Michal Wieczorek

@kevintwohy They made it too well! Don’t you know you’re supposed to buy and replace these every other year at best?!

Credit rescinded!

Oh, so BBC does know how to write headlines properly

Tadeusz Kościuszko, who played a pivotal role in the American Revolution, is the subject of an involving film on Viaplay that follows him after he returned to his home country to fight the Russians. on.wsj.com/4mZo4lF

@RadioFreeTom My favorite

Why not on money, too. It's a tradition in certain types of governments to feature leaders who are still alive on their currency

@peterbakernyt @davidfrum

His name is now on some federal buildings, his signature will soon be on the dollar bill, his face will be on coins and national park passes. And now Trump is putting his own picture on US passports. apnews.com/article/passpo…

@adgirlMM Remember this guy?

I mean, I'm not an expert on dictators or anything but...

Patriot passport unlocked. 🦅 Limited edition. Stamped for America 250. 🇺🇸

How long until this?

@StateDept Same vibes.

Sneak peak here:

COMING SOON: Limited-edition U.S. passports to commemorate the 250th anniversary of American independence.

@ProjectLiberal There’s always a Tweet…and sometimes an excuse.

This you?

@Geiger_Capital How much per post?

The first US President to survive three assassination attempts.

A profile of the new, free, and independent media in action.

@Timodc The word “pleasant” is doing a lot of work there.

Yes. My position is that reporters shouldn’t get dressed up in a tux to have some laughs with the terrible president. I also oppose trying to shoot the president (or anyone). These opinions coexist very easily if you don’t have a baby brain.

@ProjectLiberal @BrilynHollyhand Wait until he finds out how HUMINT, counterintelligence, and confidential informants work.

@BrilynHollyhand What percentage of the KKK was being paid by SPLC? Less than 1%. What percentage of the KKK voted for Trump? Over 99%.

The SPLC paid over $73,000 to former KKK members. The SPLC Action Fund endorsed Kamala Harris on July 22, 2024. Keep lying, @ProjectLiberal. That's what the Left does best.

@RadioFreeTom @atrupar This community note is going to get into so much trouble.

Math is woke

@DKThomp I agree but who gets to determine what is “right and decent”? I agree that some is self-evident and “shouldn’t” need defining, but I feel as though we are in the minority.

In Mere Christianity, CS Lewis has an awesome opening riff about how most people know the difference between right and wrong, but they justify acting immorally by appealing to "special exception." They know they shouldn't hit a friend, but what if that friend was being so mean? They know they shouldn't steal a seat a bus, but what if that person got up and created a moment's confusion and then the seat was up for grabs? Etc. When I read this section, I thought a lot about contemporary politics and the way that people justify their politics, not by appealing to higher principles, but rather by appealing to "special exception" to argue that their admitted indecency is justifiable in context. A lot of MAGA vice is justified by special exception. Trump's defenders rarely defend his crookedness directly. They don't say "it's wonderful to use trade policy to enrich the Oval Office, it's really awesome." They say: Well, look, it doesn't really matter, because the left is so dangerous, Biden maybe did something similar 3 years ago, Democrats would do the same in power, and so forth. I heard something similar in that NYT conversation everybody's talking about. You even see it in the headline: ‘The Rich Don’t Play by the Rules. So Why Should I?’ Why, hello, special exception. When you start arguing that stealing food and French paintings is justifiable in the context of political protest in an age of prevailing distrust, you're similarly not arguing *for* any kind of a universal principle. Nobody actually wants 300 million people stealing fruit from the grocery store. Nobody actually wants every Louvre visitor trying to rip a Manet off the walls. These virtues don't scale. (Because they're not virtuous!) Sap that I am, I want us to get to a place where politics is about fighting for what is right and decent, not about justifying what sort of indecent behavior might be somewhat understandable or technically justifiable given the other side's vice or the prevailing levels of indecency. The point is to build the kind of goodness that scales. nytimes.com/2026/04/22/opi…

@JamesSurowiecki Wait until they find out how HUMINT, counterintelligence, and confidential informants work.

These were real neo-Nazis, and someone with their same beliefs murdered Heather Heyer the next day. Stop pretending that one informant made this happen.

@TheFP It’s called Generous Tit for Tat.

A liberal society can’t work if both sides seize every advantage they can. But the latest gerrymander suggests we’ve gone awfully far down that road, writes Charles Lane. thefp.com/p/virginia-fai…

@davidaxelrod But then you might actually have to do and stand for something.

Wouldn't be better if political leaders who profess their faith set an example by actually OBSERVING the Ten Commandents rather than commanding schools to post them?!

@Jim_Jordan youtu.be/iSP3PUHmCvc?si…

SPLC = fraud ActBlue = fraud California Medicare = fraud Minnesota daycares = fraud FireAid = fraud What's next?