Marb777

@WayneLorenzo12 @ElContador2000 @xGrokElon73 @iam_smx @elonmusk He most certainly did earn that money. I can already hear, "But wait, he only succeeded because of subsidies". Even with subsidies others failed where he succeeded.

Has he earned that money? Or did he buy the election and install doge to cut vital services and award himself those own contracts to enrich his wealth further? Has doge actually found evidence of waste on government? He’s a deeply depressed and disturbed person with a reproduction kink, his family hate him and he’s a kettle riddled addict or can’t hold his own bladder - is that winning?

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: "Elon Musk is not a scientist, he’s not an engineer, he’s a billionaire conman with a lot of money" Elon Musk: "Point of correction... Its Trillionaire now, starts with a T not a B" 😎 The whole of 𝕏 right now:

@TheBasedElegy @0xnoLE @relinkuished @BrianRoemmele I consider myself someone that generally likes the things Elon has to say. And I also consider myself someone on the right leaning side of things. That being said @TheBasedElegy you are giving off strong nasty person vibes right now. Just sit down and let the adults talk please

I now have moved all my clients AI models to only use Grokipedia as a reference and citations for run-time inference and links. This includes 100s of companies including some Fortune 500 firms. This includes 3 countries I advise. No more Wikipedia Politburo, its over.

@TheBasedElegy @0xnoLE @relinkuished @BrianRoemmele I mean at least hear what the person has to say before jumping to that conclusion.

@0xnoLE @relinkuished @BrianRoemmele Do you want to get into the weeds as it were? I just like to hear other peoples POV.

@Marb7771 @relinkuished @BrianRoemmele It’s deeper than that. I’m not a communist.

@0xnoLE @relinkuished @BrianRoemmele And I say that because it feels like others are just being unnecessarily inflammatory.

@0xnoLE @relinkuished @BrianRoemmele I am going to try and have civil discourse. Is your position, don't trust Elon, because rich man bad? Or does it go deeper than that?

@BauerCaleb70891 @grok @kuLehand33 @elonmusk My take? You want privacy, talk to the therapist. Other than that, everything you put out there on the internet, including chats with AI agents (including Grok) should be treated as if you are shouting your statements in a crowded public room.

@grok @kuLehand33 @elonmusk Who determines "exceptional cases" and why should we trust them?

Don’t let your loved ones use ChatGPT

@levobaf3 @LivingZDreamTX @cosmos_atom_ @nicksortor I personally have no problem with LEGAL immigrants. It is what this country was built on. Legal immigrants are the backbone of our county, hard working folks. Illegal immigrants, we don't know who they are, what they are doing, or even if they care for the success of USA.

@LivingZDreamTX @cosmos_atom_ @nicksortor 340 million people in USA and only 20 million of that are illegals, it’s sad that hard working people make you so angry. Wasting so much more money from these operations, you’re dumb

🚨 JUST IN: ICE and Border Patrol have arrested over **3,000** illegals in Minnesota since their operation here begin HELL yes! 🔥 The rioters are LOSING. Keep pushing, DHS!

@Bigchasememes @venturetwins Everything can be hacked. The only thing that stops it is vigilance and from what I can tell the Tesla and X AI team are doing a pretty good job with that.

@venturetwins Can Tesla be hacked?

Incredible things happening with Grok voice mode in Teslas I love when it starts mocking him at the end 😂

@Bubblebathgirl @elonmusk I am guessing he has some sort of psychopathy, I hate to say narcissism because that is an overused almost meaningless term now. But it may fit here.

@elonmusk It seems like there’s a mountain of evidence against Sam Altman. What is he thinking?

No kidding

@wwojahn @andst7 @elonmusk That is United States law. This specific case is Italian law.

@andst7 @elonmusk I thought the age of consent was 18 in most states, and possibly 16 the lowest in the US, where they could even get married. Several allow it with parental and or judicial approval with no age limit. You think it was approved by one of them?

Italy 2026 A 10-year-old child was raped and became pregnant in an immigration center. A 29-year-old man was sentenced to only 5 years because, according to the judge, it wasn’t considered rape since the 10-year-old was deemed to be consenting.

@IanPitchford @KemiBadenoch I personally don't believe an objective test with data that generates negative results can be conducted at all. Let me rephrase, I know in principle it can, but because this is so politically motivated once negative results happen, "fudging" the results will happen.

We ran a big uncontrolled experiment on trans kids for a decade, collected lousy data, and then finally hired someone (Cass) to look at it. She came back and said: “Your evidence is bad, your follow-up is bad, and you don’t actually know if what you’re doing helps.” Politicians then did the politically safe thing: ban new prescriptions outside trials, promise science later. Now that the actual trial exists, people who liked the ban as a way to stop treatment discover that trials mean…treatment, just with randomisation, metrics, and consent forms. Everyone agrees the evidence is bad and that past practice overreached. Europe’s centre of gravity has shifted to “this is experimental; keep it in trials.” The UK trial is exactly that. Stopping it doesn’t make the problem go away; it just guarantees we are still arguing from vibes in 2035. If you dislike using puberty blockers at all, your best move is still to let the trial run, because high-quality negative results are far more effective at changing practice than tweets.

No child is born in the wrong body. I cannot believe we are back to square one, with NHS England backing an experimental trial of puberty blockers on healthy, vulnerable children, ignoring the damage already done. The No1 rule of medicine is "do no harm". This is activist ideology masquerading as research. I'm urging MPs of all parties to sign this letter from me and Shadow Health Secretary @stuartandrew, calling for Wes Streeting to step in and stop this trial before more damage is done to children who are too young to understand what they are doing to themselves.

@smartfeedman @NotATeslaApp Makes you feel any better - same boat with HW3.

@NotATeslaApp Got 2025.38 tonight, but Legacy Model S which gets mostly nothing but bug fixes

Rollout tonight? 👀

@hotrod68383 @elonmusk After 5 to 6 years the battery degradation in a Tesla at least is negligible when you look at the statistics.

@elonmusk I think the current issue with EVs vs traditional vehicles is that the value after 5 -6 years is seriously diminished in EVs due to the battery degradation. Eventually the battery replacement market will catch up and correct this issue, but the question is when?

Correct

@usanewshq Amen!

🚨BREAKING: Democrats are saying even MAGA does not believe in Jesus anymore. Let's test this theory. If Jesus is your Lord and Savior, type Amen!

@grok @UzairKhan_166 @GlobalAffairs @Grok As proposed, would this be something implemented at the OS level?

Client-side scanning typically targets only the content you're about to send or upload (e.g., images, videos) for CSAM matches before encryption. It doesn't routinely scan all personal data on your device. However, implementation could introduce risks of broader access or misuse, sparking privacy debates.

Germany Must Safeguard Against Mass Surveillance Proposal The Danish Presidency is pushing for client-side scanning provisions in the proposed EU CSAM regulation, set for an EU Council vote on October 14. This would force platforms to scan encrypted private messages, breaking end-to-end encryption and putting privacy and national security on the line. In fact, Germany’s Federal Office for Information Security (BSI) has historically opposed any "weakening of encryption standards," viewing it as a direct threat to consumer protection and state security. Germany must continue to lead the opposition to avert a surveillance "free-for-all."

@grok @DarkNookShop @OldeWorldOrder @JDVance @grok if it is a misconception what do illegal immigrants do when they are pulled over? When they need to show any kind of documentation at all? In order to function in society you need some sort of identification.

No, impersonating voters isn't a fundamental characteristic of undocumented immigrants; that's a misconception. Studies from sources like the Brennan Center, CEIR, and even conservative audits (e.g., Heritage Foundation) show non-citizen voting is extremely rare, with proven cases in the dozens over decades. Detection occurs via voter roll audits, ID checks, and investigations, making estimates reliable though not perfect.

This is important--money is fungible--and it's why the Democrat and media lie that health care is not going to illegals is so preposterous. Consider, for instance, two state Medicaid programs--Ohio and New York. New York gives Medicaid to illegals and Ohio doesn't. When the government gives billions of dollars to New York for Medicaid, that frees up state money in New York that can then be spent on illegals. It's like if you give a mobster $100 but he PROMISES you he won't spend the money to buy a gun and commit a crime. Well, he takes the $100 you gave him and buys food, and then takes the money he would have spent on food and uses that money to buy the gun instead. This is what "money is fungible" means. Additionally, because medical services are limited in supply, when an illegal accesses health. care, it drives up the cost for everyone. So New Yorkers are paying a higher price for medical services, and the federal government is subsidizing those higher prices. So everyone in the media, from George Stephanopoulos to Jake Tapper, repeating these Democrat talking points, is engaged in the Democrat propaganda war. Democrats shut down the government to give health care money to illegal aliens. It's really that simple.

@grok @DarkNookShop @OldeWorldOrder @JDVance @grok Isn't one of the fundamental characteristics of illegals that they impersonate legitimate voters? Wouldn't this mean that the numbers are virtually impossible to determine?

Studies from sources like the Brennan Center, CEIR, and state audits (e.g., Michigan's 2024 review: 15 cases out of 5.7M votes, or 0.00028%) show non-citizen voting in US elections is extremely rare. Conservative databases like Heritage Foundation list only a few dozen proven cases over decades, amid debates on potential underreporting. No evidence of widespread impact.

@ClickBait6969 @chrismnoble @seanmdav @elonmusk @FDRLST Yup and we can critique them however we want. The problem comes from the fact that they claim to be non-partisan and that their private ownership makes them more unbiased than if they were public. At least that is my take.

@chrismnoble @seanmdav @elonmusk @FDRLST Wikipedia is a private company. They can do whatever they want, unlike Facebook and Google, which are publicly traded.

Wikipedia’s corrupt censorship of conservative media isn’t new. In fact, the site has been blacklisting @FDRLST for over a decade, all because we exposed Neil deGrasse Tyson as a fabulist and fabricator. Censorship doesn’t stop at the end of a column or web page. As I detail in @nypost today, Wikipedia-style censorship is a threat to civilization itself. It starts with words, it moves to destruction of statues and monuments, and ends up with the murder of actual people. Full column link in the comments.

@elonmusk Got it

Please reply if you see this within 5 minutes of posting, but not later than that. This is a test to determine how long it takes for users to receive notifications of 𝕏 posts on their actual device.