of the current low could happen within that frame, but no breakdowns further like we had the past couple days/weeks, only fake moves that likely reclaim and form large opportunity. I have more reasons why I believe price doesn't go much lower, but these are the core ones. Sentiment I also remind you that the sentiment again stays low. Popular accounts talking about bear markets, spot capitulation in a higher low area, and lots of "it's all over" from typical flip-flop accounts that don't really trade. Also having serious news headlines as if crypto is no longer a good investment on many NY large-fund bulletin boards. In this slow reversal process, for sentiment to materialize against itself takes time. But time has already taken a while, and with my system aligning better now, it shouldn't be too much longer. How I play it You know my recent story. Had a fair few wins, but then two bigger losses. And so I'm not going to be in leverage for a while. Catching a large move is possible but not always easy with leverage, so just taking a step back to regain rhythm. At the same time, you didn't like the idea of no clear invalidation. So here you go, a clear inval-entry-exit type of trade. Not saying the stop shown on this chart is exactly where I have put mine. But it serves as a clear and proper invalidation where I will exit close against, so here you go. It still carries a risk if we were being hunted last trades, to also be hunted. But high timeframe moves like this are very hard to manipulate and target just one person + followers on this platform of although I am one of the few still sharing clear trades on this entire space by the looks of it, we'll see how it plays along the way and I'm currently looking for signs of possible hunts on last trades. So this is just an entry taking by buying spot with funds I normally don't have in crypto but moved today. It's a wider stop, paired with a wider move aimed to be caught. The overall trade is still around 2 RR however. Nothing flashy, very boring indeed, just another type of trade I like going for, as you know by now, most my trades have been between 1RR-3RR. No 10R+ type of unrealistic models, largely offset by fees, funding and slippage anyway with tight stops. On this trade, no partials will be taken, this is one and done. Final words Feel free to take this trade as you wish spot or lev (nfa). But this is just what I plan to do going forward. Step back from leverage, play spot and slowing it down. Whilst staying in the market and keeping the same frame and bias I have been keeping and still believe in firmly. Also making a very clear statement that the bull run isn't over. Because if this move happens and we are back at 112k (first target), no one will talk about the bear market anymore. And my job to erase your belief in the future, already presented now in advance, will be done. Enjoy.

English
46
26
455
99.9K
JimmyJammy
JimmyJammy@jimmy168371076·
@astronomer_zero You've been bullish since 100k, just give it up bud, admit you were wrong and stop leading your followers into a black hole. I know many people like you who were bullish on every counter trend relief rally all throughout 2022 calling every dip in a bear market healthy pullback
English
3
0
3
182
Johann S.
Johann S.@M_November·
@Wild_Randomness Love your posts but am i missing something ? To begin with, Crypto total MC has been above 2T all of 2025
English
0
0
0
27
Alan White
Alan White@Alan_White_·
im talking about his past posts not this one, in the last posts he was holding longs with tps up to 120k+ , i wonder what happned with those, he closed them but forgot to mention even though he says all is mentioned publicly? Probably all that suits him... Or maybe he is hedged both sides and when one works out thats the tweet he posting. who knows
English
2
0
2
222
Astronomer
Astronomer@astronomer_zero·
$BTC Tp'd high, and we got the drop ✅. Time to get in low again (soon) Alright got the drop after TP'ing almost the entire first base position near the local top here. Got lots of questions of why I TP'd so aggressively on this long. And the answer now clearly shows. Indeed, respecting inflection points and paying yourself helps you exploit the same type of trade multiple times. Now we have the same setup (same target of SP) forming at a higher POI. Confluences, aside from the overall bullish bias by the hash ribbons, weekly and monthly POI and our green box, now we are having a pullback after local froth has raised too much for price to continue, forming the backbone of our plan to TP up high. But fear not. Froth was not excessive enough at the 117/118k inflection point to form a top, and fear is a lot higher now upon this rather small drop so far. We also have weekly open above (untapped, looking for that to pull price up sometime this week after Monday closes). We have the Astro Block cleared and we have the CME gap closed locally. So, I'm personally happy with this pullback and no longer expect all too much lower locally. I'm not long yet, just waiting out Monday's close and see if the market wants to run Monday's lows on Tuesday or Wednesday. But other than that, a good drop this is, clearing everything out that formed on the way up last week, and resetting sentiment into an higher lows in price, equal lows in sentiment type of scenario.
Astronomer tweet media
Astronomer@astronomer_zero

$BTC CME gap closed, TP3 for me here 💰 You know the drill, while the ones waiting for a September drop continue to expect lower, we continue to reap the rewards of the long position we took instead. Given all the compounding we did at the reversal zone and how it has become a rather big position, also given that CME gap just closed, and because I want to leave about 30% for the silver pocket (or beyond depending on local momentum), I am taking a third TP here. That puts our average TP at 115.8k, scaling up 5% so far from our 110k entry, nice for a swing trade. That's also about the same amount that September has printed green so far in the first half of its existence. TP's are mentioned on the chart for transparency, and all TP's as well as entries are called out in live time, as always. Thanks again $BTC and all participants for playing so far. The pay so far has been sweet sweet sweet.

English
34
41
482
118.4K