Michael Malice

Many have said that history is the story of great men, and historian @ArthurLHerman joins me this week to break down what qualities these founders had that allowed them--and by extension all of us--to succeed Episode drops at 5pm eastern! youtu.be/Xx549krUfLY

@Ali_Margrave @grok neat

@michaelmalice @grok Perhaps Grok should explain to you that it's a long running joke that it's so common for people to just assume they have law schools that they're sometimes included in reputation surveys just to show that they get highly rated despite not even existing.

"no one is manufacturing judges to be unfair"

@Ali_Margrave hey @grok explain to @Ali_Margrave that judges also attend undergraduate school

@michaelmalice Princeton, Brown and Dartmouth don't have law schools.

@mikaockerman what do you think outloud means

@michaelmalice That dude said that with his outloud voice. Wow! This is what we are dealing with. He thinks judges are being taught to be fair? I am literally flabbergasted.

@VictorSYoung hey @grok explain to @victorsyoung what the word indistinguishable means

@michaelmalice Except that they weren’t written by a being with a soul, any interpretation would still be a mechanical one attempting to sound human.

AI is going to be infinitely faster, cheaper and more consistent in adjudicating legal disputes than our current legal system is Specifically, I am discussing a property dispute where both sides privately upload their argument and data

@VictorSYoung we are within a year to two of AI being able to writedecisions that would be indistinguishable from that of a human judge

@michaelmalice I think the problem is the battle between a mechanical legal system and a system that follows the spirit of the law. I think there’s room for both but I think some people would like the human element removed completely which seems like a bad idea.

@n990700 it must be frustrating being so ignored

@jayplemons @michaelmalice Why are Ukrainian Jews in our face 24/7 and why is he vomiting word salad like it’s something worth listening to? He says nothing of value.

The Scott Adams School: Michael Malice outlines the Democrats comeback despite big losses @michaelmalice "The Democratic Party is the oldest political party on earth, and you don't last that long unless you're doing something right. And what they know how to do is to seize and maintain power. And people are like, 'The Democratic Party's approval ratings at 20%.' You're not literally voting for the Democratic Party, you're voting for the candidate. Just like many people who despise the Republican Party were more than happy to vote for Donald Trump with an R next to his name."

@LizziePuffy how did you find my account

what's worse is a huge percentage of the population don't understand Thomas Sowell's question: "As compared to what?" They compare any proposed reform to utopia and point out problems--while being fine with those problems being part of the current system (and to a worse extent)

The new Patti Smith memoir reads like Granpa Simpson

@evilduck92 Escrow and smart contracts solve much of this Ebay adjudicates tens of thousands of disputes internationally

@michaelmalice I think the biggest problem with this is you still need to be able to physically enforce the result. Since the state has a monopoly on who's allowed to use force it requires that they either do the enforcement or allow someone else to.

@JescyRodriguez thank YOU

@michaelmalice Also while I have your attention Mr. Malice. I thank you eternally for everything you do. Your content is exquisite and I appreciate you very much.

@HeronMnemon yep

@michaelmalice With AI another problem is that people can't imagine anything changing in the future, so even if they can make a comparison they don't adjust for advancements in the tech. "It's not perfect now, therefore it can't ever be better than the average person."

@finitecosine John Oliver taught them to be condescending and when that doesnt work flip to seething rage

@michaelmalice Why are they always so angry? Have they thought about taking up running as a hobby to counter their great surge of internet rage (similar to road rage)? An hour with 2x10 min fast did me good.

@AJ__1337 exactly

@michaelmalice The models could be deterministic and you could give them certain arguments or sets of facts ahead of time to see how it would decide, reducing uncertainty for both parties before making an agreement

🚨SPEAKER ANNOUNCEMENT 📣 Rescue the Republic presents @MichaelMalice Michael Malice is the author of Dear Reader, The New Right, The Anarchist Handbook and The White Pill: A Tale of Good & Evil. He is also the subject of the graphic novel Ego & Hubris by Harvey Pekar and hosts the popular "YOUR WELCOME" with Michael Malice podcast. Join us for Rescue the Republic! Free Tickets in Bio! 🇺🇸

@SirGuy1001 @RescueRepublic

@RescueRepublic @michaelmalice Malice is an unserious joke

@Curtis_Loew we have binding arbitration now

@michaelmalice I when I first used AI it would be good for contract disputes I was told I was stupid. I don't see how you could make it legally binding w/o legislation but replacing lawyers would honestly heal the universe.

@Bobb_Dobbs x.com/grok/status/20…

They haven't found a way to prevent AI from hallucinating. Now you could argue that AI does it less than humans (would have to examine that question) however AI is not yet infallible. Stories every day where some lazy lawyer files a brief where AI simply made up case law, with fake citations.

Immediate unfollow