Malcolm Urdustani

I am very disappointed by Bhopal Muslims. I thought they were protesting the beating of that Muslim man. No, they are protesting because a bunch of Hindus insulted Allah (rabb-ul izzat). Please do not misunderstand me, may my life be sacrificed for the Lord of the heavens, however, this is a misplaced priority. The disbelievers have insulted Allah and His Messenger in hostility since antiquity; until when will you protest, and to what extent? You are ignoring the obvious fact that a Muslim brother of yours was publicly beaten, and you are not affected? You neglect it as if it does not matter? A Hindu mob can beat one of us simply because he fell in love with a Hindu woman? When the Indian Constitution explicitly allows it, how did they lay hands on one of us? How can you let this happen? Especially after realising that the same Hindu mob would have protected and funded the man if the religions or genders were reversed. You may say that forming a romantic relationship with a Hindu woman is haram. Yes, it is, but are these Hindus the custodians of Shariyat? Is India run by Shariyat? And how idiotic can one be to not realise that Shariyat is applied under a Muslim society or polity?

In Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, Muslims protested after a video surfaced showing a Muslim youth being beaten by Bajrang Dal activists over alleged "love jihad." The youth was publicly humiliated, and reportedly objectionable remarks were also made against Allah. Protesters submitted video evidence and names of attackers to the Commissioner's office, demanding strict action. Police have filed an FIR against unidentified persons and are investigating the case.

In Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, Muslims protested after a video surfaced showing a Muslim youth being beaten by Bajrang Dal activists over alleged "love jihad." The youth was publicly humiliated, and reportedly objectionable remarks were made against Allah during the attack. Protesters submitted video evidence and names of attackers to the Commissioner's office, demanding strict action. Police have filed an FIR against unidentified persons and are investigating.

Nuanced cover story from Outlook "Popular media tends to present Muslim women as victims with no agency. The more nuanced reality—where Muslim law provides early, structured exit routes for women—doesn’t fit neatly into dominant political narratives"

Pakistan's national anthem, Qaumi Taranah, is not in Persian. In fact, there is not a single Persian word in it. This lady reeks of ignorance, and here is why: Qaumi Tarana is composed of 49 words, all of which are present in Farhang-e-Asifiya, a classical Urdu dictionary, and are thus fully incorporated into the Hindustani (Zaban-e Urdu-e Mualla) tongue. But this lady is adamant about finding roots, then why did she stop at Persian? Why do Muslims, in general, stop at Persian/Iran when tracing linguistic roots? This terminological warfare slop should end. 25 words (51%) of the Qaumi Tarana have Arabic roots, why didn't she mention this? Why didn't she credit Arabic? She also said the anthem has only one Urdu word. Well, no, there is a Prakrit-root term. Why did she call that Urdu but not the others? And there are two such words. Then the remaining 22 words are Persian, but even multiples of them themselves have roots in the languages of ancient civilizations such as Akkadian, Assyrian, Hittite, etc.. Why didn't she credit those civilisations? If you are digging for roots, then dig them fully, or do not post such pathetic slops. In extreme academic works, Arabic-root words in Persian have a potential of reaching 85% of total words. Will she call those works Arabic?