@OfVoice35353 @JasonBassler1 @SendMe1776 As someone who has the name “Voice of Liberty” are sure are ironically ignorant. Those who trade freedom for safety deserve neither.
English
MarketMogz
788 posts
MarketMogz
@MarketMogz
Futures trader 📈💰See what others can’t
Indicator → Katılım Haziran 2020
27 Takip Edilen56 Takipçiler
Yeah, make sure that criminals are further empowered. Great plan. Make sure stolen cars are now harder to find. Make sure that wanted violent felons are more difficult to locate. Dumbest plan ever. Hopefully you get caught doing this, except those who post this type of shit are usually too scared to do it themselves.
English
⚠️ Definitely DO NOT point a 1000nm wavelength green laser at Flock cameras. It totally won't damage the sensor and render the camera ineffective.
So please don't consider it, okay?
English
@EelMan555 @NoahsArk1000 Not a single quote there was an admission to killing millions of Jews. Did you even read it? The 6 million figure however, was spread hundreds of times by the Jews before the Holocaust even started.
English
@NoahsArk1000 Well it is actually the Nazis who said they killed millions of Jews...x.com/ppow84/status/…
patrick p@ppow84
Here are 60 direct quotes from 40 different Nazi officials about what they were doing to Jewish people, sourced to the original documents and recordings. All of it is from 1938-1944, so none of it is from post-war confessions. Page 1 opens with Hitler, Goebbels, and Himmler, but it also includes people like Oberleutnant Walther, a field officer who wrote in a report that shooting Jews was faster than shooting Gypsies, "100 men in 40 minutes," and noted they were calm when they died. The Goebbels entry is from his private diary. Later pages have Himmler ordering troops to "drive Jewish women into the swamps," Romania's head of state saying "I say there is no law, I take full legal responsibility," and a Wehrmacht field marshal whose kill order Hitler praised and sent to every Eastern Front commander as a model.
English
@Ishwishtodish @camharless @BobMurphyEcon In your new scenario, for it to be accurate, the 100 people know that that wall will crush and kill everyone who chooses to go to the other side. If you go to the other side you are the active, not passive one. Is your IQ above 3?
English
@MarketMogz @camharless @BobMurphyEcon Do you see now how that's disingenuous? In this case, not pushing the wall (blue) is obviously correct, even if it's easier for "red" to win. I forced blue into the passive choice and red into the active one. Same with the train situation, just reversed.
English
@nocontextnewses @Slickid007 @TeeDavePosts @Param_eth They show you the code they want you to see and believe. You cannot seriously think some anonymous guy who created it doesn’t want to sell (ANY) of the bitcoin.
English
@MarketMogz @Slickid007 @TeeDavePosts @Param_eth It’s open-source code… do you have any idea what you’re talking about right now?
English
@Ishwishtodish @camharless @BobMurphyEcon Looking at what you get from each option or what you don’t get is how you decide whether the option is truly passive or not. Passivity is the act of not taking action so only red can be considered passive. That’s literally the definition and to say otherwise is factually wrong
English
@MarketMogz @camharless @BobMurphyEcon Both red and blue think their side is the passive one. A blue supporter can just as easily argue that red is making the active choice to kill while blue is not. Is it passive to choose to live, or to choose to not kill?
English
@nocontextnewses @Slickid007 @TeeDavePosts @Param_eth Why would the CIA want to make it obvious that it’s centralized?
English
@Slickid007 @TeeDavePosts @Param_eth I don’t think it was one person, “Satoshi Nakamoto” was likely a name the group came up with. It is definitely decentralized though, unless you can point to some functions in the code that would prove otherwise.
English
@d3ucedevil @camharless @BobMurphyEcon Seeing this, I’m asking myself why a person would press blue ((knowing)) the risk of death. The only risk still in this framing comes from pressing the blue button and it’s not a secret to anyone. A logical person would not risk death for no reason when red is guaranteed life.
English
@camharless @BobMurphyEcon Frame the question like this to understand the blue perspective:
If less than 50% of people pres red, then everybody lives. If more than 50% press red that everyone that presses blue dies.
English
@Ishwishtodish @camharless @BobMurphyEcon That is the exact reality of the game though. Red is passive as what you get when you press it is to choose to live whereas blue is proactive as what you get is a gamble to kill yourself or save others.
English
@camharless @BobMurphyEcon I feel like a broken record whenever this comes up, but you can't make a reframing that makes one choice the active choice and the other choice passive, that changes the game.
English
@bigbrainsteve @TheRealVerai @MrBeast We’re assuming that everyone has the complete capability of understanding the question. if you really wanna play that game, we can say that this question will be asked in English, which most of the adults in this world do not understand and they would be picking a random button.
English
@TheRealVerai @MrBeast Kids don't understand the question, picking red kills kids.
English
Everyone on earth takes a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press? BE HONEST.
English
@Chillerish @permabulla Why were the Jews throwing around the 6 million figure hundreds of times before the Holocaust?
English
@permabulla Hitler killed 6 million jews.
You utter moron.
Your an first class antisemite
English
Hitler made the jews work a job that wasn’t banking media or porn for a couple years and they claim it was a genocide.
Whites go from 36% to 7% of the global population and replacement is a conspiracy theory.
Got it
English
@FrogeLole @smith_unraveled @ChardySPX Didn’t answer the question. Can’t answer the question, without admitting that blue is simply just a stupid choice. They know the crusher is there, it’s not a secret.
English
Hilarious how many people turn an IQ question into a humanitarian question. Here is the question hyper simplified for some of you.
MrBeast@MrBeast
Everyone on earth takes a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press? BE HONEST.
English
@ford351gtcobra @ChardySPX The wording of the first picture is actually flawed unlike the second. You don’t “initiate” a gamble on life, the gamble is already there from the beginning of when the buttons appear. Blue is the only button taking the gamble.
English
@billy45632 @5stringTex Why are red pressers responsible for the blue pressers choice to enter into a gamble on death game?
English
I made a table for this.
If you pick red, you will always survive.
If you pick blue, you might die.
You should always pick red.
MrBeast@MrBeast
Everyone on earth takes a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press? BE HONEST.
English
@NeroSiegfried @PantsuTaigas @shaulamoder The question clearly states you have to press the blue button to die, so no, removing the blue button would not cause any one to die.
English
@PantsuTaigas @shaulamoder And you could remove the blue button entirely
"There's a red button, you can choose to press it or not. If more than 50% press it, everyone who didn't dies"
English
all the worst people in the universe deliberately miswording the question and choosing red in the replies/quote tweets
unless you value your own life more than that of billions of people as well as many of those you love, blue is the obvious answer
MrBeast@MrBeast
Everyone on earth takes a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press? BE HONEST.
English
@CloverJack14th @_Hazardous_Wolf Why would anyone logically choose to stand under a death trap in the first place? Just….. don’t.
English
@YuletideFrost There is no red button clause, it’s a simple choice of life. There is only a blue button clause which is a gamble on you and other blue presser’s lives.
English
Blue is only a death gamble because of the red button's clause. That being said most red button pressers are selfish, ignorant oafs
pbit@0xPBIT
English
@TrustlessState @ShitpostRock2 True. And even then the obvious correct answer is to press red and get off the track because we are not idiots trying to gamble if a train will run us over or not. I am also not responsible for the result of you choosing to stay on track like a dumbass.
English
@ShitpostRock2 The more fair framing is:
- everyone starts on the track
- press the Red button to step off the track
- if 50% of people presses the Blue button, the train stops
English
@StrongFreeLovin @NapoleonBonabot What’s the word for someone who puts labels on people who they don’t agree with?
English
@NapoleonBonabot You just learned that you're either a narcissist or a psychopath
English
>Red: guaranteed survival
>Blue: survival only if enough people press blue
Am I losing my mind? Why do so many people see blue as the favorable option?
MrBeast@MrBeast
Everyone on earth takes a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press? BE HONEST.
English
@davidslosttt @conservative767 The ballot asked voters wanted to “restore fairness”, so yes they did try to hide it.
You are not a serious person.
English
