Mark Anthony
2.3K posts

Mark Anthony
@MarkA3303
I just notice things, and everything is turning fat and gay.
Katılım Ocak 2025
106 Takip Edilen35 Takipçiler

@MottiTheMedic @MarkA3303 @nnahle It’s kinda weird to accuse us of rejecting someone who came after.
English

Here's the deal, and it is Biblical.
If you cannot get Israel right—if you believe the inhabitants of Israel today are not the real Jews—then I am not your Christian brother. Your form of Christianity is worthless to me because it is not Scripture-based. You are calling my Father God a liar, accusing Him of breaking His own words and lacking the power to return the right people to the land.
English

@MottiTheMedic @nnahle The Jews that were responsible for putting Jesus on the cross said the same thing.
English

@MarkA3303 @nnahle I do not have to cope. I have Torah which laid everything out.
English

Judaism is the acceptance, and adherence to the 613 commandments. Judaism is a living reminder of the mass revelation at Mt. Sinai where millions heard G-d speak—and lived. Judaism is the eternal covenant forged between G-d and the Nation of Israel.
Your messiah figure never even played a part in its inception.
English

@walkalonewthme @streetbrawls97 Why do niggers not know the awnser to this question?
English

@streetbrawls97 Why do men feel sad if someone else bangs their babe
English

@AwaitingChrist Low IQ people fall for the word game and say "its replacement theology" when infact Jesus Christ fullfilled the covenant.
God chose everyone, it was his plan all along.
Dispensationalist are blinded and fail to see they are engaging in racial and geographical idolatry.
English

The replacement theologians would like to say Dispensationalists are the real replacement theologians.
I disagree.
Their logic is the Church replaces Israel for a time based on what we're saying.
We say God is saving out a people, largely Gentiles, and when the full number of us comes in...then God will turn back to Israel, hence...replacement in the minds of the accusers.
Except there's a hole in their thought in that accusation. We would contend any descendants of Israel and Judah can come to their Messiah now to be included in the body of the Church.
Our opponents are so busy calling the whole of them the synag0gue of S@tan, I don't believe any of them consider that aspect or if they did, consider it abhorrent.
You don't win someone to Christ that way. Paul said he became all things to all people so he may win some of them to Christ (1 Corinthians 9:22-23). Sure, you can villify and abuse a racial group and that may possibly convict some of their sin but it's certainly wasn't Paul's approach. It certainty wasn't Peter's approach either (1 Peter 3:15-16). Not to the common person.
To the religious leaders, who worked hard to keep people in darkness, yes there were many harsh words. If you work hard to shut out people from the grace of God, The Lord certainly will call you a brood of vipers and sons of hell.
Some of you then need to be extremely worried because that's exactly what you're doing!
English

US fertility rates just hit another record low
In 2025, the US general fertility rate fell to 53.1 - the lowest level ever recorded
Japan, South Korea, and Germany have already been shrinking for years. Japan has been shrinking for years, South Korea’s population has already started to decline, and Germany would be shrinking without immigration
Now the UK joins them - deaths will outnumber births every single year starting in 2026
No economy grows without people
No pension system survives without young workers
No culture persists without families having children
This is the slowest civilizational crisis in human history

English

@Sxnt1_Sxndxval She has every right to keep a fund for herself, however much it is. She's marrying you, but who knows how your relationship will turn out. More power to her. Every woman should do it if they can. And nosing on her phone is out of order. You have no right to invade her privacy.
English

Acabo de cancelar mi boda, a solo dos semanas del evento, porque revisé el celular de mi prometida y descubrí que tiene una cuenta de ahorros secreta con más de $50,000 USD de la que nunca me habló. Llevamos tres años viviendo juntos y durante todo ese tiempo yo he pagado el 80% de los gastos, incluyendo la renta, las cenas y hasta sus vacaciones, bajo la premisa de que ella "apenas llegaba a fin de mes" con su sueldo. Incluso me endeudé con un préstamo personal para pagar la mitad de la fiesta de la boda que ella tanto quería, mientras ella decía que no podía aportar más porque estaba "en cero".
Cuando la confronté, no me pidió perdón; me gritó que yo era un acosador por invadir su privacidad y que ese dinero es su "fondo de emergencia por si las cosas salen mal", algo que su madre le aconsejó tener siempre en secreto. Mis amigos dicen que exageré, que al final es su dinero y que no hubo una infidelidad física, así que no debería tirar tres años a la basura. Yo siento que viví con una estafadora que me dejó cargar con todo el peso financiero mientras ella acumulaba una fortuna a mis espaldas. Ella dice que si la amara, su cuenta bancaria no me importaría. Yo digo que la confianza se rompió para siempre. ¿Ustedes qué harían? ¿Es válido tener secretos financieros así en una relación o es una traición total? Los leo.
Español

❖ Israel Is Israel. The Church Is the Church.
From the beginning, God’s plan unfolds through a specific people. Not an abstraction. Not a metaphor. A nation. Genesis 12:2–3 declares, “I will make you into a great nation… and all peoples on earth will be blessed through you.” This is the foundation. A real people through whom blessing comes to the world.
❖ God reinforces this with precision.
Genesis 17:8 says, “I will give to you and your offspring… all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession.” Everlasting means enduring. Not symbolic. Not reassigned. God ties His covenant to Abraham’s physical descendants and a defined land.
❖ Scripture consistently preserves this distinction.
1 Corinthians 10:32 gives three categories: “Do not cause anyone to stumble, whether Jews, Greeks or the church of God.” Jews are not the Church. Greeks are not the Church. The Church is distinct from both. Paul does not collapse these identities. He maintains them.
Romans 9:3–4 adds, “the people of Israel… theirs is the adoption to sonship; theirs the divine glory, the covenants, the receiving of the law, the temple worship and the promises.” These are not reassigned categories. They belong to Israel.
❖ And the New Testament never erases this identity.
The word “Israel” appears around 70 times in the New Testament, and it always refers to ethnic, national Israel. It never clearly means “the Church.” Not once. Language matters. If God meant Church, He could have said Church. But He didn’t.
❖ The Church is something new.
Ephesians 3:5–6 calls it a mystery “not made known to people in other generations… that the Gentiles are heirs together with Israel.” Not replacing Israel. Not becoming Israel. Sharing in spiritual blessing while Israel’s national promises remain intact.
❖ Yet early in church history, a shift occurred.
After the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70 and the Bar Kokhba revolt, many early church figures began distancing Christianity from Jewish identity. Thinkers like Justin Martyr began speaking of the Church as the “true Israel.” Origen advanced allegorical interpretation, turning concrete promises into spiritual symbols. Augustine later systematized this, merging Platonic philosophy with theology and redefining the kingdom as present and spiritual rather than future and earthly.
Why did this happen?
Partly cultural pressure. Partly a desire to separate from a persecuted Jewish people. Partly philosophical influence that elevated the spiritual over the physical. But none of those are valid interpretive authorities. Scripture is.
❖ And Scripture resists this reinterpretation at every turn.
Jeremiah 31:35–37 declares, “Only if these decrees vanish… will Israel ever cease being a nation before me.” Israel is tied to the fixed order of creation. If Israel becomes the Church, then this promise collapses into nonsense. Has the Church ever ceased being a nation? The categories break down immediately.
❖ The New Testament doubles down, not backs away.
Romans 11:1 says, “Did God reject his people? By no means!”
Romans 11:25–26 continues, “Israel has experienced a hardening in part until the full number of the Gentiles has come in, and in this way all Israel will be saved.”
If Israel means Church here, the passage becomes incoherent. The Church is partially hardened until the Church comes in, and then the Church is saved? That is not interpretation. That is confusion.
❖ The future of Israel is explicit and visible.
Zechariah 12:10 declares, “They will look on me, the one they have pierced, and they will mourn for him.” This is national repentance. Not a vague spiritual awakening. A specific people recognizing their Messiah.
Isaiah 2:3 says, “The law will go out from Zion, the word of the LORD from Jerusalem.” That is geography. That is governance. That is kingdom.
❖ Even the final pages of Scripture confirm this distinction.
Revelation 21:12 describes the New Jerusalem: “On the gates were written the names of the twelve tribes of Israel.” Israel’s identity is not erased at the end. It is honored.
❖ So the issue is not minor. It is foundational.
If Israel can be redefined, then words lose meaning. Promises lose clarity. Interpretation becomes subjective.
But if Israel means Israel, then God’s Word stands firm.
❖ Israel is Israel.
❖ The Church is the Church.
And the difference is not a problem to solve. It is a promise to believe.

English

@RoflGPT Just stop bringing race into it don’t matter who you are you cut you bleed red
English

@rabbriansamuel Every day you make every post about racial identity.
This is racial idolatry
English

@AwaitingChrist The fact that the other half is obssed with saying he is Jewish non stop is more disturbing. They care and talk more about his race than what he did and taught.
You engage in racial idolatry
English

You cannot claim to love the Jewish Messiah while harboring a heart that seeks to destroy His family. To do so is more than a contradiction; it is a betrayal.
Today, we are witnessing the poisonous fruit of a perverted "Christianity" that has severed itself from its own root.
In London, the peace of Golders Green was shattered as two Jewish men - one in his 70s - were stabbed in a terrorist act.
Simultaneously, a 22-year-old soldier in the U.S. has been charged for plotting a massacre, boasting that he would "kill every single Jew" in a synagogue
When fake Christians betray Jesus, they inevitably harvest Replacement Theology - the lie that God has disowned His people.
This ideology is the spiritual fuel for every Nazi, every white supremacist, and every radical who thinks they are doing God’s work by targeting His chosen ones
To hate the Jewish people is to hate the face of the One you pray to.
Yeshua taught that the pinnacle of faith is to lay down your life for others (John 15:13), not to take lives in a fit of vitriol.
If you do not stand in unshakable solidarity with the Jewish community, you aren't standing with the King of the Jews - you are standing with those who seek His destruction.
Everyone will need to choose.
You cannot serve the Prince of Peace while carrying the "spirit of Amalek."
Align your heart with the eternal covenant of God, or admit that the "Jesus" you follow is merely a shadow of your own hatred.
English

The new covenant is for Israel.
James Skeary@Jameslivinvegas
@BrysonGray New covenant new religion
English

@rabbriansamuel Jesus would would tell you to stop obsessing or caring about race.
He would check your racial idolatry.
You care more about the race of Jesus above anything. Are you capable of posting about anything other than this?
English


You have dodged more debates with me than times we have actually debated lol. Why are you trying to compare me not wanting to debate meta-debate topics with you for 10 hours to people having a policy of having ZERO adversarial conversations? You think the only two options are “I never allow my ideas to be critically confronted” and “I accept every single debate request no matter the person and the topic”?
This is why people call you a debate-lord, it’s an obviously stupid point you’re raising to object to something I’m stating that’s incredibly fair: for a marketplace of ideas to exist, there needs to be some kind of back-and-forth exchange.
Andrew Wilson@paleochristcon
@ReedHawk2 Cool so why won't destiny debate me on the ethical proposition I gave him? You now will no longer take him seriously correct?
English








