Margaret

@Claire_V0ltaire Victims don't supply rape videos in western courts either. What stupid perverse thinking on your part.

Yes, there are. Families were sent those videos. In addition, there are thousands of photos, testimonials, medical records, confessions and interviews you’re not privy to since you’re not included in the investigation, and I doubt the families and victims would like your antisemitic perverse eyes to watch and enjoy.

@orenbarsky Muslims think dogs are possessed by evil spirits. So dog stories become new weapons with which to demonize Israel inflame tensions and spread disinformation.

Breaking: Military dogs aren’t cute little kindergarten puppies.

@HenMazzig It's all polemic and weaponized slogans typical of high school level politics. It's cosplay. This gives her belonging to a marginalized antisocial group since she has no other. All you antizionists adoring Greta are bowing to the Emperor with no clothes.

That’s a new one- Greta Thunberg just called the fact that Israel responded to Hamas slaughtering and kidnapping over a thousand Israelis “frustration with Palestinian resistance.” How exactly is she going to help solve a conflict she can’t stop lying about?

@MMike206335 @hahussain Accusations of genocide and demands for compensation. This is hostile unable to collaborate. Palestine is not the end game it's a ruse.

@hahussain Can you explain again like I was a 5th grader? What is the troubling part? I don’t see any wording that is a threat to Israeli

In February, the Palestinians published a new constitution with the articles below that mean for Palestine to exist, Israel has to vanish. Article 4 Islam is the official religion of the State of Palestine. The principles of Islamic Sharia are the primary source of legislation. Christianity shall have its place in Palestine, and all other religions shall be respected. Article 5 The Arabic language is the official language of the State of Palestine. Article 12 The State of Palestine is... committed to achieving independence, ending the occupation, and guaranteeing the right of the refugees to return in accordance with international resolutions.

@MMike206335 @hahussain constitutionnet.org/sites/default/… Sharia law, no borders, infers that Israel is Palestine, no unity with Gaza, the right to return, capital is Jerusalem?..it's a manifesto.

@MMike206335 @hahussain The right to return would occupy Israel and demolish it from within. It is annulled by the Hamas Palestine's genocidal agenda. Israel is not Palestine. Internal political divide between Hama & Fatah would thwart peaceful coexistence. It's a manifesto not a constitution.

@NinosMaron @hahussain You mean rejected.

@hahussain Not really. These rules are meant for the Arab state that was supposed to be formed in 1947 but never happened 🤷‍♂️ This has nothing to do with the state of Israel

@hahussain @NewSamawal What are their borders? That's not a constitution it's a manifesto. They are not interested in 'Palestine' only in pan Islamic subjugation of non Muslims in Levant.

@RabbiPoupko @danburmawi/note/c-259519257?r=2j0cga" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">substack.com/@danburmawi/no…

This image tells you everything you need to know about the 1948 Nakba. Palestinians lead an effort with overwhelming power to annihilate Israel's Jewish community. Palestinians succeeded and murdered 1% of Israel's population. They ethnically cleansed all Jews from East Jerusalem and the West Bank an attempted to starve to death 100, 000 Jews in West Jerusalem.

@NYCMayor @danburmawi/note/c-259519257?r=2j0cga" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">substack.com/@danburmawi/no…

Today marks Nakba Day, an annual day of remembrance to commemorate the expulsion of more than 700,000 Palestinians between 1947 and 1949 during the creation of the State of Israel and the year that followed. Inea is a New Yorker and a Nakba survivor. She shared her story with us — one of home, tradition and memory over generations.

@Ilhan @RepRashida @danburmawi/note/c-259519257?r=2j0cga" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">substack.com/@danburmawi/no…

The Nakba never ended. The genocide of Palestinians continues as the Israeli military escalates violence in Gaza, the West Bank, and Lebanon. I'm joining @RepRashida in co-sponsoring a resolution to recognize the 78th anniversary of the Nakba and Palestinian refugees’ rights.

@strxwmxn @demoblok @danburmawi/note/c-259519257?r=2j0cga" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">substack.com/@danburmawi/no…

@demoblok @Mademell Oh really? What was the exact date? What was the precipitating event?

The Oslo Accords, which were signed in 1993 by Yitzhak Rabin and Yasser Arafat, are cited as a two-state solution — a framework for a Palestinian state alongside Israel. 6 months after sighing it, in an off-the-record speech in Johannesburg, Arafat himself called for “a jihad to liberate Jerusalem” and compared Oslo to a truce that Muhammad signed, only to break it two years later to conquer Mecca by force. iris.org.il/arafats-johann…

@jerusalemofiron Lol

It's worse than you think. The IDF has trained dogs to pilot aircraft. Fully 25% of the sorties against Iran and Hezbollah have been carried out by Belgian Malinois.

@AdinHaykin1 Only a porn freak or perpetrator could think that one up.

🚨🇬🇧🇵🇸 BREAKING: UK Muslim imam responsible for spreading the lie about Israeli rape dogs has been BUSTED raping little British girls Every accusation is a confession

@aronaya @RabbiMivasair The Arab blockade and looting of of Jews in Jerusalem started in January 1948, overseen by the Nazi Mufti al- Hussaini

@RabbiMivasair Yes. And, Plan Dalet rolled into action in December 1947. The "invasion" didn't start until May 1948. simonandschuster.com/books/The-Ethn…

One of the two states was Jews getting 55% of the land when they owned only 7% of it. Arab armies didn't "invade" until after months of Jewish terror gangs attacking and depopulating Palestinian villages and neighbourhood. Your lies are pathetic.

@GolnerUri @RabbiMivasair And the Nazi cleric Al Hussaini started looting and placed a blockade on the Jewish sector in Jerusalem which began Jan, 1948.

@RabbiMivasair Ben Gurion proclaimed the state on may 14, the 5 Arab states attacked on may 15. This is the chronology.

@RabbiMivasair Arabs were hostile to Jews from the 19th century I believe. Indigenous Jews were attacked in Hebron, yes? Jews did not attack Arabs to steal their land , they bought it. It seems to me that the absentee Arab landlords & Ottoman subjugation are the real culprits.

@EYakoby Interesting. And Arab countries expelled nearly a million Jews, indigenous to Israel correct?

Everyone discusses the Nakba, but no one seems to mention that Jordan expelled some 20,000 Palestinians, Libya expelled 30,000 Palestinians, Iraq expelled 21,000 Palestinians, and Lebanon expelled 30,000 Palestinians. And Kuwait expelled 300,000 Palestinians.

@HenchozPierre @sarah_scialom il vous demande de mettre de côté votre esprit critique et d’utiliser uniquement une émotion réactive dans la direction vers laquelle il vous oriente.

@Mademell @sarah_scialom « Si vous êtes en guerre contre #Gaza, pourquoi tirez-vous sur des enfants, en plein crâne et en plein cœur ? Pourquoi tuez-vous des journalistes, du personnel médical, des employés de l'ONU ? » « Est-ce que cela ressemble à une guerre, ou à un génocide ? » — Norman Finkelstein

Premier rappel. En novembre 2024, la Chambre préliminaire I de la CPI émet les mandats contre Netanyahou et Gallant. Elle écarte expressément le crime contre l’humanité d’extermination, jugeant que ses éléments constitutifs ne sont pas réunis. Quant au génocide, il n’est même pas requis par le Procureur. Deuxième rappel. En avril 2026, le procureur de la CPI Karim Khan, devant Mehdi Hasan, confirme qu’il n’a pas requis le génocide et ne le fera qu’à la condition d’en réunir les preuves. « No crime is off limits if the evidence is there. » Traduction : à ce jour, ces preuves n’existent pas. Et ici il faut comprendre ce que signifie réellement cette absence. Au stade du mandat d’arrêt, l’article 58 du Statut de Rome n’exige que des reasonable grounds to believe, le seuil probatoire le plus bas du Statut, très en-deçà des substantial grounds de la confirmation des charges, et sans commune mesure avec le beyond reasonable doubt du procès. La Chambre d’appel l’a même solennellement abaissé dans l’affaire Al-Bashir, le 3 février 2010, censurant la Chambre préliminaire qui avait osé exiger davantage. Résultat : un second mandat délivré le 12 juillet 2010 contre le président soudanais, pour trois chefs de génocide. La CPI dispose d’un standard probatoire minimal, jurisprudentiellement abaissé, pour retenir le génocide au stade du mandat. Et même à ce seuil-là, pourtant taillé au plus juste, le Procureur n’y est pas. Pas pour Israël. Reste l’épreuve des faits. Les chiffres récemment ventilés par le Hamas lui-même, achèvent de défaire le récit. Sur environ 70 000 décès, près de 25 000 combattants, 10 000 morts naturelles, et plusieurs milliers de morts imputables à des roquettes palestiniennes défaillantes, à des exécutions internes ou à des affrontements intergroupes. Le ratio démographique de trois hommes en âge de combattre pour une femme contredit frontalement la thèse des frappes indiscriminées au sens du droit international humanitaire. Une armée qui commet un génocide ne tue pas trois fois plus d’hommes mobilisables que de femmes. Surtout que, avant le 7 octobre, la population gazaouie était majoritairement composée de femmes et d’enfants. Alors disons-le sans détour. L’accusation de génocide portée contre Israël ne tient ni devant les juges, ni devant le Procureur censé la formuler, ni devant les chiffres de l’ennemi lui-même. Ce qui en reste n’est pas du droit. C’est un slogan. Un slogan articulé par des militants qui ont compris que le mot « génocide » est l’arme rhétorique la plus puissante du siècle, et qui s’en servent précisément parce qu’il ne s’applique pas. Le génocide est un crime juridiquement défini par la Convention de 1948. Il exige la preuve d’un dolus specialis, l’intention spécifique de détruire un groupe comme tel. Aucune juridiction internationale ne l’a constaté à l’égard d’Israël. La CIJ, en janvier 2024, n’a statué que sur la « plausibilité » d’un risque, ce qui n’est ni une qualification, ni une condamnation, ni même un commencement de preuve. C’est de la pure procédure. Le reste n’est pas du droit international. C’est de la guerre par d’autres moyens, menée avec les mots du droit pour mieux les retourner contre lui. En clair, du militantisme.