Madam Stakeholder

"Social distancing" is one of the most despicable public policies ever conceived. #PublicHealth is a menace🛑 Even a baby chimpanzee knows better than the brainwashed coldblooded fools w/ credentials in medicine, science, public health, & govt who "managed" the covid scamdemic.👇

@ericajo I don't think anything you wrote is incorrect @ericajo. Well done. But, there's more to the motives than liability laundering, royaltie$, and trying to throw everyone a bone. For ex, search "Public Health Emergency Medical Countermeasures Enterprise" (with & w/out "Burr"):

This theory makes the most sense to me anyway! A way to calm down the MAHA public. Still please the left by saying “nobody is taking your vaccines away”. We’ve heard that one lately. Royalties still come rolling in. And they have had 4 years to clean up the evidence of the first disaster.

I finally figured it out. 💡 I was confused why FDA is sending mixed messages by pulling old COVID shots but approving new ones. But now it’s so obvious‼️ It’s not public health. It’s a liability laundering operation 🤯Here’s how the scheme works 🧵

True✅ Also known as the bullshit asymmetry principle:

@The3rdFrame @classic_film My honorable mentions NOT in the tournament's 16: Guys And Dolls Kiss Me Kate Paint Your Wagon Finian's Rainbow Annie Get Your Gun Camelot Oliver Flower Drum Song Gigi Jungle Book (1967) Beauty and the Beast The One and Only, Genuine, Original Family Band A Star is Born (1976)

@classic_film Good tournament, good winner, and with many musicals not even qualifying like: Oliver Annie Paint your wagon Easter Parade On the Town Cat Balou Hello Dolly An American in Paris Guys and Dolls Bugsy Malone Was still great to recall all those that did make the final cut. 👏😎

Congratulations to our #MovieMusicals Tournament champion: The Sound of Music! The 1965 classic dominated its competition during every round. But there were no losers in this tournament--as it was grand fun to revisit and discuss so many incredible movie musicals.

@hstupak1 @NickHudsonCT To address, if not answer, your key/keen observation & question @hstupak1, we'd need to identify specific persons and evaluate & speculate on case-by-case basis. The assessment of Dr. Jay B is different than that of, for ex, J. Tucker or Toby Young—even tho they're on ~same page.

@NickHudsonCT It’s very strange to me too, almost as if someone can see through an obvious falsehood only to go on to justify the foundation of a century of falsehoods in order not to shatter their longstanding worldview. They are so close to seeing, I’m not sure why the effort stops there?

The weirdest vein of covid dissidents: “Lockdowns, masks, social distancing, school closures, nudge units, the shots, the deadly virus motif and more were all nonsense. But the actual sequence, virus and disease? On that one aspect of the scam the narrative wasn’t fake. There was a real pathogen and it came from a lab.” I’d say anyone with that perspective has last touch with reality.

@Wood_House76 @jengleruk @SeanBFlanagan @Telegraph @mattwridley @ClareCraigPath The Telegraph/Ridley piece also reinforces conventional "facts" about the SARS-1 "outbreak." One statement quotes an expert virologist (pardon the oxymoron) who said SARS (& MERSv) are viruses that are already human pathogens🤧. Supereminent investigations don't beg questions.⬇️

Dear ALL🌍 Please share your thoughts on this "Lab Leak" article in today's @Telegraph by Lord @mattwridley telegraph.co.uk/news/0/covid-1… "It’s time for the truth. Here’s the Covid Paper they don’t want you to read All the evidence on the Wuhan lab leak, properly organised." cc @jengleruk @profnfenton @MartinNeil9 @JAHockett76 @Wood_House76 @NickHudsonCT @PanData19 @hartgroup_org @USMortality @EthicalSkeptic @DowdEdward @solari_the @boriquagato @_aussie17 @RealJoelSmalley @HowardSteen4 @ClareCraigPath @AllisonPearson @AllisterHeath @DocAhmadMalik @HCimiez @JMCDelingpole @KathyConWom @PaulaJardine @TheConWom @KarenH777 @sonia_elijah Thank You

The very notion that vaccines are the necessary response to alleged-novel flus/colds is ruinous to civilized societies & free peoples. Exhibit A: 2020-23+. We've lived the undeniable ruinous effects of the ideological contagion of govt-driven drugging, but none are so blind as…

@Medical_Nemesis @rpark222 Anything—ANYTHING—in the extreme is undesirable & imprudent. It would be impractical & unhealthy for me to think every time I sit in a chair that it might collapse. I'm not brainwashed by religion of science b/c I think most things operate as intended most of the time. I'm sane.

@MdmStakeholder @rpark222 We cannot prove that we prevented anything and cannot prevent anything in any particular person. These are slogans and figures of speech of zero relation to scientific expression. These are religious beliefs amidst those who grew up under the rule of science as religion.

@Medical_Nemesis @rpark222 I see that I've given you fruitful opportunity to reiterate your philosophy & knowledge. You're welcome😁 I've never agreed with you that a drug cannot prevent a sure death. Some drugs can & do, sometimes. And drugs can & do cure as well. And, sometimes, illness CAN be prevented.

@MdmStakeholder @rpark222 We can take any vaccine, and smallpox, polio, and COVID-19 vaccines would all be easy enough to understand that a wide variety of symptoms associated with these vaccine preventable diseases have not been eradicated, eliminated, or suppressed. People still suffer physically.

@Medical_Nemesis @rpark222 YOU are the one who said he was in rapid decline and then felt better (and survived, ostensibly, to see more days). You implied he was "saved" by the drug cocktail that included remdesivir. I knowingly threw "saved his life" in your face. It seems like you want it both/all ways.

@MdmStakeholder @rpark222 No drug can save anyone from anything. This language of saving or salvation is misleading and has nothing to do with how we record what a drug is expected to do in scientific notation.

@Medical_Nemesis @rpark222 I'll take your word that remdesivir saved that patient's life. Sounds like a veritable miracle. As you know, just like a vaccine or a "vaccine preventable" illness can kill anyone, so can the pharmaceutical known as remdesivir. I assure you that you'd NEVER administer it to ME.

@MdmStakeholder @Wood_House76 @rpark222 I have never seen a patient who refused it. I have seen it used on a rapidly declining patient just this year. The patient had already been on dialysis and had a liver transplant. He felt better after a combination of drugs he received within a few days.

@Medical_Nemesis @Wood_House76 @rpark222 P.S. I agree Biology Insights website is sketchy/shady/mysterious. The article itself isn't unreasonable. Regardless, redemsivir is sketchy, too—and nefarious. I'm sorry & sad that you choose not to have an independent, professional opinion about the drug. They advised masks too.

@Medical_Nemesis @Wood_House76 @rpark222 If you don't know how remdesivir came to be approved Feb-Apr 2020, you should inform yourself. It's a Fauci-driven "fluke" that it was determined to be thee drug. It is a particular poison and you know it (or should). I find your explanations to be both reasonable AND disturbing.

@sabhlok @jengleruk @gbdeclaration "Lockdown" interventions were predicated on: 1) It's advisable to avoid shared air and physical interaction in order to avert possible mild-to-severe cold/flu. 2) A vaccine is needed & we must wait for it. The lesson, then, is that control/prevention AND vaccines are disastrous.

Was the vaccine coerced in Sweden? If so, that was wrong. If people chose vaccines voluntarily, one can't object - particularly since the vaccine did not cause any observable harm and likely did at least some good (my study on vaccines showed that they did did reduce mortality - indiapolicy.org/Documents/Lock…). I think John Ioannidis's estimate of 5k lives saved by covid vaccines is too high. My estimate is much lower, in the range of 500-600. But not zero, and not negative.

Thanks for sharing these pieces of info. It is a fact that neither Anders Tegnell nor any of the authors of the @gbdeclaration have agreed to sign my proposed declaration for abolition of quarantine, despite my repeated reminders. They still believe that focused protection will work. It will be good for @NIHDirector_Jay @NIH to study Sweden's "focus" on the elderly - which seems to have precipitated their deaths instead of delaying them. Overall, though, there were no exceptionally high deaths in Sweden - very modest. I suspect that's because the elderly who were not in aged care homes did not die from sheer fright and poor medical care. The key lesson coming out of this would be that ALL FORMS OF QUARANTINE ARE BAD. However, given the strong resistance from GBD authors and Tegnell, I don't foresee that being recognised anytime soon by public health. The trouble, of course, is that 99% of all other doctors also insist that quarantine is a great idea and refuse to sign the declaration for abolition of quarantine. Claims that vaccines caused harm in Sweden are not supported by the overall mortality data. Tegnell was very forthright initially that vaccines for covid are very unlikely to be successful, and therefore wanted life to go on as normal, but when the vaccines came, he agreed to implement them. I don't find that to be problematic, so long as the vaccines were not mandated.

@Medical_Nemesis @Wood_House76 Did you read this?: biologyinsights.com/remdesivir-dea… (h/t @rpark222). You will NEVER convince me that remdesivir is an appropriate or life-saving treatment/drug. Its very-deliberate "repurposing" was a favor to Gilead orchestrated by Fauci the psychopath. You should condemn the drug, imo.

@Wood_House76 If you are being ill and we diagnose you with an abstract concept to bridge it to some treatment and such treatment is available as proven by statistical analysis in a “population”, you will be treated upon usually a positive test result.

@6fores1 @Wood_House76 @RockHound47 @6fores1, Your question has many answers. The 1st Step is acknowledge/believe that govt (incl Trump) DOES care about vaccination. Even if you don't (presently) grasp WHYS, just accept it as indelible fact because IT IS. Govt's whys tend to be so banal that we don't hear them. Ex:

@Wood_House76 @RockHound47 Why does government care? So they can claim they did something? I’m not disagreeing with you, just wanting your insights into their motivations…

@uTobian I know I'm "just" a chick, but I can vouch for the 16-ounce Estwing. I recommend the straight claw which, if not necessarily safe, is quite effective (and surprisingly versatile). Its ping could become music to your ears. Read about the best hammers here: linquip.com/blog/the-10-be….

Nah man, we're not doing this again. Every person involved in this decision will be arrested and prosecuted at Nuremberg 2. This is a capital crime. I will personally learn carpentry to build the gallows. We tried doing this the easy way, now we're gonna do this the hard way.

When your products are so safe and effective, you turn off the comments.

@Uranian39 @USAID @realDonaldTrump P.S. This is the link for the original USAID tweet: x.com/USAID/status/1…. And see pic. The tweet no longer exists because the @USAID X acct was deleted Feb 2025. It is reasonable to assume Mr. Trump does not object to the memory-holing of his pledge (💉🤑) to Bill Gates' GAVI.

@Uranian39 @USAID @realDonaldTrump The orig post is (was) the infamous @USAID tweet featuring a clip of Pres. Trump heralding the USA's pledge of $1.16B to GAVI for a vaccine "answer," per request of UK's Boris Johnson. The USAID X account was deleted ~Feb 2025. Thank goodness for Wayback: web.archive.org/web/2022052721….

"As the Coronavirus has shown, there are no borders." USAID echo's @Realdonaldtrump's words and is proud to be partnering with @Gavi by committing $1.16 billion to protect people through vaccines, because #VaccinesWork