Proud Texan

@SoonerSnowYeti @thrluv Blasphemy!

@MadeThatMyBitch @thrluv This is all 🔥!! Lol Texas sucks btw Boomer Sooner

kinda fucked up how as you get older your fall damage multiplier increases

@lady_valor_07 How do you know they are unarmed? How do you know they didn't set one down just out of sight or have one hidden? Be safe. Shoot them. They can avoid dying by staying out of your house.

Even if an intruder is unarmed, should you still be allowed to shoot them for breaking into your house?..

@christine_clack I thank you.

Longest 6 minutes EVER.

@christine_clack @it_unprofession Don't underestimate the power of sheep.

@it_unprofession @MadeThatMyBitch Always a sheep farmer. 😂🤦🏻‍♀️

My friend invited me to his "casual game night." I thought that meant snacks and maybe Uno. He dimmed the lights, pulled out a whiteboard, and said, "We'll start with Catan, obviously." Obviously. Within 20 minutes, three grown adults were accusing each other of "sheep hoarding" with the intensity of a custody battle. One guy slammed his hand on the table and yelled, "You broke our wheat alliance, Trevor." I don't even know Trevor. I'm just trying to figure out why there's a resource called "ore" and why I'm emotionally invested in it. At one point, someone looked me dead in the eye and asked if I wanted to trade wood. I haven't recovered. We finished at midnight and my friend said, "Next time we'll do something light, like Twilight Imperium." I Googled it. That's not a board game. That's a part-time job with lore.

Genuine question here. Wouldn't the gradual buildup still need to simultaneously generate a functional cell wall, nucleus, mitochondria, etc as well as the instructions to form those parts? I admit my scientific knowledge on the subject is elementary but I don't think that changes the core problem. If there's a factory that can build a copy of itself using blueprints and raw materials, there first one still needs to be built by someone who has those or it needs to be randomly assembled with both the factory and the blueprints to build another factory. That has to be randomly assembled in a place with the raw materials and it better not take damage. I get why that seems unlikely.

The event space for the origin of life is an entire planet and 500 million years to get fossils of something that looks like a bacterium. Your argument is one trial at a time but there were 8 X 10^41 amino acid molecules on Earth 4 billion years ago, assuming a concentration of 0.001 M. Richard Dawkins in "The Blind Watchmaker." demonstrated complex structures can arise if there is selective pressure.

Listen up, atheists... The mathematical probability that just ONE functional protein forms through random mutations under the pressure of natural selection is astronomically low. So low, in fact, that estimates push the required time beyond a trillion trillion years. Yes, you read that right. Over one trillion trillions. Take a trillion, then multiply that by a trillion… and keep going. That's older than the known universe. That's how many years you would need for it to be more likely than not (>50% chance) that just ONE functional protein forms through the currently accepted evolutionary process (BTW: this also assumes the surrounding biological machinery needed to make and use that protein is already in place). Biology operates on coded information (the genetic code). And when you’re dealing with code, you can calculate probabilities. Think of it like a bike lock. If you know the number of possible combinations versus the one correct sequence, and how long each attempt takes, you can estimate how long it would take to crack it by chance. Now scale that up to the complexity of functional biological sequences. Essentially, the math tells us that the known universe isn't even old enough for just one functional protein to have formed without guided influence (intelligent design), let alone all the complexity of life that we see today. The very existence of life in our universe SCREAMS the existence of a creator. Thank you, Have a blessed day

@trailertekie @Aisha_Noura1007 @nikutaberuru Just wait until my gumbo recipe has okra in it.

@trailertekie @Aisha_Noura1007 @nikutaberuru I know. I wrote that part to piss my cajin wife off. 😂

テキサス人になりたければ ケイジャン料理を学べ！と テキサス兄貴から言われました。 ケイジャン料理とは どのような料理ですか？

Guys, My wife has concluded that, in fact, Pluto is a planet and that since we are defining them, we can make this a reality. Indeed, Pluto had a special place in our history and this deserves a special place in our names, consistency be damned. When I argued the confusion by definition, she proclaimed that the exception would actually help the rule and I don't know what to say. Is she right? @christine_clack

@Aisha_Noura1007 @nikutaberuru Just taste throughout. Don't over season to start with and add flavor as you go. You won't be disappointed.

@MadeThatMyBitch @nikutaberuru Thank you😊 I'll try to make this as a reference✨

@ronsterd89 Bro, this is heretical

Who the hell eats Okra and thinks "Wow this is so delicious" 🤢😭

It's more than this but it's a good place to start. It's about 3 points. Base, meat, toppings. Season all the phases. Take jambalaya. You start with sausage. Usually pork (andoille). Cook this and then take out. Leave the grease. Cook seasoned chicken in that grease. Next step is to add rice and sausage. Let it all cook together to brown the rice and build flavor. Once your ancestors sing to you, add liquid (chicken broth or water). Add tomato if you're Texan but it'll piss off the coon asses. Bring to boil and cover/simmer. So you have a Base of rice with chicken and sausage as seasoning. Flavor packed in throughout. Then you top it with fresh cut chives and maybe some shots of hot sauce.

@nikutaberuru スパイスを効かせたスパイシーで素朴な味わいが特徴で、タマネギ、セロリ、ピーマン（聖なる三位一体）をベースに、唐辛子、ガーリック、タイム等のスパイスを使用し、ジャンバラヤやガンボが代表ですね。 いわば、南部の料理ですね。

@RichOToole There should be 2 small green dots in Houston

The green spot needs to be over San Antonio not Austin.

@forestfrank Yes

Does the idea of Jesus returning bring you hope, urgency, or fear?

Elon, I don't need money for a DM. I just want to build your damn cryo plant in Florida and the job keeps getting pushed due to permit issues. Thing is the start date has been pushed by 6 months so far but the end date hasn't moved. I just want to know if I get a bonus for pulling off the impossible when I deliver on that date.

@Timcast Ok

I like it, let's do it @elonmusk

Yall are all crazy. @michaeljknowles is right. A man should not get on the internet and call his wife promiscuous or a whore, past or present, weather is true or not. The goal of the husband is to defend the honor of his wife, not slander it. Especially not in a "I'm better than her" way. Oh, God saved her? Didn't need to help you out much though eh, virgin? Did the holy man help his lustful wife find God? Did he convert her from her whoring and shame? So powerful a testimony. T F? You know what Jesus didn't do to Mary Magdalene? Parade her around telling everyone that she used to be a whore and that he saved her.

@TheMiddleborne “My wife was formerly promiscuous” and “my wife is a whore” carry two completely different connotations and severity. Michael pretending this distinction doesn’t exist is extremely disingenuous.

Michael, you, as a loquacious podcaster who makes his living using words(though not when writing books), know full well how different words, despite being definitively the same, carry vastly different meanings and implications by how they’re used, You choose to reword what he said in a vile way and use that as a springboard for public mockery and derision. “well he opened it up for me to call her a whore, So it’s his fault” is the excuse of a moral coward

@ShawnRyan762 Shawn, I thought you sought the truth? This? Really? Don't become a click whore like there rest of them.

“I’m not saying that the suspect didn’t do it. His fingerprints are on the gun, that case is going to be made. What I do know is that NCTC was investigating any foreign linkage that could have taken place, not necessarily just to the suspect, but any foreign connections. We were stopped really early on from thoroughly investigating that, and from my vantage point, I didn’t see that investigation being done very thoroughly. The only thing I know for sure is that our due diligence was not done on looking at the foreign links. Considering how prominent Charlie Kirk was, it’s important that every angle is looked into and that a complete investigation actually takes place.” @joekent16jan19

@michaeljknowles @TrevorSheatz @benshapiro Bunch of pearl clutching bs

I suspect you didn’t intend to disrespect your wife, and so you might have been surprised that some people, myself included, criticized you for speaking in a way that is unbecoming of a husband. I think you made a mistake. But your points here are not sound. 1. I never said you used that word. I said that’s what you called her (while contrasting her sin with your own virtue). “Promiscuous” is an adjective, the nearest nouns for which are “whore” and “slut.” 2. They are all pejorative terms that refer to people who engage in sexual immorality. They all carry negative connotations because they refer to shameful acts. If the nouns are more evocative than the adjective, that owes more to their Saxon (rather than Latinate) origins than to their meaning. It’s the same reason “pulchritudinous” is less evocative than “hot.” The words all mean the same thing, and we should not refer to our wives in such a way—certainly not to millions of strangers. 3. My phrasing was not in the present tense but rather the past. (See: “called” versus “calls” or “is calling.”) But even my description of your wording does not imply the present tense. By way of analogy, “she was promiscuous” : “he called her a whore” :: “Jeter was a Bronx Bomber” : “he called him a Yankee.” (Derek Jeter does not currently play for the Yankees, and the final comment does not suggest that anyone thinks he does.) As I said, I don’t think you meant to disrespect your wife. You might have the best of intentions. None of that is my point. You made a controversial post, which included both admirable comments about grace and inappropriate language that in my estimation is unbecoming of a husband and not to be recommended to others—hence my public commentary on your own public statement.

Multiple times, @michaeljknowles said I called my wife a whore in my post (as did @benshapiro), even though I wrote "My wife was formerly promiscuous." To my surprise, upon checking the original video, the top comments are now overwhelmingly condemning their response to our story of God's redemption (screenshot below). Michael is now doubling-down on it on X by saying that me writing that she was formerly promiscuous is the same as calling her a whore (pic attached). Here's the three primary issues with them saying I called my wife a whore, and why Michael's argument is wrong. 1. It isn't true. I never used the word "whore," so he shouldn't be telling people I called my wife this. 2. We instinctively know that "she was formerly promiscuous" carries with it much more grace than "she's a whore," because "promiscuous" is an adjective describing her past, whereas "whore" is a degrading noun, a slur used to speak harshly of women. They're similar words, but different in meaning and intent. They are not the same. 3. Crucially, they spoke in the present tense: "He called her a whore" (implying this is a present-tense sin issue, something she still is). I spoke in the past tense: "My wife was formerly promiscuous." This tense difference matters immensely, especially when people greatly struggle to separate one's life before Christ from their life after Christ. The world can't fathom that such change can happen. But the Bible is clear: "Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has passed away, and see, the new has come!" (1 Cor. 5:17). Or consider Galatians 2:20: "I have been crucified with Christ, and I no longer live, but Christ lives in me." That old Ashley is dead. It's because of these truths that my wife and I choose to boldly, confidently, and without giving loads of explicit details, share the sins that stained us before Christ with others (for I am indeed a great sinner and struggle in many ways, too). Our story isn't shared frequently, but at times and when fitting, so that other believers can be encouraged, other sinners can be given hope of redemption and forgiveness, and the lost can hear the good news of the gospel: that though all are headed for Hell for their sins (1 Cor. 6:9-10), anyone who repents and places their trust in the resurrected Christ will be saved (John 3:16, 18). Regardless of how much you've sinned, you can't out-sin the mercy of God. You can be washed clean, your shame and guilt removed, and you can have a brand-new identity in Jesus Christ (Titus 3:5-6). And we’re living proof of this! I have no ill will against Michael, Ben, @andrewklavan, or anyone else for their remarks and mocking, nor do I demand an apology. I forgive them. My greatest desire for them and anyone who's following this story, as well as God's, is for them to "be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth" (1 Tim. 2:4).

@MattWalshBlog Personally, I was thinking exile was the appropriate course, however indentured servitude might be a preferred alternative. They could do the jobs they claim immigrants should do for very low wages. It's a win win.

I’m just saying this is a debate we should have. Should the slop accounts be shut down and their owners enslaved and forced to work in the fields for their own good and the good of society? It’s a discussion. Pros and cons on both sides. Let’s have the conversation folks.

You got me there. But to be clear I only want to enslave people who run slop accounts like yours. Slavery would at least be a higher and more noble calling than the one you’re currently pursuing.

I'll try to directly answer your claim. Forgive me but the question wasn't direct and rambled. I'll try to repeat it so you know what i think i read. This is not an attempt to strawman. If I misrepresent any statement you made, it's from a faulty memory and I can't see the question in all of this back and forth so here goes. You're 'question' was for her to provide some proof of God's existence using science? I don't know. You went on about how the Bible has historically inaccurate details, views, teachings, etc. To the question, I believe i already answered. You will not find concrete scientific evidence of God's existence. To answer (i don't remember the question in the last part of there was one) the last part is, of course. The Bible is not a history book. It's a collection of different writings by different people throughout history. As with any collection of historical documents, you have to consider the author, time frame, current events, translations, etc. Was there something in particular that troubles you?

@JessicaTheGreen @MadeThatMyBitch He can question me all he wants, and given the appropriate question I might answer, but contextually he is just a deflection, the same as you , just words, no answers, just deflections. Not very christian considering 1 Peter 3:16.

People who use science as an anti-religion philosophy are BAD at Science.