Magic Buns

The Greens can’t be antisemitic because Zack Polanski is a Jew. However, Kemi Badenoch’s Conservatives can be racist and Zia Yusuf’s Reform can be Islamophobic. I don’t make the rules.

@l00tn00b @NeobornCaveman @RealDonKeith How do you think Russians pass all their censorship?

@NeobornCaveman @RealDonKeith Ha, do you?

🚨EU plans VPN crackdown: New age ID system “cannot be bypassed” via VPNs. Couldn’t stop illegal migration, but suddenly goes full North Korea on controlling what Europeans read online.

@andrew_lilico @jonnyceepembs Heck, do you even understand their techniques, and their flaws? Or do you just see fancy jargon, and go: "Yeah, this is legit?". People understand the issues with by-election results better, because they understand how by-elections are measured, thus the flaws.

@andrew_lilico @jonnyceepembs Then why are they wrong more often than they are rightISH? If they're reliable, they'd be right more often than wrong Do you even know what a confounder is? Or how a survey (questions and results) can influence people? And yeah, you do need a bigger sample to be representative

It's remarkable that, for some time now, on the Wikipedia opinion polling model, the overall poll rating for all three of the top-polling UK political parties (indeed, for 4 of the top 5) has been declining at the same time, for several months in a row!

@jonnyceepembs @andrew_lilico For reference, 0.01% is the max percentage the latest YG poll has to last election, it's lowest is 0.005%... It's really moronic that we think these are reliable - too small a sample, so there are way too many variables that'll be missed to make them reliable.

@jonnyceepembs @andrew_lilico The only valid sample, is an actual election. A *more* valid "sample" would be a by-election, because it's far more transparent (opinion polls are wrapped up in pseudo-scientific jargon to give them the allure of validity); much bigger sample, and they're focused on one area.

@peterrhague @SpiderJ Can't when they're paying more and more for pensions and healthcare, and receiving less and less from a shrinking workforce.

@SpiderJ Maybe the government should spend less 🤔

A shrinking population would increase wages and decrease housing costs. This would make it easier to start a family and thus resolve the population decline problem.

@Sombe_n_injera @Vengefulbit @TheTinMenBlog In a war, a helluva lot of liberties go out the window for the sake of survival. It's horrible, and I wish it didn't exist, but it always will. Your views are born from not having to live in a warzone. What do you think happen to women in war? They live nice and comfortably?

@MagicBuns69 @Vengefulbit @TheTinMenBlog We don’t force women to reproduce, so why would we force them to risk their lives to protect others? Either people have a choice, or they don’t. We can’t claim that one part of society has full rights and valuable lives while treating the other as tools to be used.

"WHO STARTED THE WAR!?" This is what it's all about, isn’t it? Who cares if some innocent man is dragged from his home, and never seen by his family again. Who cares if another man is brutally killed, assaulted, stabbed, shot, or raped. Who cares if hundreds of thousands of conscripted men are sent to die, in the most brutal way imaginable. All these social media brats care about, is pointing out the sex of 'WhO StArTeD tHe WaR', in some some sick point-scoring match. They have become so used to seeing men as some kind of faceless tyrannical oppressor class, that they all merge into one monolithic blob called "men", deprived of individuality. In such a warped view, the Ukrainian man is abducting himself. The boy murdered on the street stabbed himself. The man sexually assaulted in prison, raped himself. This idiotic world view is extraordinarily damaging, and yes, it all leads back to the concept of "the patriarchy". Look – If highlighting the genitals of the person committing an act of violence is more important than sympathising with the victims of such violence, then you’re a shitty person. Pointing out such a thing gives no solace to the male victim, it doesn't make the crime hurt less, or not matter. Asking what sex the assailant is, as a means of minimising their target, is no different to asking what a woman was wearing, to minimise sexual harassment against her. It's victim blaming. Except a man cannot go home and change his sex. I'm tired of this "by other men" stupidity. Did you know FGM is mostly "by other women"? Did you know lesbian relationships, which often see the highest rates of violence, is "by other women"? Did you know that most misogynistic tweets are "by other women"? No. Because highlighting such a thing is no better. To me, it's not shitty people that I worry about most. It's shitty people who are drunk on their own sense of perceived moral superiority, who are light-years away from realising they are absolutely part of the problem too. Get a grip. Grow up.

@Sombe_n_injera @Vengefulbit @TheTinMenBlog Because male life's are more expandable. A single man can impregnate countless women, a single woman can only be impregnated by one man. Look at the demographic collapse of China for example. In a war, it'd be suicidal to society if they drafted women for "meh gender equality".

@MagicBuns69 @Vengefulbit @TheTinMenBlog Why are the Ukrainian men lives seen as the most expandable? Nobody even talks about their sacrifices, it’s simply to statistics or treated as a grim necessity. All we hear is how women and girls are the most affected.

@T1494178470877 @cjsnowdon Why invest, when there are so many ridiculous obstacles to building in this country?

@cjsnowdon What a silly attitude. Have you not been anywhere else? Urban sprawl is gross and requires infrastructure. For a first world country, the infrastructure is poor and there is no will to invest....

It’s just a field. If there’s one thing England has lots of, it’s fields.

@WallpaperKeith @cjsnowdon Do you know what houses are for?

@cjsnowdon Do you know what fields are used for? If not, ask a farmer.

Thank you Conservative Party for ensuring digital ID is foisted upon everyone!

You may not agree with blocking access to an abortion clinic, but a tally of political violence that counts those instances and not Charlie Kirk's assassination, that counts defacing an LGBT crosswalk but not entire neighborhoods in 2020, is not a data set; it's propaganda.

@KrishiYasu @TheTinMenBlog Right now, their country needs men to kill - not some person living in peace banging on about ideals that whither away in war.

@MagicBuns69 @TheTinMenBlog Right now, Ukrainian men need gender activists protecting them from discrimination against them in relation to women. War is common and activists against sexism must take it into account.

@KrishiYasu @TheTinMenBlog Right now, Ukraine needs manpower, not gender activists moaning about policies only those living in peace can complain about. War is ugly and brutal.

@MagicBuns69 @TheTinMenBlog It is about gender equality. If there is no gender equality in the right not to serve in the army during defensive war, there is no gender equality in general. It means the entire legal system is designed to prepare men, not women, to be cannon fodder in case of defensive war.

@Vengefulbit @TheTinMenBlog I've seen pro-Ukrainian's using the argument. It's Putin and his cronies who started the war, and Ukraine has to do what it has to do, to survive. They need manpower to win this war, and letting men off the hook for deserting, will cause a domino effect. War is ugly and brutal.

@MagicBuns69 @TheTinMenBlog Are you trying to start the trend of a recursive strawman? The point you missed is: That argument framework is being used to flip the blame back on a whole demographic — a man did it, so men are to blame.

@Haryan_Glaeddyv Voters don't vote to cut their own benefits... Like pensions

Voters overwhelmingly voted for more "austerity" in 2015 and we ended up getting the highest taxes and spend burden ever by 2024. The problem we actually have is voters getting *the opposite* of what they voted for.

There is a huge difference here: nobody on the Right justified, rationalized, or celebrated the white supremacist in Buffalo. But many people on the Left, including in prestige media, have justified, rationalized, and celebrated left-wing violence, from BLM to the present.