Matt Stephens
44.5K posts
@MattSStephens
Christian | Former Competitive Bodybuilder | Network Engineer | @UofAlabama Alum | Matthew 5:3-11
This auto-body shop owner explains what you shouldn’t do with your insurance company after getting into an accident
I am the Attorney General of the United States. I have spent my entire career fighting for victims. I said this in my opening statement. Then twelve victims stood behind me for five hours and I did not look at them once. A congresswoman asked them to raise their hands if my department had contacted them. Every hand went up. All twelve. Zero contact. This is a batting average of .000, which in any other profession would raise questions. In mine, it raises the Dow. She asked me to turn around and face them. To apologize. I called this "theatrics." I then spent five hours hurling personal insults at every member of Congress who asked me a question. I accused them of theatrics while screaming. This distinction is important to me. Last February I invited fifteen influencers to the White House and handed them binders stamped "The Epstein Files: Phase 1." They walked out holding them high for the cameras. The binders contained flight logs, address books, and previously circulated material repackaged with DOJ letterhead. Even some attendees conceded there was little new. "Phase 1" implied escalation. The performance did the rest. When subsequent releases surfaced names that were inconvenient, eleven of the fifteen stopped posting about Epstein entirely. The binders were not for disclosure. The binders were for photographs. Two days before I went on Fox News and said a "client list" was sitting on my desk, the FBI confirmed in writing that no client list exists. I went on Fox News anyway. I also told the public the FBI was reviewing "tens of thousands of videos" of Epstein with children. The files show fifteen to twenty images, commercially obtained from the internet. No videos of abuse. No videos implicating anyone. Prosecutor Maurene Comey wrote: "We did not locate any such videos." I said these things because saying them is the job. Confirming them is someone else's problem. My staff prepared a tabbed binder for today's hearing. Not the influencer kind. This one contained the search histories of every lawmaker who used DOJ computers to view unredacted Epstein files — which names they searched, which documents they opened. A photographer captured a page labeled "Jayapal Pramila Search History." The Speaker of the House called this "inappropriate." The ranking member called it "an outrageous abuse of power." I call it preparation. I did not bring notes on the case. I brought notes on the jury. The Epstein Files Transparency Act passed with bipartisan support. Republicans wrote it. Democrats co-sponsored it. It requires my department to release all documents. We released approximately two percent. Channel 4 found we have 14.6 terabytes. We published roughly 300 gigabytes. When asked about the other ninety-eight percent, I spoke about my lifelong commitment to transparency. Representative Massie (@RepThomasMassie) — the Republican who wrote the law — found a billionaire's name blacked out on a document listing potential co-conspirators. My department unredacted it within forty minutes. It appeared unredacted in dozens of other files. We blacked it out in the one document that mattered. A DOJ official initially told CNN we "did not redact any names of men, only female victims." This was false. We redacted men. We exposed victims. Over three thousand pages contained survivors' names and nude photographs. The pattern is consistent: we protected suspects and exposed the people they harmed. FBI Director Patel testified that the President's name appeared in the files fewer than one hundred times. It appears over one thousand times. He testified there was "no credible information" that Epstein trafficked victims to others. An FBI document in the files lists eight co-conspirators. Representative Raskin (@RepRaskin) accused me of running "a massive Epstein cover-up right out of the Department of Justice." I called him a washed-up loser lawyer. He is a graduate of Harvard Law School. Representative Lieu (@RepTedLieu) cited an FBI witness statement where the President told police he was glad they were "stopping" Epstein because "everyone has known he's been doing this." My department has not interviewed this witness. Under oath, I said there is no evidence the President committed a crime. Lieu said I lied under oath. I said: "Don't you ever accuse me of committing a crime." He called for my resignation. I spoke about the stock market. Internet sleuths discovered that my department's redactions could be defeated by highlighting the black bars, copying the text, and pasting it into a new document. The names appeared. They also found that the word "don't" had been redacted in an email about polo lessons — because our automated software flagged "Don T" as a name to protect. The internet called this "the Dwigt Moment." My department spent more technical effort protecting one name than it spent contacting twelve survivors. Meanwhile, Britain stripped a prince of every title he held. Norway opened a criminal investigation into a former prime minister. An ambassador was suspended. A Swedish UN official resigned. Slovakia's national security adviser quit. Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland launched official probes. The King of England offered to cooperate with police. In the United States, the number of investigations opened: zero. The number of officials who resigned: zero. The number of men held accountable: zero. In the United States, there is one person behind bars for Jeffrey Epstein's crimes. Her name is Ghislaine Maxwell. She is a woman. Over one thousand victims were trafficked to men. Both parties want answers. One thousand victims want justice. Twelve survivors wanted me to turn around. The Dow is over fifty thousand. Your 401K's are great. I have spent my entire career fighting for victims. I did not turn around.
The globalists told us themselves.
NOW - Yuval Harari says AI will take over "anything made of words," including book based religions, "Judaism calls itself the religion of the book, and it grants ultimate authority not to humans, but to words... What happens when the greatest expert on the holy book is an AI?"
Tesla will stop selling FSD after Feb 14. FSD will only be available as a monthly subscription thereafter.
Not long after World War II the West dissolved its empires and colonies and began sending colossal sums of taxpayer-funded aid to these former territories (despite have already made them far wealthier and more successful). The West opened its borders, a kind of reverse colonization, providing welfare and thus remittances, while extending to these newcomers and their families not only the full franchise but preferential legal and financial treatment over the native citizenry. The neoliberal experiment, at its core, has been a long self-punishment of the places and peoples that built the modern world.
Keep in mind we then went and fought the Cold War. Your side always fails to see this while accusing others of not thinking in categories. How ironic. America is anti-communist and anti-fascist. We just took out Venezuela… So at what point are you suggesting we fight and destroy Nick & his followers?
Odd that Joel Webbon is appealing to Jewish Mosaic Law, which goes beyond the NT. Christ Himself specifically said, “Whoever speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven.” (Matt 12:32) The NT nowhere authorizes civil punishment for blasphemy against Christ. Why? Every unregeberate man blasphemes Christ in word and deed. This is a primary, gospel concern. Webbon is anti-reformed and anti-confessional and, despite his appeal to WCF, 1689 and Lex Rex in his show with Fuentes, he fundamentally goes against the Reformed faith. He’s a liar. Like Rutherford’s Lex Rex, Vindiciae contra Tyrannos (A Defense of Liberty Against Tyrants, c. 1579) teaches: Mosaic judicial law was tied to Israel’s polity; that kings rule under God’s moral law, not as new Moses figures; magistrates are guardians of justice, not priests; the work never argues that Levitical penalties are binding on Christian nations. The Huguenots were resisting princes who claimed authority over conscience like Webbon falsely claims. Our confessions: WCF 19.4 (1689 LBCF 19.4) To them also, as a body politic, He gave sundry judicial laws, which expired together with the state of that people; not obliging any other now, further than the general equity thereof may require. This is decisive. The Mosaic civil penalties, including blasphemy laws, expired with Israel’s covenant polity. Only the general equity remains, meaning moral principles of justice, not the penalties themselves. Executing or imprisoning blasphemers for theological offense is not general equity. It is older covenant specific law. WCF 20.2 (1689 LBCF 21.2) God alone is Lord of the conscience, and hath left it free from the doctrines and commandments of men, which are in anything contrary to His Word, or beside it, in matters of faith or worship. Civil penalties for blasphemy directly violate this article. The magistrate may restrain external acts that disrupt civil peace, but he may not punish theological error as such. Further, the Heidelberg Catechism treats blasphemy under the Third Commandment, but enforcement is framed morally and ecclesiastically, not civilly. Repentance, discipline, instruction. Never tyrannical state violence. Any system calling for modern legal penalties for blaspheming Christ contradicts the gospel and confessional Reformed settlement. It is not apostolic. It is not Reformed. It is not Confessional. It is a return to covenant confusion Christ already resolved. Mark and avoid Joel Webbon.
Curt Mills: The reason why Somalia is so in the mainstream of American media right now is that, I think frankly, the Israeli lobby wants to push it, and it wants to radicalize people on this issue, to distract from the larger macro issue of the Israel lobby in the United States driving foreign policy on this discreet issue of Iran. @CurtMills
